↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home 1 2 3 … 1,931 1,932 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post

Potemkin: the Odessa steps scene

The New Neo Posted on October 31, 2026 by neoOctober 31, 2026

The movie Potemkin came up in the comments recently. It’s a film I recall seeing when I was in college or grad school, shown by one of those film societies that specialized in famous old films. Potemkin qualifies as both famous and old, having been made in 1925.

But although I know I watched it, the only thing I can remember from the movie is what I think of as the baby carriage scene. It turns out it’s usually referred to as the Odessa steps scene. I have no recollection of the plot, a summary of which you can find here, and where I learned (or re-learned?) that the movie is actually called Battleship Potemkin:

Battleship Potemkin is a 1925 Soviet silent epic film produced by Mosfilm. Directed and co-written by Sergei Eisenstein, it presents a dramatization of the mutiny that occurred in 1905 when the crew of the Russian battleship Potemkin rebelled against their officers.

The film is a prime example of the Soviet montage theory of editing, such as in the “Odessa Steps” scene, which became widely influential and often recreated. In 1958, the film was voted on Brussels 12 list at the 1958 World Expo. Battleship Potemkin is widely considered one of the greatest films ever made.

As I said, I remember nothing of it except that scene. And of course, YouTube being YouTube, I was able to refresh my memory by watching that segment. It’s still very disturbing and powerful, and represents pretty much the invention of the montage technique by Eisenstein. See what you think:

Eisenstein was a fervent Soviet supporter at the beginning of Communist rule, but not a Stalin fan later on. This particular Odessa steps scene apparently never happened that way in real life; it’s basically propaganda:

The massacre on the steps, although it did not take place in daylight or as portrayed, was based on the fact that there were widespread riots in other parts of the city, sparked off by the arrival of the Potemkin in Odessa Harbour. Both The Times and the resident British consul reported that troops fired on the rioters; deaths were reportedly in the hundreds. Roger Ebert writes, “That there was, in fact, no tsarist massacre on the Odessa Steps scarcely diminishes the power of the scene … It is ironic that [Eisenstein] did it so well that today, the bloodshed on the Odessa steps is often referred to as if it really happened.

Odessa was a mess at the time, with a great deal of political turmoil and violence. There was also an anti-Jewish pogrom a few months later in Odessa that killed even more people [my emphasis]:

Most modern-day historians argue that pre-1881 pogroms [in Odessa] were “largely the product of frictions unleashed by modernization”, rather than a resurgence of medieval antisemitism. The 1905 pogrom was markedly larger in scale, with over 500 casualties (80% Jewish), 300 injuries, and over 1600 homes and businesses damaged, and with heightened antisemitism spurred by economic and political turmoil.

Historians believe the police and hospital figures were likely an underestimate, with a range of estimates from likely over 800, to over 1000 killed, and approximately over 2000 or even up to 5000 wounded. Even the pre-20th century incidents were incited by perennial antisemitic tropes such as rumors of Jewish desecration of the church, conspiracy theories of Jewish complicity in assassinating the tsar or the patriarch, and blood libels.

While most modern-day historians do not believe there is credible evidence that the tsarist state actively sponsored or centrally planned the pogroms, the tsar and his advisors created an environment of sanctioned antisemitism, toleration and leniency toward pogromists, and blamed Jews themselves for the events. Local authorities often failed to intervene, or in some cases actively abetted or perpetrated further violence.

What was the connection – if any – between the 1905 Potemkin killings in June and the anti-Jewish pogrom later that year? See this:

Yet fear of an impending pogrom resurfaced in June in the aftermath of a general strike and disorders occasioned by the arrival of the battleship Potemkin. On 13 June Cossacks shot several workers from metalworking and machine-construction factories who had been on strike since the beginning of May. Workers retaliated on 14 June by engaging in massive work stoppages and attacking the police with guns and rocks, but the arrival of the Potemkin that night diverted the workers from further confrontation with their employers and the government. On 15 June instead of intensifying the strike, thousands of Odessans jammed the port district in order to view the battleship and rally behind the mutinous sailors. By late afternoon some members of the crowd began to ransack warehouses and set fire to the harbor’s wooden buildings. Although available sources do not allow a precise determination of the composition of the rioters, partial arrest records reveal that non-Jewish vagrants, dockworkers, and other day laborers comprised the majority. To suppress the unrest, the military cordoned off the harbor and opened fire on the trapped crowd. By the next morning well over 1,000 people had died, victims of either the soldiers’ bullets or the fire which consumed the harbor.

