↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 432 << 1 2 … 430 431 432 433 434 … 1,880 1,881 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Johnny Depp wins

The New Neo Posted on June 1, 2022 by neoJune 1, 2022

I haven’t followed the case in any detail, although a couple of people have told me about it and I’ve read a few articles. But for anyone who’s interested, the verdict was for Depp:

…[The jury returned] a verdict in favor of Depp on all counts. The jury awarded Depp a total of $15 million. Heard was found to have made defamatory statements in the Washington Post on all three counts alleged. The jury also found one statement in Heard’s counterclaim defamatory against Heard and awarded her $2 million. This is not a win for Heard. The jury did not believe any of her claims of abuse. On the single count where they sided with Heard, it appears that the jury did not believe that Heard conspired with friends to create a disturbance on the night police were called to a domestic dispute at her penthouse. The six-week-long trial that captured the nation is finally over. Johnny Depp sued Heard for $50 million after claiming that she lied about him for six years and used her fake story of violence and has been vindicated.

Posted in Law, Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex, Movies | 37 Replies

It turns out the FBI has been very cozy with Perkins Coie

The New Neo Posted on June 1, 2022 by neoJune 1, 2022

More revelations that I predict much of America will ignore or applaud:

In the wake of the risible Sussman verdict, it has emerged that for the last ten years, the FBI has maintained a “secure work environment” within the offices of Perkins Coie, the Democratic Party’s law firm. Marc Elias, the DNC’s top lawyer, was until recently a partner in Perkins Coie. It was Perkins Coie that laundered the money the DNC and the Hillary Clinton campaign paid Fusion GPS for what became the fraudulent Steele “dossier.”

And now we learn that not just in 2016, but four years earlier, dating to the middle of the Obama administration, the FBI had some kind of cozy relationship with the Perkins firm. I have never heard of the FBI maintaining a “secure work environment” inside a private law firm, let alone a private law firm that is best known for representing the Democratic Party. We need to know a great deal more about what was going on here. How was the Bureau collaborating with the Perkins firm? Was the Perkins firm a cut-out that concealed what actually was going on, i.e., collaboration between the FBI and the Democratic National Committee or other Democratic entities? The Bureau needs to come clean.

Excuse me while I guffaw at the idea of the FBI “coming clean.”

In his post that I’ve just quoted, Hinderaker references this piece by Andrew C. McCarthy, which I had read yesterday. Say what you will about McCarthy’s stance on Donald Trump and January 6th (he was outraged by what he considers Trump’s role in it) and also his naivete about government agencies and objectivity at the beginning of the Russiagate investigation, he’s certainly learned his lesson about the FBI. This is from his latest:

Durham has banked his investigation on the premise that the FBI was a victim — an innocent dupe manipulated by the wily Clinton campaign. On Tuesday, this misplaced faith led to the acquittal of Clinton lawyer Michael Sussmann…

As I contended in “Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency,” the outrage of the Trump-Russia “collusion” farce is that the law enforcement and intelligence apparatus of the United States government was put in the service of partisan politics — first to attempt to get Hillary Clinton elected president and, when that failed, to hamstring the Trump administration’s capacity to govern.

That is, what makes Russiagate a uniquely dangerous chapter in modern American history is the willful interference by powerful federal agencies in electoral politics. The real collusion was between the Clinton campaign and the Obama-era executive branch — particularly (but by no means exclusively) the FBI…

The false-statement case against Sussmann is one of three indictments Durham has brought in more than three years of conducting his probe. In each one, the defendant is accused of duping the FBI, not collaborating with the FBI, in an effort to portray Trump as a Kremlin asset…

In Sussmann’s trial, the proof showed that the cover story did not fool the FBI; it enabled the FBI, which was second only to the Clinton campaign in its commitment to pursuing the Trump-Russia “collusion” tale.

Powerful federal agencies interfered in a presidential election, on behalf of one candidate against the other. The public needs accountability for that. It won’t get accountability if Durham continues to portray the FBI as a witless dupe, rather than a willing collaborator.

I think McCarthy makes an important point there about the Sussman trial and the FBI itself in regard to Russiagate. Unfortunately, I think McCarthy is still being naive if he believes the public would get accountability if Durham made it clear that the FBI was a “willing collaborator.”

