Here.
The Jews of Germany and Europe: why didn’t they leave in time?
It occurs to me from a recent exchange in the comments section that it might be a good idea to visit the topic of the reaction of the Jews of Germany to Hitler.
First I’d like to clear up one thing: the question of what percentage of the German population was Jewish back then. I wrote a post about the topic in September of 2005. Here’s an except:
…[I]n the course of doing some research on World War II and the Holocaust, I came across a statistic that absolutely stunned me: the percentage of Jews in the population of Germany prior to World War II and Hitler’s rise.
Since then, every so often I will ask people if they can guess what it might have been, and no one’s ever gotten it right off the top of their heads, or even come close.
So, what percentage of the population of pre-WWII Germany do you suppose was Jewish? Take a moment and think about it. Then guess.
You can do that now.
Here’s the answer, and it will almost undoubtedly surprise you (unless, of course, you were reading this blog eight years ago and remember that previous post):
According to the census of June 1933, the Jewish population of Germany consisted of about 500,000 people. Jews represented less than one percent of the total German population of about 67 million people.
Now that we’ve got that cleared up, let’s go to the larger topic: did the great majority of these Jews naively and hopefully fail to see the Nazi menace, and did they stay in Germany too long?
The answer to that is: it doesn’t seem that way. Actually, the majority of them left rather than wait it out. And many who waited it out did so because they could not leave—either because they were old and ill, and/or poor, and/or because all avenues of escape were closed to them.
Here are the statistics:
Increasing antisemitism prompted a wave of a Jewish mass emigration from Germany throughout the 1930s. Soon after their rise to power in 1933, the Nazis negotiated the Haavara Agreement between Zionist authorities in Palestine, which was signed on August 25, 1933. Under its terms, 60,000 German Jews were allowed to emigrate to Palestine and take $100 million in assets with them. Between 1929 and 1939, a total of 250,000 Jewish immigrants arrived in Palestine, mostly from Germany. Of these, 174,000 arrived between 1933 and 1936. After that, the British Mandatory authorities imposed limits on Jewish immigration, which led to clandestine illegal immigration. This wave of immigration was part of the Fifth Aliyah, and saw many Jewish doctors, lawyers, professionals, and professors leave the country.
The United States was another destination for German Jews seeking to leave the country, though the number allowed to immigrate was restricted due to the Immigration Act of 1924. Between 1933 and 1939, more than 300,000 Germans, some 90% of them Jews, applied for immigration visas to the United States. By 1940, only 90,000 German Jews had been granted visas and allowed to settle in the United States…
Overall, of the 522,000 Jews living in Germany in January 1933, only 214,000 were left by the eve of World War II.
It was probably easier to leave earlier in the 1930s as opposed to later. But from the above numbers you can see that a lot of people were trying—and even succeeding—during the mid-30s. For example, by my calculations, one-third of the entire German Jewish population managed to get to Palestine by 1936, before things tightened up and it became much more difficult to emigrate there (but even before that, numbers were limited by law).
What’s more, some who did leave Germany early on got trapped in their supposed places of refuge as time went on:
Some 100,000 German Jews also moved to Western European countries, especially France, Belgium, and the Netherlands. However, these countries would later be occupied by Germany, and many of them would still fall victim to the Holocaust.
In most cases emigration required cunning, connections, and money, and even then it often failed. The German Jews were generally more well-off and assimilated than Jews in countries where the Jewish population was much larger, such as Poland. I’ve talked mostly about Germany so far, but as is evident from the statistics, the Jews of Germany constituted a very small minority compared to the Jews of Europe. However, German Jews were more directly affected early on by Hitler and the Nazis and their restrictive laws. In other parts of Europe, the Jews would have been alerted to the dangers only later. But they were subject to all the restrictions mentioned, and it’s actually quite amazing that many made it out at all.
For every person who managed to leave, I would guess (although I have no way of knowing for sure) there were many many more who tried very hard and yet failed. A personal anecdote: I have read the translation of a series of letters written by a Polish Jew who was a relation by marriage. These documents are utterly heartbreaking and chilling. They begin in 1936 and continue to 1939, although there is one very brief one written in the early 1940’s. They consist of reports of what’s happening in Poland and requests for help in order to emigrate to America, where my ex-husband’s uncle (the recipient of the letters) was living at the time.
The writer was eventually trapped in Poland and murdered in the Holocaust. He was an ordinary man in the sense of having no particular wealth—as I recall, he had a small textile business—and he even had a brother in the US willing to help and pull every string he could find, including promising the US government that he would take financial responsibility for him. All to no avail.