Not on the Odessa steps – but still, the above paragraph seems to be describing what the Odessa steps scene in the movie was trying to convey (minus the ransacking of warehouses and the fire set by members of the crowd, and minus the deaths caused by the fire).

More:

During these disorders rumors of an impending pogrom once again surfaced, as right-wing agitators attempted to incite Russian workers against the Jews. On 20 June, only a few days after the massacre, a virulently antisemitic, four-page broadside entitled Odesskie dni appeared. The tract blamed the Jews, in particular the National Committee of Jewish Self-Defense and secondary school students, for the recent disorders and the tragedy at the port.

Accusing the Jews of fomenting the unrest and enlisting the support of unwitting Russians, the author of the broadside stated that Jews initiated the shootings on 14 and 15 June and were responsible for setting fire to the port.

Further events at the time are described at the link. It’s long and complex, but the whole thing culminated in a terrible 10/7-style pogrom in Odessa in November of 1905. There is no doubt that Jews were well-represented among the political agitators involved in the leftist (anti-Tsar) side of the initial and ongoing unrest (about a third of Odessa’s population at the time was Jewish). But the pogrom killed uninvolved Jews indiscriminately and viciously.

Watching the movie clip on YouTube, I’m struck by both the operatic style of the close-ups as well as the realistic feeling of the violence. It’s hard to believe people weren’t really hurt creating that scene, but there’s no record of any problems of that sort.

Posted in Jews, Movies, Violence | Tagged Ukraine | 5 Replies

Pelosi walks the tightrope on Mamdani and El-Sayed

The New Neo Posted on October 31, 2026 by neoOctober 31, 2026

Shorter version of what Pelosi said: Mamdani and El-Sayed are awful and they are wrong on Israel. But be sure to vote for them anyway.

Excerpt:

[Interviewer] “When you say Israel doesn’t have the right to be a Jewish state, that’s antisemitic as far as I’m concerned with all that,” Deutsch told Pelosi.

When Deutsch pointed to Mamdani and El-Sayed as examples, Pelosi didn’t mince words.

“No, it’s more than concerning,” she responded. “It’s wrong. It’s wrong. And it isn’t a reflection of the Democrats in the Congress of the United States.”

Oh no? It has become standard for Democrats at this point, although Pelosi doesn’t want voters (especially Jewish voters and most particularly Jewish donors) to notice.

But hey, vote for El-Sayed anyway or the big bad Republicans might win:

Nicholas Martin, spokesperson for Pelosi, however, told The Post Friday that Pelosi still “urged everyone in Michigan and across America to support Abdul El-Sayed.”

No glaring contradiction there, right? Because Democrats will be doing great things:

“While they may disagree with [El-Sayed] on some issues, [Pelosi] is united with him in the fight to lower costs, protect healthcare and defend our democracy,” Martin said in a statement.

None of which the Democrats have any intention of doing or any recent record of doing.

That sort of thing explains why Pelosi didn’t support Omar recently, either; I mentioned that fact in this recent post. I strongly doubt her stance is about principle, it’s about retaining Jewish votes in the midterms.

Speaking of El-Sayed:

This might just be the best video on the internet.

Reporter: “What has attracted you to the Mike Rogers campaign?”

Detroit voter: “Well, he’s an American.” https://t.co/7zN41YtbP4

— Jack (@jackunheard) October 30, 2026

That second guy is, at least for the moment, a political changer. Let’s hope he is not alone.

NOTE: And then there’s El-Sayed supporter Hasan Piker, who recently said:

Abdul El-Sayed surrogate Hasan Piker crashes out over El-Sayed’s canvassers knocking doors in West Bloomfield, Michigan.

Piker compares it to “going to that like Klan KKK neighborhood to stump for like a Black candidate.”

“It’s racial supremacy. It’s Jewish supremacy. What do you think it is? Yeah, clip it and post it.”

Piker, a dual citizen who grew up in Turkey, then rages at a Jewish Democrat in Oakland County who says she is voting for Mike Rogers: “If it’s so dangerous, go live in Israel… You f*** ing idiot. You f*** ing moron… You f***ing psycho.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Replies

The Polish conflict seems to be about control of the nation’s high court

The New Neo Posted on October 31, 2026 by neoOctober 31, 2026

I’m not any sort of expert on Polish politics, so I’m relying on newspaper stories to fill me in. It’s not easy to sort out, but here’s a summary:

A long-running political dispute over the Constitutional Tribunal has effectively paralysed the institution, with the pro-European government and the nationalist president refusing to recognise appointees put forward by the other side.

