↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 437 << 1 2 … 435 436 437 438 439 … 1,880 1,881 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Nice going, Putin old boy, say Finland and Sweden

The New Neo Posted on May 16, 2022 by neoMay 16, 2022

Well, well, well:

Finland will apply for membership in the NATO military alliance, the country’s president, Sauli Niinisto, confirmed on Sunday, in a historic policy shift prompted by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Moscow, which shares a 1,300 km (800 mile) border with Finland, has said it would be a mistake for Helsinki to join the 30-strong transatlantic alliance and that it would harm bilateral ties.

Sweden is also expected to follow suit as public support for membership has grown amid security concerns.

Sunday’s announcement comes after Niinisto and Finland’s prime minister, Sanna Marin, said on Thursday they both favoured membership in NATO (the North Atlantic Treaty Organization), giving a green light for the country to apply.

Interestingly: “Putin said he thought the move would be a mistake, but did not repeat earlier threats that any such move would trigger countermeasures from Moscow, the Finnish leader said in an interview with CNN on Sunday.”

And then there’s Poland:

A Russian lawmaker has issued a fiery warning that Warsaw is next in line for “de-nazification” after Poland’s Prime Minister penned an op-ed calling Russia’s imperialist “Russkiy Mir” ideology a “cancer” consuming Russian society and a “deadly threat” to other countries.

Poland is a NATO member, so I don’t think Russia is contemplating much fake “de-nazification” there, despite “lawmakers” issuing “fiery warnings.”

By the way, this video has been posted many times at YouTube, and recent comments tend to follow the sarcastic “This aged well, didn’t it?” One person wrote, “Not so funny now is it Mr. President?”:

Posted in War and Peace | 53 Replies

Horrific shooting in Buffalo

The New Neo Posted on May 16, 2022 by neoMay 16, 2022

What is there to say anymore about a racist murder such as this most recent one, in a Buffalo supermarket – hasn’t it all been said before, so many times?

I’ll say this: that each such murder is an outrage and must be punished to the full extent of the law. That sometimes the perpetrator is a white person who hates black people and that sometimes it’s a black person who hates white people. That the MSM goes on and on and on about the first type of murder, trying to link it to the GOP, and that it is mostly silent about the second type and tries to pretend that a car did it, or insufficient gun control did it, or some other garbage.

I think this guy sums it up rather well:

RIP to the victims.

Posted in Press, Race and racism, Violence | 24 Replies

Abortion, angry women, and “choice”

The New Neo Posted on May 16, 2022 by neoMay 16, 2022

I was walking in a certain town in New England this past Saturday and I happened on a pro-abortion demonstration. I heard it long before I saw it. There was a lot of yelling and honking, and a crowd composed mostly but not entirely of women, many of them carrying signs.

One that especially caught my eye was this: “ANGRY WOMEN WILL CHANGE THE WORLD.” My immediate thought was they already have, for the worse. What are they so all-fired angry about? What they see as the potential loss of the right to abortion? In most states, that right will remain, although some of the demonstrators probably aren’t even aware of what Alito’s draft actually said or what it actually meant, and are therefore highly susceptible to leftist propaganda about it.

Another large sign I saw read, “Impeach Alito.” For what? My guess is that the bearer of that sign probably neither knew nor cared what impeachment is supposed to be about. To her it may simply be a synonym for “removing someone whose decisions and policies I don’t like.”

The idea that any state could ban or severely limit abortion – not just their own state, but any state – is unconscionable to these demonstrators, both men and women. A leftist-favored “right” once created, however poorly-reasoned the opinion that creates it, can never be allowed to be taken away. The ratchet only works in one direction for leftists, and any reversal is an anathema.

I also noticed two posts at Legal Insurrection (this and this) in which people who are asked about abortion or outright killing of viable infants, even full-term infants, respond by repeating as a sort of mantra that women have the “right to choose.”

Here’s an example from that last one. The man being interviewed is New York’s mayor Eric Adams:

“Do you think there should be any limitation on abortions?”

NYC MAYOR ADAMS: “No, I do not.”

“None? Day of birth, totally fine?”

NYC MAYOR ADAMS: “No, I do not. Women should have a right to choose” pic.twitter.com/zvyIq4iLsQ

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) May 15, 2022

Right after that, he adds, “Men shouldn’t have the right to choose how women should treat their bodies” (see this video, which can’t be embedded here).

