1. Go get ’em Neo!

   Our “justice” system has numerous flaws. Our effete politicians need to be correcting many problems, instead of worrying about re-election.

   Maybe “truth” has something to do with both justice, and solving problems….

2. My God, this whole thing is horrific! Thank you for following this. It’s frightening how even the current DA was completely against giving this a second look. Politics should NEVER get in the way of justice.

3. I would like to see Mr. Morton bring a civil suit against the “judge” for megabucks. The man should spend the rest of his life eating from dumpsters.

4. Come to think of it if the legal system won’t take action for such blatant misconduct maybe the civil courts are the answer.

5. Mr. Morton certainly deserves more than a, “sorry ’bout that,” from the system. Hope something might be done to give him, some compensation.

6. J.J.: according to Texas law, Morton can end up getting $80,000 per year from the state. It’s not nearly enough, IMHO.

   One of the articles I read said that, in addition to everything else, Morton’s son broke off communication with Morton some years ago. So he lost his son, too. I hope this relationship can be repaired now. No amount of money can compensate for that loss.

7. I read that besides the witness testimony of his 3 year old son there was evidence that his wife’s credit card was used a few days after the murder and a forged check with her faked signature 9 days afterward but this was withheld from the defense. That former prosecutor is now a judge. So disgusting! And how he lost the opportunity to raise his own son is just tragic for both of them. I found some information on his son and how the relationship was severed by the son and it is just heartbreaking. They should hold both the original prosecuting attorney, now a judge, and the current D.A. who suppressed this evidence for 6 years, responsible for this travesty of justice. Disgusting!

8. It would be nice if we could always escape our pre-conceptions, but we sometimes don’t. Reason and deliberation are dependent upon rational and honest actors. The jury was convinced by a narrative which agreed with the standard Marxist-feminist narrative that rules our culture. This “religion” combined with misconduct overcame the safeguards of rationality. Given the evidence and the accepted narrative, jurors had no choice but to convict. Change either the religion or the misconduct and you have a different result.

9. I plan on doing a series of posts at the blog Traditional Christianity that explores issues like this in terms of bad forensics practices, the politicization of evidence standards, prosecutorial immunity, how appeals are handled and a whole bunch of other things. The justice system is huge parts of this country is truly broken, other places is could use some improvement but basically functions well for the most part. A lot of this depends on your local law enforcement and political cultures.

10. It would be interesting–cough, snort–to see if the Texas bar has an opinion about the case and the prosecutor.

11. Unfortunately this sort of thing does not appear to be that unusual. I know of a case in Virginia were a man was executed when a DA refused to consider additional DNA testing. To say nothing of the fact so many inmates on Illinois’ death row were cleared by DNA evidence after conviction that the governor felt obligated to end the death sentence in that state. I’ve heard an estimate that 10% of the convictions and imprisonments are wrong.

12. neo: “……Morton’s son broke off communication with Morton some years ago. So he lost his son, too. I hope this relationship can be repaired now. No amount of money can compensate for that loss.”

    So true. This is really heartbreaking as well as an example of improper prosecutorial conduct.

13. It also shows how a person’s actual innocence and integrity can work against him or her after conviction, when DAs insist on a showing of remorse or an admission of guilt for a crime the person never committed.

    yeah… like being order to attend a batterer re-education class where you have to admit to crimes you never did or fail the course and not see your children. and that without any due process or ability to appeal…

    maintaining your innocence is something your just not allowed to do… you cant get parole if your don’t pretend you did it, and pretend your now penitent and have learned your ways and more…

    how about noting the asymmetric sentencing..

    or how about this injustice…

    Wife Who Fired 11 Shots Is Acquitted of Murder
    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/07/nyregion/barbara-sheehan-who-killed-husband-is-found-not-guilty-of-murder.html?_r=1&partner=MYWAY&ei=5065

    in a society with so many resources available to one, should such a defense even be allowed?

    May I ask where is the due process for the guy who was shaving in the bathroom, when she shot him 11 times… a jury of 9 women and three men…

    the critical question at trial was whether Ms. Sheehan was in imminent danger when she killed her husband; New York State’s self-defense law justifies the use of lethal force when a threat to a person’s life is deemed immediate.