Tusk, writing on X, said his government was ?seeking to restore the rule of law, which the European Union had accused his predecessors — the Law and Justice Party — of subverting.

Tusk is the Polish prime minister, and the conflict is with the Polish President Karol Nawrocki. European designations of “left” and “right” are so different from ours that I hesitate to use the terms, but I’ll tentatively say that Tusk is more to the left and Nawrocki more to the right. Not-always-helpful Google AI calls Tusk “center-right” but adds that he is allied with progressive and “center-left” parties. As for Nawrocki, he is called “far-right” here, but in Europe that seems to be applied to most people on the right who want to limit immigration. But Tusk is in agreement on limiting illegal immigration; perhaps that’s why he’s called “center-right”?

So, what is the dispute about besides power? The party that controls the high court controls the country? Perhaps to a certain extent – also true of the US, which is why the Democrats wish to pack the Court, and if they control the Senate and any SCOTUS judge dies or wishes to retire in the next two years, they will not approve his or her Trump-appointed successor.

More on the Polish crisis:

Poland’s Constitutional Tribunal (TK) was plunged into chaos on Friday evening as one group of judges, backed by the government, moved to take control of the court from its chief justice, who is aligned with the right-wing opposition and President Karol Nawrocki.

One of the government-backed judges said that she had suspended the chief justice, Bogdan Swiczkowski, from his duties. Police have surrounded the court and were seen preventing Swiczkowski from entering the grounds after his supporters had cut through the fence with a power tool.

Swiczkowski and the opposition claim that an illegal “coup d’état” is underway. Nawrocki, who had been flying to Senegal for a state visit, ordered his plane to turn around and return to Warsaw.

But what led up to the present situation?:

The dramatic events follow a years-long crisis surrounding the TK. Since the current government – a coalition ranging from left to centre right led by Prime Minister Donald Tusk – came to power in 2023, it has refused to recognise the court’s legitimacy.

That is because three of its judges were unlawfully appointed under the former national-conservative Law and Justice (PiS) government, which was widely seen to have brought the court under political control.

As a result, Tusk’s government has ignored the TK’s rulings and, until this year, refused to even nominate new judges to fill vacancies that arose on the court’s 15-person bench.

The article goes on and on in that vein, but try to figure out who might be acting correctly and you might run into trouble, as I did. Suffice to say it’s a nasty power struggle and has been going on for a while, with each side accusing the other of lawlessness.

However, if I were forced to choose a side, it wouldn’t be Tusk’s.

Posted in Law | 21 Replies

Open thread 10/31/2026

The New Neo Posted on October 31, 2026 by neoOctober 31, 2026

Try try again:

Posted in Uncategorized | 15 Replies

I wouldn’t want Bari Weiss’s job

The New Neo Posted on October 30, 2026 by neoOctober 30, 2026

Which is fortunate, because it will never be offered to me.

But what a thankless task, to tell biased leftist “journalists” they need to cover an important story that reflects poorly on Democrats:

CBS News editor-in-chief Bari Weiss faced “significant resistance” from staff at Thursday’s 9 a.m. meeting about the growing Alaska ballot controversy, network insiders told Fox News Digital.

“This is a scandal,” Weiss declared to staff.

According to multiple sources on the call, several CBS News staffers pushed back at Weiss’ enthusiasm over the bombshell New York Times report alleging Democrats schemed to find a Dan Sullivan to run against incumbent Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan, in hopes of aiding Democratic opponent Mary Peltola.

My question is quite simple, though: why did The New York Times cover it? What’s going on there?

And here the Ruthless podcast guys try to answer that question. They provide a fair amount of detail, but the gist of what they say is that the Democrat operatives in charge of the ploy had previously lied to the Times reporters, and the reporters got angry about having been duped:

Posted in Election 2026, Press | 16 Replies

Did the Israeli Arab parties commit election fraud?

