↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 775 << 1 2 … 773 774 775 776 777 … 1,914 1,915 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

RIP Doris Day

The New Neo Posted on May 14, 2019 by neoMay 14, 2019

Doris Day died yesterday at the age of 97.

Day was all sunshine, and her singing voice was velvet. She was mocked by some for being so all-fired wholesome, but she was a great entertainer in several genres and made it all seem completely natural.

I’m intrigued by the story of how Day began singing:

She developed an early interest in dance, and in the mid-1930s formed a dance duo with Jerry Doherty that performed locally in Cincinnati. A car accident on October 13, 1937, injured her right leg and curtailed her prospects as a professional dancer…

While recovering from an auto accident, Doris started to sing along with the radio and discovered a talent she did not know she had. “During this long, boring period, I used to while away a lot of time listening to the radio, sometimes singing along with the likes of Benny Goodman, Duke Ellington, Tommy Dorsey, and Glenn Miller”, she told A.E. Hotchner, one of her biographers. “But the one radio voice I listened to above others belonged to Ella Fitzgerald. There was a quality to her voice that fascinated me, and I’d sing along with her, trying to catch the subtle ways she shaded her voice, the casual yet clean way she sang the words.”

Observing her daughter sing rekindled Alma’s interest in show business, and she decided Doris should have singing lessons. She engaged a teacher, Grace Raine. After three lessons, Raine told Alma that young Doris had “tremendous potential”; Raine was so impressed that she gave Doris three lessons a week for the price of one. Years later, Day said that Raine had the biggest effect on her singing style and career.

During the eight months she was taking singing lessons, Doris had her first professional jobs as a vocalist, on the WLW radio program Carlin’s Carnival, and in a local restaurant, Charlie Yee’s Shanghai Inn. During her radio performances, Day first caught the attention of Barney Rapp, who was looking for a female vocalist and asked if Day would like to audition for the job. According to Rapp, he had auditioned about 200 singers when Day got the job.

While working for Rapp in 1939, she adopted the stage surname “Day”, at Rapp’s suggestion.

So an accident that probably seemed like a terrible blow to the young woman ended up making her…Day.

RIP.

Posted in Movies, Music, People of interest | 20 Replies

Whatever amount of time I may think it will take to write a certain blog post…

The New Neo Posted on May 14, 2019 by neoMay 14, 2019

…I probably should just triple it and I’ll be closer to the mark.

To take one example, here’s the post I wrote earlier today. It was based on a little article that caught my eye in the Guardian, about an expedition to explore the flooded lands that used to connect the British Isles to the mainland of Europe.

Pretty straightforward. Not too long. Do an intro, then a few quotes, a concluding paragraph, and voila! Done.

But as so often happens, that’s not how it went. As Frost said—“knowing how way leads on to way…”—one thought leads to another thought and some more research, which takes more time. And that leads to another thought that I hadn’t anticipated when I had the concept for the post, which leads to more research and more time. And then to a post that’s substantially different from the one I’d originally envisioned, and I hope more interesting.

I’m not complaining. That’s the way my mind works anyway, whether I blog or don’t blog. A regular Garden of Forking Paths (oh no neo, don’t turn this into a post on Borges!). But it does mean that, whatever amount of time I budget for writing, I’m usually underestimating.

Posted in Blogging and bloggers, Me, myself, and I | 19 Replies

Exploring Doggerland

The New Neo Posted on May 14, 2019 by neoMay 14, 2019

An ambitious expedition is about to start, with a mission to map the undersea area known as Doggerland, and in particular to take samples to see if any trace of human habitation can be found.

I’ve written about Doggerland before. It’s a large landmass that used to connect the British Isles to the mainland of Europe during the most recent Ice Age’s low sea levels, and it was submerged when the ice melted as the Ice Age ended. Speculation is that the area was settled, and that the humans there left evidence of their habitation that might be discovered, although it’s a longshot:

Using seabed mapping data the team plans to produce a 3D chart revealing the rivers, lakes, hills and coastlines of the country. Specialist survey ships will take core sediment samples from selected areas to extract millions of fragments of DNA from the buried plants and animals.

Prof Vincent Gaffney, from the University of Bradford’s school of archaeological and forensic sciences, said: “If this is successful it will be the first time anybody will have produced such evidence for settlements in the deep waters of the North Sea. This will be a real first. That would be new knowledge of what is really a lost continent.”

