↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 436 << 1 2 … 434 435 436 437 438 … 1,880 1,881 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Now a university in England has rejected the sonnet as too white and Western

The New Neo Posted on May 19, 2022 by neoMay 19, 2022

First they came for the statues. Now they’ve come for the sonnets:

The University of Salford, a public university in Greater Manchester, England, removed sonnets and other “pre-established literary forms” from a creative writing course assessment, The Telegraph reported.

…A University of Salford slideshow shared with staff stated that teachers have “simplified the assessment offering choice to write thematically rather than to fit into pre-established literary forms…which tend to the products of white western culture,” according to documents cited by The Telegraph.

The slideshow affirmed the change as an example of best practice in “decolonising the curriculum.”

So here’s my offering:

My grief is deep, as deep as oceans vast
But virtue has its own reward, and so
I’ll give up sonnet-writing, and the past
Can sink beneath the waves of gloom so low.
Old Shakespeare, with his bootless bootless cries
No doubt was white and certainly supreme
Let’s stamp him out, and “colonization” dies.
We’ll show fidelity to the new meme.
Oh Wordsworth, even more forlorn are we.
Bereft of your old counsel, now we stand
On a much less wise and quite unpleasant lea
Without the comfort of tradition’s hand.
The poems they write today are stupid shite
And sonnets are too challenging to write.

In researching this post, I came across this sonnet by Wordsworth. I’d never seen it before:

Scorn not the Sonnet; Critic, you have frowned,
Mindless of its just honours; with this key
Shakespeare unlocked his heart; the melody
Of this small lute gave ease to Petrarch’s wound;
A thousand times this pipe did Tasso sound;
With it Camöens soothed an exile’s grief;
The Sonnet glittered a gay myrtle leaf
Amid the cypress with which Dante crowned
His visionary brow: a glow-worm lamp,
It cheered mild Spenser, called from Faery-land
To struggle through dark ways; and, when a damp
Fell round the path of Milton, in his hand
The Thing became a trumpet; whence he blew
Soul-animating strains—alas, too few!

[NOTE: I’ve written posts about the sonnet before. I recommend this one.]

Posted in Academia, Me, myself, and I, Poetry, Race and racism | 56 Replies

If the Palestinians say it, they print it

The New Neo Posted on May 19, 2022 by neoMay 19, 2022

Who is “they”? Why the MSM, of course. For as long as I’ve been blogging (and before), this has been the way it’s been.

The latest involves the death of an Al Jazeera journalist:

McKernan then uncritically repeats Al Jazeera’s unsubstantiated allegation that Israel “deliberately killed” the journalist, whilst omitting that the outlet is well known as a “mouthpiece for the Qatari monarchy” and a “purveyor of Islamist extremism” whose claims can’t be accepted at face value. A couple paragraphs down, McKernan uncritically quotes a ‘journalist’ from Al-Quds Network suggesting that the killing was an Israeli “assassination”, without reminding readers that Al-Quds is associated with Hamas.

Later, McKernan writes that Israel’s foreign minister, Yair Lapid, said Israel had “offered the Palestinians a joint pathological investigation”, but fails to note that Palestinians reportedly rejected the offer…

Further, today Palestinian officials made it clear that they wouldn’t be handing over the bullet that killed Abu Akleh, the key piece of evidence that could have shown who killed her.

McKernan then attempts to frame Abu Akleh’s killing in the context of what she suggests is an Israeli pattern of targeting journalists…

That the Guardian, a leftist newspaper. But there’s also the AP:

CAMERA’s Israel office yesterday prompted correction of Associated Press captions which stated as fact the unverified claim that Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh “was shot dead by Israeli forces.” There is no substantiation of this allegation, with the Palestinian side having blocked the necessary ballistic analysis to match the fired bullet to the weapons used by the Israeli troops.

The captions were corrected, but only at CAMERA’s urging. This sort of thing has been going on for many many decades, despite CAMERA’s dogged work fighting it. In this manner, the press has done remarkable damage to the truth, to Israel, and to the world. To continue to report Palestinian propaganda without plenty of caveats is to continue to be complicit.

Posted in Israel/Palestine, Press | 34 Replies

Open thread 5/19/22

The New Neo Posted on May 19, 2022 by neoMay 19, 2022

He had tremendous energy when he spoke. The very beginning, of course, wouldn’t be allowed today:

Posted in Uncategorized | 37 Replies

About the possibility of moving to Substack

The New Neo Posted on May 18, 2022 by neoMay 18, 2022

Commenter Tom Grey has a suggestion for me: that I move to Substack. It’s not the first time someone has made that suggestion, either.