The New Neo Posted on October 30, 2026 by neoOctober 30, 2026

See this (it’s a translation from the Hebrew, so attempts to embed it end up with a Hebrew version). Here’s what it says in English [my emphasis]:

Likud: The elections in the State of Israel were stolen by Arab parties that support terrorism and the elimination of the Jewish state through serious criminal offenses of bribery, threats, violence, forgeries, and the use of prohibited software to mobilize voters.

The Likud party is transferring to the police, the Shin Bet, and the Central Elections Committee hundreds of testimonies and pieces of evidence regarding election theft in many Arab polling stations—thousands of envelopes with cash and Ra’am slips, threats and violence against polling station members, multiple voting behind the curtain, voting with double identities, discrepancies between the number of envelopes and the number of voters, the use of prohibited mobilization software, and more.

We demand from the police and the Shin Bet a thorough investigation into the election theft by the Arab parties and the full prosecution of the criminals.

We demand from the Central Elections Committee an immediate response to investigate these criminal offenses that have severely damaged the integrity of the elections in Israel and the election results.

This is a serious blow to Israeli democracy and the voting rights of Israeli citizens. The law enforcement agencies must act with an iron fist and in an immediate manner.

There are interesting comments at the link, mostly of the “loser, loser!” variety. And yet Netanyahu didn’t actually lose, although he lost seats compared to his majority win in the 2022 election. That majority victory, however, was a rare event in recent Israeli elections; a stalemate has been much more common. His party is the leading party now and his coalition the leading bloc and therefore may be the most likely to be able to form some sort of coalition government.

Twenty percent of Israeli citizens are Arabs, something the Israel-haters ignore except when they want to say that Israeli Arabs are persecuted. But they vote and have Knesset representation. In the recent election the Arab parties did much better than expected, and the question is why.

If there’s evidence of fraud, it needs to be heard. Of course, the left says it’s racist to even consider the question.

Posted in Election 2026, Israel/Palestine | Tagged Benjamin Netanyahu | 16 Replies

RIP Patrick Stewart

The New Neo Posted on October 30, 2026 by neoOctober 30, 2026

Actor Patrick Stewart has died at 86, “after a brief battle with Alzheimer’s disease and Lewy Body dementia.” Terrible diseases both.

Stewart had a commanding presence (he was Caption Jean-Luc Picard, after all) and a sonorous voice. His career was long and varied, although I confess it’s really only the Picard role for which I know him.

RIP.

Posted in Uncategorized | 18 Replies

It’s candy corn day

The New Neo Posted on October 30, 2026 by neoOctober 30, 2026

[NOTE: This post is a slightly-edited repeat of a post.]

No, I didn’t make it up. It really is National Candy Corn Day, the day “the nation celebrates its favorite vegetable.”

No doubt all of my readers, being unusually well-informed people, were already aware of that. But did you know it is estimated that in this country thirty-five million pounds of the classic treat (invented in the 1880s) are sold every year? And by the way, my original post from 2008 had the number at twenty million, according to the same Wiki link, so the number had nearly doubled by 2016, the year of the most recent update at the site.

I personally might be responsible for approximately a ton of that if I gave in to my worst impulses. However, I keep my addiction in tightly-controlled check.

It is part of my penance to confess here that I really love the dreadful stuff and always have, and I’m far from alone (my impression is that candy corn is one of those things a person either loves or hates). Years ago I even went to a Halloween party dressed as a piece of candy corn, and believe me I was already a grownup. I did it again last year and in fact, I’m planning to dress that way again this year. The first time I did it, no one guessed what I was supposed to be, although I thought it was obvious.

Apparently I am not the only adult who has dressed up as candy corn on Halloween. And no, I didn’t look like this—more’s the pity (although to be technical, isn’t she dressed as two pieces of candy corn, the body and the hat?):

candycorncostume.gif

I heard on Fox News (can’t give a link here because I was unable to find the information online) that candy corn is the Halloween treat most often stolen by parents from their kids’ Halloween stash. I believe this to be undeniably true. It is a guilty, shameful secret for most, but I am glad this is finally seeing the light of day.

There are various gourmet variations on candy corn, and I’ve sampled quite a few in my day. A helpful reader sent me some information about this Brach product for example, which includes:

Green Beans, Roasted Turkey, Cranberry Sauce, Stuffing, Apple Pie and Coffee. (Fans of Ginger Glazed Carrots, which were part of last year’s batch, should note that flavor is gone.)