Eric Adams’ statement is both nonsensical and horrifically amoral. But that’s where the Democratic Party has arrived, whether all its voters realize that or not. And that’s what the “right to choose” and “pro-Choice” are meant to hide. Who isn’t for liberty, for the right to choose? But the right to choose is not absolute – in other words, we can choose to steal or murder or to assault someone, but those acts are unlawful and if the legal system was working correctly we would pay the price. Someone like Adams and the women demonstrating for unlimited abortion are saying that there should be no such limits on abortion even if states decide democratically to limit it. And to label the killing of a viable child “abortion” and “choice” is an assertion way way down the slippery slope to evil. Calling it “choice” does not mitigate the evil, although to some it hides that evil rather effectively.

But that’s why people defending abortion and especially late-term abortions keep repeating the word “choice.” It is a smokescreen employed to hide what they are actually saying. And adding the idea that men have no right to “choose how women should treat their bodies” introduces two absurdities. The first is that a person can only opine on and vote for or against a question that can directly affect that person. What about post-menopausal women? Do they still get a vote on this, or does their right to vote on it end with the cessation of menstruation? What about trans men; are they allowed to vote on it?

The second absurdity is, of course, the idea that a full-term baby is a part of a woman’s body and that she gets to choose to murder it if she so desires. And “absurdity” is a word that’s way too kind – it’s actually an abomination.

[NOTE: The other day the name Peter Singer came up the comments, because he is a “bioethicist” who advocates infanticide in some circumstances. I have written extensively about Singer in 2015, in a three-part series. Part I is here, Part II is here, and Part III is here.]

Posted in Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe, Language and grammar, Law, Liberals and conservatives; left and right, Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex | Tagged abortion | 35 Replies

Open thread 5/16/22

The New Neo Posted on May 16, 2022 by neoMay 16, 2022

Posted in Uncategorized | 47 Replies

The story of my left eye – so far: Part V

The New Neo Posted on May 14, 2022 by neoMay 15, 2022

[Part I can be found here.
Part II can be found here.
Part III can be found here.
Part IV can be found here.]

I can’t remember much about the drive home from the surgery, except that I was tired and some combination of relieved and apprehensive. My eyesight hadn’t cleared from the surgery yet, but this was expected. I’d read – both in the handouts the surgeon had given me and also in material from other doctors – that by the next morning I might expect a great improvement.

But the next morning when I woke up what I saw was a thick fog, much worse than the day before and certainly worse than my cataract had been. Panicked, I phoned the doctor (he had a policy of allowing texts and phone calls and returning them in a very timely fashion). He called back quite quickly, and I explained that what I saw was a pea-soup fog.

“It’s normal,” he said, “especially because I had to do much more work on your eye than usual. It will clear.” And clear it did, that afternoon. Fortunately, I also had a follow-up appointment with him that afternoon, and as we drove (my ex-husband drove; I was a passenger) through the freeways of southern California, I experienced something remarkable.

I know that people whose sight has been compromised by cataracts often ooo and ahhh afterwards at how clear things are and how bright the colors. But I think that my sight had been poor for longer than most; I’m not even sure how many years but at least eight, and I don’t even really remember what it was like to see clearly. Eyeglasses really had not corrected it to any extent at all, and although I could still see colors pretty well (or maybe my brain and imagination filled them in, so I didn’t perceive much deficit there) I lived in a blurry world where all sharp edges were smoothed and almost nothing had detail. I knew trees had leaves, but until I got up close they were like impressionist paintings with blobs of color rather than separate leaves. Same with the petals of flowers: just blobs. The hills in the distance likewise – blurry, and the trees on them were mere suggestions of trees.

And street and traffic signs? Blobs again. I had stopped driving at night and stopped driving distances of more than a mile or two in familiar territory, because street signs were also a blur unless I was right on top of them – sometimes they even remained so when I was on top of them. I either knew the way or I relied on my GPS to tell me where to turn. I could see the street and the other cars, so I wasn’t really endangering anyone, but I was very much in danger of getting lost without my GPS and I certainly wasn’t driving at night, when the glare became a psychedelic light show that was interesting but so distracting that driving was not recommended at all.

