We are so sorry, says “leader” (for the moment) of Iran to Gulf States
Oopsies about those attacks:
Regime president Masoud Pezeshkian issued the apology to other Gulf states in a rushed video message, but it won’t come with a change of policy. Apparently, no one’s taking orders from the mullahs’ side of the regime any longer:
“Iran’s president apologized Saturday for attacks on regional countries even as its missiles and drones flew toward Gulf Arab states, indicating that Tehran’s political leadership could not exercise full command over Iran’s armed forces. He also rejected US President Donald Trump’s repeated demands for surrender.
President Masoud Pezeshkian, one member of a tripartite leadership council overseeing Iran since a Feb. 28 airstrike started the war and killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, delivered the defiant message exactly one week into a conflict that has spread across the region, rattled global markets and air travel and left Iran’s own leadership greatly weakened by hundreds of Israeli and American airstrikes.
The message, seemingly filmed in a hurry without professional broadcast equipment, again underlined the limited powers being exercised by the theocracy’s leaders over its paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, which controls the ballistic missiles targeting Israel and others. It answered only to Khamenei and now appears to be picking its own targets as the conflict widens.
And yet the attacks continue. Either he has no control over them or he’s pretending to have no control over them. I think probably the former. I read quite a while ago – don’t recall where – that Khameini had de-centralized command and control of the ballistic missiles, giving instructions to the people in charge of each station as to what to do in the event of his death. So I don’t think these attacks are uncoordinated. I think they were pre-coordinated by Khameini.
And now, reading further down in that article I quoted for this post, I see that’s what’s being said there, too:
It’s not even clear how much control the IRGC has at this moment either, but they have enough to defy Pezeshkian’s orders. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has claimed that Ali Khamenei prepared for the war by ordering the all-out attack on Iran’s neighbors and implementing a “mosaic” strategy, in which decentralized units would be empowered to carry out their last orders independently until … something happened. In the last eight days, the US and Israel has done tremendous damage to command, control, and communication functions within Iran, so we are likely seeing the mosaic strategy playing out without any central control to reverse it and halt action – a risk in every war in which leadership gets destroyed.
So will the attacks on the Arab states and others continue unabated until there are no more missiles to fire?
Trump has this to say:
Iran, which is being beat to HELL, has apologized and surrendered to its Middle East neighbors, and promised that it will not shoot at them anymore. This promise was only made because of the relentless U.S. and Israeli attack. They were looking to take over and rule the Middle East. It is the first time that Iran has ever lost, in thousands of years, to surrounding Middle Eastern Countries. They have said, “Thank you President Trump.” I have said, “You’re welcome!” Iran is no longer the “Bully of the Middle East,” they are, instead, “THE LOSER OF THE MIDDLE EAST,” and will be for many decades until they surrender or, more likely, completely collapse! Today Iran will be hit very hard!
He understands this strong horse versus weak horse thing.
Azerbaijan has also been attacked by Iran in the last week, and has mobilized its military. They may even be ready to put a few boots on the ground in Iran themselves.
And the IRGC has basically said they aren’t paying a particle of attention to Pezeshkian:
President Pezeshkian made a mistake [saying they won’t attack neighboring countries], and our forces demonstrated his mistake. His comments were 5 hours ago, and since then Dubai and Abu Dhabi are being struck. Ignore Pezeshkian’s words during the war.
Pay no attention to the man in front of the curtain.
These are indeed interesting times.
What is the endgame in Iran? It would be wonderful if it was some sort of stable and liberty-loving republic. But if that can’t happen – and perhaps it can’t or won’t – perhaps taking away its weapons and ability to make more weapons, as well as getting rid of the worst elements of its leadership, would be good enough.

So no leadership, just those acting on their own. Will be hard to destroy them, but with drones overhead 24/7, there will be fewer places to hide.
RE: Is British PM Starmer (not to mention the long touted “special relationship” between the UK and the US) finally “finished”?
Various commentators have given their opinions–over and over again—after each new misstep, disastrous policy decision, or scandal, that British PM Kier Starmer is “finished.”
But this comment on Starmer and his policies by President Trump, out just a few minutes ago on Truth Social, is the most savage rebuke I think I have ever seen in the diplomatic communications between nations.
How Starmer survives President Trump’s comment below, I don’t know. *
“The United Kingdom, our once Great Ally, maybe the Greatest of them all, is finally giving serious thought to sending two aircraft carriers to the Middle East,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “That’s OK, Prime Minister Starmer, we don’t need them any longer — But we will remember. We don’t need people that join Wars after we’ve already won!”
* See https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-tells-starmer-aircraft-carriers-no-longer-needed-mideast-accuses-him-joining-war-us-already-won
The situation with Iran reminds me of the fable, “Who Will Bell the Cat?”
________________________________
The mice met in council to figure out how to defeat the Cat. One suggested a bell for the Cat to warn them.
Problem: Nobody would volunteer to bell the Cat. It is easy to propose impossible remedies.
https://fablesofaesop.com/belling-the-cat.html
________________________________
Somehow I remembered the story ending with a brave mouse doing the deed. Happy ending! Maybe that was the Disney version. But the fable ends on the question.
Today Israel and the US are succeeding in “belling” Iran. But we sure are hearing a lot of mouse excuses.
huxley:
Yes – other Western nations, and previous US presidents, have been afraid to bell the Iranian cat.
But one thing I hadn’t thought about previously but read something about the other day is that the Israeli campaigns post 10/7, particularly the defanging of Hezbollah, and the change of regime in Syria (which had long been an Iran ally), were necessary before that cat could be belled. Iran set up Hezbollah in Lebanon and other proxies in order to protect Iran from attack. The idea was that the proxies would go on the warpath if anything happened to Iran at the hands of Israel or the US or the West. “If you attack me, the kid gets it” – “the kid” being Israel. Plus, the unleashing of wider terrorist attacks in the West, which could still happen.
Post 10/7, Israel took the gloves off somewhat when Biden was president, and did the amazing beeper operation to Hezbollah. Then, only a month after Trump’s election, Iran lost its allies in Syria when the Assad regime was deposed. But then after Trump took office, Israel and the US had the 12-day joint operation against Iran – which was only possible because Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Syrian allies were much weakened. The 12-day air war was a success as far as it went. But it was not enough to force Iran to give up its weapons development (long-range ballistic, nuclear enrichment, etc). So the present attacks were needed. But I don’t think it would have been possible to be so bold without all the other things leading up to it.