↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 767 << 1 2 … 765 766 767 768 769 … 1,914 1,915 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Sarah Huckabee Sanders is leaving

The New Neo Posted on June 14, 2019 by neoJune 14, 2019

Too bad, although understandable. Talk about stressful jobs! I thought she was one of the better press secretaries.

Sanders held the job of press secretary under Trump for nearly two years. That’s a long time in this day and age, when under constant harassment from the Trump-haters.

“Remember: for the left, all politics is personal,” Higgins responded, adding that there was an effort to “delegitimize” Sanders’ voice as well as other female figures who support or work for Trump.

“It basically tells you that it’s OK to treat people who disagree with you with disdain and contempt and sort of write them out of the picture,” she said. “And that’s all driven by a very different worldview of who we are as people and what to expect.”

By the way, today is Trump’s birthday. He turns 73. By the standards of today’s politics—what a young’un!

And by the way, when I Googled “Trump birthday” just now to get a link, I had to scroll down quite a bit to find one that wasn’t mocking him or berating him.

Posted in Press, Trump | 13 Replies

The latest media hysteria about Trump

The New Neo Posted on June 14, 2019 by neoJune 14, 2019

You can read about it here as well as here and here.

From the latter:

As Trump told Stephanopoulos, there is nothing wrong with listening to information that anyone, foreign or domestic, might have that is relevant to a presidential candidate. But what is blindingly obvious, yet absent from every Democratic Party news account feigning horror at the ABC interview, is that the Hillary Clinton campaign didn’t just receive “foreign dirt” on the Trump campaign. It paid for foreign sources to fabricate lies about Trump, which it then disseminated to the press. Listen to “foreign dirt”? The Clinton campaign paid for it!

This is just one more example of why no sensible person takes “news” sources like the Washington Post seriously.

Ah, but many people must not be sensible then, and I seem to know an awful lot of them.

I sometimes feel I ought to write something about every single brouhaha that takes center stage for a day and then fades away. And sometimes I do add my 2 cents into the mix. But sometimes I just shrug and think that, unless I have something at least somewhat clever or insightful to contribute, why bother? Because the repetitiveness and the trivia of it all wearies me.

And yet these things do matter. I don’t dismiss them, because the media still affects and influences a great many people. Most people are not new junkies. Most people just read headlines or the first paragraph of a story, or listen to it for a moment or two with half an ear while double-tasking. The MSM knows that, and they know that they can influence people by the steady drumbeat of negative news and analysis. And they do.

Posted in Press, Trump | 24 Replies

Oberlin will fight the Gibson verdict

The New Neo Posted on June 14, 2019 by neoJune 14, 2019

[NOTE: I just learned that Professor Jacobson of Legal Insurrection, who’s been following this story in-depth from the start, will be on Tucker Carlson’s show tonight at 8 PM ET to discuss the Oberlin judgment.]

Oberlin says the Gibson award isn’t the end, and it’s not even the beginning of the end, it’s just the end of the beginning (apologies to Churchill):

The President of Oberlin College, Carmen Twillie Ambar, just sent this blast email:

Dear Members of the Oberlin Community,

By now many of you will have heard about the latest development in the Gibson’s Bakery lawsuit, a jury’s declaration of punitive damages against Oberlin. Let me be absolutely clear: This is not the final outcome. This is, in fact, just one step along the way of what may turn out to be a lengthy and complex legal process. I want to assure you that none of this will sway us from our core values. It will not distract, deter, or materially harm our educational mission, for today’s students or for generations to come…

We are disappointed in the jury’s decisions and the fragmentary and sometimes distorted public discussion of this case. But we respect the integrity of the jury, and we value our relationship with the town and region that are our home. We will learn from this lawsuit as we build a stronger relationship with our neighbors.

I doubt it.

I also was struck by this phrase: “It will not distract, deter, or materially harm our educational mission, for today’s students or for generations to come.” The “educational mission” of Oberlin and many many other colleges today, in fact the majority of them, has become the indoctrination of America into leftism.