The following excerpts will give you a flavor of the sentiments and thoughts expressed in these missives. Here’s a quote from the earliest letter that survived (from 1936):
Our situation here grows worse from day to day. A Jew here is worse off than a dog that runs about the streets…The burden of taxes is unbearable. Not a week goes by that there isn’t something new. And it is always on the Jew. It is truly indescribable. You Jew, you have money for everything. And on the other hand, the Jew is persecuted as a Communist. The whole story of the Middle Ages is being repeated.
…Polish Jewry is in a desperate state. Above all, there are no prospects in life for the young people. Very few marriages are taking place among Polish Jews, and so on. The young people see no future for themselves here. They want to emigrate, but unfortunately the world is completed closed to them…Above all, we are very frightened…These days, the people in high places speak openly about how they need to rid Poland of at least 100,000 Jews. Anti-Semitism is growing by leaps and bounds. They send free anti-Semitic newspapers into every village. The Jew is blamed for everything.
Here is one from 1939:
Now, my dear brother, let’s get down to business. You write that you spoke to a “lawyer” [Eng.] and he told you that he would find out everything that needs to be done. My dear brother, you should know that I dwell on this day and night; I simply don’t sleep.
Most importantly, you must understand what I write you. First, the American consulate here is very strict about the papers it receives. First, the papers must indicate that the person submitting them is in a good financial situation ”“mainly that his income exceeds his expenses, that he can support [the immigrants.]. If so, they grant a visa. I don’t know if you can show this. If your boss [Eng.] can provide certification that you are paid, for example, $70, and that you require only $40, and you can also show that you have a couple of thousand in the bank, that is good. My dear, I would very much like to rescue the children from this fire. I believe that there is sure to be a war in Europe, and you are well aware what the word “war” represents.
They do everything they can to get rid of the Jews. A young person, if only he has the wherewithal, wants to escape, as if from hell. Oh, my dear brother, we must do everything with great care and deliberation, to see that things go well, because in the American consulate in Warsaw they look to see who has better papers, and better guarantees, and those people get a visa sooner. That’s the thing you have to see to. There are people whose papers have been lying in the consulate for three years already, and still nothing has happened. And whoever has papers that show that someone can put up a lot of money as a guarantee, and also makes a good living, then it’s OK. May God help us get this done successfully.
Here is one from later in 1939:
If I had something happy to write, I would write to you twice a week. Unfortunately, such terrible things happen occasionally, they are indescribable. What times we are living in! People were mistaken in their belief that the aristocracy will win, and that courtesy and decency will rule. Instead, we have barbarism, ferocious violence, concentration camps and women buried alive with babies in their arms. This continues, and England still supports it and gives [untranslatable word] and so on.
…And it’s now clear that war is inevitable. Hitler has arms and people; he needs bread. All of world Jewry must be ready to fight all on fronts with strength and money and influence, to make sure that he fails. For he has decreed that Jews are bad and must be stamped out and their possessions taken.
Now, my dear brother, I know you are eager to know what has happened with the papers you sent. It is not a simple matter. Everyone loves the Jews but nobody wants them [as immigrants in their country]. The American consulate is inundated with [illegible word] and it goes with great difficulty.
From two letters late in 1939:
This week I got your letter with the [illegible word] that you wrote to the senator [word is in English]. I see that you are devoted and want to rescue my children from this powder keg. Today it said in the paper that America will be closed for 5 years…
America pities and sends wishes to the Jews. Can’t they let in a couple of million Polish, German, Rumanian and Austrian Jews?
It’s like the rich man who was very charitable. A poor man came begging at his door in winter. It was exceptionally cold. The rich man stood at the door and gave him alms. Shouts the poor man, I don’t want alms. It’s cold and I’m freezing. Let me in so I can warm myself a bit. No answer. The rich man gives him a couple more pennies, but doesn’t let him in.
There was a time when the Spanish and German Jews were chased out and Poland took them in. And now in such developed countries as America and England”“they know how to give alms but they won’t allow you to come in and warm yourself.
I’ll stop there, but I’ll add that these represent only a few short excerpts from a much lengthier series of letters that show a man who knows that he and his children are almost certainly trapped and doomed, and yet is fighting with all his might to escape. It is inexpressibly sad to read these letters and know what happened.
How typical this man’s sentiments and knowledge were at the time I do not know. But to me they suggest that a substantial number of the Jews who stayed in Europe in the 30s and died there in the 40s were quite aware of the fate that awaited them, either in general or very specific terms, and had tried their best to escape. But for most of them there was no way to do it and nowhere to go.
