↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 441 << 1 2 … 439 440 441 442 443 … 1,880 1,881 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Robert Frost, commencement speaker

The New Neo Posted on May 3, 2022 by neoMay 3, 2022

[NOTE: Here’s a slightly-edited version of a post I first published in 2014. I thought it might be good to put it up again, because it still seems appropriate.]

The time was 1956, over 65 years ago. The place was Colby College in Waterville, Maine, and the speaker was the poet Robert Frost. What he had to say to the students there may surprise you. If you want to read the whole speech, go here, but the part that I was most interested in is this portion, which I’ve condensed into short excerpts from the original:

Is our dream, our American dream—that I think Dreiser thought was “An American Tragedy”—is that dream over? Are we on a new dream?

Or is the Constitution something that isn’t performing—a sort of vanishing act, fading as we watch it, and turning into something else? When they call it “a living document,” that means they can have it any way they want it for this generation. That’s the danger…

Let me say what I’d do about it if I were you. I’d go back and read some of the “Federal Papers.” I’d go back and see whose dream it was. Plenty of time, you’ve got it all before you…

…for me the man that comes nearest what I think was the dream, that may be ours still, was Madison. In the “Federal Papers,” go to Madison and see what he thought it was going to be.

What was it going to be? Go along and think about that—using the “think” in the slang: “You’ve got another think coming.” You see? I’ve got another think coming…

I would think that Tom Paine was very little in it…I’ve read a good deal of Tom Paine, and I know a good deal of what he thought. He thought there was something started about the brotherhood of man that was going to set the whole world on fire, sweep the whole world.

So he rushed right off to France about it. And we see what came of it. They had a revolution there. And they had four republics—and not to mention three or four monarchies—since then. Their dream was a very confused dream, if they had a dream.

Another thing that I pick up…about freedom and equality. It occurred to me not so terribly long ago—rather recently—that the more equality I have, the less freedom I have. These two things balance each other.

If one party leans a little more towards the freedom—freedom of enterprise, freedom to assert yourself, freedom to achieve, freedom to win—the other comes in with the tone of mercy and says: “Let’s not let anybody get too far ahead. Let’s have a Sherman Act or something, to keep people from getting too rich.” That’s toward the equality, the fraternity of it.

I didn’t know that for years, didn’t know that the more freedom I had, the less equality I could expect—somebody’d beat me and get ahead of me if we had freedom. (I’m willing to let him get ahead of me, if he can.)…

Can you imagine any poet giving a similar commencement speech today? In fact, I can hardly imagine anyone giving a similar commencement speech today. Frost assumed a certain context for his graduating class listeners—for example, that they knew something about who Dreiser and Tom Paine and Madison might be, and he assumed that what these men said and thought might actually interest and inform them. I don’t think that would be the case now.

I’ll close with one more quote from Frost, who was an educator for many years of his long long life—not just a poet, although he was certainly that, and not just a farmer, although he did that too when a young man. He was a teacher at all levels: grade school, high school, and college. He was a teacher in many places. He was a teacher when he was obscure and when he was very very famous.

Here’s what he had to say about his attraction to teaching, from a lecture he gave in 1961 at the University of Minnesota:

I’m almost as interested in education as I am in poetry…I’ve had so much to do with education that I say I’m like some monkeys that Darwin tells about.

He showed them a bagful of snakes. And they looked at ’em and and shrieked and threw up their arms and fled. But they couldn’t stay away. They kept coming back and and looking in the bag at the snakes and throwing up their arms and shrieking and running away again.

That’s the way I’ve done for education, about the last fifty, sixty years—sixty, sixty-five years. And here I am again.

Frost died a little over a year later, at the age of 88.

Posted in History, Liberty, People of interest, Poetry | Tagged Robert Frost | 11 Replies

Spambot of the day

The New Neo Posted on May 3, 2022 by neoMay 3, 2022

My blog is yummy:

Magnificent website. Plenty of helpful info here.
I am sending it to some buddies and also sharing in delicious.

Posted in Blogging and bloggers | 4 Replies

Controlling the narrative: slip-sliding away?

The New Neo Posted on May 3, 2022 by neoMay 3, 2022

What’s going on here? [emphasis mine]:

While discussing the Musk take-over on CNN’s potato time with Brain Stelter, “media analyst” David Zurawik proclaimed that Musk is “dangerous” and shouldn’t be allowed to restore free speech on the platform.

Zurawik suggested that the U.S. look to Europe, which has recently brought in new laws to limit social media, and even threatened to ban Twitter if Musk doesn’t play ball.

