↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 435 << 1 2 … 433 434 435 436 437 … 1,880 1,881 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Sowell on the history of Ukraine and Russia

The New Neo Posted on May 23, 2022 by neoMay 23, 2022

This is a reading from Thomas Sowell’s book Conquest and Cultures, that was witten in 1998. I’ve never read it but it sounds interesting – of course, virtually all his books sound interesting and probably are. This is a good summary of the interactions between Ukraine and Russia up to that point, and quite relevant today:

Posted in History | Tagged Thomas Sowell, Ukraine | 12 Replies

Pithy sayings by none other than Otto von Bismarck

The New Neo Posted on May 23, 2022 by neoMay 23, 2022

Otto von Bismarck certainly had a way with words.

For example:

“Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.”

“God has a special providence for fools, drunkards, and the United States of America.” (I’d heard that one many times, but had forgotten it was von Bismarck who said it.)

And also:

“Preventive war is like committing suicide out of fear of death.”

“One day the great European War will come out of some damned foolish thing in the Balkans.”

“What we learn from History is that no one learns from History.”

Well, not no one. A few people do learn from history. But they usually are not in charge of making the history that follows, and can only sit helplessly by and watch it and/or be victimized by it.

Posted in Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe, People of interest | 19 Replies

Open thread 5/23/22

The New Neo Posted on May 23, 2022 by neoMay 23, 2022

Okay, so the chicken is being cued by a red laser. The bird nevertheless seems to anticipate a few of the higher notes, and the execution is impressive. And then there’s the eating of the flower stems at the end; a nice humble touch:

Posted in Uncategorized | 26 Replies

The story of my left eye – so far: Part VI

The New Neo Posted on May 21, 2022 by neoMay 21, 2022

[Part I can be found here.
Part II can be found here.
Part III can be found here.
Part IV can be found here.
Part V can be found here.]

At the end of Part V, I’d had my surgery and was trying to relax and heal. I continued to be astounded and entranced by the clarity of my distance vision after all those blurry years. All I had to do to refresh my memory, at least somewhat, was to close my left eye and look at the world with my right. My right eye had been my good eye previously, so it wasn’t really a trip back in time, but my vision with that eye was bad enough in comparison to my new left eye that it practically made me gasp.

Reading was another story, but I had expected that to degrade because I’d been given a monofocal distance lens. Before the surgery, I was able to read without glasses with my left eye (close-up vision is sometimes improved with a cataract), although with some difficulty and with the print being fainter than it really was, looking gray rather than black. My right eye wasn’t so good at the task as my left had been, although with some struggle I still could do it. But now, to my great surprise even though I’d been told it would happen, reading glasses actually corrected my left eye’s close vision so that print was not only sharp but dark black. This had not been possible before the cataract was removed.

Our next plan (I was with my ex-husband) was to drive along the west coast and visit various relatives along the way. About ten days after the surgery we made the first stop, which was in a fairly rural part of California. The first day of our arrival we all went for a walk in the countryside near dusk. It was lovely there, and even more lovely because I was now able to see the surrounding hills in sharp focus.

Suddenly I saw a flash in the left of my vision. What was that? Actually, I knew almost immediately what it was, because in 2016 something similar had happened in my right eye. I assumed I was either having a retinal detachment, a retinal tear, or a posterior vitreous detachment. It had been the latter, less serious occurrence that had given me the symptoms in my right eye years ago, so I was quite familiar with that. I also knew from my readings, as well as the release I’d signed before the surgery, that all of these things were possible complications from cataract surgery and are not even extremely rare.

Frightened, I excused myself and went back into the house. And then I realized that I’d also had a sudden increase in floaters, which is a possible sign of all the aforementioned occurrences: detachment, tear, or PVD. I also know that floaters can increase for other reasons after cataract surgery, or can become more visible because of the increased visual acuity that results. In fact, with all the eye doctors I’d seen prior to surgery I’d discussed the post-surgery possibility of seeing the floaters I already had better, and they all agreed that was very possible and happened quite often.

But right after the surgery I’d been relieved to note that my floaters weren’t more visible or annoying, although the light in my eye from my iridotomy was. But now, ten days later, I had new floaters, and one of them was largish, quite dark, and floated across my main line of vision. I knew from past experience that people sometimes had floaters disappear or at least get more tolerable as the brain gets used to them, but I found it depressing to realize that my new and amazingly clear vision was now troubled by this large floater as well as a sprinkling of small blackish dots that had appeared at the same time.

