Home » Lindsey Graham’s replacement will be his younger sister

Comments

Lindsey Graham’s replacement will be his younger sister — 20 Comments

  1. I’m with Niketas Choniates on this one. I didn’t like it when they did with Carnahan, I didn’t like it when they did it with Murkowski. I don’t like it in general. It’s a bad habit that is too often indulged.

    That said, I have nothing against his sister personally. I hope she serves well, and helps keep the seat out of Dem hands.

  2. HC68:

    Is there any indication that Nadine intends to make a career of being a senator? “Widow’s succession” (she is his sister, not his widow, but the idea is the same) has been a tradition for a century. A senator dies in office and his widow is appointed as a placeholder to serve out his term. This provides her with some possibly needed income, and the eventual successor will be chosen in an open election without an incumbent picked by the governor. In some cases, the governor appointed the widow as a placeholder because he wants to run for the seat himself.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Widow%27s_succession

  3. A big part of me doesn’t like it, but can’t think of any way that is better on full criteria balance:
    Vote similar,
    No plans to run for that seat or other national office
    Tribute to the deceased.
    (Popular choice)

    I do like the Tribute to the deceased, but that’s the criterion most difficult to fulfill without the family connection.

  4. “Widow’s succession” (she is his sister, not his widow, but the idea is the same) has been a tradition for a century.
    ==
    It’s not a tradition at all, just an occasional event. Some succeeding widows are in and out in a matter of months (see Muriel Humphrey).

  5. I simply don’t care because I am not a South Carolinian. It is none of my business.

  6. This seems like a good choice, since there is so far no indication that Mrs. Nordone intends to be a permanent replacement.

  7. HC68:

    Is there any indication that Nadine intends to make a career of being a senator? “Widow’s succession” (she is his sister, not his widow, but the idea is the same) has been a tradition for a century. A senator dies in office and his widow is appointed as a placeholder to serve out his term.

    — bof

    Her intentions are mostly beside the point. The only reason she will be a Senator is her blood connection to Lindsey Graham, and that’s a bad reason.

    To the degree that it’s a tradition, it’s a bad tradition. America is supposed to be based on a rejection of the principle of ‘hereditary succession’, and widow succession is a form of that.

    It isn’t the worse thing in the world, and it might sometimes work out well. But it’s still a bad idea, everything else being equal.

    Again, I have nothing against his sister. She may be a fine person and a competent Senator. But I don’t like dynastic succession.

    I simply don’t care because I am not a South Carolinian. It is none of my business.

    — Chases Eagles

    Of course it’s your business, assuming you are an American. I’m not from NC either, but it is absolutely my business, because Senators affect the whole country. If it was a State level office one could at least reasonably make the argument that it’s purely a North Carolina matter, but not at the Federal.

    By that same logic, it’s none of my business if North Caroline decides to let illegals vote and sends an illegal alien to the Senate. Of course it would absolutely be my business.

  8. HC68:

    Pick your battles:

    “He who defends everything, defends nothing.”

    Frederick the Great

  9. HC68, my hands are full with the commies here in the Soviet of Washington.

    Illegals are voting here, now. The Seattle Supreme Court is nothing but a commie rubber stamp for Olympia and why not? Those commie shitbags are “elected” too. The butt ugly DSA mayor of Seattle won’t go after immigrant fraud because “it is an attack on the immigrant community.”

    “There are forty-seven states in the Union, and the Soviet of Washington.”
    Postmaster General James Farley

  10. This would be the sister he helped raise, I assume. Hero. (Though he’d probably say he just did what he had to do. Did what had to be done.)

    So Don’t Cry for Me, Carolina?