Oh, they have other missions, to be sure. To raise money. To give a lot of administrators and professors a livelihood among simpatico others in an atmosphere of culture. And yes, to impart some information to its students about things such as literature, science, and history, along with the leftist ideological slant that pervades everything.

The email burns with its own outraged self-righteousness and a bit of fake humility at the end. Oberlin, like many colleges set in towns that are not entirely of the same mind or demographics as the denizens of the school, has a town/gown problem that has seemingly escalated, and administrators have become aware of the fact that there might be negative consequences to the college itself when townies [* see NOTE below] are harmed by something the college has done. It behooves Oberlin the school to make nice to Oberlin the town to avoid future incidents spilling over in a way that can negatively impact their bottom line.

Do I sound cynical about this? If so, that’s because I am.

I also think that Oberlin will be successful on appeal in getting the award reduced, and that it will end up being just a little bump in the road for the college. The award itself won’t hurt enough. What will hurt more—if it occurs—is a big drop in enrollment in the future.

[* NOTE: Re “townies”—that was the word typically used when I was of college age, long long ago. I haven’t checked with the PC police to see if that’s still an okay word to use; is it?]

Posted in Academia, Law | 23 Replies

The Russiagate news du jour

The New Neo Posted on June 13, 2019 by neoJune 13, 2019

On certain days (today is one of them) I’m happy to rely on other people to present the Russiagate news du jour. So here are some links from Ace:

More on the Ohrs.

On getting dirt from the Russians.

And this one isn’t from Ace; it’s Andrew C. McCarthy on the lessons of the Mueller probe.

This next tweet doesn’t really have much if anything to do with the above, but I found it at Ace’s and it made me chuckle:

Trump trolls the press while trying to pick a reporter to call on: “Let’s see, who do I like? …. Nobody.” (He picked someone) pic.twitter.com/t2OKp2HsRZ

— Marcus Gilmer (@marcusgilmer) June 12, 2019

Posted in Politics, Trump | Tagged Russiagate | 7 Replies

Oberlin loses, big time

The New Neo Posted on June 13, 2019 by neoJune 13, 2019

Wow.

The jury really really really didn’t buy Oberlin’s “poor little me” argument:

Daniel McGraw, our reporter in the courtroom, reports that in addition to the $11.2 million compensatory damages awarded last Friday, the jury awarded a total of $33 million in punitive damages, which will probably be reduced by the court to $22 million because of the state law cap at twice compensatory (it’s not an absolute cap, but probably will apply here). That brings the total damages to $33 million. We will have the breakdown soon. The jury also awarded attorney’s fees, to be determined by the judge.

In closing argument, Gibson’s lawyer Lee Plakas argued:

“Why is the country watching you. Because the country agrees that what happened to the Gibsons should not happen to anyone, but could happen to everyone.”

”Colleges are watching us and you. Because they all know the way colleges are run will be affected, and by your decisions, they will be.”

Just to clarify, the award wasn’t about student demonstrations against Gibson’s Bakery. It was about Oberlin’s participation in the persecution and defamation of Gibson’s as a supposedly racist business.

In the punitive damages section of the trial, one of Oberlin’s main defenses was that their bottom line would suffer from a large award and that it would ultimately be the poorer students who would wind up paying. As Defense attorney Rachelle Kuznicki argued, “less [sic; it should be “fewer”] students who are not able to afford a college education will be able to do so.”

I think Oberlin might not understand the nature of the term “punitive damages.” The award for punitive damages is meant to hurt the person or group or institution ordered to pay it. Oberlin is that group. Will a large award mean that fewer students will be able to afford a college education? Only if Oberlin decides to cut back on that element of its spending rather than other areas.

Such an award means makes it more likely that fewer students not able to afford a college education will not be going to Oberlin. That hurts Oberlin. There are plenty of other institutions from which to choose, and Oberlin serves a rather small number anyway, enrolling around 800 students a year. Oberlin used to be a great school, but that was a long time ago. In recent years at Oberlin, “serves” has tended more and more to mean “indoctrinates in leftist thought and leftist activism.”