“There’s a bigger problem here about how we’re going to control the channels of communications in this country,” Zurawik frothed, panicking at the notion of the likes of CNN not being able to dictate what Americans think.

Musk has them very very frightened. They are accustomed to having controlled the “narrative” for so many people for so long that the prospect of losing even some of that control is terrifying them and causing them to want to clamp down further.

Posted in Liberals and conservatives; left and right, Press | 20 Replies

Politico publishes SCOTUS leak on overturning Roe

The New Neo Posted on May 3, 2022 by neoMay 3, 2022

It’s another giant step down the road to the ruin of the tacit agreements that allowed this country to function in a relatively peaceful manner. First we have the leak of Alito’s alleged majority opinion overturning Roe, and then the publication by Politico – although I wouldn’t expect the press to restrain itself, since this leak was most likely perpetrated by the left to attain some of the goals of the left.

There are multiple articles about the leak and the opinion just about everywhere, and I suggest reading some at Legal Insurrection, Powerline, and RedState. This one is of interest as well.

Goals? Intimidation of conservative justices: check.
Inflaming of Democrat voters: check.

One thing we do know is that the 98-page draft is authentic, because Justice Roberts has confirmed that, while adding that it’s not a final opinion, calling for an investigation by the SCOTUS marshal, and saying that the Court’s work will be unaffected.

I’ll leave aside the question of who leaked it, because it’s very speculative at this point, but most of the chit-chat centers on Sotomayor and/or a clerk of hers who is graduate of Yale Law School. Most law schools have become leftist activist training centers these days.

But the leak could even have been perpetrated by someone on the right, although I think the chances of that are extremely low, since the leak this would seem more likely to serve the purposes of the left. However, if the leak is specifically meant to intimidate John Roberts into upholding Roe – as so many people believe, and I tend to concur with that – and the vote against Roe was already 5-3 without him, then what purpose would a Roberts change of vote serve? If he joins the pro-Roe side the vote still only comes to 5-4 against. I’m not sure whether the difference between 6-3 and 5-4 is a difference that matters, although I suppose the closer the vote the more it fuels the leftist drive for court-packing (which already is probably quite well-fueled).

What are the political consequences if Roe is overturned? I believe that most Americans are unaware of what overturning Roe would do in the legal sense, because the left doesn’t want them to know. So many people appear to think it would outlaw abortion, but that’s certainly not true. It would allow a state to do so, however, and the reality is that not too many states would be likely to ban it outright, and those states almost certainly would be strongly red states. Blue states would keep very lenient abortion laws, and purple states would probably have some abortion but restrict it somewhat.

However, the left does not surrender ground once won. All leftist ground is sacred. Repealing Roe is considered a kind of sacrilege to what has become the leftist religion, and it cannot be allowed.

As for the leak itself, as commenter “MBunge” says:

This leak, if it’s accurate, is possibly the most outrageous and damning betrayal of U.S. legal community ethics in history. Even John Roberts is going to be enraged by this and he’ll be joined by any pundit or legal thinker out there who even pretends to believe in judicial independence and integrity.

This is the Left almost literally declaring war on the U.S. federal court system.

However, now it’s done. It’s of a piece with so much recent court intimidation by the left. The left must think this is a winning hand, but I’m not at all sure. Biden and Democrats are hugely unpopular right now for other reasons, and most people who would be extremely outraged by a Roe repeal may have already been among the minority planning to vote for Democrats. It would be nice if the GOP could get out the word that repealing Roe merely throws the question back to the states, because that might allay some fears as well. I also don’t understand the assumption that this will only rally the left, because it seems to me that it could also energize the right, which finally smells victory in its long fight against Roe, a victory which only could have happened with Court appointments by Republicans.

The left is indeed energized to demonstrate, however. Going back to the summer of 2020 and all the riots doesn’t seem to be a winning hand for them either, but who knows? They’re been playing the January 6th Insurrection card for so long that it might make them look like hypocrites as well to start (or revive) their own insurrection. But the appearance of hypocrisy has never been much of a stumbling block for them before, and I doubt it will be now.

Posted in Law | Tagged abortion | 79 Replies

Open thread 5/3/22

The New Neo Posted on May 3, 2022 by neoMay 3, 2022

Posted in Uncategorized | 33 Replies

Is Trump the cleanest real estate developer and the cleanest politician in America?