What would give the FBI “accountability”? At this point I don’t know. But at least public approval of the agency appears to be down. This poll was taken in January of 2022:

A new national telephone and online survey by Rasmussen Reports finds that 46% of Likely U.S. voters have a favorable impression of the FBI, including 15% who have a Very Favorable view of the agency. That’s down from May 2020, when 60% had a favorable impression of the FBI. Forty-seven percent (47%) now view the FBI unfavorably, including 26% who have a Very Unfavorable impression.

That’s a pretty substantial change. But it’s nowhere near enough.

As far as the legal process goes, as long as these cases are brought in DC I don’t see accountability happening. Government agencies are so fraught with bias and corruption that it’s hard to see that anything but some fundamental and perhaps even cataclysmic change could cause accountability to occur, and prevent future government agency offenses of the same nature.

Posted in Law, Politics | Tagged FBI, Russiagate | 27 Replies

Open thread 6/1/22

The New Neo Posted on June 1, 2022 by neoJune 1, 2022

“Rosebud!” said Charles Foster Kane. But not this type of rosebud:

Posted in Uncategorized | 28 Replies

What one Border Patrol agent says about the efforts of officers at Robb Elementary

The New Neo Posted on May 31, 2022 by neoMay 31, 2022

This is from a border patrol agent who rushed to the Uvalde school after getting a frantic text from his wife, a fourth-grade teacher at Robb Elementary. The siege was ongoing at the time [emphasis mine]:

Albarado said he raced to the school…in an effort to save his wife and his daughter, a second grader, and others in his community.

When asked about the scene outside the school during the shooting, which has come under intense scrutiny, Albarado said, “Chaos. Chaos. Everyone was trying to get to the school, people were trying to get everything situated, I was just trying to get toward my wife’s room and my daughter’s room.”

Albarado said that local law enforcement and other members of the Uvalde community recognized him and let him through to help traumatized children climb out of broken windows to escape the school.

“The police were breaking out the windows from the outside and the kids were jumping out through the window,” Albarado said. “As I was coming in I could just see kids coming out the windows and kids coming my way, so I was just helping all the kids out.”…

Albarado disagreed with the idea that local police were not working hard enough to save the children inside.

“To me, I believe everyone there was doing the best that they could given the circumstances,” he said.

I’d like to hear from more officers who were there. Just to take one example, we’ve heard assertions that Border Patrol officers had equipment to breach the door and were told to hold back. I remember reading it myself. And yet just now, in a fairly lengthy search, I can’t find the source. Was it Border Patrol agents themselves? Someone else? I’d like to know, if anyone can locate it. There are so many inaccurate reports that it’s important to sort them out.

One thing I know is that, if the “cowardly inaction” story about Ivalde police turns out to have been untrue, or at least basically untrue, most people will probably continue to believe that it is true. I’ve seen this happen many times before, and it’s certainly not confined to criticisms of the police.

Commenters on this blog have also accused me of trying to exonerate the police of Uvalde. I am not trying to exonerate anyone. I always try to find the truth, and I’ve found over and over again that the truth is often not to be found for quite a while, especially in violent and chaotic situations. Authorities make errors (and/or lie), pundits make errors (and/or lie), and the MSM certainly makes errors (and/or lies).

[NOTE: Here’s another fact that may or may not be true:

Speaking to the New York Post, the source — who wished to remain unnamed — said that [Ramos’] grandmother, 66-year-old Cecilia “Sally” Martinez Gonzales, had been a teacher’s aide at [Robb Elementary], a fact confirmed by public records of employees in the Uvalde Consolidated Independent School District. Though the type and duration of her employment is unclear, she was on the school’s payroll at the time of the incident.

That could certainly be part of the reason this particular school was chosen: it was familiar to the shooter and therefore convenient, and it was also a way to get back at the grandmother (whom he shot in the face) in an even more personally vindictive way.]

Posted in Law, Violence | 25 Replies

Beware of imagining you know more than you do about the Uvalde school shooting

The New Neo Posted on May 31, 2022 by neoMay 31, 2022

I was going to write a huge post on this issue today, but I got busy with other things and decided to postpone it till tomorrow.