Posted in Academia, Finance and economics, Law | 24 Replies

Britain: and in no surprise…

The New Neo Posted on June 13, 2019 by neoJune 13, 2019

…Boris Johnson leads the race to head the Conservative Party and become Prime Minister.

This is just the first round, and it involves a secret ballot by the 313 Conservative MPs. The next step in the process is for further elimination rounds that involve the party lawmakers, winnowing the candidates down to two. Then the final decision will be decided by a vote of the 160,000 Conservative Party members.

It seems to be a bit of a hybrid between something resembling our old “smoke-filled room” party system and the more recent primary system. I believe that Johnson is virtually certain to win. There won’t be an opponent from another party, because this isn’t a general election. It’s a one-sided contest to replace Conservative Party leader May, who is leaving.

Posted in Politics | 4 Replies

Human nature and political left vs. right

The New Neo Posted on June 13, 2019 by neoJune 13, 2019

Commenter “Snow on Pine” makes the following excellent observation about the differences between left and right:

The fork in the road occurs at the crossroad named Human Nature.

Believe that humans are innately good and that it is just their circumstances that make them misbehave—do bad things, and you travel down one of the two forks—everything thereafter—your view of the world, your value system, your view of the purpose and role of government, and the solutions to those “circumstances” you propose—are all based on that fundamental assumption about human nature.

That road terminates at Socialism and dictatorship, in less and less Freedom—as you try (or claim to try)—in vain—to arrange “circumstances” to create a perfected man.

Believe that human beings are fallible, and tend to get into trouble if left to their own devices—are what they are and are not “perfectible”—and you travel down the other fork—and everything thereafter—your view of the world, your value system, your view of the purpose and role of government, and the solutions to that “misbehavior” you propose—are all based on that fundamental understanding of human nature, how to take it into account, and to plan government and public policy around it.

That road leads to more Freedom and, among other destinations, to Capitalism.

Starting at that fundamental divide, each road diverges more and more from the other, getting further and further apart, until the people traveling each road can no longer even see or easily communicate with each other.

I agree wholeheartedly with that last paragraph of Snow’s. And I believe that Snow’s general analysis has some basic truth, particularly regarding the more idealistic sort of leftist (and they absolutely do exist) and the smaller-federal-government type of conservative. But there’s also a way in which the situation sometimes gets flipped/reversed/twisted.

I’ve known leftists who don’t seem to believe in the basic goodness of humankind. They just happen to believe that they themselves know best and therefore should have power and control over flawed humanity, that they themselves can put the correct restrictions on other people so that they themselves can get the results they deem “good.” If people are innately selfish, for example, they must be forced to share. If they are innately racist, they must be forced to check their privilege. Don’t let re-education camps fool you; the instruction is not necessarily meant to gently persuade. Sometimes the goal is to tell the attendees what is the expected behavior for them, and what is the penalty for non-compliance.

On the other side, there are some people on the right (not very many, but some) who seem to be quite sanguine about human nature, or at least about the larger social systems in which humans are involved. They veer towards thinking that total laissez-faire capitalism would work just fine, for example. Likewise, they believe that by lowering taxes very dramatically and eliminating entitlements, people would give so much to charity that social ills would be adequately addressed.

I also think that the divergent roads along which people disposed to be on the left and those disposed to be on the right travel are not entirely ideological roads (although there’s certainly that). They are also informational roads and group-identity roads. I believe this tends to be more true for left than right, but that it can be true for either.

For example, people on the left don’t tend to expose themselves to any media outlets on the right, whereas people on the right are exposed (voluntarily or not) to the left far more often. That’s the informational road I’m talking about, and the left travel one that’s more homogeneous. For me, one of the main drivers of my political change was being exposed to new sources of information available over the internet in the early years of the 21st Century—and I’m not talking about fringe sites on the right, I’m talking about hoary periodicals such as Commentary or National Review which I’d vaguely heard of before but never actually seen until I started getting most of my news via internet around 2000. The internet made it easy, and I was far more simpatico with what the right was saying than I had previously thought I would be before I had that exposure.