And the supermarket, with its enormously bright fluorescent lights, was a booming buzzing confusion of blur. The signs in the aisles were little help unless I was a few feet from them, the labels were hard to read too, but I knew my way around my familiar supermarkets and had gotten used to the whole thing.

But this ride a day after surgery made my jaw drop. The hills of southern California were alive with – not the sound of music – but the sight of grasses and trees and bushes sharply etched. Even the dirt was sharply etched. And the branches of trees (not all the trees had leaves yet) were black.

A word about the color black. Things had gotten gray for me rather than black. The print in books was gray, which made it harder to read even with my reading glasses. The computer likewise. Years ago I thought my font color had changed and went to “settings” to try to change it back to black, and was surprised to see that it already was on black. Street signs and signs in the market looked gray as well, even though I couldn’t read them well.

I had forgotten what black looked like, especially in small sharp things like branches and letters. But here it was – so intense and so clearly defined it stunned me. The same with the signs. I kept exclaiming about the signs, “I can read them! I can read them!”

I realized also that I hadn’t allowed myself to really deeply imagine what it would be like to see more clearly again; I had had so much negativity fed to me by the doctor in Boston that I had lost track of that.

But even more importantly, this was different than I might have imagined. I did not remember seeing this way, even in childhood, and I had had very good vision most of my life. As a child I know it was 20/20, and for many years as an adult it was no worse than 20/30. But what I remembered from then was different than this. It was never as sharp, and the light now was overpowering, so bright that I really felt the need for the sunglasses I was wearing.

My theory now is that an artificial lens really does make a person see differently than a natural lens, even the healthy natural lens of a young person. Maybe most people don’t perceive the difference, but I do (at least, I think I do).

My appointment was reassuring. The doctor said everything looked good. He explained once again how he’d had to free my eye of the extra membrane and the adhesions, and he told me that one little bit had remained and he’d had to snip that part of the iris, and also that he’d had to “reconstruct” my pupil. That gave me pause, but he added that my pupil now looked great, and showed me my “before” and “after” photos.

Quite something.

So now my task was to take my eye drops, and heal.

[To be continued – more to the story, of course…]

Posted in Health, Me, myself, and I | 42 Replies

Roundup

The New Neo Posted on May 14, 2022 by neoMay 14, 2022

(1) Buh-bye, Jen Psaki:

Psaki is now headed to MSNBC to host a primetime show, a plan she’s had in place for months while still manning the podium in what can only be called a massive ethics breach.

Psaki: “[A]s I look back, I hope I followed the example of integrity and grace that they have set for all us and do set for all of us everyday…There is a Biden family that has extended and expanded far beyond the Biden name…They have integrity, grit, commitment…”

(2) On the Pennsylvania GOP Senate primary race, in which Kathy Barnette is now taking heat.

(3) On the Sussman case (Russiagate) and where it’s at. Yes, it’s from Andrew C. McCarthy, who’s been variable lately. But on this sort of thing he’s still quite good, I think.

(4) Get your ultra-MAGA T-shirts. Maybe it’s even better than “deplorable”?

(5) A look back at a public health policy paper that was ignored in the response to COVID. I originally wrote a post about this paper in August of 2020.

Posted in Uncategorized | 29 Replies

Law “at its core”

The New Neo Posted on May 14, 2022 by neoMay 14, 2022

In a recent thread, commenter “Rufus T. Firefly” has made an interesting point about abortion:

…[A]t its core it’s not a legal or political issue. I hate that our society has turned it into a political war with slogans, chants and parades.

I agree that “at its core” it’s not a primarily or basically legal or political issue. But that’s true of just about all the big legal questions except procedural matters (and even some of them represent larger philosophical issues).

When I was in law school so many years ago, my favorite course was something called “Philosophy of Law.” It was a new name for a course that in olden times was required but now was optional, previously known as “Jurisprudence.” It was a course that stepped back from the finer points of statutes and cases and looked at the underpinnings of our legal system and others around the world. It not only was of intense interest to me, but it was the only course in law school that I felt that way about.

That was one of the reasons I never became a lawyer; I realized that I was temperamentally unsuited for it. I couldn’t figure out a way to parlay an interest in “Philosophy of Law” into anything else besides becoming a law professor, and for a host of reasons that was off the agenda for me.