The New Neo Posted on May 2, 2022 by neoMay 2, 2022

Could be:

…[T]he most investigated man in America is set to walk away from another grand jury with no charges brought against him.

“A six-month grand jury convened to hear evidence in the investigation into the business dealings of former President Donald Trump has reportedly ended, and no charges are expected to be filed as the investigation appears to be waning.

“Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg recently ceased sending evidence to jurors.”

Posted in Law, Trump | 31 Replies

The Musk acquisition of Twitter continues to panic the left

The New Neo Posted on May 2, 2022 by neoMay 2, 2022

You can see what’s going on here:

While discussing the Musk take-over on CNN’s potato time with Brain Stelter, “media analyst” David Zurawik proclaimed that Musk is “dangerous” and shouldn’t be allowed to restore free speech on the platform.

Zurawik suggested that the U.S. look to Europe, which has recently brought in new laws to limit social media, and even threatened to ban Twitter if Musk doesn’t play ball.

“There’s a bigger problem here about how we’re going to control the channels of communications in this country,” Zurawik frothed, panicking at the notion of the likes of CNN not being able to dictate what Americans think.

Musk has them very very frightened. They are accustomed to having controlled the “narrative” for so many people for so long that the prospect of losing at least some of that control is terrifying them and causing them to want to clamp down further.

I keep wondering whether they believe in their own virtue and self-righteousness, or whether that’s an act and they are simply Machiavellian. I suppose the answer isn’t all that important – what matters is the damage they have done and are still trying to do – but I continue to wonder. I suspect it’s about 50/50: half believe in their own virtue and half do not.

Posted in Liberty, Press | 25 Replies

Roger L. Simon on the D’Souza film “2000 Mules”

The New Neo Posted on May 2, 2022 by neoMay 2, 2022

Here’s some of what Roger Simon writes:

…[W]hat Engelbrecht and Phillips have done is to turn on its head what concerns many American citizen…that our government and Big Tech, separately and together, have been spying on our activities and whereabouts for years…

This is done in our case largely through our ubiquitous cellphones that, if the right apps are on board, and often we don’t know which is which, are able to track us even when the phone is turned off…

…[T]his tracking information has been gleaned by many local private companies and could be bought for a price.

True the Vote did that and used the geo-tracking to follow many “mules” in their nighttime travels from dropbox to dropbox. These peregrinations were matched with large numbers of videos of the ballot stuffing—staggering numbers, actually—that are available from several of the states, notably Georgia. Others seem to have “lost” them (Arizona).

You get to watch many of these videos in the film. I predict your mouth will be open, as was mine.

“2000 Mules” offers several mathematical formulations—depending on number of drop boxes, number of “mules,” how many ballots per “mule” and so forth—for how this stuffing of the drop boxes affected the overall election…

In case you’re interested, the “mules,” according to a whistleblower, got $10 per vote, more during the Georgia Senate runoff…

Guess whose activities and movements amazingly matched that of the “mules” in several instances via that same geo-tracking?

Ever heard of “Antifa”?

I haven’t seen the film, but I certainly plan to do so. Here’s the website with information on how to do that.

The left canceled D’Souza long ago and even pursued him legally for violations that are almost never prosecuted. This means that most Democrats you know – and even some independents as well as NeverTrumpers – will almost certainly dismiss the film out of hand as a lie without watching it.

Posted in Election 2020, Movies | 18 Replies

Coming out as a conservative at Harvard, but very late in the game

The New Neo Posted on May 2, 2022 by neoMay 2, 2022

Is this young woman courageous, or not, or something in-between? I suppose in-between:

Carine Hajjar dealt with ideological homogeneity at Harvard University for three-and-a-half years mostly in silence, but in the spring semester of her senior year, she finally came out as conservative. She said she has no regrets…

…Hajjar said what she experienced after coming out as conservative by becoming a columnist for the Harvard Crimson in her final months as a student at the Ivy League school in the spring of 2021 was camaraderie.

She received a lot of quiet agreement from peers, friends, teaching assistants and professors, including private emails, texts, and even people coming up to her in person expressing their approval and concurrence.

She also said some of her very liberal friends thanked her for writing her column, as they felt like they “couldn’t say anything anymore” due to today’s stigma and intense analysis of everything people say. Others told her to make sure she continued to write it, saying a contrarian point of view was sorely needed.

This shows a lot of people are fed up but are too scared to speak out due to the “progressive orthodoxy that’s a very vocal minority that rules over discourse,” she said.