    The physical evidence appeared unpersuasive: Mr. Sheehan had been shaving before he was killed; his body was found on the bathroom floor, the faucet still running.

    Ms. Sheehan testified that the couple had a fierce argument the day before, and she had decided to leave, carrying one of her husband’s guns for protection. When her husband saw her, she said, he reached for a gun on the bathroom vanity and aimed it at her.

    In an interview, the jury forewoman, Barbara Fleisher, said jurors ultimately decided to exonerate Ms. Sheehan of murder because the family’s accounts of chronic and vicious abuse had rung true. She said they had believed that Ms. Sheehan reasonably feared she faced an imminent threat of bodily harm when she shot her husband the first time.

    “We believed she was justified with all the things she went through over the years,” she said. “We didn’t believe that Raymond Sheehan was the perfect family man or the photographs that were supposed to make him look like a pillar.”

    She said that the jury had decided, however, to find Ms. Sheehan guilty of possessing the second weapon, since she had shot her husband even after he no longer posed a danger. The verdict, she indicated, was something of a compromise.

    and just to show… its a formulea..
    the prosecution tends to make up stuff.

    Ms. Fleisher said the jury’s impasse had been overcome once jurors agreed that they had several doubts about the prosecution’s case. In particular, she said the jury doubted the attempt to show that Mr. Sheehan’s bizarre sexual behavior, which included forcing his wife to watch while he masturbated dressed in an adult diaper, had been a motive for a murderous rage.

    anyone care to look up how many shelters are in her area? how many colleges of which each has crisis people… psychiatrists and psychologists?

    Legal experts said the verdict was a vindication for the so-called battered-woman defense.

    Under this strategy the battered woman chronicles her abuse in intimate and graphic detail with the aim of convincing the jury that she reasonably feared for her life based on her abuser’s past behavior.

    “The case is a good marker of the willingness of jurors to realize that a history of abuse can inform a woman’s sense of the need to act in self-defense,” said Holly Maguigan, a law professor at New York University.

    “based on her abuser’s past behavior”

    but the abuser is DEAD he cant defend nor is there a trial to determine if the past behavior is valid. the police after the case do not go and investigate and find evidence of past actions and such.

    for the woman, this means short jail or no jail, free defense money, free charity money that comes, a political machine that love bombs you, social sympathy and on it goes.

    but in the case of morton above, being the man, the SAME PRESUMPTION abrogates his ability to defend himself nor prove innocence.

    ie… she is innocent even if guilty by reason of some action in the past, and her not finding an alternativce solution, while havcing the backing of the feminists and society as a protected class.

    he is guilty until he can prove innocence, as in this SAME FORMULA, if she is innocent above regardless, then he is guilty regardless…

    ie… every person who finds themselves in Mortons position who cant prove innocence… goes to jail… even later if they can, they go to jail often with huge bail and with the newspapers and such declaring guilt.

    how did such affect me? well i have aspergers, so i am not social. at the time it happened i had come out of my hole and closet. i was in the world had a great job, a career, and thought i found a ok person..

    after.. i realized that any moment that i was alone, and had no way to prove what i was doing, was a danger to me. any person who was with me, and there wasnt a third party, that was dangerous.

    it was those things that allowed them to insinuate fantasy for reality once they established that there was no proof available to the guilty person. from there they work to construct evidence whether real or not, fantasy or not, etc… to then build a case that pretends to tell the jury what happened in those moments where the defendant loses witness or ability to show some other action.

    so in the case of Morton, they fudged the time of death to insure that it aligned with one of those blank times we have in our lives.

    i bring this all up because its two sides of the same coin, and different than the cop killer movement (to free about 10 left blacks and others who have killed police officers)

    claire harris was such a case as well.. she ran over her husband three times with is daughter in the passenger seats screaming at her… everyone in the world knows that mr harris was having an affair, most people dont know that she had had several for years and he had finally decided not to be alone while married to someoen who dates others.

    now on to the DA in the Morton case!!!!

14. The District Attorney of Williamson County is John Bradley. He was appointed to the office by Governor Rick Perry in December of 2001 and then was elected in November 2002.