And I was frightened. Was this a retinal tear or retinal detachment rather than a PVD? Would I require more surgery? I was in a strange place, too, hundreds of miles from LA and the doctor. Fortunately, he has a policy of responding quickly to emails or texts or phone calls, and so I called him and left a message and he called back promptly and reassured me that according to my symptoms (no curtain across my vision) it probably wasn’t the more serious possibility of a retinal detachment although I had to go the next day to see an eye doctor. He knew a good one in the city nearby, and told me to call in the morning and tell them I was a patient of his.

He added that he wasn’t particularly surprised that I was having more floaters and a possible PVD, because he’d had to do so much extra work on my eye that it could easily have stirred things up. This was in line with everything I’d been told prior to the surgery, including what I’d heard from previous doctors, so it made sense to me. But I was still frightened.

I spent the next morning at the office of a very nice ophthalmologist who said it was probably a PVD and he saw no evidence of a retinal problem. That was reassuring, but now I had to deal with the floaters. Fortunately the flashes had subsided – with my right eye they’d lasted about a month, so I saw this as a good sign. But now I struggled against noticing and studying the floaters, and tried to start ignoring them.

It wasn’t easy. It still isn’t easy, although it’s gotten somewhat easier over time. It helps that the little black dots are now a much paler gray. I don’t know why that happened, but it’s an improvement and any improvement is a good thing.

My distance sight continues to be good, for which I’m extremely grateful. I hesitate to say it because I still find it so astounding and it somehow feels tenuous. I think when a person has had diminished vision for many years, and it’s suddenly restored, it’s hard to trust it will continue because the whole thing feels like some sort of miracle.

The PVD (or whatever it was) and the resultant floaters were reminders, and continue to be reminders, of the fact that we never know what’s in store for us. All we can do is our best, go to the best people for help, and hope for the best.

This may seem like the last post in the series. But I plan a Part VII to explore further reflections on the whole thing, and lingering questions that I have. So, to be continued…

Posted in Health, Me, myself, and I | 31 Replies

Biden border injunction

The New Neo Posted on May 21, 2022 by neoMay 21, 2022

During the Trump administration, he was often blocked by federal judges issuing national injunctions on things he was attempting to do. Now the shoe is on the other foot:

A Louisiana federal judge blocked the Biden administration on Friday from ending Title 42—a pandemic-related border restriction that allows for the immediate expulsion of asylum-seekers and other migrants.

The preliminary injunction provides a more long-term stop to the administration’s plans while the lawsuit led by a multi-state coalition of Republican attorneys general plays out—barring a successful appeal by the Biden administration. The border restriction had been set to lift Monday.

The ruling, issued by the US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, is the latest in a series of judicial rebukes of the Biden administration’s border security and immigration policies, with implications for US-Mexico border operations, international migration patterns, and Capitol Hill battles.

The judge, Robert R. Summerhays, was a Trump appointee.

What happens next? This:

The Justice Department announced it will appeal the ruling. The case will go to the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, a bench that leans heavily conservative.

“The authority to set public health policy nationally should rest with the Centers for Disease Control, not with a single district court,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said in a statement.

If the ruling had gone their way – as it sometimes did during the Trump years – you would not have heard a peep of protest from the left.

This might end up with SCOTUS, although it’s hard to predict. However, there is actually significant bipartisan Congressional support to stop (or at least postpone) the Biden administration’s lifting the restriction – that’s how unpopular the administration’s position on this has become.

Posted in Biden, Health, Immigration, Law | 14 Replies

Help for spinal cord injuries?

The New Neo Posted on May 21, 2022 by neoMay 21, 2022

This is tremendously encouraging:

The drug, called AZD1236 and developed by the pharmaceutical firm AstraZeneca, can reduce the “secondary damage” generated by the body’s response to spinal cord injury, they said in an article published Friday by the journal Clinical and Translational Medicine.

In animal experiments, AZD1236 promoted nerve regeneration, with 80% preservation in nerve function following spinal cord compression injury, which can occur following motor vehicle accidents or falls, the data showed.

This translated into an 85% improvement in movement and sensation following three days of treatment with AZD1236 and starting within 24 hours post-injury, according to the researchers.