But she already knew that, because for the bulk of the four years she was there, she was one of them: too scared to speak out. I’m not unsympathetic, but why did she take the easy way out for so long? Why so very much fear? I understand fear, but isn’t the cost of pretending to believe something you don’t believe way too great? Is status in the Harvard world, and the jobs that go with it, really worth that sort of moral compromise?

I don’t go round advertising my views to everyone; I pick and choose my battles. But I never have spoken or written something with which I disagree, just to get ahead. Of course, I never got that far ahead – my ambitions were rather muted. But even in graduate school in the 1990s, by which time my views were already somewhat to the right of the norm in academia, it never occurred to me to shut up and shy away from a fight, although I don’t like fighting.

Back then I saw other students be silent on issues and then come up to me privately and say they agreed with what I’d said but didn’t want to speak up themselves because of potential harm to their careers. The issues were smaller back then and the stakes lower, but they still were afraid. Nor am I holding myself out to be some brave Profile In Courage. By that point in time I simply didn’t care. I was middle-aged and I was not the support of an entire family, so I could afford not to care.

But something about the youngest generation as described in that link seems craven to me. Hajjar says:

“People are just afraid. It’s not that there are necessarily rules against saying conservative things; there’s just a social structure and an unspoken speech code that makes people really scared to express their views,” she said.

“It goes to show that there is probably a silent majority that is still liberal but thinks that things have gone too far on campus.”

If it’s a silent majority that thinks things are too far gone, then with their acquiescence they have allowed the unsilent and highly vocal radical minority to silence them.

More from Hajjar:

Hajjar also said many students are too scared to argue against loud, progressive voices in their classes due to the fear of being canceled if they said the wrong thing.

“It’s so easy just to take an extremely progressive stance. You know you’re never ever going to get in trouble for it, everyone has to nod along; instead of doing the hard thing and putting yourself out there,” she said.

It’s a cliche to say these people have been coddled all their lives and are afraid of any conflict or stress or what they call “harm”. I really don’t know if that’s true, though. I see the younger generation as having had a tough time: little to look up to and admire in government or the press or so many of our institutions, families that commonly feature divorce, drugs readily available, the sexual standards and mores that protected children in my day declining, social media pressures, arts that are so often decadent or empty – and that’s hardly an inclusive list.

I don’t envy them anything except their youth.

Posted in Leaving the circle: political apostasy, Liberals and conservatives; left and right, Me, myself, and I | 48 Replies

Open thread 5/2/22

The New Neo Posted on May 2, 2022 by neoMay 2, 2022

The Bee Gees not only have had tons of hits, but they’ve had many many songs that either were unreleased or never promoted that I think are excellent, many of which could have been hits. Here’s just one of them (which happens to be from 1993) with some catchy hooks:

Posted in Uncategorized | 39 Replies

Dance teachers I have known: Natasha Boskovic

The New Neo Posted on April 30, 2022 by neoJuly 11, 2022

[NOTE: This is part of a series I’ve done. So far I’ve featured dance teachers Stanley Holden and Finis Jhung. There are plenty more I could write about.]

Last night I was musing about the changes in dance in my lifetime, a topic I’ve written about many times and which boils down to the sacrifice of art to gymnastics. Three of the most astounding ballet dancers I’ve ever seen – and I’ve seen many – are Violette Verdy, Carla Fracci, and Galina Ulanova, all of whom I’ve written about and all of whom had a transcendent essence that could not be captured on film. Verdy was the most fleet and musical dancer I’ve ever seen, Fracci the most charming and other-worldly – like an old ballet lithograph come to life – and Ulanova the best at naturalistic believability with a gossamer and fluid technique to support it. There’s no one today anything like them. The entire aesthetic that trained and elevated them is gone.

But I remember, and so do a lot of other people who aren’t young.

Which brings me to a dance teacher I’ve known: Natasha Boskovic. At the ages of fourteen and sixteen I attended an arts camp in Canada at which she was the ballet mistress. I spent many hours under her tutelage every day but Sunday, and even some Sundays when extra rehearsals loomed. She was a colorful old-world figure, with a cabin of her own that included a trunkful of memorabilia and old costumes, and many scrapbooks with wonderful clippings from around the world and marvelous photos of her with famous people in the ballet world of the 1930s.

Natasha had a Slavic accent (it turns out she was originally from Yugoslavia, although I was unaware of it at the time). Her favorite phrase when exasperated was German, however: “Gott in Himmel!” – and considering her task, which was to teach nearly every day and organize a huge end-of-summer dance production with students whom it would be kind to call amateurs, she had plenty of cause for exasperation. But most of the time she was wonderful to us all, although demanding.

