Rumors about Trump’s talk tomorrow night
A lot of rumors are swirling around about the talk Trump is scheduled to give to the nation tomorrow night at 9 PM Eastern Time. They all seem to involve some sort of statement about fraud – or at least “rigging” in terms of foreign influence – in the 2016 and 2020 elections.
In a way it’s old news, but Trump promises something new. You can see some of the rumors at Ace’s (see this), but what Trump has actually said so far is this:
Speaking in the Oval Office two days ahead of the planned address, Trump affirmed the speech would focus on elections and a “couple of other things.” …
… Trump framed the elections portion of his Thursday speech as the centerpiece. Two sources said he is expected to focus on voting machine security and alleged efforts by foreign nations to influence elections.
“It’s really, really big news, and our country has to shape up,” Trump said during a meeting with Iraq’s prime minister.
“It doesn’t get bigger, because without free and fair elections, you don’t have a country,” the president added. “We’ll be discussing other things too, but it’s going to be a very big announcement.”
It could be about the SAVE Act. It could be about nearly anything related to elections. But I am convinced that, whatever he says – for example, if he produced what ordinarily would be considered ironclad evidence of fraud in previous elections – at least half the nation would not believe it. They don’t believe anything he says or anything his confederates say. They believe that everything and anything that comes from the GOP is fabricated, fake, false.
NOTE: Speaking of which, Chuck Grassley writes on X that he has evidence about prosecutor Jack Smith:
I received records frm DOJ confirming Jack Smith’s investigative team reviewed the contents of text msgs sent by 44 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Im 1 of the 44
Im alerting my colleagues who were impacted and will release the records w Sen Johnson so American ppl can see the evidence.
Most of the responses on X are from angry people saying they’re tired of this sort of thing without any prosecutions of high-up perpetrators such as Smith.

You’re right, half of them won’t believe it, evidence or no.
2 true statements in your piece:
1, as Kate says 50% of the population will not believe anything he says, or even if he shows solid evidence.
2, I’m one of those angry ones who believes none of the guilty are ever perp walked, so why bother?
I want a presidential proclamation declaring states with all mail balloting to be illegitimate and takeover such states to force fair elections. Also declare DSA members ineligible for positions of public trust and force them to resign forthwith.
We have one of the little bastards running in the upcoming primary that says he can work with other “demsoc”.