Theories abound as to what has caused the periodic ice ages of earth’s past, but it certainly wasn’t humankind’s carbon footprint. One wonders about whether ubiquitous flooding legends are connected to some of this melting and subsequent flooding. And when I say “ubiquitous,” I mean it:

The flood myth motif is found among many cultures as seen in the Mesopotamian flood stories, Deucalion and Pyrrha in Greek mythology, the Genesis flood narrative, Pralaya in Hinduism, the Gun-Yu in Chinese mythology, Bergelmir in Norse mythology, in the lore of the K’iche’ and Maya peoples in Mesoamerica, the Lac Courte Oreilles Ojibwa tribe of Native Americans in North America, the Muisca, and Cañari Confederation, in South America, Africa, and the Aboriginal tribes in southern Australia.

That Wiki entry I just linked goes into quite a bit of detail about theories about the origins of these myths. Suffice to say that theories vary. The flooding that submerged Doggerland didn’t all happen in a day, or even forty days, but it seems to have been a result of both gradual and sudden processes [emphasis mine]:

As ice melted at the end of the last glacial period of the current ice age, sea levels rose and the land began to tilt in an isostatic adjustment as the huge weight of ice lessened. Doggerland eventually became submerged, cutting off what was previously the British peninsula from the European mainland by around 6500 BC. The Dogger Bank, an upland area of Doggerland, remained an island until at least 5000 BC. Key stages are now believed to have included the gradual evolution of a large tidal bay between eastern England and Dogger Bank by 9000 BC and a rapid sea-level rise thereafter, leading to Dogger Bank becoming an island and Great Britain becoming physically disconnected from the continent.

A recent hypothesis postulates that much of the remaining coastal land was flooded by a megatsunami around 6200 BC, caused by a submarine landslide off the coast of Norway known as the Storegga Slide. This suggests: “that the Storegga Slide tsunami would have had a catastrophic impact on the contemporary coastal Mesolithic population…. Britain finally became separated from the continent and in cultural terms, the Mesolithic there goes its own way.” A study published in 2014 suggested that the only remaining parts of Doggerland at the time of the Storegga Slide were low-lying islands, but supported the view that the area had been abandoned at about the same time as the tsunamis.

Another view speculates that the Storegga tsunami devastated Doggerland but then ebbed back into the sea, and that later Lake Agassiz (in North America) burst releasing so much fresh water that sea levels over about two years rose to flood much of Doggerland and make Britain an island.

All of this without apparent human intervention. It drives home the point that, whatever is happening now with global warming and climate change, enormous such events have periodically occurred in the past through some sort of natural non-anthropogenic process.

As for Lake Agassiz, here you go [emphasis mine]:

Around 13,000 years ago, [a lake formed from glacial melt] came to cover much of what are now Manitoba, northwestern Ontario, northern Minnesota, eastern North Dakota, and Saskatchewan. At its greatest extent, it may have covered as much as 440,000 km2 (170,000 sq mi), larger than any currently existing lake in the world (including the Caspian Sea) and approximately the area of the Black Sea…

The ice returned to the south for a time, but as it again retreated north of the present Canada–United States border around 10,000 years ago, Lake Agassiz refilled. The last major shift in drainage occurred around 8,200 years ago. The melting of remaining Hudson Bay ice caused Lake Agassiz to drain nearly completely. This final drainage of Lake Agassiz has been associated with an estimated 0.8 to 2.8 m (2.6 to 9.2 ft) rise in global sea levels.

Lake Agassiz’s major drainage reorganization events were of such magnitudes that they had significant impact on climate, sea level and possibly early human civilization. The lake’s enormous freshwater release into the Arctic Ocean has been postulated to have disrupted oceanic circulation and caused temporary cooling. The draining of 13,000 years ago may be the cause of the Younger Dryas stadial. Although disputed, the draining at 9,900–10,000 years ago may be the cause of the 8,200 yr climate event. A recent study by Turney and Brown links the 8,500-years ago drainage to the expansion of agriculture from east to west across Europe; they suggest that this may also account for various flood myths of prehistoric cultures, including the Biblical flood narrative.

