Home » Medical transition of children in Colorado

Comments

Medical transition of children in Colorado — 18 Comments

  1. But gender is imaginary. Nobody can tell me what the physical basis of gender is. So, gender affirming care is imaginary affirming care,

  2. This topic is personal for me. My sister’s only grandchild is a boy, now 6’7″ and nineteen years old, who decided at 14 or so that he’d rather be a girl. He is highly intelligent but, I’m told, somewhat autistic. Since he lives in California, I fear he’s been medically changed, if not surgically. I view this as a tragedy. As Neo has written often, nothing medical or surgical is advisable until at least age 25 or 26. I would say never, but at the very least, these treatments for children are wrong.

  3. Kate, I’m truly sorry for your sister’s grandson’s delusion.
    Prayers!
    Hoping he’s not had irreversible treatment!

  4. Believing stupid things is almost the definition of youth.

    These kids are being failed by the (chronological!) adults that should be protecting them.

  5. Gender: masculine, feminine, refers to sex-correlated attributes (e.g. sexual orientation). Most sims are homos. All homos are trans, diverging near viability (six weeks). A minority are boys and girls confused or dissatisfied while passing through puberty. Some are transsocials in style (e.g. dress). What a drag. At least homos, unlike sims, receive gender corruption… uh, therapy without human affirmative action. Dreaming of Herr Mengele with forward-looking, sustainable benefits.

  6. This case is part of the reason that if I were 20 today I would not go into medicine. I had a long and highly productive medical career but today docs are pawns, no longer independent, unable to exercise independent judgement. Here, nutty parents successfully sue a hospital (and its medical staff) to force delivery of unethical services. Bizzaro.
    On another note, Sen. Lindsey Graham died last night at age 71, apparently of a sudden cardiac event.

  7. The hospital continues to provide “mental health care” for such children. That is very appropriate
    ==
    No, all it does is provide fee income for these characters.

  8. This topic is personal for me. My sister’s only grandchild is a boy, now 6’7? and nineteen years old, who decided at 14 or so that he’d rather be a girl.
    ==
    Debar 3d party payments for this quackery and demand for it falls through the floor.

  9. Consider the Obamacare debate. How often have we heard the mantra “evidenced based” health care?

    It seems the courts of Colorado no longer believe in this mantra anymore.

    Fortunately, it seems the insurance industry is not so easily gulled or guilted.

  10. Docs afraid of criminal liability will kill it faster. Crimes against humanity. Also personal vendettas by Grandpa George or Uncle Bob on these monsters.

  11. Is there a Big Pharma element at work? Is there a lifelong need for makeup hormones that produces a new class of profitable wired in consumers?

    Big Pharma has a huge army of lobbyists and influencers IMO their top management is totally amoral.

    I remember back when the Trans issue first developed. It seemed like the Wokesters needed more victim classes to keep things fresh, and suddenly disturbed kids were getting attention from adult professionals in ways they were unable to resist to beieve they were stuck in the wrong body.

    I was disgusted by the willingness to surgically alter these young humans. I see it as pure evil, but the situation developed with amazing rapidity, and the intensity of the Wokesters was hard to overcome. It has now become a major Luxury Belief.

  12. The doctors are scum and deserve the hangman”s noose. The Trans activists go after autistic kids to mutilate. They cannot be hated enough.

  13. like the Wokesters needed more victim classes to keep things fresh

    — Richard Illyes

    Pretty much exactly that, at least on the political side. This is something I’m embarrassed to admit I didn’t immediately ‘get’ in the first aftermath of Obergefell. I expected the next big push to be legally enshrining polygamy as equal to monogamy.

    I’m sure that is still on the long term agenda of the Left, but what I didn’t understand at that time was that Obergefell had messed up a big Democrat/lefty talking point. They needed a new issue that they could push so they could point and yell “hater! hater! hater!” at opponents to rally the social-left base. Ideally it needed to be something extreme enough that the opposition had to oppose it.

    Trans ideology was perfect from that POV. It worked well…for a while.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Web Analytics