A week or so ago I went to Substack and began to read up on what it might involve – accent on the word “began.” There’s a massive amount of information there and elsewhere attempting to explain the process and the pros and cons, and I find it’s a lot to digest. I’ve been writing a blog for over seventeen years (!) now, first on Blogger and then on WordPress, and I know the ropes here. I’m not a big one for change, being rather a creature of habit – although if a change really has advantages I’ll do it.

The problem is figuring out whether it really does have advantages for me. Would it increase traffic in any substantial way? Should I offer some posts that are only available to paid subscribers? Would I have to move my old content over there? Would I really get more readers, or would I have to enter the social media fray as well to do that? And after all, I earn some money here, and perhaps I should just step up my pleas for donations if I want to earn more.

Would such a move affect the ability of commenters to post long responses? Would I still be able to post little snippets of posts – such as the popular Open Threads, for example – although I guess I could keep the blog as well and post that sort of thing here. But would the different platforms be confusing for readers?

It’s a bit like the idea of writing a book, which I’ve had for some time. Or even compiling a book from old posts. I freely admit to a combination of laziness and exhaustion. I like to follow the events of the day, add some bigger picture posts, respond to comments, and then go about my other “real life” business. To add a book to that seems to be an easy thing to postpone. It’s a funny thing to accuse myself of laziness when I already write six days a week and spend many many hours at it, so maybe “laziness” isn’t quite the right word. Maybe it’s “inertia.”

So, what do you think? I won’t necessarily do what the majority decrees, but I’m interested in your opinions.

At the moment I only go to Substack if I see an interesting link to something there, or to check the offerings of Bari Weiss and Glenn Greenwald. But I never just browse there – do you? Do you discover new writers there regularly?

Posted in Blogging and bloggers, Me, myself, and I | 58 Replies

The GOP gets a break in the New York redistricting fight

The New Neo Posted on May 18, 2022 by neoMay 18, 2022

Democrats in New York are outraged because their efforts to gerrymander themselves between three and four extra Democratic seats in the House of Representatives have backfired. But back in 2014, NY state had actually amended the NY state constitution and banned partisan gerrymandering:

New Yorkers recognized these harms and, in 2014, voted to enshrine in the New York Constitution an explicit prohibition against partisan gerrymandering, which banned maps drawn, “for the purpose of favoring or disfavoring incumbents or other particular candidates or political parties.”…

When the U.S. Supreme Court recklessly declared that federal courts could not address cases about partisan gerrymandering, state-level efforts to outlaw partisan gerrymandering became more important than ever.

I’m not sure how that amendment came about, although I’ve researched it a bit. I would imagine there’s quite a story there, though, because the Democrats have controlled NY state for a long time and I don’t know why they would relinquish their ability to gerrymander. Here’s a little bit about the history:

In 2014, voters in New York State voted yes on Proposition 1, a constitutional amendment to implement historic changes with the intent to achieve a fair and readily transparent process by which to redraw the lines of state legislative and congressional districts. The redistricting process occurs every ten years, informed by data obtained by the Census. The goals of this proposal were to reform the redistricting process to introduce greater independence, and guarantee the application of substantive criteria that protect minority voting rights, communities of interest, and rational line-drawing…

One of these important reforms was the creation of the Independent Redistricting Commission. The purpose of creating the Commission is to make the process independent from the legislature in favor of an equally bipartisan body. For the first time, both the majority and minority parties in the legislature will have an equal role in the process of drawing lines.

At any rate, recent developments have led to the following

But all the braggadocio was for naught when a New York State trial judge, then Appellate Division panel, then the Court of Appeals (the highest court in the state) threw out the Democrat maps as an unconstitutional political gerrymander. The Court of Appeals confirmed the trial judge’s decision to appoint a Special Master to propose a map. The Special Master has circulated his preliminary map, and like a tiger caught by the toe, Democrats are hollering.

The new map – which hasn’t been finalized yet as the law of the land – has these possible consequences:

The proposed maps, drawn by Jonathan R. Cervas, the court-appointed special master, would unwind changes that Democrats had hoped to use to unseat Representative Nicole Malliotakis, a Staten Island Republican; flip other Republican-held swing districts; and secure their own tenuous seats in the Hudson Valley region.

The new lines even cast the future of several long-tenured, powerful Democratic incumbents in doubt, forcing several to potentially run against one another.

Did the Democrats think that the judiciary would side with them despite the 2014 amendment? Probably. But apparently they thought wrong.