What’s especially interesting is that the changes in a lake in the middle of North America would have such an effect on sea levels. That, in turn, has affected human history—and yet how many of us ever learned about Lake Agassiz in our history classes (or even our science classes, if we didn’t take geology)? Not me. How about you?

Posted in History, Science | Tagged geology, global warming | 14 Replies

What’s your first memory?

The New Neo Posted on May 13, 2019 by neoMay 13, 2019

BUMPED UP just for fun.

[NOTE: I came across this old post of mine today, and thought it might be fun to repeat it.]

I’ve always had an excellent recollection for early events in my life, with the peculiarity that my memories tend to be visual as well as auditory and emotional. That is, not only can I remember a great many incidents occurring at a very young age—what happened, what was said, how I felt—but there’s also a sort of theatrical scene-setting. I can often recall where I was standing in relation to the other players—and, more oddly, what everyone was wearing at the time.

It took me a while to learn that most people don’t remember things that way. I would be reminiscing with a friend and would say, “Don’t you remember? You were standing over there, and you were wearing that black and white suit with the red silk blouse,” and the friend would gaze at me in puzzlement, wondering what I was talking about.

Of course, no independent corroboration exists to tell me whether I’m right or wrong. So perhaps I’m full of it; there’s no way to know for sure.

I once participated in a study of first memories. The researcher’s premise was that our earliest memories are not random and that, in particular, a person’s very first memory has some significance and is a sort of theme.

I have no idea what the results of that research were, or whether the concept is true, but I find it fascinating.

As for my first memory—well, first I’ll offer the following, from commenter sergey, posted quite some time ago:

Tolstoy also writes in his authobiographical notes on his rememberance of how he was born—not only all the environment of the room, but also his sensations of the delivery itself. My own first rememberance does not runs so close to the begining, but I do remember very clear how I was weighted after being brought from the clinic to the flat of our family doctor. It was cold being sripped of swaddling bands and put on scales platform, white and cold metal trough, and I was frightened when it begin to rock to and fro under me.

Why am I posting sergey’s first memory? Because it is virtually the same as mine. Although I think mine occurred when I was older, perhaps at ten months or so, I was very surprised indeed when I read his comment. It’s the first memory of another person, one who lives halfway across the world, and yet it represents a fairly accurate rendition of my own first memory.

If so, why this first memory rather than another? The theme in my early life that I think it represents is the idea “you’re on your own, kid”—at least, in the emotional sense.

That may have been my first memory; it’s pre-verbal. There are no words because I didn’t have them yet. But my first memory that involves thinking—and it’s a pretty big thought, actually—took place in the bathroom when I was about two. I was sitting on the john, probably being toilet-trained, and my mother was sitting on the edge of the bathtub, waiting for me. It suddenly struck me that we were two different people, a thought both scary and fascinating, perhaps even exhilarating.

I remarked to her in awe: “You’re you and I’m me.” Come to think of it, it’s another extension of that same theme mentioned above: “you’re on your own, kid.”

Feel free to offer your own first memories in the comments section.

Posted in Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe, Me, myself, and I | 51 Replies

Funny stuff: the Times and the Trump tax stroy

The New Neo Posted on May 13, 2019 by neoMay 13, 2019

[Hat tip: AesopFan]

I can just picture the The New York Times gathering a team of actuaries, legal accountants, tax historians, advisers and financial consultants around a big executive office table, piled high with reams of papers and spent coffee cups, saying:

“We’ve got him now…. as soon as people understand: fixed asset depreciation schedules; and if the assets were depreciated legally using straight line or diminishing balance; then we move to whole-value equity pick-up, or minority interest accounting; before digging into section 1031 ‘like-kind’ asset exchanges; partnerships (limited or writ large), carried interest loopholes, pass-throughs, net capital losses/gains, seven-year income averaging and the difference between long-term and short-term capital gains”…

…or something.

Seriously, the ‘Trump-taxes’ story has to be the biggest, funniest, most well documented, and most absurd, ongoing snipe hunt in history. “I was going to support President Trump’s re-election until I saw his depreciated amortization schedule from 1989?”… said no-one, like, ever.

As I said, it’s funny.