But here’s a piece of information (hat tip: commenter “Kate”) that was revealed today that demonstrates one point I was going to make in that post: that the “fog of war” is still heavily operating. Even facts which we think we know for sure about the incident turn out to have been wrong. And there probably will be more revisions and then more revisions before a full report comes out.

Some people will consider these changes CYA lying. And perhaps there is some of that – if so, it wouldn’t be unheard of. But my guess is that a lot of it is simply that piecing together the truth, from hundreds and perhaps even thousands of interviews and videos and recordings, takes time and there are many reversals along the way as more information gets uncovered.

Case in point: the teacher who left the school door propped open. That story, which was reported just about everywhere quite early and didn’t waver (till now), turns out to be only half true, according to recently reviewed video:

Investigators initially said the teacher had propped the door open before Salvador Ramos, 18, entered the school in Uvalde, Texas, on May 24. Investigators have now determined that the teacher, who has not been identified, propped the door open with a rock, but then removed the rock and closed the door when she realized there was a shooter on campus, said Travis Considine, chief communications officer for the Texas Department of Public Safety. But, Considine said, the door did not lock.

Investigators confirmed the detail through additional video footage reviewed since the Friday news conference when it was first stated the door had been left propped open. Authorities did not state at that time what had been used to prop open the door.

Now the question is: why didn’t that door lock? It’s apparently supposed to lock automatically. It’s probably just one of those awful situations in which maintenance wasn’t completely on the ball, or someone had unlocked it at some time in the past, and then in a crisis the error is revealed.

Horrible. But at least the teacher needn’t feel quite the level of guilt that I was previously imagining she (I’d heard it was a she, but who knows at this point?) would be feeling. However, she’s probably feeling very guilty about not having double-checked to see whether the door actually locked behind her. My guess is that she was probably shaking with fear and in a mental state of panic, however, eager to get inside as fast as possible, and that she just made what she thought was a valid assumption about that door lock.

Posted in Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe, Violence | 27 Replies

The Etute trial

The New Neo Posted on May 31, 2022 by neoMay 31, 2022

Ever hear of it? I hadn’t heard of this case until today when commenter “j e” wrote a comment about the verdict in the second degree murder case, which was an acquittal.

The facts of the case are both disturbing and of the type that one would think would mean that the case would get very widespread sensationalist coverage in the media. The fact that – at least as far as I know – it’s gotten mostly local coverage is interesting. And yet it’s got racial angles and sexual angles, and the story slightly resembles the plot of the movie “The Crying Game” gone even more horribly, horrifically wrong.

Here’s a summary

A jury found former Virginia Tech football player Isimemen “Isi” Etute not guilty of second-degree murder Friday in the death of Blacksburg resident Jerry Paul Smith.

The verdict was rendered after a three-day trial in Montgomery County Circuit Court that occurred almost a year after the beating death of Smith, 40, who posed as a woman named “Angie Renee” and matched with Etute on Tinder. Etute’s attorneys argued self-defense after an altercation between the two in Smith’s apartment when he was revealed to be a man…

Etute and Smith had an initial sexual encounter in April 2021 in Smith’s downtown Blacksburg apartment during which he, presenting as Angie, performed oral sex on Etute, who was a freshman linebacker at the time. After discovering upon a second meeting with Angie on May 31 last year that it was not a woman but Smith, a man, Etute said he struck Smith several times and kicked him as he left Smith’s apartment.

Upon questioning from Jensen, forensic pathology specialist Dr. Amy Tharp described a brutal beating that left nearly every bone in Smith’s face broken, his brain swollen and teeth knocked out. Jensen noted the size difference between Etute, who is 6 feet 2 ½ and over 200 pounds, and the 153-pound Smith.

“Only two people know what happened in that room and one of them is dead,” Jensen said during his closing argument.

Please read this article as well. Excerpt:

[Etute’s defense lawyer] Turk also said Smith was “controlling the entire environment and the entire episode.” He added that Smith had “demanded that it be dark” and had hidden a knife under his mattress “in case there was something awry.”…

Turk also argued that [Etute didn’t initially mention to police that he thought Smith was reaching for a knife or that he had fear of Smith because] police didn’t ask Etute essential questions about Smith’s knife or Etute’s fear while in the apartment, two questions whose answers could have shown whether Etute was afraid for his life and acting in self-defense.