    The District Attorney provides information and support to victims of crimes and hires a trained professional to work as a Victim/Witness Coordinator.

    sounds interesting… whats that?

    Victim Witness Coordinator
    Irene Briones-Odom, Victim Witness Coordinator

    Irene Briones-Odom is the Victim/Witness Coordinator for Williamson County District Attorney’s Office. She ensures that a victim, guardian of a victim, or close relative of a deceased victim is afforded the rights granted to them by Chapter 56 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Ms. Briones-Odom works closely with appropriate law enforcement agencies, prosecuting attorneys and the Board of Pardons and Paroles in carrying out those duties.

    Chapter 56?

    “CHAPTER 56. RIGHTS OF CRIME VICTIMS”

    Rights? an extension to the bill of rights created by the assumption that a victim is a victim, which also assumes that the perpetrator is guilty? YES…

    Art. 56.01. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:
    “Victim” means a person who is the victim of the offense of sexual assault, kidnapping, aggravated robbery, trafficking of persons, or injury to a child, elderly individual, or disabled individual or who has suffered personal injury or death as a result of the criminal conduct of another.”

    since the prosecution claims that he masturbated over the body, later found to be a FALSE CLAIM, the victim fell under this code…

    now before i point out the rest… PLEASE NOTE THAT A VICTIM IS NOT AUTOMATICALLY A VICTIM UNLESS THE PERPETRATOR IS AUTOMATICALLY GUILTY.

    ie… how can you award things to the victim or family if the condition of victim has not been determined?

    ie… what if she is lying? what if her lying started a situation in which it gets her killed? what if the prosecutor is lying FOR the dead women who have more rights than living men?

    i guess my point is to say THINK while reading.

    A victim, guardian of a victim, or close relative of a deceased victim is entitled to the following rights within the criminal justice system:

    (1) the right to receive from law enforcement agencies adequate protection from harm and threats of harm arising from cooperation with prosecution efforts;

    (2) The right to have the magistrate take the safety of the victim or his family into consideration as an element in fixing the amount of bail for the accused;

    (5) the right to provide pertinent information to a probation department conducting a presentencing investigation concerning the impact of the offense on the victim and his family by testimony, written statement, or any other manner prior to any sentencing of the offender;

    (6) the right to receive information regarding compensation to victims of crime as provided by Subchapter B, including information related to the costs that may be compensated under that subchapter and the amount of compensation, eligibility for compensation, and procedures for application for compensation under that subchapter, the payment for a medical examination under Article 56.06 for a victim of a sexual assault, and when requested, to referral to available social service agencies that may offer additional assistance;

    (8) the right to be provided with a waiting area, separate or secure from other witnesses, including the offender and relatives of the offender, before testifying in any proceeding concerning the offender; if a separate waiting area is not available, other safeguards should be taken to minimize the victim’s contact with the offender and the offender’s relatives and witnesses, before and during court proceedings;

    (9) the right to prompt return of any property of the victim that is held by a law enforcement agency or the attorney for the state as evidence when the property is no longer required for that purpose;

    (12) the right to request victim-offender mediation coordinated by the victim services division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice;

    (c) The office of the attorney representing the state, and the sheriff, police, and other law enforcement agencies shall ensure to the extent practicable that a victim, guardian of a victim, or close relative of a deceased victim is afforded the rights granted by Subsection (a) of this article and, on request, an explanation of those rights.

    of course space does not allow me to put everyting in, so i selected some highlights

    the key here is that the prosecutor, regardless of who it is, is compelled by law to treat the victim as a de facto victim, and not even attempt to try to ascertain if she or he is trying to use the legal system as a weapon.

    over time, the prosecutors office develops an attitude of rescue of the oppressed other…

    they could NOT give Morton a fair trial and investigation as long as they also had to meet the terms of such feminist victim laws…

    each point i highlighted above can abrogate innocence after the fact.

    how can an innocent man claim innocence at a parole hearing if the victim or family gets to keep saying he is guilty. if he or she is, then thats one thing… but if in reality they arent, it becomes a political tool to remold the statistical outcomes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    and thats why each point is there.. to change the statistical outcomes on the reports so that it appears that they are doing something as the harridans will squawk.