I didn’t foresee an activity known as “blogging,” but here we are.

Law is a system whereby a society tries to make rules to deal with things that sometimes can be extremely difficult to make decisions about, issues that often have very deep philosophical underpinnings. Whether there should be a presumption of guilt or a presumption of innocence is one. What constitutes murder is another: when is murder not murder but self-defense, are there mitigating circumstances and what might they be, does intent matter and when, and even what constitutes a human life and when does it begin? That last one, of course, affects abortion law.

The answers a person – and ultimately a society – might give depend on a host of things that are not law-related, although they are expressed though approval or disapproval of a certain law or a certain bill or support for a certain candidate or certain court decision. Politics and law are the practical expressions of the philosophical and even spiritual viewpoints people hold, and the codification thereof within a society.

Posted in Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe, Law, Me, myself, and I | Tagged abortion | 19 Replies

Open thread 5/14/22

The New Neo Posted on May 14, 2022 by neoMay 13, 2022

I can relate:

Posted in Uncategorized | 28 Replies

The intensity of the pro-abortion crowd

The New Neo Posted on May 13, 2022 by neoMay 13, 2022

I’ve never understand the fervent embrace of abortion by some people on the left. Yes, I know the explanations the right tends to give: they’re evil, they love death, they hate children. But although I suppose that’s true of some people who seem to find abortion perfectly fine and even something to brag about, the people I know on the left are not like that at all.

So those explanations don’t work for me to explain the phenomenon as a whole. What I think is happening is something else. One of these things is that the rabidly intense and hate-filled activists you see who seem to be half in love with abortion are a small but vocal group and probably unrepresentative sample of the whole.

I remember the days when abortion was illegal, and yet plenty of people had abortions – illegal abortions, dangerous abortions. I know many who did, and most of them went on to become loving parents later on. Some regret their abortions, some don’t seem to ever think about them any more. But I believe that for most of them, their current support for the universal availability of abortion lies in their own experience of desperation and their fear of the danger inherent in an illegal abortion.

I don’t think that’s true for young people who don’t remember those days, but it’s true of many of the older ones.

On a personal note: I always had an instinctive horror of abortion and fortunately I only got pregnant when I wanted to. The way I accomplished this feat was through rigorous birth control. But pregnancies sometimes happen even when people use birth control, although fewer of them.

When Roe was passed, the idea was that abortion wouldn’t become commonplace nor would it substitute for birth control. At least, that was the rhetoric. Abortion would be “safe, legal, and rare.”

Roe helped make it safe and legal. It did not make it rare.

Nor did birth control make abortion rare, as it was supposed to. Why not? Is it because birth control isn’t perfect, is sometimes messy and always requires forethought? Is it because even people who often use it don’t always use it, and some never use it? And would more people use birth control more conscientiously if abortion had not become “safe and legal” as a backup plan?

I don’t know. I do know that sex and its connection to birth control is one of those things a great many people are not conscientious about, and this has enormous consequences.

The younger crowd – that is, people who have grown up post-Roe – have always known so many options, including many forms of birth control and also abortion that is legal in every single state. I believe that they have probably gotten used to the idea of having all those choices that include the choice to have a legal abortion from medical professionals and consider it the norm. Women can prevent a pregnancy in any number of ways, or they can end it through abortion (including, if early, the so-called morning-after pill). Or they can continue the pregnancy and keep the baby – not an option most people took in my younger days without getting married (the so-called shotgun wedding), at a time when being an unwed mother carried a huge stigma. Or they can continue the pregnancy and give the baby up for adoption, which was much more popular in my youth because of the relative lack of other options.

All of these things have huge consequences and they are usually not easy decisions.

But people do not want to give up something they’ve always been told is a right, something they’ve always experienced as a right. And they don’t want to hear complicated legal explanations for why they must give that thing up if their state votes to do so (or travel to access it). Abortion is indeed about the unborn child, but it’s an inescapable fact that the unborn child is housed in the body of the woman for up to nine months. That’s a very intimate connection, to say the least, which is why the idea that this is a question of personal body autonomy came in when in fact there obviously are two bodies involved.

Many of the most fervent abortion advocates ignore the two-body issue or trivialize it. Many abortion opponents ignore it or trivialize it as well.

