Home » Al Green loses his primary

Comments

Al Green loses his primary — 14 Comments

  1. So is Menefee any better than Green. I mean, other than waving a cane, raising Cain

    My fear is that the Reps that lost to Trump supporters will do everything they can to cause trouble.

  2. As an ex-congresscritter, Green can still attend the SOTU, although he will be seated in the gallery. He could still make a spectacle from the gallery, at least for a short while. That’s all he did on the floor — made a spectacle until he was escorted out.

  3. My fear is that the Reps that lost to Trump supporters will do everything they can to cause trouble.

    — Shirehome

    It’s already started, though more visibly in the Senate. Thom Tillis has been taking potshots at Trump and MAGA ever since he announced he wasn’t running again, and now I fully expect Cornyn to join in. Thune might or might not join them, it might come down to whether his rage is stronger than his sense of political self-preservation.

    Lindsey Graham and MAGA have had a touchy relationship for decades (all the way back to the 2006 Comprehensive Amnesty effort, though MAGA wasn’t called MAGA back then, it was still MAGA). OTOH, Graham has been taking some measures to mend fences, in both the first term and since 2024.

  4. Yep – “shoo-in”, as in shoo-ing some small animal or insect away from you with waves of the hand, while exclaiming “Shoo!”

  5. @ Ben David – the two phrases seem to be used interchangeably now, although shoe-in is a mistake for the homophonic shoo.

    https://www.vocabulary.com/articles/pardon-the-expression/shoo-in-vs-shoe-in/
    “You can find this misspelling of shoo-in even in respected publications:”
    Citations from Time magazine and the New York Times.
    Sigh.
    What loosers.

    That’s because people are ignorant of the etymology, especially if they have only heard the phrase and not read it somewhere. And maybe with air conditioning in offices and homes, journalists no long shoo flies. Or fix horse races.

    (h/t Maureen IIRC, who mentioned this common but mistaken substitution for losers)

    Continuing down the rabbit-hole, originally the phrase came from corruption in horse races.
    https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/shoo-in
    “From a sense of the verb shoo, where racehorses would fall back and allow a chosen rider to win a fixed race. See 1910 quotation.”

    1910, “Vernacular of the Race Track”, in New-York Tribune?[2]:
    Most of the “regulars” are deeply suspicious of all steeplechase races of late years, and, whenever the favorite falls at one of the obstacles and a long priced leaper wins the race, they loudly call the race a “shoo-in” (a fixed affair, that is, in which the steeplechase racers have arranged to drop to the rear of the “meant” jumper and “shoo” him to the wire, they previously, of course, having got their money down on the horse thus generously treated).

    Also from Wiktionary: “From Middle English schew, schowe, show, showe, scou (“shoo!”, interjection). Compare Middle High German sch?, schuo (“shoo!”, interjection) (modern German scheu! (“shoo!”)), Dutch schuwen (“to shun”), German scheuchen (“to scare, drive away”).”

    Thus endeth today’s English lesson.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Web Analytics