I had tried the earlier version, and it was terrible. This sounds even worse. It’s the good old Brach’s original candy corn that I continue to crave; there is no other brand worth eating, and believe me I’ve tried many a substitute. The Brach’s version been sold out where I live for quite some time, but I purchased it early.

And here’s a burning question: do you eat your candy corn in sections? And, if so, do you consider the top to be the yellow part or the white part? I’ve always seen the little white triangle as the “foot” of the candy corn, but I learned when I designed my costume years ago that most people see it the other way. For those who might be inclined to disagree with me, I offer the following exhibit from the realm of science; the kernel grows with the tip – corresponding to the white part of the candy – down, embedded in the cob:

corn-components.jpg

I have noticed this year – 2026 – that candy corn sold out in most stores very very early. For weeks I haven’t seen it anywhere. Probably a blessing in disguise.

Posted in Food, Me, myself, and I | 16 Replies

Open thread 10/30/2026

The New Neo Posted on October 30, 2026 by neoOctober 30, 2026

Posted in Uncategorized | 12 Replies

Could this be the most common method for living past 100?

The New Neo Posted on October 29, 2026 by neoOctober 29, 2026

It’s rather grotesque. And who would have thought this practice would be popular in Japan, of all places?:

Fraud is rampant everywhere, it seems:

In 2010, welfare officials in Tokyo tried to visit Sogen Kato, a local man living in the city’s Adachi district, to congratulate him on his 111th birthday. Their records identified him as the oldest man in the city, but his family kept turning them away, saying he didn’t want visitors or had taken a trip somewhere five hours away.

When police finally entered the house, they found Kato’s mummified remains lying in bed, dressed in pajamas and covered with a blanket. He’d been dead for at least 30 years, although his family claimed he’d shut himself away to become a living Buddha.

His pension kept paying, and someone withdrew 2.7 million yen, about $31,000 at the time, after officials started asking questions. …

“This prompted the Japanese Ministry of Justice to check in on other centenarians: not just in Tokyo but across all Japan,” writes scientist Saul Justin Newman in his new book, “Morbid: Debunking Modern Longevity Science” …

Across Japan, the audit identified 234,354 people still on family registers whose whereabouts couldn’t be confirmed. All would have been at least 100 if alive. Newman describes them as dead or missing and puts their share at more than 82% of the recorded centenarian population.

His findings have been disputed, however, and some researchers say there were only 600 such “missing” centenarians. That’s 600 too many, I’d say.

The whole thing reminds me of a bit of the Faulkner story “A Rose for Emily.”

Posted in Finance and economics, Health | Tagged Japan | 16 Replies

Another changer heard from – plus, poll of Jewish voters

The New Neo Posted on October 29, 2026 by neoOctober 29, 2026

For this woman and former Democrat, who had believed Obama would be a fabulous president, it was Obamacare that started her political change experience.

Does the following sound familiar?:

Changing your political beliefs is not easy. It’s especially difficult when you’ve invested years of your life believing that your side consists of the Good Guys. If your side is the Good Guys, then the other side must be the Bad Guys. And if the Bad Guys turn out to have been right about something important, you have a problem.

You can either reconsider your beliefs or construct an elaborate series of excuses explaining why reality is being unfair.

She made excuses to herself for a while. But eventually she had trouble doing that:

… I had to admit something. I had been wrong.

I had been wrong about enough important things that I could no longer pretend otherwise, and I changed my political allegiance. I could no longer pretend.

That was about eleven years ago. You might think this would be the end of the story.

HA HA HA.

No. Because the Democratic Party had decided that the Obama years were merely the warm-up act.

Well, yes. Then again, a great many Democrats seem to be able to either continue to make excuses for the party, or to embrace the changes.

And speaking of political changers, here’s a poll that might reflect something real (although as I’ve said many times, polls have gotten iffier and iffier):

Republicans lead Democrats by 31 points among Jewish voters on the congressional ballot, according to a McLaughlin & Associates poll that points to a potential shift among a group that has long favored Democrats.

The poll found that 64 percent of Jewish voters backed Republicans for Congress, while 33 percent supported Democrats, pollsters John and Jim McLaughlin wrote in an article published by the firm Monday.

The result would mark a major shift from the large margins by which Jewish voters have traditionally favored Democrats, though pollsters John and Jim McLaughlin warned that the sample of Jewish voters was small.