Fashion forward, fashion backward
Ah, the Paris designer shows during Fashion Week! The elegance, the money, the glamour, the je ne sais quoi.
Or perhaps not:
Then there’s always Wizard of Oz retro:
And modesty:
Enough, enough.
For a palate cleanser, let’s go back in time to some decades with real glamour:
And even though this dress is over-the-top with all its feathers, Ginger Rogers keeps it classy:

It’s an amazing dress, but it’s best appreciated in motion—which, after all, is what it was designed for. Enjoy this view of what we’ve lost these days—although thankfully we have the film and YouTube to remind us.
It doesn’t really get going till a bit after minute two, but you’ll be rewarded for your patience with a light-as-air dance of surpassing delicacy and tenderness. Watch for Ginger’s transcendent backbends:
Two political conservatives, by the way. Astaire was a dance genius who had many partners, but none was better than Rogers. In fact, I have trouble watching him dance with any of the others, good dancers though they may have been. Rogers was his dance soulmate.
Violent DC car chase
It’s hard to know what to make of the incident yesterday in Washington DC in which a dental hygienist from Stamford Connecticut, with her one-year-old toddler in the back of her car, seems to have had some sort of meltdown/breakdown/panic and ended up provoking her own shooting death.
There was nothing in Miriam Carey’s background that would have led up to this—until about a year ago, that is, when (her mother reports) Carey had a baby and suffered from a postpartum depression serious enough to have hospitalized her for a while. Usually, though, when women with postpartum depression become violent, it is directed solely towards themselves and/or their children. Then again, Carey’s behavior yesterday could have been a possible case of what’s known as “suicide by cop.”
Another hint might be here:
Carey’s former boss, Dr. Brian Evans, told The News that she “fell down some stairs and she had a pretty significant head injury” toward the end of the nearly two years she worked for him.
And still another hint is here:
The woman who led authorities on a chase from the White House to the Capitol before she was killed by police may have thought that President Barack Obama was stalking her, law enforcement sources told NBC News.
That lends itself to some bleak humor—isn’t Obama stalking us all? But this really seems to be a tragic incident all around, but mostly for Carey and her family.
[NOTE: And before you blame the mental health establishment, remember that whatever the treatment is, it can’t always be effective. That said, there is some statistical evidence that anti-depressants can increase the incidence of violence, but we don’t even known whether Carey was on antidepressants. And even if she were we don’t know whether they were a factor in her particular case.]
Harry Reid won’t go broke underestimating the American public
Quote from Reid yesterday in answer to a question from CNN’s Dana Bash:
What right did [the House of Representatives] have to pick and choose what part of government is going to be funded? It’s obvious what’s going on here. You talk about reckless and irresponsible. Wow. What this is all about is Obamacare. They are obsessed. I don’t know what other word I can use. They’re obsessed with this Obamacare thing. It’s working now and it will continue to work and people will love it more than they do now by far. So they have no right to pick and choose.
You might be tempted to give Reid the simple and obvious answer: look this up. It’s the sort of thing every kid used to have to learn in civics class (I’m not sure what children learn now, or if they even have civics class any more). First there’s Article I, section 7, clause 1: “All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other Bills.” It’s followed by Section 7 Clause 9: “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law…”
So Congress was given what is commonly known as the power of the purse, and at the Constitutional Convention it was decided that the House of Representatives should hold more of that power than the Senate because the House “was more immediately the representatives of the people, and it was a maxim that the people ought to hold the purse-strings.”
Aside from this balancing of fiscal power somewhat in favor of House over Senate, another goal was to make sure the executive did not spend money without congressional authorization. The framers had had experience with kings spending money without being directly answerable to the people, and they didn’t like it.
But I strongly suspect that Reid doesn’t really need to be informed of any of this. For one thing, he has a law degree, and that usually indicates at least a glancing familiarity with the Constitution. In addition, he’s been a member of both Senate and House in his career, and he knows the procedures of both bodies.
But Harry Reid is well aware of something else: the fact that more and more voters are ignorant of the way our government is set up, and why it was designed that way. So he knows he can get away with these ignorant-sounding remarks. Or perhaps he is aware that some of the public knows how the government is set up and doesn’t care or would even like that system changed; some think it’s archaic and gets in the way of what they want Reid and company to do (see this or this).
Reid is aware of still another thing: that he and Obama and the Democrats have much of the MSM in their pockets. That’s one of the reasons he was so outraged when Bash asked him some tough questions yesterday; she was breaking the protective rules to which he’s grown accustomed. So he served notice on her; after calling the Republican House “reckless and irresponsible,” he tarred Bash with the same brush, saying “To have someone of your intelligence to suggest such a thing means you’re as irresponsible and reckless.”