    Aw, get a life…

    + Related:

    “Farewell to a friend of a Free Iran;
    “Lindsey Graham chose to stand with America’s allies, with Israel in its darkest hours, with Ukraine in its struggle for sovereignty, and with many Iranians who continue to hope for a free homeland….”—
    https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/430104

  11. I don’t know Darline’s qualifications for the job but I don’t see being related to a former senator as a disqualification. I suppose you could call it “dynastic succession” if she were to run for reelection to a full term, but I don’t believe that is going to happen. Otherwise the “Graham Dynasty” is only going to last for the duration of the term that Lindsey Graham was elected to. I have a few hundred better things to worry about than which Republican is going to hold Lindsey Graham’s seat for the next four months.

    “What is the superlative of ‘so what’?”

  12. Reports of cops ,FBI and US Marshals at Lindsey’s house ,bringing out boxes. The Marshals make this very interesting .

  13. Keith:

    As a first guess as to what the federal LEOs are doing, consider that Lindsey Graham had authorized access to highly sensitive national security information. It would be very prudent to ensured all that information/materials are secure given his untimely and tragic death.

  14. @ om – that is the conclusion that Jeff Childers reached as well, and a bit more.

    https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/from-russiagate-with-love-tuesday

    Yesterday, the Hill, which inspected eyewitness photos from the scene, reported that “at least six men and two women in FBI gear were at Graham’s row house.” Just ‘assisting’ the locals. Some reports pegged the number of LEO officials as high as twenty. Depending on the eyewitness report, either one or two US Marshals were also on the scene with the FBI. Remember that fact; it will be important later.

    It is possible that the FBI team was just there to secure classified materials from Graham’s home. You can easily imagine the kinds of sensitive documents, like handwritten notes, that the Senator might have lying around on the coffee table and on various devices. Or even in a safe. Reasonably, officials might want to secure that stuff stat.

    image 12.png

    But … it still doesn’t quite fit. Congress has its own police force— the Capitol Hill Police and the Sergeants at Arms. Classified documents are required to be stored in secure SCIFs (presumably even more so after the Trump lawfare and the awkward Biden deposition). The Capitol Police and Sergeants at Arms are normally responsible for setting up SCIFs and helping to secure classified congressional information, including managing staff security clearances.

    Normally, the FBI (executive branch) would get involved only if Graham were improperly keeping classified materials at home, in which case the feds would treat it as a law enforcement issue. Otherwise, securing members’ documents seems more appropriately the jurisdiction of the Capitol Police (legislative branch). So why were the FBI needed?

    Next, the fact that Marshals may also have been there raises some intriguing possibilities. Marshals work for the courts. In this context, court involvement implies a warrant. The Hill described a “big black container” outside with an FBI agent “standing watch,” from which another agent retrieved a manila folder. An evidence locker, perhaps? Or nothing to see here?

    Taken altogether, it looks remarkably like the bootprint of a federal criminal investigation. None of it is consistent with a “natural at-home death.” The remaining possibilities are all pretty astonishing. One that we discussed yesterday is possible foul play involving a sophisticated foreign or domestic perpetrator.

    ? But another wild possibility is that Graham’s tight relationship with the Administration might not have been quite as close as advertised. The Executive Branch has just assumed control of Graham’s personal information, devices, notes, emails, texts, and so on. If Graham’s loyalties were split, the Trump Team is about to find out.

    Fact: Lindsey Graham was closely tied to Ukraine, going back to 2014.

    Fact: Ukraine is closely tied to RussiaGate, shady biolabs, and ‘potential’ USAID graft, going back to at least 2014.

    Fact: Graham’s ‘loyalty’ to Trump 2.0 could be fairly described as transactional; until recently, he’s often been a fierce Trump critic and political adversary.

    For example, in 2015–16, Graham called Trump a “kook” who was “unfit for office,” a “race?baiting xenophobic religious bigot,” and “the world’s biggest jackass.” He dramatically announced his vote for Evan McMullin— not the President.

    Then, during Trump 1.0, Graham boarded the Trump train for four years. But after January 6th, Graham theatrically broke with President Trump, saying he was done— “count me out, enough is enough.” Within months, he reversed again and declared, “we can’t grow without him,” and said that the GOP could not “move forward without President Trump.”