Posted in Law, Politics | 14 Replies

Roundup

The New Neo Posted on May 18, 2022 by neoMay 19, 2022

(1) In yesterday’s primaries on the GOP side, we had the defeat of NC member of Congress Madison Cawthorn. I hadn’t been following his trajectory closely, but let’s just say he had major issues. The link provides further details. Because the district he is coming from is red, his ouster probably won’t affect the House balance of power.

(2) Speaking of yesterday’s primaries, the fight between GOP Senate candidates Mehmet Oz and David McCormick in Pennsylvania is too close to call. This was the contest in which celebrity Oz was backed by Trump, angering a lot of people on the right who don’t trust Oz and who prefer McCormick. The race is so close that a mandatory recount may be triggered. Whoever wins, I hope he’s strong enough to beat the very “progressive” Democrat John Fetterman, who’s got his own problems of the health variety.

(3) The new official “disinformation” board is no more. Pity. Boy, that must have polled poorly. Then again, media and social media have been serving the same twisted function for quite some time.

(4) The US is in the hypersonic weapons game.

(5) To ask this question is to answer it: “The alleged supermarket killer is self-described as authoritarian left — so why isn’t this being reported?”

Posted in Uncategorized | 48 Replies

Open thread 5/18/22

The New Neo Posted on May 18, 2022 by neoMay 17, 2022

Apes rather than monkeys, but that’s a minor quibble:

Posted in Uncategorized | 18 Replies

Separated at birth?

The New Neo Posted on May 17, 2022 by neoMay 17, 2022

Posted in Uncategorized | 25 Replies

Maybe Musk will now start reading NewNeo to guide him through the transition to voting Republican

The New Neo Posted on May 17, 2022 by neoMay 17, 2022

The title of this post is tongue-in-cheek; I don’t expect Musk to be interested in what I’ve written about political changers and left-to-right political change. But he’s a classic example of the phenomenon in this announcement:

Elon Musk, admitting he had voted “overwhelmingly” for Democrats in the past, has changed his mind.

Musk is registered as an independent voter; he announced the switch over video link at a tech summit in Miami, Florida, hosted by the All-In podcast.

“I have voted overwhelmingly for Democrats, historically,” Musk acknowledged. “Like I’m not sure, I might never have voted for a Republican, just to be clear. Now this election I will,” Newsweek reported.

One of the classic changer elements Musk is demonstrating is the need to emphasize his past solidarity with Democrats in order to let the left know he’s not a bad person, not one of those terrible people on the right. And he’s also implying that maybe the switch is just for this election rather than being permanent (I suppose that could even be true). I know that, at the beginning of my change when I would discuss it with friends, I would emphasize that I’d never voted for a Republican before and was not a Republican now.

No one seemed to care. Actually, I think it only infuriated those whose politics were such that they were inclined to be infuriated. My past bona fides only made my “conversion” more threatening and more pernicious to that group. No one likes an apostate – or at least, many people on the left don’t. And I don’t think Musk parading his past liberal bona fides will impress those on the left, either, who now see him as the archenemy.

Posted in Leaving the circle: political apostasy, Political changers | Tagged Elon Musk | 22 Replies

Judge Jackson won’t denounce the Dobbs leak or the protesters at justices’ homes

The New Neo Posted on May 17, 2022 by neoMay 17, 2022

A lot of people are writing about this Andrew C. McCarthy article in which he reports the following:

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, who will replace Justice Stephen Breyer on the Supreme Court after the current term ends in a few weeks, sat for an interview by the Washington Post…
Here’s the relevant excerpt from the interview:

Q: What was your response when you when you saw the draft leak [of a Supreme Court opinion that would strike down Roe v. Wade]?

A: Everybody who is familiar with the court and the way in which it works was shocked by that. Such a departure from normal order.

Q: Do you think it was a good thing or a bad thing?

A: I can’t answer that.

Q: What do you think about peaceful protests outside of Supreme Court justices’ homes?

A: I don’t have any comment.

This ranges from somewhere between cowardly and sinister, much like the failure of the justices to issue a joint statement that echoes the chief justice’s condemnation of the leak and statement of determination to identify the leaker, and that condemns the protests, which violate federal law.

Why would anyone be surprised by this? The Democratic Party and the current administration is leftist, and leftists almost never condemn anything the left does, and don’t feel they have to explain. Usually the MSM obliges them and doesn’t even try to make them explain.

What’s more, Justice Jackson is younger than the other liberal/left justices on the Court, and she came up in a law school environment (graduated Harvard Law in 1996) that was almost certainly more influenced by the theory that law is not objective, and cannot be objective, but is actually power politics by another name masquerading under the guise of objectivity (if you’re interested in an excellent book on the subject take a look at Beyond All Reason, written in 1997 and describing how the approach had taken over legal education.) I am fairly sure that Jackson has been heavily influenced by that sort of thinking, and that this will be the approach of Democrat-nominated justices in the future unless something occurs to make the Party steer away from the leftism it espouses and promotes today.