That was in animals, and often drugs that show great promise with animals fizzle out in humans.

Also, the time frame is discouraging although unsurprising:

University of Birmingham Enterprise, a school-affiliated initiative that connects academic research with financial support, has filed a patent application for the use of AZD1236 in the treatment of spinal cord injury and is seeking investors and partners to help bring it to clinical trials.

They are already prepared to conduct Phase 2 trials, the second stage of the development process, which will take two years to complete, according to Ahmed.

If those are successful, a full Phase 3 trial, the final step in the process, could be started in two years and “if all goes well as we believe it will, this drug could be ready for use by spinal cord injured patients in approximately five years,” he said.

“Safety studies have already been performed with this drug in humans and the drug was extremely well tolerated at clinically relevant doses for up to six weeks,” Ahmed told UPI.

If it’s truly well-tolerated and it’s the only treatment that might prevent the terrible results of such injuries, why five years? I know they’re just following the protective rules that are in place for a good reason, but the slow pace does seem very frustrating.

Posted in Health, Science | 14 Replies

Hispanics disapprove of Biden, but so do a lot of other people

The New Neo Posted on May 21, 2022 by neoMay 21, 2022

A recent poll and breakdown (it’s hard to get the spacing right on the blog, so these may be a bit hard to read – follow the link if you want to see the original charts):

1a. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Joe Biden is handling his job as president? COMBINED WITH: (If approve/disapprove q1) Do you strongly or somewhat approve/disapprove?

Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Yes No
Approve strongly 17% 2% 47% 9% 15% 19% 23% 10%
Approve smwht 18 2 32 20 16 20 22 14
Disapprove smwht 11 6 10 14 11 10 8 8
Disapprove strongly 46 88 2 48 50 43 40 62
DK/NA 8 2 8 9 8 9 6 6

– AGE IN YRS
– 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Men Wom Wht Blk Hsp
Approve strongly 4% 11% 23% 32% 12% 17% 15% 37% 10%
Approve smwht 23 21 15 13 17 17 17 27 16
Disapprove smwht 22 12 4 3 9 7 8 16 16
Disapprove strongly 39 49 52 48 56 53 54 12 43
DK/NA 12 7 6 4 6 5 6 9 15

4. If the election were today, would you want to see the Republican Party or the Democratic Party win control of the United States House of Representatives?

Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Yes No
Republican Party 47% 93% 3% 46% 50% 43% 41% 63%
Democratic Party 42 4 93 37 37 46 54 28
DK/NA 12 3 4 16 13 11 5 10

AGE IN YRS WHITE
18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Men Wom Wht Blk Hsp
Republican Party 38% 47% 55% 50% 56% 54% 55% 8% 46%
Democratic Party 41 40 39 47 34 39 37 75 34
DK/NA 20 14 7 3 10 7 8 17 21

Hipanics are still the biggest surprise with 10% strong approval of Biden, 16% approve somewhat and 16% disapprove somewhat, and 43% disapprove strongly. That’s far more disapproval than blacks and not far behind whites in disapproval (total of strongly and somewhat disapprove among whites is 62%; total of strongly and somewhat disapprove among Hispanics is 59%). However, there’s a higher “don’t know or no answer” rate among Hispanics, 15% versus 6% for whites.

Only 28% of black respondents are in the strongly or somewhat disapprove of Biden category, but that’s pretty high for a group that usually is extremely pro-Democrat. However, support for the Democratic Party among black respondents is still quite strong, at 75% vs. 8% for the Republican Party. Old habits die hard. But the “don’t know or no answer” category for that question about the parties drew 17% of the poll’s black respondents. I don’t know whether that represents doubtful searching or disinterest among that group.

Both Democrats and Republicans (93% for each) seem quite happy with their own parties – at least, in terms of wanting them to win control of the House in 2022. It’s Independents who tell the tale – perhaps – because they would prefer Republicans to Democrats 46% to 37%.

And who are those 4% of self-identified Republicans who like Biden, 2% strongly and 2% somewhat? Not even most of the pundit NeverTrumpers would go that far.

Yes, polls all most be taken with a huge grain of salt. But I do think they reflect trends, and this poll was no outlier. Of course, the results of the election will depend on what happens between now and November (or earlier for absentee voters), as well as whether significant fraud occurs.