    So right from the start, a prosecutor has to negate innocence till proven guilty and assign a victims rights person to the victim. the judge is compelled to put a higher bond on the criminal than otherwise, as a right of the victim!!!

    so here he is.. arrested… and there is this machine that says… ok… she is a victim… now the victim cant have her right fulfilled if we dont have a guilty party!!!

    if they dont have a guilty person, how can they insure that bond will be higher? how can they insure several of the rights above without a designated guilty party?

    we are all too willing to go after the prosecutors and such… AND NOT THE IDEOLOGY THAT IS DEFINING THESE CHANGES AND FOR SPECIFIC REASONS AND OUTCOMES…

    what happens, as in the Duke case, and micheal nifong, is that the prosecutor pays the price for these victim laws… and we dont realize that he is stuck… at best he ends up being punished either way!

    The representative must be approved by the penal institution and must be a:

    (1) psychologist;

    (2) sociologist;

    (3) chaplain;

    (4) social worker;

    (5) case manager; or

    (6) volunteer who has completed a sexual assault training program described by Section 420.011(b), Government Code.

    out of that list, the ones that actually are the majority are the ideological warriors…

    of course common people dont read such statutes, and even FEWER read what is in those training manuals.

    95% of all domestic violence is male on female
    True or False?

    False… women are more likely to be violent towards their mates, but men are more likely to do physical damage…

    [ask and i will list dozens of studies confirming this over the past 40 years… the trick is in what you define]

    now lets return to that statute..

    note that morton was convicted by the wrong testimony of an expert in the employ of the prosecutors office.

    Art. 56.06. MEDICAL EXAMINATION FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIM WHO HAS REPORTED ASSAULT; COSTS.

    (c) A law enforcement agency that requests a medical examination of a victim of an alleged sexual assault for use in the investigation or prosecution of the offense shall pay all costs of the examination. On application to the attorney general, the law enforcement agency is entitled to be reimbursed for the reasonable costs of that examination if the examination was performed by a physician or by a sexual assault examiner or sexual assault nurse examiner, as defined by Section 420.003, Government Code.

    (d) A law enforcement agency or prosecuting attorney’s office may pay all costs related to the testimony of a licensed health care professional in a criminal proceeding regarding the results of the medical examination or manner in which it was performed.

    so what you have are specialists who know that the man is guilty and assume that and this big machine, all paid for by the state.

    do you think the doctors that come up and testify would be hired again if they were honest and their testimony ended up proving something else?

    ALSO, has anyone taken a look at the text books for those who become special nurses of sexual violence, or investigators?

    Presumption of Guilt
    apublicdefender.com/2010/04/04/the-presumption-of-guilt/

    The presumption of innocence is dead, at least in practice. The real presumption, if you must, is that of guilt. Despite the Constitutional and historical directives to the contrary, the defendant “enjoys” a presumption of guilt from the moment of the institution of criminal proceedings.

    From the absurdly low standard of probable cause needed to arrest a citizen, to the pitifully slanted pre-trial proceedings, to the trial itself, the presumption weighs heavily against all those who have been charged with a crime.

    and even MORE So if the prosecutor can add some form of sex to it!!!!

    note that in Mortons case, once we found out the truth thanks to DNA, the ideas of sexual deviancy were false. however they DID move the whole of the case to be under this ideological feminist umbrella where specialists are called in… and of whom their training is HEAVILY ideologically skewed from empirical reality

    “What would you say is the most difficult aspect of being a public defender?”*

    The most difficult aspect for me, then, is this. This wretched presumption that hampers and stymies and confounds at every step of the way. This presumption that takes what would be an obvious case of injustice and turns it into a fight for a dismissal.

    Take it a step at a time: the State (or prosecution, if you prefer) has already made up its mind about the defendant’s guilt. They’re initiating a criminal prosecution. In their mind, they’ve already convicted the defendant. That’s the hand they’re playing from. “Why should I believe your client?” “You think a jury’s going to buy that?” “Oh, that’s his alibi?”

    Skepticism and disbelief reign supreme. We have to prove to them that their initial assessment of the defendant’s guilt is incorrect. The burden is shifting.

