Karmelo Anthony has been sentenced to 35 years
As I wrote yesterday after the verdict but prior to the sentencing:
Anthony must pay the price. But what will the price be? It really depends; he was 17 when he killed Metcalf and perhaps the jury will be lenient for that reason. …
I have a hunch, though, that … Anthony will get less than the maximum sentence.
The maximum was life or 99 years. The crime was a heinous one. And the carrying of the knife to a school track meet, plus witnesses saying Anthony kept his hand in his bag (apparently at the ready with the knife) during basically a verbal spat, indicates the murder was not a sudden “heat of the moment” thing. Premeditation can involve a short time; it doesn’t have to be hours or days. Also, a knife plunged that deeply into the chest would almost certainly be known to be a mortal blow, so it would be very difficult for Anthony to successfully claim that he didn’t mean to kill Metcalf.
Therefore there was a very good argument that Anthony should have gotten life. The death penalty is not allowed if a perpetrator is under 18 and without other special circumstances, and since Anthony was 17 at the time of the murder and the requisite special circumstances were not present, life in prison was the maximum allowed.
Why did Anthony not get a life sentence? The jury didn’t deliberate long, and I don’t think they explained their sentencing decision; at least, I haven’t found an explanation. But I think – as I wrote earlier – it was his youth. Also his baby face. He will have a long time in prison to think about what he did, especially if he ends up serving most of it. But even if he only serves half of it (the minimum, because he would be eligible for parole then), when he gets out he would be around 34 because he’s 19 now. That will have to do.
Meanwhile, the scene in the courtroom during the penalty phase was absolutely heart-rending. I’m not primarily referring to the fact that Anthony himself was weeping during the sentencing phase. Was he weeping mostly for himself? Probably, but I’m not a mind-reader and perhaps the intense sorrow voiced by Metcalf’s family may have moved Anthony. It’s nice to think so, anyway:
Anthony sat with his head on the table moments before the sentence was delivered and appeared to be sobbing, NBC DFW reported.
He stood when asked, but still kept his head angled down, NBC reported.
Metcalf’s mother, Meghan, delivered a powerful statement calling her slain son their family’s beloved peacemaker.
“There was a part of him you can never take from me, the strength I still get from him every day, because I know what it was like to be loved by him. My son was murdered. He didn’t just die. He was taken from us. Just as he was starting to live,” Meghan said.
“You may have just been given a sentence of 35 years, you should feel lucky because I’ve been sentenced to a life without my son.”
Meghan’s sister imparted a poignant question that has haunted Metcalf’s loved ones since his murder.
“One question will always be with me. Why? Why could you not have just left?” she asked.
Anthony kept his head down the whole time – even when Metcalf’s father, Jeff, ordered him to look up, according to the report.
Jeff smacked the podium while reading his statement, telling Anthony that he doesn’t “belong in this community” and detailing how Metcalf’s murder “destroyed the person I used to be.”
Anthony finally raised his head when Metcalf’s twin brother, Hunter, asked him to look him in the eye.
“You took a son, a brother, a friend, and my best friend, from this world. You took someone from me who was supposed to be an uncle, godfather to my kids. Now I want everything taken from you,” Hunter choked.
Hearbreaking.
Meanwhile, Anthony’s family did not behave well:
After the hearing, Anthony’s mother, Kala, and his brother blasted the killer’s conviction and sentence as “racist and biased” to cheering supporters who chanted “free Karmelo.”
Were these the sort of values Anthony was taught by those who should have been guiding him? Apparently. And yet, of course, they are suffering too.
Here’s some background information about the Anthony family:
By all appearances, the Anthonys look like a typical family. Karmelo has several siblings and the family’s social media showed a comfortable life like vacations, a lavish home and expensive cars, per Distractify. Three years before the incident, they had relocated to North Texas. “Three years ago, my family moved to North Texas, searching for a better life,” Kayla said in a press interview after Karmelo’s arrest, she described their family as loving and said they had provided their children with opportunities to succeed.
The emotional toll of the trial on the family was visible in court. On Monday, Anthony’s parents were summoned into the courtroom for a private visit with their son during a two-hour delay. His mother came out of the courtroom alone and sobbing and had to be escorted to the restroom by security. His father followed shortly after, also in tears. It was not clear what was said during the private meeting, Daily Mail reported.