But the group identity road is an important one, too. A lot of people grow up as members of groups (for example: religious, racial, urban-vs.-rural) in which they rarely meet someone who thinks differently, or if they do they’re not aware of it. If a person grows up with that sort of political identity forged by group identity—what Zell Miller called the “birthmark”—it is particularly difficult for that person to change a political affiliation and outlook. It’s felt as a very jarring experience. You can hear a lot of these stories on the WalkAway videos at YouTube, and it’s clear that many of these people have gone through a lot of emotional anguish as they sort it out.

Posted in Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe, Leaving the circle: political apostasy, Liberals and conservatives; left and right | 57 Replies

The social fallout of political disagreements—umpteenth version

The New Neo Posted on June 12, 2019 by neoJune 12, 2019

As you might expect, when I saw the headline “Don’t get divorced because of Trump. The tough work of settling America’s political differences,” I immediately clicked on it, because it sounded as though it would deal with one of my major interests.

That’s not because I’m trying not to get divorced; I’m already long-divorced. And I didn’t get divorced because my husband (now my ex-husband) and I disagree on politics or ever disagreed on politics; strangely enough, we’ve been on the same page pretty much right along. But I know that political differences can be a big problem in marriages, and I’ve certainly experienced the problem in other relationships with friends and family.

But the article doesn’t deal with marriages at all. And it deals with the general topic in a rather surface way, and seems to be trying to balance things out with a “both sides are qually hateful and angry” point of view interspersed with a subtle skew towards blaming Trump.

In my experience—and I have a lot of experience—there is indeed hatred on both sides, but the hatred is far more virulent and widespread left to right. And although it has exacerbated during Trump’s presidency—and although Trump himself is anything but a conciliatory figure—I most definitely do not see this phenomenon as his fault. I see the press as having had an enormous role to play in the escalating hatred, as well as social media—predominantly Twitter, which the nearly-worthless article doesn’t mention at all.

I say “nearly worthless” because the article does have one potentially helpful part in which the author mentions groups such as Better Angels and the Listen First Project, which try to promote more meaningful and less abusive discourse between the two sides. I’m not all that sure how much such movements actually help, however, because they appeal mostly to people who are interested in such civil discourse in the first place, as the article states. My guess is that most of the people doing all the flaming of others don’t really want to give up the excitement and the venting of bile.

At the moment I’m not very hopeful about all of this. As the 2020 election approaches, I see the prospects getting worse. And I don’t see the problem as a mere lack of civility, although there certainly is a dearth of civility. I see it as a huge divide involving very basic political assumptions that are quite fundamental, and I see the lack of civility as a byproduct of that, exacerbated by the hypocritical bias of the press, the general coarsening of our culture, and the amplification caused by social media,

Posted in Liberals and conservatives; left and right, Politics | 61 Replies

Bruce Ohr’s role in Russiagate

The New Neo Posted on June 12, 2019 by neoJune 12, 2019

Russiagate has so many elements and such complexity that it’s easy to lose track of the details. One detail I haven’t covered all that much is the role of Bruce Ohr, who was an Associate Deputy Attorney General during the Obama administration.

Eric Felton certainly has, however. Please read the whole thing, but here’s an excerpt:

Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr was perfectly positioned to advance the Russia collusion narrative. He had a rare set of relationships — ties to opposition researchers and the FBI — and would use his links to both in 2016 to connect federal law enforcement to those advancing Trump-Russia conspiracy theories.

A mystery remains: To some in his narrow circle, Ohr was upfront about the compromising nature of his connections, yet he hid that fact from officials charged with overseeing ethics at the Justice Department. Why, then, did Bruce Ohr admit to the FBI that his wife worked for opposition researchers Fusion GPS while failing to disclose it to the DoJ? The answer speaks volumes not just about how the Trump-Russia affair gained traction but about the way Washington works…

Fusion GPS didn’t just get Bruce Ohr’s valuable attention, the firm used it to make an ask. Nellie Ohr acknowledged in her own congressional interview what Fusion GPS had in mind when Steele invited her and her husband to breakfast at the Mayflower Hotel on July 30, 2016. “Chris Steele was hoping that Bruce would put in a word with the FBI to follow up on the information in some way.” He did just that.