    It would all be bad enough, except that in certain areas… there is EXTRA unfairness on top of it all, thanks to ideologues promising people to change the outcomes, and their playing with the law, and support structure and defining unilateral special rights, so as tl change that outcome (and then pretend that the other group that got them to game the system owes them power for accomplishing something)

    But there’s always the trial, you say. A determination of guilt or not-guilt to be made by a jury of “peers”. All 6 or 12 of them are indoctrinated about the presumption of innocence and all vow to uphold the State to its burden.

    I have come to believe that that is hogwash. Jurors are smart enough to know what to say. They’ve also been reading the same newspapers and watching the same news. There’s still this cultural divide between “them” the defendants, and “us” the jurors. Someone’s been arrested and is going to trial? Well, there must be something to it or why else would the State waste its time?

    The presumption goes to the State. If the State, in its benevolence and infinite wisdom has decided to pursue this matter, then, well…

    If you had a client in whose case you believed the State’s evidence could not sustain the burden, would you dare rest without putting on any evidence? Do you have that much faith in jurors?

    I have this belief — it may be a naive belief — that most trials are won not because the jury upheld the presumption of innocence, but because the defense overcame the presumption of guilt.

    and this is the real point behind the machinations of the feminists… and other leftists..

    that by avoiding tilting the actual law… they avoid us looking at the game to the system. “see” they say, the law is fair…

    but we forget that the law is just a point and a start of a process… and so they play with the PROCESS…

    so what happens is that in these SPECIAL Cases where sex and some domestic sometning is and a woman is involved…

    the external factors that are allowed change the very presumption and view of it.

    if mr morton had murdered a stranger… say from a distance… that special team of specialists would not be up front and changing the process and perspective of it!

    and so morton in that case would come into court without shackles… and so on..

    but in such a case with these special rights.. morton is shackled… how is that work? easy… the clause on the protection of the witness, family and the others.. makes it ok to deny the guilty his right to appear innocent for trial…

    the fact that the victim gets to have supporters, but the guilty do not is another skew…

    the fact that most women read cosmo, and other such things and that they are vastly more likely to convict the guilty than men are… (go ahead, take a lot of time to separate advocate from actual studies and see)…

    their being taught that they owe it to other women, the feminist idea that its better to put 100 born rapists who just havent done it yet into jail than it is to release one guilty one.. and so on.

    makes for a overwhelming level of guilt presumption.

    and its WHY the left and womens domestic violence industry focuses on these procedural extras. its beaue the people dont… they blame the pitcher, the prosecutor. they dont blame the team or the extra set of team members who have only one purpose: to surround the parties with presumptive of innocence and presumptive s og guilt to insure that the outcomes match the ideological pronouncements.

    big SIGH….

15. NOTE!!!
    at the time of Mortons conviction, such laws and things were new… between their formation and the public conciousness after burning bed, and such… the prosecutors themselves took it to skew… however there was and is a large group of activist judges who lead from the bench, all the way up to sotomayer…

    Irene Briones-Odom…
    note she carries her ideology on her sleeve…
    she has hyphenated her name

    which means she will not carry the name of some other man she marries..(but instead will carry the name of the other man in her mothers life… she showed them didnt she!)

    http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/2009/11/30/Irene-B_-Odom.html

    Helping victims of violent crimes
    District attorney’s office victim/witness coordinator guides victims through complicated court process.

    http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/2009/11/30/1130victims.html

    For the last seven years, Odom has worked with victims of felonies, witnesses and their families at the Williamson County courthouse, making sure they are emotionally cared for while the person accused of wronging them awaits trial.

    “She really helps keep the emotional side of what we do very balanced,” Williamson County District Attorney John Bradley said. The court process “is overwhelming. And it’s our job, particularly through a victim/witness coordinator, to not let that overwhelm the victim.”

    there is absolutely no question as to validity of accusations or what happens… the victim is always innocent. in fact, the whole movement to “not blame the victim” has us so scared and pc we refuse to even look at it with common sense, and now avoid even questioning whether a victim is a victim!!!!

    Odom, who is also a licensed court interpreter in Spanish, spent years as a volunteer with the Williamson County Crisis Center, now the Hope Alliance, working with victims immediately after a crime was committed. She also worked in the protective order division of the Williamson County attorney’s office.

