To tell you the truth, I was surprised when they hired Herridge, for the simple reason that she seemed to be an intelligent and fair reporter. Now they’re fired her as part of a cost-saving layoff – they say that’s the reason, but there’s no particular reason to believe them.
From The Hill, (which is not a right-wing site), written by Jonathan Turley:
There is trouble brewing at Black Rock, the headquarters of CBS, after the firing of Catherine Herridge, an acclaimed investigative reporter. Many of us were shocked after Herridge was included in layoffs this month, but those concerns have increased after CBS officials took the unusual step of seizing her files, computers and records, including information on privileged sources.
The position of CBS has alarmed many, including the union, as an attack on free press principles by one of the nation’s most esteemed press organizations.
I have spoken confidentially with current and former CBS employees who have stated that they could not recall the company ever taking such a step before. One former CBS journalist said that many employees “are confused why [Herridge] was laid off, as one of the correspondents who broke news regularly and did a lot of original reporting.”
That has led to concerns about the source of the pressure. He added that he had never seen a seizure of records from a departing journalist, and that the move had sent a “chilling signal” in the ranks of CBS.
One thing that caught my attention about Turley’s piece is that appeared at all at The Hill; people in the news business really do seem concerned about this, I guess. Another is the phrase “one of the nation’s most esteemed press organizations.” Perhaps that’s even true, but only because many of the others are even worse. I could even argue that CBS has long been one of the worst; after all, Rathergate was perpetrated at CBS. No travesty surprises me anymore on the part of the MSM.
Perhaps the upset over CBS’s treatment of Herridge is also because her fellow workers at CBS recognized her as a person of integrity interested in pursuing truth as best she could. But it also has to do with source confidentiality.
I believe it is meant to have a chilling effect on reporters who stray from the Democrat party line.
Turley writes:
CBS is one of the world’s premier news organizations, with a legendary history that includes figures from Murrow to Walter Cronkite to Roger Mudd. That is why the hiring of Herridge was so welcomed by many of us. The network was at risk of becoming part of the journalistic herd, an echo-chamber for Democratic and liberal narratives. It had been mired in third place for ages, and it was moving in the wrong direction by alienating half of the country.
Not that Cronkite was unbiased, however (please see my posts about him). But I, likewise, welcomed the hiring of Herridge as a potential breath of fresh air at CBS.
More:
The timing of Herridge’s termination immediately raised suspicions in Washington. She was pursuing stories that were unwelcomed by the Biden White House and many Democratic powerhouses, including the Hur report on Joe Biden’s diminished mental capacity, the Biden corruption scandal and the Hunter Biden laptop. She continued to pursue these stories despite reports of pushback from CBS executives, including CBS News President Ingrid Ciprian-Matthews.
So it is logical to suspect a Biden pressure campaign, or at the very least an understanding on the part of CBS executives that in an election year the network doesn’t want to give any support to the Trump forces by emphasizing Biden’s myriad flaws. At least, not until a replacement is found – which may not happen.
This is about the confidentiality problem:
CBS is suggesting that it will allow unnamed individuals to rifle through Herridge’s files to determine what will remain with the network and what will be returned to the reporter. That could fundamentally alter how reporters operate and how willing sources are to trust assurances that they will be protected. …
CBS could be forcing a showdown with the union, which must protect not only this journalist but all journalists seeking to maintain control and confidentiality of their files.
The union may have no choice but to go to court to force CBS to protect journalistic values, including a demand for an injunction to force the company to secure these files and bar review until a court has had a chance to consider these questions of confidential and proprietary claims to the files.
Now, that would be an interesting development.