As I said, please read the whole thing.

Posted in Politics | Tagged Russiagate | 14 Replies

Isn’t it curious how the national media takes zero interest in Ilhan Omar’s tax irregularities?

The New Neo Posted on June 12, 2019 by neoJune 12, 2019

Can you imagine what the headlines would look like if a Republican had claimed on his/her tax returns that Person A was his/her spouse while still married to Person B?

But when Ms. Intersectionality does it, crickets.

At least, according to that article, the local affiliate in Minneapolis is taking some interest. But Omar isn’t answering.

I can’t even imagine what answer would suffice to exonerate her, so she’s probably best off keeping mum and hoping the national media will continue to ignore the issue. Actually, I can imagine her excuse, but someone like Nancy Pelosi would have to make it for her again, because it would be a difficult one for Omar to pull off by herself: that Omar “didn’t understand the full weight” of what she was doing.

As Iowahawk has said:

Journalism is about covering important stories. With a pillow, until they stop moving.

— David Burge (@iowahawkblog) May 9, 2013

Posted in People of interest, Press | 44 Replies

California proposal to expand illegal immigrant health coverage

The New Neo Posted on June 11, 2019 by neoJune 11, 2019

California is poised on the brink of expanding Medi-Cal (the state Medicaid program) to cover illegal immigrants 19-26. When I read that, my first thought was aren’t they already covered in California?

It turns out that previously they only had been covered to the age of 19, and this new move would place Medi-Cal coverage in compliance with the ages of Obamacare coverage, which goes to 26.

When Goveror Newsom was inaugurated back in January, he proposed the change:

California already covers undocumented children until they turn 19, with Newsom’s plan increasing the age cut-off to mirror that of the Affordable Care Act, which allows young adults to stay on a parent’s health insurance plan until turning 26.

“It’s the right thing to do,” Newsom said in a Facebook Live feed announcing the proposal. “It’s the fiscally conservative thing to do. It’s the moral thing to do … When we talk about universal healthcare, it means everybody. When everybody pulls together, it means lower costs to each and every one of you.”

If you’re somewhat puzzled by the “fiscally conservative” statement of Newsom’s, you wouldn’t be alone. The idea is to pay for this through the following:

A legislative proposal last year pegged the cost of extending Medi-Cal to undocumented immigrants under 26 at $250 million a year. That cost would fall solely to California, despite the mix of federal and state money that typically comprises Medi-Cal funding because the Affordable Care Act prohibits the use of federal dollars for covering immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally.

So although Medi-Cal in general is partly federally-funded, this proposal would not be.

More:

Newsom’s proposal would also create an individual mandate in California to thwart predicted drops in the state’s health insurance market after the federal government removed financial penalties for uninsured consumers beginning this year. The requirement that consumers have health insurance or face financial penalties propped up the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, and its elimination is expected to drive up premiums.

Without the individual mandate, all consumers will experience rate increases this year, said officials for Covered California, the state’s official health insurance marketplace. Covered California Executive Director Peter Lee said Newsom’s proposal would bring stability to the market and is a critical step toward reaching universal healthcare.

Newsom’s plan to create a individual mandate for Californians could be a heavy lift, even in the Democrat-dominated state Legislature, where such a requirement could require a two-thirds vote.

That was back in January, but now the proposal is before the legislature, tasked with approving a budget by June 15:

Republicans on the legislative committee negotiating the budget voted against the proposal, arguing it was not fair to give health benefits to people who are in the country illegally while taxing people who are here legally for not purchasing health insurance.

Republicans in California are essentially powerless, however.