Did they ever teach Karmelo a sense of personal responsibility? Or was everything bad that happened to him due to racism? I simply don’t know enough to come to any conclusions. But the behavior of his mother and brother now, inflaming crowd passions and calling the verdict racist, may give us a hint.
[NOTE: This Daily Mail article contains more of the victim’s family members’ statements. Very sad.]
Anthony had been suspended recently for carrying a knife.
Anthony was a captain on the football team and was on the track team.
Obviously athletic, would indicate Anthony was no sissy,
So, why did Anthony provoke an altercation and then not
punch the victim in the face and attempt to beat him down
like normal high school boys do every day?
Fact that Anthony continued to carry a knife after previously
being busted for it suggests he intended to use it on somebody, or was afraid of somebody.
Wonder if Anthony had recently lost a fight to a white guy and was
looking to recover respect from his peers.
I have found out that you never argue with a bereaved family. It’s cruel and pointless. Mostly cruelly pointless or pointlessly cruel.
Doesn’t apply to those not in the immediate family. They can be judged as if they’re being rational but wrong. Lying, possibly. Avoiding reality, maybe. Trying to make a false case depending on the “lineup”.
Did karmelo’s parents teach him responsibility or blame racism? Please, we already know the answer to that.
I just read that Karmie and family have already begun the process of filing for an appeal.
Marisa:
There was never any question that, if found guilty, they will appeal. That is their right.
I had predicted the appeal will be on the grounds of no black people on the jury. There probably will be other grounds too.
I can’t imagine what basis they can bring for an appeal, other than “racism” in selecting the jury. But when prospective jurors stated they couldn’t be objective in evaluating guilt, the prosecution rightly struck them from the jury.
The evidence in this case was overwhelming. People who were surprised at the “guilty” verdict had never read about the facts or had not followed the reports of the testimony at the trial.
A white youth who stabbed a black kid in similar circumstance would also have been convicted.
In order for the death penalty to have any deterrent effect, it has to be understood as (a) a swiftly carried out sentence, preferably within weeks or months of conviction, and (b) done by some means other than lethal injection. With modern DNA testing the chances of wrongfully convicting a murderer have plummeted to next to zero, and hanging, firing squad, or the gas chamber are much more powerful statements of society’s “getting even” than humane euthanasia. The latter is for a beloved pet that is terminally ill, not someone who has intentionally killed another human being.
I like the idea of hard labor. A convicted murderer spending 50 years of his life, 6 days a week, 10-12 hours a day with a sledgehammer turning great big rocks into piles of little tiny rocks. Given that criminals are generally on the left hand side of the bell curve, that might still be too abstract a concept to be a deterrent.
So, if the verdict is reversed on Appeal, can then White people riot?
“After the hearing, Anthony’s mother, Kala, and his brother blasted the killer’s conviction and sentence as “racist and biased” to cheering supporters who chanted “free Karmelo.”
Some of Satan’s “useful idiots”…
Kate
If the appeal is a jury trial, rest assured that black prospective jurors will have learned to mask their feelings—that they could not vote to convict a “brother”—so that when questioned, they will answer that if the facts support a conviction, they will vote for conviction. And then when they vote against conviction, to state another reason for doing so. Provoked, what have you.
Though it may be of interest that the 3 prospective jurors who were black were all educators.
I found it interesting that of the blacks supporting his conviction online, either from video or from their blog posts, they were all male. I did not come across any black females online who supported the conviction.
My conservative cousin is a retired truck driver who now drives Lyft to supplement his SS. He mostly enjoys it. He says that he gets along fine with just about everyone, including blacks.
He says he thinks about that when he reads hot button news about racial conflicts.
Maybe things aren’t as bad as they may seem from living la vida internet.
huxley:
The group demonstrating in favor of Anthony was small, but fervent. The “worst are full of passionate intensity.”
Gringo:
An appeal is heard by a judge or panel of judges, not a jury. A retrial after a successful appeal could be heard by a jury.
Gringo, I don’t think appeals courts have juries. It goes to judges. As far as I know, appeals courts don’t usually challenge the jury’s finding of facts unless the defense can bring egregious process violations.
Huxley
In my experience it’s the vast majority. They do not have to be screaming and yelling to demonstrate this. I have some black features. Enough that blacks that look like Wall St. bankers figure they can let down the hair with me. From NYC to San Diego to Chicago and Missouri. They have the same outlook. “I’m black, gimme.”