In taking the stand earlier in the week, Etute had testified that he felt “violated” when he discovered that the Tinder match he believed to be a woman was actually a man.

In his testimony Thursday, Etute had testified that Smith reached for what Etute thought was a gun. Smith did not own a gun, but police reported finding a knife between the man’s mattress and box spring.

Etute said he punched Smith five times and kicked him to gain time to escape the apartment.

Jensen had maintained that Etute had not acted in self-defense. He argued that after Etute punched Smith and Smith fell to the floor, there was “no way” Smith could have reached a weapon under his mattress.

“He could never reach a gun from there,” Jensen said.

Jensen recalled the testimony of medical examiner Dr. Amy Tharp, who Jensen said testified Smith had been the victim of a “brutal beating.”

Jensen said that while Etute was wearing flip-flops at the time of the encounter, those shoes were attached to a “big person” and a “strong person.” He compared Etute, an “elite college athlete,” to Smith, who weighed 153 pounds (just under 70 kilograms).

“That’s a big disparity,” Jensen said.

It seems odd to me that Etute wouldn’t have initially mentioned to police that he feared for his life if in fact that was the case. I don’t know enough of the details of the evidence to what I would have voted had I been on the jury, but I do wonder whether the verdict would have been the same had the races been reversed – that is, if a huge, young, strong, athletic white man had beaten to death a small somewhat older transgender black man posing as a woman.

I wonder, but I think I know that answer: the verdict would have been “guilty” or the jury would have been hung, and the case would have gotten a great deal more national publicity than it did.

Posted in Law, Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex, Race and racism, Violence | 14 Replies

The Sussman jury

The New Neo Posted on May 31, 2022 by neoMay 31, 2022

I already wrote a post today on the Sussman acquittal, but I thought I’d give one subtopic its own post as well. It concerns the following, which I read in this piece (hat tip commenter “Barry Meislin”):

The jury unanimously found Sussmann not guilty.

“I don’t think it should have been prosecuted,” one juror told reporters.

“There are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI.”

There are probably “bigger things that affect the nation” than the content of any one trial. But that should never be a consideration for any juror.

Jonathan Turley responds:

“Telling a lie to the FBI was the entire basis for the prosecution. It was the jury’s job to determine the fact of such a lie and its materiality.

…Of course, this statement can be a simple criticism of the underlying charge without admitting to bias in weighing the elements. Yet, it would have prompted a challenge in the courtroom if expressed during jury selection.”

Of course it was not expressed during jury selection.

There’s also this:

TURLEY: “I mean, he is facing a jury that has three Clinton donors, an AOC donor, and a woman whose daughter is on the same sports team with Sussmann’s daughter. With the exception of randomly selecting people out of the DNC headquarters, you could not come up with a worse jury” pic.twitter.com/RHqen6AMAc

— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) May 26, 2022

Just to review the facts of the case:

On the facts, there was more than sufficient evidence to prove Sussmann’s guilt. Sussmann lied to then-FBI general counsel James Baker in order to get a meeting to pass the Alfa Bank hoax materials to the FBI. Sussmann lied again during the meeting – stating he was not there on behalf of a client – in order to get the FBI to open an investigation into the Trump Organization’s purported ties with Alfa Bank. Later, during testimony to Congress, Sussmann admitted he met with Baker on behalf of a client. Billing records proved he had been working on the Alfa Bank project on behalf of the Clinton Campaign…

The popular leftist narrative goes “who cares what Sussman told Baker? Everyone knew he was working for the Clinton campaign.” It’s flawed because it’s asking the wrong question.

The right question is “would Baker have passed on Sussman’s data to investigators had Sussman informed him he was there representing the Clinton campaign?” The answer is no. In fact Baker said he wouldn’t have even taken the meeting…

Sussman didn’t lie just to give himself cover. He lied so BAKER would have cover to hand the data over to Cyber Division. In fact the lie was necessary BECAUSE “everyone knew” Sussman was working for the Clinton campaign. Including Sussman.

