Meet the new Conservative Party of Iran
The launch of the CPI brings to the fore something often forgotten when discussing Iran: the Islamic Republic has suppressed political parties so completely that an entire generation of Iranians has never experienced genuine political pluralism.
If the regime collapses, the absence of organized political institutions could leave a vacuum. Groups like CPI are attempting to prepare for that possibility. …
“The Conservative Party of Iran stands firmly upon the enduring pillars of Iran’s historical and political truth,” the declaration states. “Its national identity, its sovereignty, and the continuity of Iran’s native polity – the monarchical institution.” …
Amiri argues that the resurgence of monarchist sentiment in recent years has been visible across Iranian society. …
Still, Amiri emphasized that the ultimate decision must come from the Iranian people.
“The legitimate determination of Iran’s political system must come through a free national referendum held under democratic conditions,” he said. “We do not prejudge the sovereign will of the people.”
Even if the outcome were to differ from current expectations, he added, the party would adapt. …
[The CPI’s] draft constitution outlines a political organization that resembles parties operating in established democracies. …
“To restore Iran’s economy we would begin with disciplined monetary policy aimed at stabilizing the rial,” he said.
Much more at the link.
They’ve certainly had a while to think about all of this.

Good luck to them.
Many of us are old enough to remember pre-ayatollahs Iran — I know I do. I was friendly with a few Iranians back in those days, and one thing that was impessed upon me was the savagery of SAVAK, the Shah’s secret police. Iran was no picnic back then.
I don’t know enough of the history to expound on whether SAVAK was better or worse than the Gestapo, but I do believe they were comparable. [Hey, anyone here who’s knowledgeable, do help me out. Please.] I do recall that SAVAK was awfully *evil*.
So the Shah was deposed, and Iran got the ayatollahs. We (most of us, anyway) revile the ayatollahs, their hatred and their fanatical religion. Frying-pan-to-fire, anyone?
My point, which is more a hope than a salient point, is that Iran can emerge from this ungodly mess better off, first for its sake, and then secondarily, for USA’s sake.
Here is an interview of Reza Pahlavi by Jason Calacanis from the All-In Podcast. Well worth the time, IMO.
It appears he has the support of Iranian diaspora and in keeping with the JPost article, the newly formed Conservative Party of Iran.
Pahlavi talks about the economic benefit to the US (and the world) that a free and prosperous Iran would bring (among other things). Definitely will appeal to President Trump.
Jason concludes with a conversation with Shervin Pishevar, an Iranian-American entrepreneur, venture capitalist, super angel investor, and philanthropist, born March 24, 1974, in Tehran, Iran. Interesting story how his father escaped from Iran under threat of death from the Islamic regime.
President Trump’s recent comment that he should get a say in any future leader was curious, and might be dismissed as bluster or hyperbole. More likely it is the President just reinforcing that nothing short of surrender will be sufficient and a break from the Islamic regime is necessary. Is an end closer than seems possible? As has been commented elsewhere, the Khamenei regime did decentralize the command structure of the IRGC in event of the decapitation of the leadership.
The battles may require these elements to be eradicated before a transition can begin.
It’s looking like Pahlavi has sufficient support to lead an interim government. Once a sufficient amount of the Islamic regime and IRGC have fled the country or been killed to empower the national army to assert power and guarantee security for the Pahlavi coalition to assume authority and lead Iran to a new government.
If this is successful, President Trump would deserve an additional figure carved on Mt. Rushmore.
More from the All-In Podcast, this time with Shervin Pishevar. Very positive.
Of course, none of this can come about because it will benefit Israel. The potential benefit to the US will be manifest in many tangible ways, but sorry, none of that matters, because we can’t support anything that might benefit the Jews. /sarc