Looking at the quoted portion of the interview itself, I see some interesting things. McCarthy writes, “[Jackson] first expressed shock over the leak, so it was clearly a topic she was willing to weigh in on.” But did she? What she said was a very very careful, “Everybody who is familiar with the court and the way in which it works was shocked by that. Such a departure from normal order.” But there is no “I” statement there. The implication is that she is familiar with such things and that she also was shocked. But she doesn’t say that, and since she is a lawyer and judge I think it’s pretty clear she chose her words carefully in order to present the appearance of saying that without actually saying it. Then she follows up by refusing to express any judgment on it (does she need to consult a lawyer, in much the same way that she said she needed to consult a biologist to define “woman”?).

The interviewer than asks Jackson not about protests at justices’ homes but specifically about peaceful protests at justices’ homes. Interesting. Jackson would not weigh in on it, and I think we can safely conclude that it’s because she knows that these are her constituents. She may or may not have an opinion, but she certainly has no need to voice it and arouse ire within the base of the Democratic Party.

Jackson also probably suspects that the right isn’t going to do the same to her and picket her dwelling place. I’m not 100% certain that they wouldn’t, but it’s not their usual m.o. although the left loves that sort of thing when it’s the left doing it to the right. I also would guess that Jackson believes that if it did happen to her, the DOJ would be on it in a heartbeat, and the MSM minions would waste no time in falling all over themselves to condemn it.

It’s nice to have so many institutions on your side.

Posted in Law, Press, Violence | 19 Replies

The spam filter is a bit underactive and a bit overactive these days

The New Neo Posted on May 17, 2022 by neoMay 17, 2022

Lately I’ve noticed that a few spam comments have been escaping the filter and getting posted. I get rid of them and I also have certain additional ways of blocking them before they even appear. Hopefully my methods will bear fruit soon.

In addition, I’ve noticed that a slightly-increased number of bona fide comments are getting filtered out by that very same span filter. Just now, I liberated three or four of them from the last week and they should be showing. That’s the rate I’m talking about; it’s not high. But if you notice that you’re having difficulties of that nature with a certain comment that has no obvious offensive content, just email me and I’ll try to find it and fix it. But there may be a time lag.

For the most part, the spam filter is still working quite smoothly.

Boring inside-baseball stuff, I know. But there’s always a certain amount of that sort of thing with a blog, usually kept behind the scenes.

Posted in Blogging and bloggers | 4 Replies

Open thread 5/17/22

The New Neo Posted on May 17, 2022 by neoMay 17, 2022

Posted in Uncategorized | 46 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • sharksauce on Open thread 5/5/2026
  • Keith on The parking permit blues
  • sdferr on Open thread 5/5/2026
  • Barry Meislin on Open thread 5/5/2026
  • Snow on Pine on Open thread 5/5/2026

Recent Posts

  • Open thread 5/5/2026
  • Small changes in Europe?
  • The parking permit blues
  • Rudy Giuliani is very ill with pneumonia
  • Open thread 5/4/2026

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (319)
  • Afghanistan (97)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (162)
  • Best of neo-neocon (90)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (583)
  • Dance (287)
  • Disaster (239)
  • Education (320)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (565)
  • Election 2018 (32)
  • Election 2020 (511)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (24)
  • Election 2028 (5)
  • Evil (127)
  • Fashion and beauty (323)
  • Finance and economics (1,015)
  • Food (316)
  • Friendship (47)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (728)
  • Health (1,138)
  • Health care reform (545)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (331)
  • History (700)
  • Immigration (432)
  • Iran (437)
  • Iraq (224)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (797)
  • Jews (423)
  • Language and grammar (361)
  • Latin America (203)
  • Law (2,913)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (124)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,283)
  • Liberty (1,102)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (388)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,476)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (910)
  • Middle East (381)
  • Military (318)
  • Movies (346)
  • Music (526)
  • Nature (255)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (177)
  • Obama (1,736)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (128)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,024)
  • Poetry (255)
  • Political changers (176)
  • Politics (2,775)
  • Pop culture (393)
  • Press (1,618)
  • Race and racism (861)
  • Religion (418)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (625)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (967)
  • Theater and TV (264)
  • Therapy (69)
  • Trump (1,601)
  • Uncategorized (4,391)
  • Vietnam (109)
  • Violence (1,411)
  • War and Peace (991)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