That’ll teach her to be so impudent.
These remarks of Reid’s are the hallmarks of an elected official and a party whose arrogance has swollen to unconscionable and dangerous proportions.
Guess who
Who do you think this beauty is?
(a) Vivien Leigh in a costume drama
(b) a model from the 50s
(c) ?
No, it’s not Vivien Leigh in a costume drama:
Nor a model from the 50s:
It’s Princess Fawzia of Egypt, who became the first wife of Mohammad Reza Pahlevi, the last Shah of Iran. She was divorced from the Shah in 1945 after only six years of marriage, and died in Alexandria, Egypt, in July of 2013.
The shutdown shuffle: the press, the public, and the president
The MSM is full of articles about the shutdown and how it will affect the country and the reputation of both parties. The whole thing is being treated mostly as a political game in which one side will win—and that side is generally expected to be the administration and the Democrats.
I don’t pretend to know how this will ultimately go. In this I suppose I differ from most politicians and pundits, who do just that: pretend to know. Their pretending has a purpose, which is to not just analyze and reflect but to influence, to create a public perception that will become a reality.
They do it because propaganda works. And Democrats are much better at it than Republicans, for a number of reasons, first and foremost that the press is almost entirely composed of Democrats, and secondly because Democrat appeals (the poor starving children!!) lend themselves far more readily to propaganda than Republican ones do.
When I look at stories such as this one and this, it’s crystal clear to me that the Obama administration is creating a crisis where none exists, in order to blame Republicans. Charles C. W. Cooke describes the game plan well in his article in National Review:
America, we are told, is in the grim midst of an unrivaled constitutional crisis that is being perpetrated in anger by “racist,” “bomb-throwing” “anarchists” whose “endgame” and ultimate fantasy is the shutting down of government ”” not, of course, because the co-equal branches of the American polity cannot come to a budget agreement, but because a vocal “extreme” minority, that has magically managed to transmute itself into a majority of the House and 46 percent of the Senate, does not believe in having a government at all.
It is transparently absurd, and yet it’s a “narrative” that might win out, because it’s been screamed so loudly and so often, and most people are not only not paying attention, but most people really are strongly influenced by what they read in the MSM whether they admit it or not or are even aware of it or not.
There are glimmers of hope; as I said, I don’t really know how this will play out. I like to think that people have enough sense to see through this and are paying enough attention and reading through the lines enough to perceive that it is the Democrats who will not negotiate and are forcing the shutdown and then exaggerating its effects. In this respect it’s been interesting to see that the British papers sometimes seem to have more sense than American ones. For example, there’s this in the Telegraph from Nile Gardiner (who admittedly is a conservative):
Cursing political opponents will do Obama no good and smacks of arrogance and desperation from a White House that has lost its grip on reality. The legacy of President Obama will be the relentless rise of big government and a large expansion of government dependency, the strangling of economic freedom, a huge increase in the national debt, and the implementation of hated health care reforms that carry with them a $1.85 trillion price tag. The Obama presidency will also be remembered for its bitter partisanship, and its relentless vilification of political opponents, emanating from an administration that would rather engage with a terrorist sponsoring regime in the Middle East than talk to elected US lawmakers three miles down the road.
Would that Gardiner were right, but I wonder whether Obama doesn’t in fact have an excellent grip on reality: the reality of how well his propaganda works, that is. Sp far it seems to have been working well enough to do the trick.
[RELATED: A good article by Fred Barnes.]
[ADDENDUM: Da Tech Guy is guardedly hopeful, as is Spengler.]
Either/or: Ronan Farrow’s father
In more celebrity news, we have the revelation by Mia Farrow that her 25-year-old son Ronan (and whom I’ve written before at some length; he’s a very accomplished, intelligent, and handsome fellow) may not have been sired by Woody Allen, but instead might “possibly” be the biological offspring of Frank Sinatra, to whom she’d been married at eighteen and who she refers to as the love of her life.
Sinatra, Allen: they’re both megastars, but there the resemblance ends. Mom Mia (Momma Mia?) seems to have had what you might call a big tent approach to choosing sexual and marital partners: Sinatra in her youth, when he was about 50; Andre Previn a bit later on; and then Allen, to whom she never was married and did not live with, but to whom she was closely connected for twelve years.