Posted in Biden, Election 2022, Liberals and conservatives; left and right, Race and racism | 10 Replies

Open thread 5/21/22

The New Neo Posted on May 21, 2022 by neoMay 21, 2022

Posted in Uncategorized | 57 Replies

Roundup

The New Neo Posted on May 20, 2022 by neoMay 20, 2022

(1) Here’s how the Ukraine war is going these days. See also this.

(2) Hillary Clinton’s former campaign manager testifies in the Sussman trial:

Former Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook testified Friday that then-Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton approved the dissemination of materials alleging a covert communications channel between the Trump Organization and Russia’s Alfa Bank to the media, despite campaign officials not being “totally confident” in the legitimacy of the data.

They will just say they thought it was possibly true and also newsworthy. In addition, even if they knew it was false, I’m not aware that that would constitute a crime, although it’s reprehensible.

(3) Were you wondering what’s going on right now with the Webb telescope? I was. Here’s the answer. And July should be an important month for the Webb.

(4) I guess math is hard, especially for government agencies.

(5) It seems more likely than not that Oz will be the GOP candidate for Senate in Pennsylvania, although it will take some time for the results to become official. I certainly hope the GOP ends up winning this seat whoever runs. Although I have no idea what will eventually happen in November, I think that Oz will have three advantages: his Democratic opponent is way to the left in a state that is rather purple; he has Trump’s endorsement (a double-edged sword, but mostly good); and the public is generally fed up with the Democrats this year. His minuses are that conservatives find him too moderate, and this is PA and there could be cheating by Democrats in the big cities.

Posted in Uncategorized | 88 Replies

The Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue covers

The New Neo Posted on May 20, 2022 by neoMay 20, 2022

The Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue never had much to do with sports, unless sex is a sport. Which I suppose it is for some people. But it used to feature conventional models of the “beautiful face and very trim figure” type, preferably airbrushed.

I have no problem with that. Models are models, and they’re there to be eye candy and to display the clothing to advantage.

But now various woke messages have taken over – not entirely, but certainly quite often – and the current swimsuit issue features some interesting cover choices (for what I assume are copyright reasons, I’m having some trouble transferring the photos, so I’ll just link them).

First we have Elon Musk’s mom (hey, this is my second Musk post of the day) – who has been a model for much of her life and is now 74. She says:

“My first reaction was, I could never dream up something like that because why would anyone have a 74-year-old on their cover, especially in a swimsuit,” Musk joked with PEOPLE of her covergirl moment. “I do think it’s going to make women feel more comfortable in their seventies when they swim, as well as women in their twenties and thirties.”

I respectfully submit that magazine covers haven’t traditionally been designed to “make women feel more comfortable,” and if that is the point of this one I’ll have to point out that Maye Musk does not have the typical body of a 74-year-old woman. Her face – which does look fairly age-appropriate – has got those great bones, and her body doesn’t seem to have been visited all that much by gravity or by adipose tissue. To start out as a model means you start out with an advantage anyway, and I’m not knocking Maye Musk. More power to her. But her cover is not really going to make most 74-year-old women (or even 24-year-old women) feel better about themselves.

You can find all of the covers here. Two of the women, Kim Kardashian and singer Ciara (I’ve never heard of the latter before, but I don’t really have my finger on the pulse of popular culture), are more conventionally young (or youngish; Kardashian is 41, but has apparently been helped along body- and face-wise by medical science) and more conventionally pretty and fit. However, both are rather unusually callipygian, which I suppose is A Thing these days.

Which brings us to plus-size model Yumi Nu, who I suppose also fits the “POC” bill by being half-Japanese. You can find her photo at that link, too. I’ve seen outraged discussions of it around the internet, and it’s certainly true that most people don’t consider plus-size models to be eye candy – although there is a small contingent of men who find them especially attractive. This particular woman seems to have aroused additional ire by supposedly not being pretty enough in the face, but to me her face looks pretty enough, and I believe that if it had been transposed to a more conventional model’s body no one would have any special complaints about her.

I’m not a man and I’m not the target audience for all of this, but as a woman I have to say this about the swimsuits chosen for Maye Musk and for Yumi Nu: ugh, in different ways. Musk has a sleek and sophisticated vibe and her swimsuit is at variance with that instead of highlighting it. The ruffles are too sweet and girlish and the color is unflattering to her (and would be to most people). As for poor Yumi, that swimsuit does her no favors at all. It would be exceptionally difficult to wear well even for the slimmest and most model-ish of models, with all the cutouts and the boob-flattening top.