But to be serious for a minute, that’s not what the Times was counting on at all in publishing the story. First of all, they need to keep the Trump attacks coming, so even though they probably knew it was a relatively weak story it may have been all they could come up with that particular day. Secondly, they are counting on readers not really understanding the ins and outs of the tax code for businesses of the size and complexity of Trump’s. Most of us don’t, and I certainly don’t, but they were trusting that Trump-haters and even Trump-dislikers would think boy, he says he’s so rich but he lost so much money as well as boy, for a man living so high on the hog he certainly didn’t pay much in taxes compared to me.

Posted in Finance and economics, Press, Trump, Uncategorized | Tagged taxes | 8 Replies

Those pouncing, attacking, seizing, warring Republicans

The New Neo Posted on May 13, 2019 by neoMay 13, 2019

It’s become obvious and commonplace: when Democrats do something for which they can be heartily criticized, instead of criticizing them the MSM attacks and pounces and seizes on the Republican reaction and characterizes it in aggressive and somewhat sinister terms such as the aforementioned attacking and pouncing and seizing, as well as warring.

Call it MSM jujitsu (in the sense of using an opponent’s force against themselves). I don’t know how successful it is—I’m not their intended audience—but they certainly must think it’s successful because it’s standard operating procedure for the MSM.

And so we have this:

“TRUMP’S ALL-OUT WAR AGAINST HOUSE PROBES”

That’s the headline of a Washington Post story (print edition) about the clash between the White House and House Democrats over the latters’ investigations of the former. The article notes that President Trump “is blocking more than 20 separate Democratic inquiries.” According to the Post, this “amount[s] to what many experts call the most expansive White House obstruction effort in decades.”

Let us pause here for a moment to reflect on how verbally clever that is. In using the word “obstruction” in its vernacular colloquial sense, the Post inserts an echo of one of its pet projects, the idea that Trump was guilty of the crime of obstructing justice a la the insinuations of the Mueller Report.

Moreover, the Post has the big picture backwards. It is House Democrats, having launched more than 20 separate investigations of the president, including many relating to his personal and business affairs (and those of family members), who are waging “all-out war” against Trump. They are engaged in the most expansive harassment campaign against a president in decades, and probably ever.

It’s natural — a matter of simple math — that the more investigations the House launches against a president, the more instances of resistance it will encounter. That’s especially true when House committees insist on unreasonable conditions like refusing to let witnesses bring White House lawyers with them.

Whether the accused is some random Republican, Donald Trump, or Judge Kavanaugh in justified outrage against the flimsiness of the potentially destructive charges against him, the person on the right who uses lawful means to launch understandable defenses of him/herself, and shows justifiable anger at what’s being done by those out to destroy him/her, will be characterized by the press as being the aggressor and wrongdoer.

Posted in Politics, Trump | 8 Replies

Brexit redux

The New Neo Posted on May 13, 2019 by neoMay 13, 2019

Polls in Britain are indicating that in the upcoming election for EU representatives, the rather new Brexit Party, headed by Nigel Farage, is poised to do very very well:

That vote is set for May 23. Had Prime Minister Theresa May and her Conservatives honored the Brexit referendum of 2016, Britain wouldn’t have to participate in the blasted EU election. Voters decided, after all, to leave the EU, and a departure date of March 29 was all set. Mrs. May, though, betrayed the referendum. And now Britain has to elect a delegation to sit in the EU “Parliament.”

In that election, the party polling at the head of the field is the Brexit Party. It was founded at the last minute by Nigel Farage. He’s the former head of the United Kingdom Independence Party who led the campaign for Britain to return to being a sovereign country…

The latest poll quoted by the Guardian suggests that 34% of voters will vote for Mr. Farage’s party. Polls suggest support for the Conservatives, as the Tories are also called, has “collapsed,” amid the “Brexit uncertainty,” to just 11%. Labor, bedeviled by charges of anti-Semitism, is polling at 21%. The best showing of any “openly anti-Brexit” party, the Liberal Democrats, is 12%, the Guardian says.

The article goes on to speculate that Farage might even end up parlaying his support into a Prime Minister position some day. At the same time, it cautions that polls can be pretty meaningless.

So what does that leave us with? The usual uncertainty about elections these days.