There are plenty of Democrats in California who won’t stop at having Medi-Cal cover illegal immigrants up to the age of 26, however, and are eager to cover all of them throughout life. I will add that Medi-Cal only covers very low-income people, so (assuming that illegal immigrants would be disproportionately represented in the low-income Medi-Cal eligible group), this could and probably will stick in the craws of legal residents and citizens who are above the poverty level, are struggling to make ends meet, must provide their own health insurance or remain uncovered, and also be taxed and/or penalized to support illegal immigrants who are poorer than they.

The reality, however, is that California can do what California wants to do. There is nothing to stop it. And there is nothing to stop plenty more illegal immigrants from flocking there for the free ride on health care. There is also nothing to stop more middle-income (or higher) people from fleeing the state, although California still has its natural beauty and climate to attract others.

Another reality is that in California and across the nation, taxpayers are already paying for the health care of illegal immigrants through requirements that they be treated in emergency rooms. I believe that may be the origins of Newsom’s otherwise puzzling “It’s the fiscally conservative thing to do” statement. The argument goes something like this: because it is mandated that we cover people who go to the emergency room and cannot pay, illegal immigrants are using that service both for emergencies and for health care that would ordinary take place in a doctor’s office. They also lack preventive care. The “fiscally conservative” argument is that providing regular health coverage for them would actually reduce costs because it would prevent illness through making preventive care more available, and it would also reduce emergency room visits which tend to be far more expensive than regular doctor visits.

I have no idea whether the above argument would pan out in California if this measure were to pass, but my guess is that it wouldn’t reduce emergency room visits as much as thought, or prevent illness as much as hoped, and that it would be more expensive than projected—as well as drawing more and more illegal immigrants to the state.

[NOTE: I’ve previously written here about Medi-Cal policy in covering illegal immigrants, and emergency room coverage in general.]

Posted in Health, Health care reform, Immigration | 39 Replies

“Chernobyl” and the press; the real Chernobyl and the public

The New Neo Posted on June 11, 2019 by neoJune 11, 2019

In a recent article in The New Yorker about the very popular HBO mini-series “Chernobyl,” the author writes:

The Soviet system of propaganda and censorship existed not so much for the purpose of spreading a particular message as for the purpose of making learning impossible, replacing facts with mush, and handing the faceless state a monopoly on defining an ever-shifting reality.

Sound familiar? In the US, however, the left hasn’t yet achieved a monopoly—although not for lack of trying in recent years.

I previously wrote a long post on the subject of the Chernobyl disaster itself; please see this. One thing of which I’m pretty sure is that the series “Chernobyl” will probably replace the history of the actual event in most people’s eyes, because all most people know about it these days (if they knew about it at all, that is, prior to watching the series) is that it was a big nuclear disaster. And the conclusion they have drawn, for the most part, is that nuclear power is bad.

The HBO series—which I haven’t seen, and I welcome comments from anyone who has—seems to blame the Soviet system (true) as well as individuals who worked at the plant:

So far Breus [an engineer working at the plant at the time of the disaster] has watched only three episodes of the HBO series. “All details of people’s clothes, furniture, dishes, equipment look real, but none of the characters,” he told The Daily Beast. “The series portrays Anatoly Dyatlov, the supervising engineer of that tragic night shift, as an evil and even stupid person—that is not true. He was sometimes tough, but never demonic; it was not his fault the reactor was bad.”

Breus continued to list the issues: “Two out of the three ‘scuba-divers’ who die in the movie, Bespalov and Ananenko, are still alive; also, the engineers working with Dyatlov that night were not cowards terrified by the threat of punishment like they are portrayed in the movie, but brave and responsible professionals… My concern is that many of the survivors, families of the personnel, will feel hurt watching this series.”

The Soviets blamed the engineer Dyatlov, and he served four years in prison. But he said, “If they [the Soviet regime] built the reactor according to the rules, the disaster would not have happened.”