Her son Ronan long ago decided to have nothing to do with the person he thought was his father, Allen. Ronan’s reasons were clearly stated:
He’s my father married to my sister. That makes me his son and his brother-in-law. That is such a moral transgression. I cannot see him. I cannot have a relationship with my father and be morally consistent”¦ I lived with all these adopted children, so they are my family. To say Soon-Yi was not my sister is an insult to all adopted children.
And Ronan seems to have a sense of humor; in reaction to Farrow’s news, he tweeted, “Listen, we’re all *possibly* Frank Sinatra’s son.”
In my earlier post on Ronan I had remarked on his lack of physical resemblance to Allen, as well as their different moral compasses. Now it occurs to me for the first time, looking at the photos, that although Ronan looks a great deal like his mother, I can see a resemblance to Sinatra that I certainly never noticed before. Take a look:
RIP Tom Clancy
Today we have the sad news that best-selling blockbuster author Tom Clancy has died of undisclosed causes at the age of 66.
I must admit I never read any of his books; it’s just not my style of reading matter. But I do know he was highly regarded by people I respect, and also that (unlike so many authors) he was politically conservative. I would imagine he has a lot of fans among readers of this blog, too.
Sixty-six seems very young to me. RIP.
Obama says “come, let us reason together”
Just kidding.
Actually, he predictably demagogues the government shutdown:
President Barack Obama on Tuesday defiantly declared that “this Republican shutdown” risks hurting the fragile economy and pressed the House GOP to abandon its “ideological crusade” against Obamacare.
“This Republican shutdown did not have to happen,” Obama said in the Rose Garden, surrounded by a dozen Americans who stand to benefit from his landmark health care overhaul.
“They’ve shut down the government over an ideological crusade to deny affordable health insurance to millions of Americans,” he charged. “This, more than anything else, seems to be what the Republican Party stands for these days. I know it’s strange that one party would make keeping people uninsured the centerpiece of their agenda, but that apparently is what it is.”
What a disgustingly divisive Alinskyite excuse for a leader he is. To this country’s shame, it has worked for him so far.
The Muslim war on Christians escalates
And even Robert Fisk notices:
The Diab family can never return to Maaloula [Syria]. Not since the Christians of this beautiful and sacred town saw their Muslim neighbours leading the armed Nusrah Islamists to their homes. Georgios remembers how he peered over his balcony and saw Mohamed Diab and Ossama Diab and Yasser Diab and Hossam Diab and Khaled Turkik Qutaiman ”“ all from Maaloula ”“ walking in the street with men whom he said were dressed in Afghan-Pakistani clothes. “One of them had a Kalashnikov rifle in one hand and a sword in the other,” he says, shaking his head in disbelief.
Twenty years ago, identical tragedies destroyed the villages of Bosnia. Now they are being re-enacted in Syria. “We knew our Muslim neighbours all our lives,” Georgios says. He is a Catholic. “Yes, we knew the Diab family were quite radical, but we thought they would never betray us. We ate with them. We are one people.
“A few of the Diab family had left months ago and we guessed they were with the Nusra. But their wives and children were still here. We looked after them. Then, two days before the Nusra attacked, the families suddenly left the town. We didn’t know why. And then our neighbours led our enemies in among us.”
It is a story being repeated all too often over much of the Muslim world of the Middle East and Africa. As Robert Spencer writes (and it was his article that led me to the one by Fisk), “the call to jihad can override all existing loyalties.”
For those of you unfamiliar with Robert Fisk, see this. Fisk has long been an apologist for Muslim violence (even when perpetrated against himself), and so it’s especially puzzling—and potentially interesting—that in his article about Maaloula he seems to have recently abandoned that stance.
I wonder why. Not because I’m so very interested in Robert Fisk, but because I wonder whether this is a real change, and symptomatic of a dawning realization among more people than Fisk himself. Could it be that Muslim violence against Christians has reached a sort of critical mass, where more and more people are unable to deny its spread and the one-sided nature of its provocation?
Okay, here’s the latest game my computer is playing with me
All of a sudden, apropos of nothing, my Google page shows the word “Yahoo” (very light gray) in the search bar. When I type in something and start a search, instead of using Google it defaults to Yahoo.
It’s the search-engine equivalent of the invasion of the body snatchers. I’ve looked at the Yahoo support forum, and other people seem to have the same problem, but I can’t make head or tail of the suggestions. Anyone have an easy fix for this [she asks naively and hopefully]?
UPDATE: I may have asked naively and hopefully, but the easy fix was offered by “Ann,” and it worked like a charm. It literally took just a second or two and voilé ! Problem gone.
If anyone has a similar problem of a search engine being hijacked, here’s where to go.