Although I don’t exactly have my finger on the pulse of British politics (apparently I’m hardly alone in that), I do have a theory, which is that not only its Brexit stance but also the extreme and increasing leftism of the Labour Party has turned a lot of people off who might otherwise have supported them. Although political parties in Britain generally lean more to the left than their supposed American counterparts, what’s happening to Labour in Britain may be a similar phenomenon to what appears to be going on with Democrats in the US. The candidates have been so busy getting to the left of each other that they forgot that pleasing their leftist base isn’t quite enough to win more general elections.

Here’s an article about the British version:

During an interview by LBC’s Theo Usherwood to Nigel Farage, members of a crowd gathered around the Brexit Party leader voiced their discontent with Jeremy Corbyn’s failure to deliver a clear message on its Brexit stance. After admitting to the LBC presenter they would now rather vote for Nigel Farage than Jeremy Corbyn’s Party at the upcoming European elections despite having been Labour supporters for a long time, Mr Usherwood pointed out the former Ukip leader was the “antithesis” of Mr Corbyn’s policies.

But one woman in the crowd responded: “That’s beside the point.

“I know what I think, I’ve got my own feelings, my own thoughts.

“I voted to leave and I want to leave. Full stop.”

Another passionate Brexiteer in the crowd explained: “In this room, it’s all about trust and honesty.

“It’s filled with the people that all around the country are attending these Brexit rallies.

“And that’s because when Nigel is asked a question on mainstream TV or any interviews he answers it.

Interesting. So for a lot of people there are at least two things going on. One is that they wanted Brexit and they voted for it (even though these particular people were previously on the left), and they are completely turned off by what they see as the betrayal of their wishes by the superior, condescending “elites” of government.

Sound familiar?

The other is that they are also tired of the beat-around-the-bush, jargon-filled, obfuscating answers from said superior, condescending “elites” of government. They prefer straight talk.

I have no idea what will happen in these upcoming elections. But the build-up has certainly been interesting.

Posted in Politics | Tagged Britain, European Union, NIgel Farage | 11 Replies

Happy Mother’s Day!

The New Neo Posted on May 12, 2019 by neoMay 12, 2019

[NOTE: This is a repeat of what has become my annual Mother’s Day post. It was written while my mother was still alive.]

Okay, who are these three dark beauties?

A hint: one of them is the very first picture you’ve ever seen on this blog of neo-neocon, sans apple. Not that you’d recognize me, of course. Even my own mother might not recognize me from this photo.

My own mother, you say? Of course she would. Ah, but she’s here too, looking a bit different than she does today—Mother’s Day—at ninety-eight years of age. Just a bit; maybe her own mother wouldn’t recognize her, either.

Her own mother? She’s the one who’s all dressed up, with longer hair than the rest of us.

The photo of my grandmother was taken in the 1880’s; the one of my mother in the teens of the twentieth century; and the one of me, of course, in the 1950s.

Heredity, ain’t it great? My mother and grandmother are both sitting for formal portraits at a professional photographer’s studio, but by the time I came around amateur snapshots were easy to take with a smallish Brownie camera. My mother is sitting on the knee of her own grandfather, my grandmother’s father, a dapper gentleman who was always very well-turned out. I’m next to my older brother, who’s reading a book to me but is cropped out of this photo. My grandmother sits alone in all her finery.

We all not only resemble each other greatly in our features and coloring, but in our solemnity. My mother’s and grandmother’s seriousness is probably explained by the strange and formal setting; mine is due to my concentration on the book, which was Peter Pan (my brother was only pretending to read it, since he couldn’t read yet, but I didn’t know that at the time). My mother’s resemblance to me is enhanced by our similar hairdos (or lack thereof), although hers was short because it hadn’t really grown in yet, and mine was short because she purposely kept it that way (easier to deal with).

My grandmother not only has the pretty ruffled dress and the long flowing locks, but if you look really closely you can see a tiny earring dangling from her earlobe. When I was young, she showed me her baby earrings; several miniature, delicate pairs. It astounded me that they’d actually pierced a baby’s ears (and that my grandmother had let the holes close up later on, and couldn’t wear pierced earrings any more), whereas I had to fight for the right to have mine done in my early teens.

I’m not sure what my mother’s wearing; some sort of baby smock. But I know what I have on: my brother’s hand-me-down pajamas, and I was none too happy about it, of that you can be sure.