Natasha was somewhat crippled, like so many of my early ballet teachers. She wasn’t young but she wasn’t very very old, nor were the rest of them. Dance had injured them way back when, and the injuries never quite healed. This was the case for Natasha, whose partner had dropped her several times (that’s what I recall her saying, anyway), and she had danced through the injuries and paid the price. Now she couldn’t really demonstrate steps but instead indicated them – and of course used the French nomenclature that every ballet student must learn. Sometimes she had one of the more advanced students demonstrate. But her own legs never went higher than a couple of inches off the floor, if that, and she walked with a limp.

One day she was engaged in teaching a friend of mine the Russian Dance from Act III of “Swan Lake,” the ballet we were performing that summer. The third act features dances from around the world, and the Russian variation is one. My friend was having trouble learning the style, which should appear effortless but was hard to pick up, and Natasha got out of her chair to demonstrate.

She hardly bothered with the feet, which didn’t feature pyrotechnics (and the dance was not on pointe; it was meant to be a character dance of the folkish variety). She was showing the arms, head, position of the body, and style.

But first she did the most extraordinary thing. I remember it still, very vividly. She turned on a spotlight inside herself.

I have never seen anyone do that before or since. Suddenly she glowed, although nothing external to her had changed. She radiated some tremendous power that was charismatic and enchanting and made you forget whatever was missing with her feet, or her considerable age. It was riveting, and no one – including the near-professional dancers in our midst – could begin to imitate it.

I have searched online for a video or photo of Natasha and can’t find even one. I doubt photos could capture what I’m talking about anyway. I did find some videos of more recent dancers performing that Russian Dance, but they’re not worth watching. They’re stiff and strange – at least to me – and they dance on pointe which I’m pretty sure was not the original way the dance was done. They strike pretty poses and wave their arms around, but it is nothing – and I mean nothing – like the transcendent artistry I saw in that room on that day.

Here’s the best one I’ve found. This is probably from the 1980s – I see Princess Diana is in the audience – and the dancer is Russian and not all that young. So it’s a bit more old-fashioned than other renditions you’ll see. Some even eliminate the obligatory handkerchief.

Please note the little hand waves that begin at 1:38. They were incredibly hard to perform naturalistically, and Natasha was especially masterful at imbuing them with charm. At around 2:58, note the funny hand rolls that make little sense; in Natasha’s version this was a forceful clap with the hands a la folkdance tradition:

Some years later when I was in my early 20s I attended some weekend classes at Natasha’s New York City studio. The classes were large and featured everyone from the likes of me to professional dancers, attracted by her knowledge and in particular the fabulous combinations she gave in the last half of the class, more like little ballets. I recalled that she had a notebook full of them to which she sometimes referred, but usually she did it completely from memory.

I was there in the summertime, and summer in Manhattan can have heat that’s brutal. Summer in Manhattan in a dance studio could be especially brutal – no air conditioning, ventilation only on one wall, and a room full of sweaty dancers. One day it was so hot that even before the class began we were all sweating. I took a moment, while we waited, to go into the hallway for a little more air.

As with many New York dance studios, this one featured a long long climb “up a steep and very narrow stairway.” At the bottom, I saw Natasha, but she didn’t see me because I was partially hidden by the door. She climbed very laboriously, a few steps at a time, looking alarmingly worn and tired. She frequently stopped to rest and get her wind back, and I believe she may have muttered “Gott in Himmel!” a few times.

I stepped back even further but I could still see her. But then, not many steps from the top, I saw her turn on the floodlights within again, just as I had years earlier. I ducked back into the entrance to the studio as she swept in, a huge smile on her face, looking twenty years younger and glowing from within, as the students applauded. Only I had witnessed the spectacular transformation.

Natasha Boskovic died just a couple of years later. Here is her obituary in the New York Times; it’s short. But in my memory she looms large.

The summer we did “Swan Lake,” I danced a few roles and among them was the Neapolitan Dance, another ethnic offering in Act III. She loaned me an old costume of hers for the occasion, a beautiful thing and easily the most wonderful costume I’ve ever worn, with satin appliques on a wide skirt. Here I am at sixteen:

RIP, Natasha, and thank you. You were rare and wonderful.