As I said before, this verdict was expected. A guilty verdict would have been an utter shock.

ADDENDUM:

Please read Ace’s take on the matter. Some particularly succinct observations:

The FBI’s corruption has the side-effect of rendering its co-conspirators immune from prosecution…

In other words: Sure, there was a lie here. And that lie was told by the senior leadership of the FBI. Blame them, not Sussman.

Can’t say that argument is without merit.

At some point, the system becomes so corrupt it becomes incapable of producing outcomes that are anything other than corruption. That’s where we are now.

Indeed. And we’ve been there for many years – at least since 2008 and probably earlier.

Posted in Law | Tagged Russiagate | 12 Replies

Sussman acquitted

The New Neo Posted on May 31, 2022 by neoMay 31, 2022

In a move that should surprise absolutely no one, a jury in DC acquitted Hillary Clinton’s campaign lawyer Michael Sussman, who had been accused of lying to the FBI.

The reason this result is no surprise is because the trial was in DC. Washington DC is what you might call a company town – the company being “the Swamp” and in particular the Democratic Party. What’s more, some jury members had ties to people involved in the case (see information at the link), but I think it’s highly likely that any DC jury would have acquitted even without such ties.

The trial had the advantage of spelling out some very bad stuff on the part of Clinton, Sussman, and the FBI, but only for those inclined to pay close attention, which is only a small percentage of the American people. For those on the left, the trial’s outcome will almost undoubtedly be used to claim innocence on the part of those who orchestrated and executed Russiagate.

The law ordinarily cannot save a system so corrupted.

It also occurs to me, and not for the first time, that the only reason the Watergate conspirators were convicted was that they were on the Republican side. In addition, although many had formerly been in the CIA (or in Liddy’s case the FBI), they weren’t working on behalf of those agencies when they perpetrated Watergate. Last but not least, they were guilty of more obvious crimes of the conventional type, and that’s what their convictions were about: burglary, wiretapping, and conspiracy around those things.

The Russiagate conspiracy was far wider, involved members of government agencies working supposedly on behalf of those agencies, was perpetrated by Democrats and others who didn’t like Trump, and didn’t involve the same sort of obvious crimes as Watergate even though Russiagate was far worse and far more dangerous, in my opinion.

ADDENDUM: On today’s open thread I noticed the following from John Tyler in the comments, referring to the Sussman acquittal:

Is it because it is not illegal to create a fictional narrative to slander and destroy a political opponent?

Or is it because, the conspirators are all so versed in the law, they know how and what to do and not be in violation of any laws?

That’s what I was getting at in this post when I compared the Russiagate perps to the Watergate perps. Russiagate was incredibly widespread, sophisticated, and coordinated exercise in which many of the perps were lawyers and knew exactly what they were doing. They never expected to be caught. But in the off chance that they were caught, they knew they almost certainly were safe from conviction for a host of reasons.]

Posted in History, Law | Tagged FBI, Russiagate, Watergate | 8 Replies

Open thread 5/31/22

The New Neo Posted on May 31, 2022 by neoMay 31, 2022

Wow:

Posted in Uncategorized | 68 Replies

For Memorial Day

The New Neo Posted on May 30, 2022 by neoMay 30, 2022

I’ve posted this song before, but I think it bears repeating, especially on Memorial Day.

It’s Tim McGraw’s extraordinarily moving song “If You’re Reading This“:

If you’re readin’ this
My momma’s sittin’ there
Looks like I only got a one way ticket over here.
I sure wish I could give you one more kiss
War was just a game we played when we were kids
Well I’m layin’ down my gun
I’m hanging up my boots
I’m up here with God and we’re both watchin’ over you

So lay me down
In that open field out on the edge of town
And know my soul
Is where my momma always prayed that it would go.
If you’re readin’ this I’m already home…

The first time I ever heard the song I got the chills as the lyrics unfolded and I realized what it was about, and then again and again as the heartstrings were jerked harder and harder as the song went on.

Most of us do, or should, feel a very strong gratitude to the men and women who sacrificed their lives to defend liberty here and abroad, and a very strong sorrow that it was necessary. On Memorial Day, we thank them.