So, a very happy Mother’s Day to you all! What would mothers be without babies…and mothers…and babies….and mothers….?

Posted in Uncategorized | 9 Replies

Nope, this isn’t Photoshopped

The New Neo Posted on May 11, 2019 by neoMay 11, 2019

This looks for all the world as though a very elderly woman’s head was photoshopped onto a younger—much younger—body. But that’s not the case for Johanna Quaas.

She’s quite the inspiration:

Here’s her Wiki entry. As you might expect, Johanna has been doing this her entire life.

Posted in Baseball and sports | 13 Replies

Awaiting IG Horowitz’s report: was the criminal justice system perverted by the FBI?

The New Neo Posted on May 11, 2019 by neoMay 11, 2019

Attorneys Joe diGenova and Victoria Toensing have said that Inspector General Horowitz’s report, due to come out next month, has concluded that the final three FISA warrants pertaining to Russiagate were obtained illegally. I don’t know how their track record of such predictions have turned out, but that would be big news if true.

In addition, there’s this story of what seems as though it may have been attempted entrapment of George Papadopoulos by the FBI in the summer of 2017:

Joe diGenova and Victoria Toensing explain how the FBI used $10,000 to try and set up @GeorgePapa19 in a blatant sting. Incredible corruption! https://t.co/oztegHjFhI

— Sebastian Gorka DrG (@SebGorka) May 9, 2019

We’ll see how this pans out, I guess.

One thing I do know is that Andrew C. McCarthy—who started writing about what became known as Russiagate back when he was not much of a Trump supporter and when he trusted Comey and Mueller and all the rest—has become what I can only describe as hopping mad [emphasis mine]:

Russiagate has always been a political narrative masquerading as a federal investigation. Its objective, plain and simple, has been twofold: first, to hamstring Donald Trump’s capacity to press the agenda on which he ran (immigration enforcement, conservative judicial nominees, deregulation, and a military build-up, along with skepticism about military interventions, free trade, and NATO); and ultimately, to render him unelectable come autumn 2020…

Access to sensitive law-enforcement information and classified intelligence is a trust. It is extended with the understanding that it won’t be politicized or used to smear people.

Abuse of this privilege mirrors the most objectionable aspect of the Mueller investigation: The abuse of the criminal-justice process — converting it into a political weapon to smear a person the government has not charged with crimes.…

…[T]he anti-Trump partisans…are perverting the criminal-justice process they claim Trump has obstructed. With the transparently eager cooperation of Mueller’s team, they intimate that the president could have been charged and would have been convicted. They suggest that, although not charged, he has not been “exonerated,” effectively imposing on him the burden to establish his innocence.

I don’t want the criminal-justice system to be the prism through which we conduct politics. But if you insist on evaluating the president’s conduct as a criminal-justice issue rather than a political impeachment issue, then he is entitled to the presumption of innocence. He is entitled to have the evidence discounted (indeed, it should have been concealed) unless and until he is formally charged. He is entitled to have the burden of proof imposed entirely on the government. For current and former officials who have been involved in the investigation to refrain from charging him, publicize the evidence, and then suggest he is guilty is a willful undermining of the justice process.

That is, they are doing what they accuse Trump of doing.

McCarthy has devoted his life to that criminal justice system. He previously respected it, although of course he knew it wasn’t perfect. And he previously respected the people who worked with him, such as Comey and Mueller, and the integrity of the whole. I don’t think he was extremely naive, but apparently he was somewhat naive, and he’s not happy at the undermining and perverting of a system he knows is (or should be) one of the biggest safeguards of our liberties.

All Americans ought to feel the same alarm, but unfortunately they don’t.

More from McCarthy here:

Desperate to project the illusion of cover-up in the utter absence of cover-up, Democrats proceeded against the attorney general even though (a) Barr did not owe Congress a single comma in the report because federal law calls for it to be confidential (i.e., between the prosecutor investigating the case and his supervisor, the attorney general); (b) Barr nevertheless gave Congress about 95 percent of the report; (c) congressional Democrats did not avail themselves of the opportunity to read other unredacted portions to which he gave access; (d) all of the unsavory information about President Trump – i.e., the stuff in the report that Democrats truly care about – has been disclosed; and (e) Barr only withheld grand jury information which it would be illegal to disclose – meaning: Democrats put the AG to the untenable choice of violating the law or being held in contempt.

