Portland used to be a pretty nice town. What happened?:
…[S]omewhere around the time of the Ford administration…Portland reinvented itself as the Pyongyang of the Pacific Northwest, if with a few more trendy artisanal coffee bars than Kim Jong-un has to offer. With astonishing speed it rebranded itself as a bastion of progressive values, with a commission-based council and the only directly-elected metropolitan planning organization in the United States. In 1993, it also became the first American city to unveil a Climate Action Plan, with a whole raft of subsequent environmental measures designed to fight what was then called global warming — a commendably disinterested gesture on the part of a city where rain falls on around 170 days a year and the average high temperature in July struggles to get out of the seventies.
It’s surely an ‘only in America’ story, where you can go from gritty, end-of-the-line Western outpost, to something out of Norman Rockwell, and then embark on a headlong rush to mirror the Chinese cultural model of 1966-76, all in the space of a citizen’s lifetime. Add the presence of a 40,000-strong downtown university — and, perhaps not coincidentally, a thriving drug scene — and you get some of the flavor of the place.
I’ve been to Portland several times, mostly on my way to the Columbia River Gorge (highly recommended). Once I went there to see the rose garden, which was also great.
But I’d steer clear now, and for the foreseeable future. Because of all the cities whose government officials – and perhaps inhabitants – have lost their minds, Portland is probably the leader right now.
Since the demonstrations/riots began post-Floyd, Portland has been a scene of almost nonstop violence:
Portland celebrated Independence Day this year in unusual style. The police twice declared a downtown demonstration to be a riot over the July 4 weekend. In the measured words of Chief of Detectives Chuck Lovell, ‘Officers responded when [protesters] threw bricks, mortars, M-80 firecrackers, and other flammables toward them.’ He added: ‘Portland deserves better than nightly criminal activity that destroys the value and fabric of our community.’
These are words of wisdom unlikely to pass the lips of Portland’s current mayor Ted Wheeler. He blames the continuing violence squarely on the presence of plainclothes officers of the US Customs and Border Protection, among other federal agencies. ‘This is not the America we want,’ Wheeler rousingly announced. ‘We’re demanding that the President remove these troops [sic] that he sent to our city. It is not helping to contain or de-escalate the situation.’ I’m reliably told that the mayor’s tone while privately viewing televised scenes of masked rioters being arrested as they threw rocks through the windows of Portland’s downtown courthouse this week was considerably more colorful, and perhaps betrayed some of his youthful experience in the Oregon logging industry. ‘It’s a f***ing nightmare,’ he remarked…
…Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon said the other day that the main problem currently facing his state’s biggest city wasn’t the presence of bomb-wielding radicals, but that of ‘paramilitary figures that you expect in a banana republic.” For her part, Oregon’s Gov. Kate Brown characterizes the situation as ‘very challenging’ — but, again, it’s all down to the feds. ‘Trump needs to get his officers off the streets,’ she declared this week.
The article points out that in Portland, the demonstrators/rioters are mostly white and male. That makes sense, I suppose, because Portland has a population that’s only about 6% black (see this), and actually the bulk of the BLM demonstrators in many cities have been reported to be predominantly white and young. It’s also not clear that in Portland it is BLM rather than Antifa – I suspect mostly the latter, because Portland is the de facto national headquarters of Antifa and has been for years.
I wonder what the goals of the elected officials in Portland are, really. Is opposition to Trump the guiding principle, and will it all end if he’s defeated in November? Do they not care at all if the tax base of the city starts to leave and tourism also fails to provide revenue? Do they think it more important to satisfy their hard-left constituents, who may constitute the bulk of the city’s voters? Is the whole thing just a kind of guerilla theater, a playing at revolution?
Do they have a clue what they’re doing, or why?
Those last two questions put me in mind of this quote from the book Reading Lolita in Tehran, by Azar Nafisi:
When in the States we had shouted Death to this or that, those deaths seemed to be more symbolic, more abstract, as if we were encouraged by the impossibility of our slogans to insist upon them even more. But in Tehran in 1979, these slogans were turning into reality with macabre precision. I felt helpless: all the dreams and slogans were coming true, and there was no escaping them.