Posted in Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe, Military, Music | 26 Replies

Open thread 5/30/22

The New Neo Posted on May 30, 2022 by neoMay 30, 2022

“A jury consists of twelve persons chosen to decide who has the better lawyer.”

—Robert Frost

Posted in Uncategorized | 19 Replies

The girl who played dead in Uvalde

The New Neo Posted on May 28, 2022 by neoMay 28, 2022

You’ve probably already heard of one fourth-grader in Uvalde who smeared herself with the blood of her dead friend, intending to pretend to be dead herself if the shooter returned to her classroom from the adjoining room where he was at the time.

I consider this an impressive display of resourcefulness and composure in one so young. From where did she get the idea? Movies? Pretend play? She was incredibly brave – and she also is the girl who took her dead teacher’s cellphone from the body and made many 911 calls describing the situation and asking for help.

This girl and her surviving classmates have witnessed and experienced an encounter with the deepest evil, and that is difficult for anyone much less a child of her age. She is understandably traumatized and will need to learn how to see herself as a heroine – which she is – rather than as a victim. It will take time, but I hope she makes it.

The interview with this girl is hard to even hear about. She is neither shown nor heard in the video, except for a still photo from the past; what she said in the interview is described by the interviewer, but that’s bad enough.

The killing of her teacher is one of the most chilling parts of the story the girl tells, and once again it illustrates what I consider to be the psychological sadism of the killer. It reminds me of some of the things the Columbine killers said to their victims, grim cinema-like “jokes” as though playing a role in a violent movie. It bolsters my previous belief that Ramos was a psychopath, although “psychopath” is merely a descriptive word that tells us little to nothing about how a person becomes one.

A couple of things this girl’s interview makes clear is that the school went on lockdown very early. You will see when you watch it that the murdered teacher was just about to lock the door when she encountered the killer. Another thing that is made clear is that the girl made the 911 calls while the murderer was in an adjacent room; that might explain why he didn’t hear her and come back to kill her, which I had wondered about earlier. The effectiveness of her act of smearing blood on herself in order to effectively play dead was never tested because apparently the perp never returned to her room.

[NOTE: By the way, why are there so many girls among the dead? Did the perp especially target girls? Or was it just by chance? Five boys and fourteen girls died. I don’t know the breakdown of boys and girls among the wounded.]

Posted in Evil, Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe, Violence | 45 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Snow on Pine on Open thread 5/5/2026
  • Cappy on Did the press get a wake-up call at the Correspondents’ Dinner?
  • Irishotter49 on Rudy Giuliani is very ill with pneumonia
  • om on Small changes in Europe?
  • strepthroat on Small changes in Europe?

Recent Posts

  • Open thread 5/5/2026
  • Small changes in Europe?
  • The parking permit blues
  • Rudy Giuliani is very ill with pneumonia
  • Open thread 5/4/2026

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (319)
  • Afghanistan (97)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (162)
  • Best of neo-neocon (90)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (583)
  • Dance (287)
  • Disaster (239)
  • Education (320)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (565)
  • Election 2018 (32)
  • Election 2020 (511)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (24)
  • Election 2028 (5)
  • Evil (127)
  • Fashion and beauty (323)
  • Finance and economics (1,015)
  • Food (316)
  • Friendship (47)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (728)
  • Health (1,138)
  • Health care reform (545)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (331)
  • History (700)
  • Immigration (432)
  • Iran (437)
  • Iraq (224)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (797)
  • Jews (423)
  • Language and grammar (361)
  • Latin America (203)
  • Law (2,913)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (124)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,283)
  • Liberty (1,102)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (388)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,476)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (910)
  • Middle East (381)
  • Military (318)
  • Movies (346)
  • Music (526)
  • Nature (255)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (177)
  • Obama (1,736)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (128)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,024)
  • Poetry (255)
  • Political changers (176)
  • Politics (2,775)
  • Pop culture (393)
  • Press (1,618)
  • Race and racism (861)
  • Religion (418)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (625)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (967)
  • Theater and TV (264)
  • Therapy (69)
  • Trump (1,601)
  • Uncategorized (4,391)
  • Vietnam (109)
  • Violence (1,411)
  • War and Peace (991)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