Oh, and about that grand jury secrecy rule … it is Congress’s own law. Democrats could easily get the information by just passing a two-line amendment to federal criminal procedure rule 6(e), so that grand jury material could henceforth be disclosed to Congress in special counsel investigations. With the Trump administration trying to show it is being transparent, the Senate would surely pass such a House amendment, and the president would sign it. But Democratic legislators are not taking any legislative action (you know, their job) because they don’t really want the information. They want the issue. They are straining to create the appearance of Watergate, even as Barr has turned over an Everest of information.

You can sense McCarthy’s saying the equivalent of “It’s all so clear; why can’t I make everyone see it?”

Posted in Law, Liberty, Politics, Trump | Tagged FBI, Russiagate | 66 Replies

Did the NY Times violate tax law?

The New Neo Posted on May 11, 2019 by neoMay 11, 2019

Maybe yes, maybe no [emphasis mine]:

Confidentiality, as the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held in 1991 in U.S. v. Richey, is essential to “maintaining a workable tax system.”…

Taxpayer privacy is “fundamental to a tax system that relies on self-reporting” since it protects “sensitive or otherwise personal information,” said then-Judge (now Supreme Court Justice) Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 1986 in another case when she served on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia…

Federal law – 26 U.S.C. §7213(a)(1) – makes it a felony for any federal employee to disclose tax returns or “return information.” Infractions are punishable by up to five years in prison and a fine as high as $250,000 under the Alternative Fines Act (18 U.S.C. §3571).

Regardless of the accuracy or inaccuracy of The New York Times story, tax returns themselves, as well as tax return information such as these IRS transcripts (which are a summary of the tax returns), are protected from disclosure by federal law. And this provision applies to private individuals as well as government employees, a fact that should be considered by the New York Times’ source.

That’s the letter of the law. However, in practice a newspaper may be safe from conviction under the law [emphasis mine]:

If the newspaper obtained this information from an employee of the IRS, that employee will be in big trouble if he or she is identified.

Could the editors and reporters at the New York Times be prosecuted for publishing this information?

Section (a)(3) of the law makes it a felony for any person who receives an illegally disclosed tax return or return information to publish that return or that information. But it’s unknown if the bar on publication by a media organization could survive a First Amendment challenge.

What we do know is that in previous incidents, the government did not attempt to prosecute the publisher of tax return information…

Are the interests of the government in an effective tax system and that of citizens in maintaining the confidentiality of their financial information outweighed by the First Amendment right of the press, and by and the public’s interest in obtaining financial information on elected officials?

Tthe press is full of garbage and partisanship, but press freedom is still an important principle to defend. However, I’m not for allowing the press to violate this law and publish information such as tax returns, and I mean anyone’s tax returns—as I wrote in my earlier post on the Times’ publication of Trump’s tax information—without that person’s consent.

I don’t think freedom of the press should include freedom from all consequences for anything the press does. It’s a delicate balancing act, to be sure, but it’s tipped too far if the press is allowed one hundred percent free rein. The way Sullivan is applied, for example, has made it nearly impossible to prove defamation of any public figure even if it’s pretty clear that a defamatory story was published with reckless disregard for the truth.

Then again, the monetary penalty for violating this particular tax privacy law is so small (not small for an individual, but for a newspaper) that even if that element were to be enforced against the press it would hardly constitute more than an inconsequential little slap on the wrist (I can’t see that anyone would ever be sent to prison, so I don’t think that the chance of a prison term is really an issue). So I doubt even being found guilty would deter the MSM from publishing this sort of information if they thought it could hurt someone they despise. The possibility of conviction might even motivate them to do it because then the press could claim the mantle of martyrdom.

Posted in Finance and economics, Law, Liberty, Press, Trump | 15 Replies

Herding the Japanese

The New Neo Posted on May 10, 2019 by neoMay 10, 2019

Pocket thinks I’d be interested in this article entitled “The Amazing Psychology of Japanese Train Stations: The nation’s famed mastery of rail travel has been aided by some subtle behavioral tricks.”

And Pocket’s got my number, all right, because indeed I am interested.