    She joined the DA’s office as its first victim/witness coordinator when the position was created in 2002.

    The job exists by law in some form in every Texas district attorney’s office, with some jurisdictions distributing witness coordinator duties among staff members.

    she volunteered to work, after a friend suffered, and so found meaning in what?

    now… anywhere from 25% to 45% of rape accusations are false… (i can list the studies from around the world)…

    does she treat that number of those that come in skeptically? or is it 100% for her?

    you see we have this thing where if you treat a person who didnt do it as if they didnt do it, we all jump on the person as that would be denying their rights…

    now…
    lets take a look at what forms the ideas and thigns of the hope alliance takes… and see if ideology and such is directly connected into prosecutorial action through such extra laws outside of case law

    http://www.hopealliancetx.org/

    some selected points:

    Founded in 1984 as a rape crisis center, Hope Alliance celebrated 25 years of service to the community in 2009. The agency expanded to include services for domestic violence victims in the late 1980s and opened the 24-hour emergency shelter in 1990.

    Core Services
    Our core services include a 24-hour crisis hotline, emergency shelter, transitional housing, accompaniment services, legal advocacy, counseling, support groups, education and prevention.

    if there is one of those everywhere…
    then how is it ok that woman shot her husband 11 times and is justified?

    24 hour crisis line, shelters, transitional housing, police on your side, and so on… aint that a good question? and how can a jury find her justified if they know that all that is available? well they invented stockholm syndrome… (something that battered husbands seem to be immune to)

    but this is about morton, and so on.

    you can see that such shelters boomed in the same years as mortons trial…

    that they deny that a woman will lie about something so important as rape (ignoring all the confirmed studies and cases)…

    and now pretty much you have a case where false testimoney and such is ok, as it serves the greater good of the collective..

    or as that feminist said, a man falsely imprisoned can learn something..

    yesterday i pointed out that statistically rape, and domestic violence and such ahs gone down a whole lot since the 60s and 70s… when records were not kept… or made… so myth becomes measured reality at some point.

    however, if you read the site, you get the feeling that people are walking around with bats and its a community past time.

    There is a growing need for emergency shelter in Williamson County. Hope Alliance has documented a 39 percent increase in the number of victims provided shelter during the last year and, for the last two years, has been forced to make referrals for alternative refuge for 10-15 families each month.

    – Hope Alliance serves more than 5,000 clients through our core programs each year.
    – In 2008, 9,725 nights of shelter were provided to women and children.
    – Each year, 4,500 hotline callers receive crisis intervention services, information and referrals.
    – Volunteers provide Hope Alliance with nearly 7,500 hours of service each year.

    its big business..

    if you go to the SBA, you will find that there are lots of grants ajnd programs and free money if your a woman and want to start a business… and that business happens to be rape crisis or domestic violence or womens services!!!!!!

    all linked together in a large chain, and your not going to fix anything if your going to look at a point in isolation.

    [edited for length by n-n]

16. Artfldgr:

    I often skip your comments because they are often so long and rambling.

    But I read all of your comments posted on the two threads neo-neocon has created about Morton’s wrongful conviction.

    I’m glad I found the time to read them for this topic. Great contributions. Thanks.

17. Frederick Heebe

    National Feminist Leaders Protest Nomination of Alleged Batterer as Federal Prosecutor in New Orleans

    Two women have now come forward with credible accounts of domestic violence at the hands of Frederick Heebe

    Gandy, a former New Orleans attorney today announced that she will lead a protest on Saturday

    Gandy will be joined by former Tulane Law Professor Terry O’Neill, local NOW activists, and members of NOW’s National Board, which is meeting this weekend.

    and

    Ironically, if he U.S. justice system that defended a poor black woman accusing a famous, rich white man of sexual assault helped embolden French feminists to speak up about sexual violence at home, the eventual selling out of that same New York victim–and her claims–due to the cynical politics that dominate America’s legal system may inspire those same feminists to redirect attention to the fundamentals of that case as part of advancing their own cause.

