Home » We are so sorry, says “leader” (for the moment) of Iran to Gulf States

Comments

<i>We are so sorry</i>, says “leader” (for the moment) of Iran to Gulf States — 4 Comments

  1. So no leadership, just those acting on their own. Will be hard to destroy them, but with drones overhead 24/7, there will be fewer places to hide.

  2. RE: Is British PM Starmer (not to mention the long touted “special relationship” between the UK and the US) finally “finished”?

    Various commentators have given their opinions–over and over again—after each new misstep, disastrous policy decision, or scandal, that British PM Kier Starmer is “finished.”

    But this comment on Starmer and his policies by President Trump, out just a few minutes ago on Truth Social, is the most savage rebuke I think I have ever seen in the diplomatic communications between nations.

    How Starmer survives President Trump’s comment below, I don’t know. *

    “The United Kingdom, our once Great Ally, maybe the Greatest of them all, is finally giving serious thought to sending two aircraft carriers to the Middle East,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “That’s OK, Prime Minister Starmer, we don’t need them any longer — But we will remember. We don’t need people that join Wars after we’ve already won!”

    * See https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-tells-starmer-aircraft-carriers-no-longer-needed-mideast-accuses-him-joining-war-us-already-won

  3. The situation with Iran reminds me of the fable, “Who Will Bell the Cat?”
    ________________________________

    The mice met in council to figure out how to defeat the Cat. One suggested a bell for the Cat to warn them.

    Problem: Nobody would volunteer to bell the Cat. It is easy to propose impossible remedies.

    https://fablesofaesop.com/belling-the-cat.html
    ________________________________

    Somehow I remembered the story ending with a brave mouse doing the deed. Happy ending! Maybe that was the Disney version. But the fable ends on the question.

    Today Israel and the US are succeeding in “belling” Iran. But we sure are hearing a lot of mouse excuses.

  4. huxley:

    Yes – other Western nations, and previous US presidents, have been afraid to bell the Iranian cat.

    But one thing I hadn’t thought about previously but read something about the other day is that the Israeli campaigns post 10/7, particularly the defanging of Hezbollah, and the change of regime in Syria (which had long been an Iran ally), were necessary before that cat could be belled. Iran set up Hezbollah in Lebanon and other proxies in order to protect Iran from attack. The idea was that the proxies would go on the warpath if anything happened to Iran at the hands of Israel or the US or the West. “If you attack me, the kid gets it” – “the kid” being Israel. Plus, the unleashing of wider terrorist attacks in the West, which could still happen.

    Post 10/7, Israel took the gloves off somewhat when Biden was president, and did the amazing beeper operation to Hezbollah. Then, only a month after Trump’s election, Iran lost its allies in Syria when the Assad regime was deposed. But then after Trump took office, Israel and the US had the 12-day joint operation against Iran – which was only possible because Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Syrian allies were much weakened. The 12-day air war was a success as far as it went. But it was not enough to force Iran to give up its weapons development (long-range ballistic, nuclear enrichment, etc). So the present attacks were needed. But I don’t think it would have been possible to be so bold without all the other things leading up to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Web Analytics