When I was young, I remember seeing film of how the Japanese handled the crush of rush hour in its subways. It was somewhat terrifying—they had white-gloved attendants shoving people into already overstuffed trains, and even watching it could give a person both claustrophobia and enochlophobia.

Apparently they still do it:

But the article indicates there’s a lot, lot more:

In 2016, for instance, London Underground operator Transport for London partnered with the behavioral science department at the London School of Economics to develop ways of encouraging riders to queue on both sides of station escalators as a means of increasing their capacity in the capital’s Holborn Station. Among other measures, simple hand and footprints were also painted on each side of the “up” escalators. In Australia, researchers conducted an experiment with lighted directional arrows on signposts to improve flows of departing passengers. Using a camera system designed to recognize and distinguish brisk-walking businesspeople from dawdling tourists, for example—green arrows would flash to direct commuters in an efficient route towards the exit.

When it come to passenger manipulation, what sets the stations of Japan apart from their counterparts is both the ingenuity behind their nudges and the imperceptible manner in which they are implemented. Japan’s nudges reflect a higher order of thinking…

Standing at either end of a platform in Tokyo’s labyrinthine Shinjuku Station, one might detect a small square LED panel emitting a pleasant, deep-blue glow. Nestled among vending machines and safety posters, the panel might be dismissed as a bug zapper. But these simple blue panels are designed to save lives…

It is an approach that has proven to be surprisingly effective…

To address the Japanese fear of loitering and vandalism by young riders, some train stations deploy ultrasonic deterrents—small, unobtrusive devices that emit a high-frequency tone. The particular frequency used—17 kilohertz*—can generally only be heard by those under the age of 25. (Older people can’t detect such frequencies, thanks to the age-related hearing loss known as presbycusis.) These devices—the brainchild of a Welsh inventor and also used to fend off loitering teens in the U.S. and Europe—have been enthusiastically adopted in Japan.

Standing outside one of Tokyo Station’s numerous exits on a recent summer day, it was easy to see the effectiveness of this deterrent in action. Weary salarymen and aged obaachan passed under the sonic deterrent without changing pace. Among uniform-clad students, however, the reactions were evident—a suddenly quickened pace, a look of confusion or discomfort, and often a cry of urusai! (Loud!) None appeared to connect the noise to the deterrents placed almost flush in the ceiling panels above.

Much more at the link.

It reminds me a bit of Temple Grandin’s brilliant designs for cattle handling:

Posted in Science | Tagged Japan | 18 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Niketas Choniates on A summary of Lindsay Clancy’s efforts to get help
  • Mary Catelli on The Lindsay Clancy case
  • physicsguy on Open thread 8/26/2026
  • Alan E Colbo on Yesterday’s primaries
  • Barry Meislin on Open thread 8/26/2026

Recent Posts

  • SCOTUS ruling on mail-in voting
  • Yesterday’s primaries
  • A summary of Lindsay Clancy’s efforts to get help
  • Open thread 8/26/2026
  • RIP Dolly Parton

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (328)
  • Afghanistan (98)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (164)
  • Best of neo-neocon (91)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (592)
  • Dance (292)
  • Disaster (244)
  • Education (323)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (566)
  • Election 2018 (33)
  • Election 2020 (513)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (89)
  • Election 2028 (12)
  • Evil (129)
  • Fashion and beauty (324)
  • Finance and economics (1,040)
  • Food (317)
  • Friendship (47)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (733)
  • Health (1,157)
  • Health care reform (545)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (337)
  • History (716)
  • Immigration (447)
  • Iran (464)
  • Iraq (227)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (820)
  • Jews (437)
  • Language and grammar (364)
  • Latin America (211)
  • Law (2,967)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (124)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,318)
  • Liberty (1,116)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (392)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,493)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (929)
  • Middle East (383)
  • Military (324)
  • Movies (353)
  • Music (533)
  • Nature (260)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (183)
  • Obama (1,738)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (131)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,043)
  • Poetry (258)
  • Political changers (178)
  • Politics (2,793)
  • Pop culture (397)
  • Press (1,633)
  • Race and racism (880)
  • Religion (428)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (639)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (970)
  • Theater and TV (266)
  • Therapy (71)
  • Trump (1,627)
  • Uncategorized (4,540)
  • Vietnam (109)
  • Violence (1,442)
  • War and Peace (1,026)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