    ANY and every sexual case in any way has the same army behind it wanting 100% conviction regardless of evidence… (or lack)

    Students, community activists plan to protest Ingham County Prosecutor

    Michigan State University students and community activists from the greater Lansing region will descend on Veteran’s Memorial Courthouse in downtown Lansing Friday morning for a planned eight hour protest.

    Activists are targeting Ingham County Prosecutor Stuart Dunnings III over his decision not to issue charges in an alleged sexual assault on campus in late August. Michigan Messenger reported Wednesday that the two accused are both basketball players with the MSU Spartans.

    every prosecutor knows that if he convicts an innocent man, all he has to do is deal with the family, some friends, and maybe minor newspaper play.

    but if he dont do what the feminists want, he will have people (like acorn with banks) making his life miserable, removing him from office, and so on.

    so if you want to stop this injustice, you HAVE to oppose feminism, as they are not going to stop, and without opposition, your not going to be able to counter protest all their collective mobilizations and candle burning marches, and slut walks…

    here you can read about the case…
    michiganmessenger.com/42253/msu-sexual-assault

    those prosecutors are in trouble for NOT prosecuting and no reason would be good enough for the activists…

    how bad does it get for the people who have no support and are innocent?

    Thomas James Ball Self-Immolated in Protest of the “Justice” System

    Thomas thankfully dropped off a “last statement” to the Keene Sentinel, so we could all know what he was going through.

    The Jaffrey PD apparently admitted that pressing forward as a domestic violence case was a mistake. His wife’s testimony shows he did not have a history of violence. Thomas figured he’d get to see his kids again after the not guilty. He figured wrong. The court continued to press for counseling at Monadnock Family Services (MFS) prior to allowing Thomas unsupervised visits with his kids. Of course, this is a huge racket for MFS, who likely is paid for every one of the cases they are sent by the court, either by the people involved or by the state of NH.

    despite making child support payments and having unsupervised visitation with his young son, he was unable to have unsupervised visitation with his two daughters, not because he was considered a danger, but because he refused to attend counseling as ordered by the court.

    Why did he refuse? Because the location of the counseling was to be Monadnock Family Services, the very same agency that he believed was responsible for escalating the situation and intimidating Karen Ball into calling the police in the first place.

    He wanted the decision on unsupervised visits to be made by the court, but the court kept passing the buck to MFS, therefore he did not participate, as he felt the case worker had a vendetta against him, as she allegedly refused to meet with him until he “changed his attitude”.

    so how does a feminist domestic violence agency get power delegated to them? by the court doing this, the client was denied any due process or means of redress, or action…

    that is, once the court mandated re-education, he had to go, they had control over his life, the court would not hear pleas. etc.

    so, he set himself on fire… one of about a half dozen

    and ALL of this is related as it ALWAYS comes back to the same groups, organizations and so forth.

    excerpts blocked together from a domestic violence site protesting this industry and its effects on law:

    In prosecuting domestic violence cases the district attorneys are out to win. Whether you are guilty or innocent is of no consequence to them. They most definitely do not want to be perceived as soft on domestic violence defendants.

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

    “It doesn’t matter that you’ re innocent. Or that she attacked you first. Or that you both went over the line and that both of you want to put it behind you and work it out. The system will prosecute you and persecute you until you’ve confessed your sins – even if you’ve none to confess. And you’ re not cured until they say you’ re cured – even if you were never sick to begin with.” Glenn Sachs (a friend from my days publishing articles on this subject for 20 years fighting the courts and such till i gave up)

    In one case reported to the Equal Justice Foundation a woman hemorrhaging as a result of a tubal pregnancy was treated by police as domestic violence and the woman nearly died while police insisted on investigating the “violence.”

    it was a 911 call, she was in pain, the police treat all such calls as domestic violence first… ask if anyone wants the details

    If you call for an ambulance for any reason the police will likely arrive first and investigate with a presumption of family violence. They will also use that presumption as an excuse to search your home without a warrant.

    The police will enter your home night or day without a warrant and search for evidence of violence. We have repeatedly heard reports that women cut up clothes, scratched or bruised themselves, or broken things in the house, and then blamed their male partner. Deliberate self injury is five times as common as criminal domestic violence but such false allegations and perjury are never prosecuted.

    i can confirm that… she tossed the apartment, then left for months… they prosecuted me for her murder… no body, no report, no 911 call, nothing. and i was the one who contacted them worried about her!!!!!!!