Let’s just say that evidence points to problems with the execution of the test itself and problems in the design of the reactor. You can find a lot of information about it at this Wiki page, as well as here. A summary from the latter source [emphasis mine]:

The April 1986 disaster at the Chernobyla Anchor nuclear power plant in Ukraine was the product of a flawed Soviet reactor design coupled with serious mistakes made by the plant operators. It was a direct consequence of Cold War isolation and the resulting lack of any safety culture…

The Chernobyl disaster was a unique event and the only accident in the history of commercial nuclear power where radiation-related fatalities occurred. The design of the reactor is unique and in that respect the accident is thus of little relevance to the rest of the nuclear industry outside the then Eastern Bloc. However, it led to major changes in safety culture and in industry cooperation, particularly between East and West before the end of the Soviet Union.

More details from that article [emphasis mine]:

A series of operator actions, including the disabling of automatic shutdown mechanisms, preceded the attempted test early on 26 April. By the time that the operator moved to shut down the reactor, the reactor was in an extremely unstable condition. A peculiarity of the design of the control rods caused a dramatic power surge as they were inserted into the reactor…

The interaction of very hot fuel with the cooling water led to fuel fragmentation along with rapid steam production and an increase in pressure. The design characteristics of the reactor were such that substantial damage to even three or four fuel assemblies would – and did – result in the destruction of the reactor.…

The 1991 report by the State Committee on the Supervision of Safety in Industry and Nuclear Power on the root cause of the accident looked past the operator actions. It said that while it was certainly true the operators placed their reactor in a dangerously unstable condition (in fact in a condition which virtually guaranteed an accident) it was also true that in doing so they had not in fact violated a number of vital operating policies and principles, since no such policies and principles had been articulated. Additionally, the operating organisation had not been made aware either of the specific vital safety significance of maintaining a minimum operating reactivity margin, or the general reactivity characteristics of the RBMK which made low power operation extremely hazardous.

The accident not only weakened the Soviets, it also had the effect of putting the kibosh on nuclear power plant construction worldwide because of widespread fear of a similar accident, although—as those quotes indicate—the situation wasn’t especially relevant to Western-designed and operated power plants, nor (as my previous post indicates) did the Chernobyl disaster itself cause anything like the loss of life most people think it caused.

I’m a proponent of nuclear energy. But I understand the unease about it. Murphy’s Law (“Anything that can go wrong will go wrong”) is a bitch, and the fear that Murphy’s Law will come into play in the future in a nuclear power plant—with even more disastrous consequences than before—isn’t going to go away.

Posted in Disaster, Press, Science | 42 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • HC68 on RIP Dolly Parton
  • Alan E Colbo on Yesterday’s primaries
  • huxley on Open thread 8/26/2026
  • HC68 on Yesterday’s primaries
  • Unwillin Bar-Kiss on A summary of Lindsay Clancy’s efforts to get help

Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS ruling on mail-in voting
  • Yesterday’s primaries
  • A summary of Lindsay Clancy’s efforts to get help
  • Open thread 8/26/2026
  • RIP Dolly Parton

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (328)
  • Afghanistan (98)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (164)
  • Best of neo-neocon (91)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (592)
  • Dance (292)
  • Disaster (244)
  • Education (323)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (566)
  • Election 2018 (33)
  • Election 2020 (513)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (89)
  • Election 2028 (12)
  • Evil (129)
  • Fashion and beauty (324)
  • Finance and economics (1,040)
  • Food (317)
  • Friendship (47)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (733)
  • Health (1,157)
  • Health care reform (545)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (337)
  • History (716)
  • Immigration (447)
  • Iran (464)
  • Iraq (227)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (820)
  • Jews (437)
  • Language and grammar (364)
  • Latin America (211)
  • Law (2,967)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (124)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,318)
  • Liberty (1,116)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (392)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,493)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (929)
  • Middle East (383)
  • Military (324)
  • Movies (353)
  • Music (533)
  • Nature (260)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (183)
  • Obama (1,738)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (131)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,043)
  • Poetry (258)
  • Political changers (178)
  • Politics (2,793)
  • Pop culture (397)
  • Press (1,633)
  • Race and racism (880)
  • Religion (428)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (639)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (970)
  • Theater and TV (266)
  • Therapy (71)
  • Trump (1,627)
  • Uncategorized (4,540)
  • Vietnam (109)
  • Violence (1,442)
  • War and Peace (1,026)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