    Thus, we cannot accurately describe the men’s relationship as a bromance. It’s not like Graham was a lifelong Trump ally. So it’s puzzling that, in February, 2024, Graham flipped even on his beloved Ukraine for reasons that have never been satisfactorily explained. Headline from the Washington Post:

    image 9.png

    It could be that Graham flipped to Trump’s side because he knew he needed Trump’s endorsement for his 2026 re-election campaign. That is true. By February, 2024, Trump was considered the odds-on favorite for the GOP primary and the party’s de facto kingmaker. Lindsey might just have been practicing prudent politics.

    But that kind of Machiavellian politics hardly makes Graham a reliable Trump ally. For instance, what might he do after getting re-elected to another six-year term, when he no longer needed Trump’s support for the South Carolina primary?

    And now, the FBI has presumably taken possession of all Graham’s notes and communications from both periods— before and after what the obituaries have described as the transition “from staunch critic to fierce ally.”

    Other than Obama himself, it is difficult to name a senior U.S. politician as intimately involved in the Ukraine project as Lindsey Graham— before, during, and after RussiaGate. Runners-up include notable figures like Joe Biden and John McCain. But Graham was at the pinnacle of the pro-Ukraine, anti-Russia org chart. So.

    Remember the Marshals? U.S. Marshals are rarely on?scene at a private home without some federal court authority in the background. Coincidentally, Trump already has a sitting grand jury trained on the RussiaGate case. It would have been trivial for the DOJ to obtain a quick warrant.

    Connecting all these dots, if you asked me for a wild speculation, I would place my chips on the FBI “raid” at Graham’s residence not being connected to his untimely death but to the RussiaGate investigation. Even giving Graham the benefit of the doubt, it fits the motive structure of a White House intent on owning the RussiaGate narrative end?to?end.

    Ukraine again. Graham died within hours of returning from his tenth Kiev trip, roughly a year after calling for a “sledgehammer to go after Putin’s economy,” and one day after publicly claiming that his long-desired Russia-sanctions bill had finally cleared the White House. (Trump hasn’t said that.)

    It’s still a breaking story. Things could change. Which is why I usually wait as long as it takes for all the facts to surface before I start connecting dots. But this one is just too irresistibly juicy.

    He also covers a few other issues of the day:

    Your roundup includes: conservative social media going up like dry timber over President Trump’s mysteriously-announced Thursday primetime address, and why — before you clear your calendar — the smart money says potpourri (Iran, with a dash of election integrity), not the fraud-reveal Rapture the base is pining for; then the story that refuses to stay buried, as the FBI descends on the late Senator Lindsey Graham’s home in force — Marshals, a big black evidence box, a guy posted to guard it — all for a death the government still calls natural, and why the scene smells less like grief and more like RussiaGate catching up with a man who spent a decade elbow-deep in Ukraine; and finally, meet Matthew Colangelo, the hush-money prosecutor who downshifted from the number-three job at the entire Justice Department to a desk in Alvin Bragg’s office — and the calendar entries hinting he never really left the DOJ at all.

  15. I don’t know Darline’s qualifications for the job but I don’t see being related to a former senator as a disqualification. I suppose you could call it “dynastic succession” if she were to run for reelection to a full term, but I don’t believe that is going to happen.

    — bof

    It’s irrelevant whether she runs for reelection or not. It’s dynastic succession simply because she got the job simply by being someone else’s sister. If you want to claim it isn’t dynastic succession, show me why she would still be Senator if she was unrelated to Graham.

    As I said, it’s not the worst thing in the world, and as Om notes, there are bigger fish that need frying right now. But it is still dynastic succession, and it’s still a bad extension of a bad precedent.

  16. AesopFan:

    Wow, regarding the LEOs at Lindsey Graham’s home; at least he didn’t bring in Unicorns and dead scientists/engineers.

    96 hours?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Web Analytics