What were the people who chose these swimsuits (I assume it’s not the models themselves) thinking? I could dress those women better.

At least all of this is a respite from politics. Except that it’s not, because the choice of an older woman and a plumper woman for swimsuit covers is all about politics these days.

Posted in Fashion and beauty, Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex | 56 Replies

Elon Musk is in their sights

The New Neo Posted on May 20, 2022 by neoMay 20, 2022

Elon Musk is now a threat rather than a Green hero. He thinks for himself and has a lot of money, and is attempting to gain more power over leftist instrument Twitter and end its bias. Therefore he is now a target of the left.

Here’s Glenn Reynolds’ take on it:

After Twitter censorship reached the point of ridiculousness, he responded by setting out to buy it. Now as a result of that effort, it turns out that Twitter is, well, kind of a sham. About half of President Biden’s followers turn out to be fake. (So do nearly a quarter of Musk’s.) Much of America’s journalistic and political agenda appears to be directed by bots.

And fools. Powerful ones, with an agenda – and I’m not talking about Musk.

The next step, of course, is the time-honored one of accusing Musk of sexual harassment (they’ve already done racism, because he was born in South Africa, although he was only seventeen when he left). They’ll investigate and investigate and investigate, and they’ll also accuse and accuse, working under Beria’s old mantra, “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime.”

For example:

Business Insider, a far-left rag, published a thinly sourced hit piece accusing Musk of exposing himself to and propositioning a flight attendant. According to the report, she was paid a $250,000 severance after filing a complaint with SpaceX…

As per usual with these types of media-led accusations, the documents in question are not shared in the story. The actual source is a single, anonymous “friend” of the woman who was supposedly paid off over the alleged incident. That makes it impossible to ascertain the veracity of the report. Are there missing details? What do the documents actually say? Was the account disputed or admitted to by Musk? What evidence was provided that the encounter happened as described in the story?

The allegations are six years old and were apparently kept under wraps by an NDA until this point.

Well, they weren’t considered useful or helpful till this point.

Posted in Liberty | Tagged Elon Musk, Twitter | 24 Replies

Open thread 5/20/22

The New Neo Posted on May 20, 2022 by neoMay 20, 2022

The lion shall lie down with the lamb, and I guess the Golden Retriever shall lie down with the bunnies and the parakeet:

Posted in Uncategorized | 15 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • sharksauce on Open thread 5/5/2026
  • Keith on The parking permit blues
  • sdferr on Open thread 5/5/2026
  • Barry Meislin on Open thread 5/5/2026
  • Snow on Pine on Open thread 5/5/2026

Recent Posts

  • Open thread 5/5/2026
  • Small changes in Europe?
  • The parking permit blues
  • Rudy Giuliani is very ill with pneumonia
  • Open thread 5/4/2026

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (319)
  • Afghanistan (97)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (162)
  • Best of neo-neocon (90)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (583)
  • Dance (287)
  • Disaster (239)
  • Education (320)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (565)
  • Election 2018 (32)
  • Election 2020 (511)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (24)
  • Election 2028 (5)
  • Evil (127)
  • Fashion and beauty (323)
  • Finance and economics (1,015)
  • Food (316)
  • Friendship (47)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (728)
  • Health (1,138)
  • Health care reform (545)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (331)
  • History (700)
  • Immigration (432)
  • Iran (437)
  • Iraq (224)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (797)
  • Jews (423)
  • Language and grammar (361)
  • Latin America (203)
  • Law (2,913)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (124)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,283)
  • Liberty (1,102)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (388)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,476)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (910)
  • Middle East (381)
  • Military (318)
  • Movies (346)
  • Music (526)
  • Nature (255)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (177)
  • Obama (1,736)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (128)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,024)
  • Poetry (255)
  • Political changers (176)
  • Politics (2,775)
  • Pop culture (393)
  • Press (1,618)
  • Race and racism (861)
  • Religion (418)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (625)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (967)
  • Theater and TV (264)
  • Therapy (69)
  • Trump (1,601)
  • Uncategorized (4,391)
  • Vietnam (109)
  • Violence (1,411)
  • War and Peace (991)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