Posted in Dance, Me, myself, and I | 25 Replies

Roundup

The New Neo Posted on April 30, 2022 by neoMay 2, 2022

(1) The New Hampshire Senate passes 1431, creating the New Hampshire Parents Bill of Rights. The text of the bill can be found here. My guess is that more states are contemplating something similar or with even more teeth. New Hampshire is not a red state anymore, either; it’s quite purple and is currently blue on the national level and red on the state level.

(2) Another incredibly bad idea from the Biden administration: forgive student loans. Democrats think it’s a great idea, though, because they believe it will buy them lots of votes from the younger crowd who are paying off such debts (some of them are even middle-aged by this time). No matter how much harm it stands to do the economy, as well as the whole concept of debt, the Democrats believe it will help them stay in power and nothing is more important than that. But I have my doubts about whether it will have the desired effect. Just to take one example, won’t people who already paid off their debts at great sacrifice to themselves be spitting mad?

(3) Everybody’s favorite head of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, has mentioned this idea as a possibility:

During his recent testimony before Congress, Mayorkas slipped in one option that Joe Biden is reportedly considering. In order to provide better care for the tens of thousands of illegal aliens streaming across the border, the White House is looking at the possibility of diverting funding from the Veterans Administration for that situation. Additionally, some of the doctors and nurses tasked with caring for our veterans could be reassigned to providing care for the illegals.

Priorities, priorities.

(4)Derek Chauvin has appealed his state conviction. Good. If you click on the link you’ll see what a strong case he has. But anyone who followed the trial – covered extensively at Legal Insurrection – should already know that. The list of irregularities, violations, and biases involving his trial is very long.

However, there are several problems, first and foremost among them that I don’t think any judge will dare to grant him a new trial for fear of riots. Nor do I think a new trial would change the verdict. Chauvin was tried immediately in the MSM and the verdict was rendered, and most people closed their eyes to any facts that might challenge that. Another problem is that he has already pleaded guilty to federal charges, probably because he and his family consider that a federal prison would be much better for him than state prison, if he must be incarcerated. I have no idea how his federal plea would complicate the appeal of the state verdict, although it’s clear that the two are related and that he never would have pleaded guilty if not for the state guilty verdict that was already rendered.

In October, Chauvin was denied when he asked to have a court-appointed attorney for his appeal. That may have delayed such an appeal. Powerline’s Scott Johnson explains:

Former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin was unaccountably denied a public defender to appeal his convictions in the death of George Floyd. Bill Mohrman answered my call for a Minnesota attorney to represent Chauvin on appeal. Bill filed his brief on behalf of Chauvin this week. It is posted online here. Derek Chauvin’s mother has set up a page to support the expenses of appeal here.

At least she didn’t make the error of using GoFundMe.

(5) Further doom and gloom on the left over Musk’s acquisition of Twitter.

Posted in Uncategorized | 52 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Barry Meislin on Open thread 5/5/2026
  • Jimmy on Open thread 5/5/2026
  • Dwaz on Open thread 5/5/2026
  • Nonapod on Open thread 5/5/2026
  • Miguel cervantes on Rudy Giuliani is very ill with pneumonia

Recent Posts

  • Is there still a ceasefire with Iran?
  • Open thread 5/5/2026
  • Small changes in Europe?
  • The parking permit blues
  • Rudy Giuliani is very ill with pneumonia

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (319)
  • Afghanistan (97)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (162)
  • Best of neo-neocon (90)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (583)
  • Dance (287)
  • Disaster (239)
  • Education (320)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (565)
  • Election 2018 (32)
  • Election 2020 (511)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (24)
  • Election 2028 (5)
  • Evil (127)
  • Fashion and beauty (323)
  • Finance and economics (1,015)
  • Food (316)
  • Friendship (47)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (728)
  • Health (1,138)
  • Health care reform (545)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (331)
  • History (700)
  • Immigration (432)
  • Iran (438)
  • Iraq (224)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (797)
  • Jews (423)
  • Language and grammar (361)
  • Latin America (203)
  • Law (2,913)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (124)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,283)
  • Liberty (1,102)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (388)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,476)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (910)
  • Middle East (381)
  • Military (318)
  • Movies (346)
  • Music (526)
  • Nature (255)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (177)
  • Obama (1,736)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (128)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,024)
  • Poetry (255)
  • Political changers (176)
  • Politics (2,775)
  • Pop culture (393)
  • Press (1,618)
  • Race and racism (861)
  • Religion (418)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (625)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (967)
  • Theater and TV (264)
  • Therapy (69)
  • Trump (1,601)
  • Uncategorized (4,391)
  • Vietnam (109)
  • Violence (1,411)
  • War and Peace (992)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