    If there is the slightest evidence of violence, a loud argument, interfering with a telephone call, or insulting or abrasive language, one or both of the parties will be arrested although at least 75% of the time only the male is taken into custody. Police training generally discourages dual arrests and primary aggressor statutes are used to train and justify arrest of the male almost without regard to the circumstances.

    think that doesnt skew the whole system from the police to the prosecutor?

    as i said.. its SYSTEMIC… not a rogue prosecutor.

    [edited for length by n-n]

18. go ahead. cut that one down too..

    i cant condense a graduate course of material into a paragraph… not without the listener just believing in blind faith.

    i detail who, what, where, when and how

    i guess its easier to just go after the prosecutor
    or let the innocent be hurt…

    it sure aint worth the effort to know the facts behind things… is it?

    you want to fix it, then get rid of the collective that has been modifying it and threatening judges and prosecutors, and remolding eduation for nearly 100 years if you believe bella dodd, and hundreds of others.

    sorry its so long..

    but how do i condense that?

    we have alreayd had you dash off the mackinnon quote and feminists as not being that powerful..

    so we are now pc and cant see the source… so we cant fix it, and so its a complete waste of time…

    nothing will change for the more than 100,000 innocents that are affected at various levels and various categories for the new collective..

    no one will go out and defend the prosecutor who doesnt do what the harridens want and their political idols they follow.

    so its a waste if no one is going to get to the actual crux – and that is a person in a collective system who has to follow X is not responsible for X…

    killing the camp guard at bergon belson will not dismantle any camps.. or affect those who are behind him or her and what they are forcing them to do. a new one will be hired, the same feminist law will have them deal with a social worker in every case watching them (as in the soviet union!!!!!!!!!), and the prosecutor will convict the innocent…

    until he or she makes a mistake, or the wind blows and we notice for a day or two… or a week… then he is disbarred like nifong..

    but who replaced nifong and what organization has to be included in all that new persons work?

    without truth, its a waste

19. Artfldgr: If you want to write a book, write a book.

    But not here.

    As I said before, I edit your comments for length and not content. If you want something to stay in there, put the most important stuff at the beginning, because it’s the end I cut off.

    If there are a lot of lengthy comments by one person in a thread and they are somewhat redundant in their message, I also sometimes remove some of them. That would be for you or anyone else.

20. J.J.: according to Texas law, Morton can end up getting $80,000 per year from the state. It’s not nearly enough, IMHO.

    it’s also pointless, because stealing money from taxpayers is going to hold who accountable? The judges and the lawyers, they don’t pay attention when the state pays. That’s the problem right there.

    The idea of collective bargaining has grown in malignancy to the point where people think lawsuits should be making the state or the government pay, rather than individuals at fault.

21. One would think that these are isolated incidents but they aren’t. When lawyers are under the protection of the Left, this is what will happen as their greed and ambitious expand exponentially without someone putting a foot on them to suppress them.

    It’s a simple difference between how organized crime, a mafia, runs vs small time independent operators doing jobs that require only 1-3 people.

    Catching the individual lawyers or judges, is meaningless. You have to find the source and shut it off. Cause if you don’t, they’ll just spawn more of em.

22. Curtis, it’s Williamson County, so Marxist-Feminist preconceptions do not enter into this case. “Tough on Crime,” does. I understand that Coakley lost her Senate race for her intransigence in prosecuting a child abuse case, and refusing to allow new evidence, etc. It happens, and I think that Bradley will very likely pay for it next election. You may all be assured that our family will do our part to make that happen.

23. I just sit back and enjoy.

    For many moons, I’ve seen comments that are anti-art. Neo tries to limit him/her/it, but art-t-f resists. Art-t-f knows it all, because he/she/it know how to copy/paste. Art-t-f simply searches the topic and does the necessary copy/paste, thinking that will make him/her/it a hero.

    Most simply scroll past.

    Newbies may read for awhile, and then learn to scroll past.

    Hey Art-t-f, most people already know about wiki….

    But, W-t-f

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>