Jury on appeal? It depends. A wealthy investor filed a civil lawsuit against our HOA here in TX. He lost the lawsuit and was subsequently liable for our attorney fees. The wealthy investor filed an appeal. A judge or panel heard the appeal, finding in favor of the HOA, against the wealthy investor plaintiff.
The wealthy investor then filed another lawsuit based on the alleged rights of the investor from whom he had purchased his properties. Which was the final chance. I was the HOA’s point man for our attorney for the appeal on the appeal. There was very definitely a jury involved, as I was in the courtroom when the jury was selected.
When everyone had assembled in the courtroom for the commencement of the trial, the wealthy investor decided he couldn’t win, so he dismissed his lawsuit. It was dismissed with prejudice, which I found out meant the wealthy investor could not file a similar lawsuit again.
The jury heard the arguments for monetary damages—attorney fees—and awarded the HOA what our attorney testified were his fees. The wealthy investor ended up spending an estimated $200,000 on his and our attorney fees. Probably double that amount today. The wealthy investor had a lot of money—$200k was chicken feed for him. A fellow homeowner, also in the real estate biz, said that he filed suit just to see what he could get. If he wins, so much the better, If he lost, no big deal.
Come to think of it, the new lawsuit, while it might be construed as an appeal on an appeal, was still another lawsuit—not an appeal. It was in local county court, not in state appeals court.
I guess I do stand corrected, but my mistake still makes for a good story.
Gringo:
Indeed – it was a new lawsuit and not an appeal.
Also a civil rather than criminal case.
If blacks don’t win their case, whatever it is, the yell of “Racism” goes up.
Houston, we have a problem. And I do not capitalize “blacks”, as they do not capitalize “whites”.
@Richard Cook: In my experience it’s the vast majority [of blacks]. They do not have to be screaming and yelling to demonstrate this
I don’t doubt you. Blacks have been deeply indoctrinated into their victimization and being a victim can be an attractive identity.
But not all go that way, though I don’t know the percentage breakdown.
Here’s a mixed-race YouTuber speaking out against those blacks defending Anthony:
–Amala Ekpunobi, “They’re Defending Karmelo Anthony. Let’s Respond.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6ar6fcmiSM
Neo-
Life in prison was not possible on the charge convicted, that of Murder (TPC 19.02).
The Texas Penal Code has four degrees of criminal homicide: Capital Murder, Murder, Manslaughter, and Criminally Negligent Homicide. Only Capital Murder carries the death penalty or life without parole, analogous to 1st Degree Murder in other states.
Murder is a 1st degree felony, with a possible sentence of 5-99 years.
Under Texas law, a convict must serve half of their sentence, or 30 years, whichever is less, before they are eligible for parole.
huxley:
Here’s a mixed-race YouTuber speaking out against those blacks defending Anthony:–Amala Ekpunobi, “They’re Defending Karmelo Anthony. Let’s Respond.”
She plays an interview w Tx Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett:
I would agree with her response. If someone larger than you is on top of you and beating you, you should not legally be limited to fists.
Does this mean that Jasmine Crockett agreed with what George Zimmerman did in response to Trayvon Martin’s beating Zimmerman while he was on top of Zimmerman? Trayvon Martin was about 6 inches taller than Zimmerman.
(Google made it very frustrating to view the video. Had to solve five different pictures. I got to see the video by going to You Tube and typing in the title of the video.)
Basically, the appeal of this verdict is trying to legalize murder in this country for all black people who perceive themselves the victim of any slight. Picture the OJ Simpson verdict, but you had 20 eyewitnesses to the murders and a sober confession of guilt from OJ after being apprehended.
It’s sad that so many blacks and “allies” are trying to reframe Anthony as the victim and gin up protests, maybe even riots.
The good news, I hope, is that Americans are smarter this time. This won’t be rerun of Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown and George Floyd.
huxley, what is your response to my take on Jasmine Crockett? (@ 3:00 in the video)
I though jazzy was gone maybe only her lashes
She has long since removed all doubt
Some places in Texas that is not done!
@Gringo: huxley, what is your response to my take on Jasmine Crockett? (@ 3:00 in the video)
Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump got that one right.
I believe Crockett will regret that soundbite in front of a camera.