I hate the topic of abortion, hate it in every way. As I’ve already said, I’ve always been repulsed by the idea of abortion for myself and even in general. But I have witnessed the despair of women who are pregnant and feel desperate to end that pregnancy. I’ve witnessed it firsthand. And I’ve heard of bitter regrets that last a lifetime about decisions that were made as teenagers. It’s just so very very sad.

[NOTE: I’ve written many times previously about abortion. Some of those posts can be found here, here, here, here, and here.]

Posted in Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe, Me, myself, and I, Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex | Tagged abortion | 79 Replies

Americans don’t approve of protests at the homes of SCOTUS justices

The New Neo Posted on May 13, 2022 by neoMay 13, 2022

First of all, it’s illegal – although the DOJ hasn’t seemed to mind so far, since they probably think it serves the purposes of this administration. But even Democrats don’t approve of protesting at justices’ homes. The poll was taken between May 6 and May 8 and overall 75.8% disapproved and only 15.9% approved, with the rest uncertain.

More interestingly – at least to me – is that the disapproval figures were high for both Democrats and Republicans, with Democrats at 66.6% and Republicans at 86.5% and “other” at 75.1%.

A much bigger difference between the parties arose when the question involved whether the Biden administration’s refusal to condemn the practice is likely to encourage the protests turning violent. 75.6% of Republicans thought so, whereas only 27.7% of Democrats believed it, with 54.7% of “other” agreeing.

It’s encouraging that so few respondents were in favor of the protests at justices’ homes. And it’s not surprising that the Democrats are highly reluctant to blame Biden and company for the possible violent results of not condemning these protests. That’s in line with the way so many of them have rationalized this administration’s failures right along, so they’re quite practiced at it.

Posted in Law | 12 Replies

The horse that came in first…

The New Neo Posted on May 13, 2022 by neoMay 13, 2022

…still comes first with the owner and the trainer, and therefore will not race in the Preakness but will rest up for the Belmont Stakes.

The horse has made history already. Who needs the Triple Crown?

Posted in Baseball and sports | 5 Replies

My hosting service is having problems today

The New Neo Posted on May 13, 2022 by neoMay 13, 2022

If you’ve had problems reaching the blog today or very late last night, it’s not the blog itself but rather the hosting service. This used to happen more often, but lately (the past year?) they’ve been really good. Now this. I don’t think it affects the whole country, but it’s been affecting my ability to access the blog and to post.

Hopefully it will be cleared up soon. Of course, if you can read this notice, it means it’s working for you – at least, for the moment.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Posted in Uncategorized | 9 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Niketas Choniates on Open thread 5/5/2026
  • om on Open thread 5/5/2026
  • Marisa on Open thread 5/5/2026
  • John Galt III on Open thread 5/5/2026
  • sharksauce on Open thread 5/5/2026

Recent Posts

  • Open thread 5/5/2026
  • Small changes in Europe?
  • The parking permit blues
  • Rudy Giuliani is very ill with pneumonia
  • Open thread 5/4/2026

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (319)
  • Afghanistan (97)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (162)
  • Best of neo-neocon (90)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (583)
  • Dance (287)
  • Disaster (239)
  • Education (320)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (565)
  • Election 2018 (32)
  • Election 2020 (511)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (24)
  • Election 2028 (5)
  • Evil (127)
  • Fashion and beauty (323)
  • Finance and economics (1,015)
  • Food (316)
  • Friendship (47)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (728)
  • Health (1,138)
  • Health care reform (545)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (331)
  • History (700)
  • Immigration (432)
  • Iran (437)
  • Iraq (224)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (797)
  • Jews (423)
  • Language and grammar (361)
  • Latin America (203)
  • Law (2,913)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (124)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,283)
  • Liberty (1,102)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (388)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,476)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (910)
  • Middle East (381)
  • Military (318)
  • Movies (346)
  • Music (526)
  • Nature (255)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (177)
  • Obama (1,736)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (128)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,024)
  • Poetry (255)
  • Political changers (176)
  • Politics (2,775)
  • Pop culture (393)
  • Press (1,618)
  • Race and racism (861)
  • Religion (418)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (625)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (967)
  • Theater and TV (264)
  • Therapy (69)
  • Trump (1,601)
  • Uncategorized (4,391)
  • Vietnam (109)
  • Violence (1,411)
  • War and Peace (991)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