Of course, as I’ve written many times, the definition of “Jewish” in the case of US voters is not a religious one, it’s an ethnic one. The more religious a Jew is, the more likely to vote for conservatives. Or, as CBD at Ace’s wrote today:

When a Christian rejects his religion, does not follow its precepts, is openly antagonistic to those who follow Christ, we call him an atheist. When so-called Jews reject their religion, do not follow its precepts, are openly antagonistic to those who follow the Torah, we call them…Jews? Why? Because they have Jewish names and eat bagels and lox on Sunday mornings? I eat fish most Fridays…does that mean I am Catholic?

Well, being Jewish is different from adhering to Judaism, because Jews are also a people. I’ve written about this and related topics before, for example here.

Posted in Election 2026, Jews, Political changers | 19 Replies

Ilhan Omar’s problems seem to have reached critical mass

The New Neo Posted on October 29, 2026 by neoOctober 29, 2026

So much so that some Democrats seem to be abandoning her, at least somewhat.

Funny thing is that people on the right – and particularly anyone who regularly reads Powerline – have known for many many years most if not all of the facts now coming out in the MSM about Omar (including her probable real name, but for simplicity’s sake I will continue to call her Omar for now). The evidence Powerline presented was really quite overwhelming. And yet it was ignored by the mainstream – till now.

Why have forty Democrats suddenly decided that Omar may not be worth fighting for?:

On Monday, 175 House Democrats signed a letter penned by Rep. Pramila Jayapal (WA-07) that accused the DOJ and DHS of weaponizing law enforcement. …

But take note of who did not want to be associated with the circus: 40 Dems, including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (CA-11) and several lawmakers in the New York/New Jersey area. Why?

Those non-signers who are from New York and New Jersey might be abstaining because both states have many Jewish voters and signing it would have hurt their re-election chances. But Nancy Pelosi didn’t sign it either – why?

However, even if Omar is somehow removed from Congress, it’s virtually certain that she would be replaced by another Democrat – perhaps even another Democrat of Somali ethnicity. So I don’t see that there’s all that much risk for Democrats to abandon her; it ultimately wouldn’t affect Democrat totals in Congress.

And I don’t want to make too much of this. After all, the vast majority of Democrats in the House signed that letter.

[ADDENDUM: Also, an Obama-era investigation found that Omar had committed fraud but decided not to pursue the matter. Fancy that – a completely nonpolitical decision, I’m sure.]

Posted in Law, Politics | Tagged Ilhan Omar | 17 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Luis S Rodrigues on Potemkin: the Odessa steps scene
  • Xylourgos on The Polish conflict seems to be about control of the nation’s high court
  • FOAF on Pelosi walks the tightrope on Mamdani and El-Sayed
  • Xylourgos on Pelosi walks the tightrope on Mamdani and El-Sayed
  • Gregory Harper on Potemkin: the Odessa steps scene

Recent Posts

  • Potemkin: the Odessa steps scene
  • Pelosi walks the tightrope on Mamdani and El-Sayed
  • The Polish conflict seems to be about control of the nation’s high court
  • Open thread 10/31/2026
  • I wouldn’t want Bari Weiss’s job

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (330)
  • Afghanistan (98)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (164)
  • Best of neo-neocon (91)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (598)
  • Dance (292)
  • Disaster (244)
  • Education (328)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (566)
  • Election 2018 (33)
  • Election 2020 (513)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (113)
  • Election 2028 (13)
  • Evil (129)
  • Fashion and beauty (324)
  • Finance and economics (1,052)
  • Food (319)
  • Friendship (48)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (737)
  • Health (1,168)
  • Health care reform (546)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (338)
  • History (718)
  • Immigration (452)
  • Iran (466)
  • Iraq (227)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (834)
  • Jews (444)
  • Language and grammar (365)
  • Latin America (216)
  • Law (2,996)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (124)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,329)
  • Liberty (1,118)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (394)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,518)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (934)
  • Middle East (384)
  • Military (326)
  • Movies (355)
  • Music (534)
  • Nature (262)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (184)
  • Obama (1,740)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (132)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,051)
  • Poetry (259)
  • Political changers (179)
  • Politics (2,796)
  • Pop culture (397)
  • Press (1,636)
  • Race and racism (885)
  • Religion (430)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (642)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (983)
  • Theater and TV (266)
  • Therapy (71)
  • Trump (1,634)
  • Uncategorized (4,624)
  • Vietnam (109)
  • Violence (1,465)
  • War and Peace (1,034)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