↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 508 << 1 2 … 506 507 508 509 510 … 1,880 1,881 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

The real “Pygmalion”? – Jane Burden Morris

The New Neo Posted on September 24, 2021 by neoSeptember 24, 2021

[NOTE: I noticed that last night commenter “Zaphod” brought up Jane Morris towards the end of the open thread (see this as well as this). I thought I’d respond by putting up a link to an ealier post of mine on Jane Morris, but when I looked for it I was surprised to find no such post existed. It was actually in draft form, along with about a thousand other unpublished posts of mine.

Yes, you read that right – about a thousand. It amounts to a severe case of post-hoarding – as I wrote over three years ago, when the number of hoarded posts was about half what it is today. In that piece on post-hoarding, I described three categories of hoarded posts, but I now realize I should add a fourth: posts that started out sounding interesting but didn’t quite pass muster once I’d fleshed them out.

My post about Jane Morris is one of that latter group. And yet, after reading Zaphod’s comment, I’ve decided to liberate it from bondage and put it out here despite that. Why not? At least, it’s a break from politics. So here it is.]

You know how it goes. You’re researching something, way leads on to way, and suddenly you’ve stumbled on an altogether different but fascinating story. This happened to me recently when I was researching some artwork for a post, and I came across the story of Jane Morris, who turns out to have been not only an artist’s model and the wife of William Morris, but was probably the model for Eliza Doolittle in “Pygmalion” and “My Fair Lady”:

Burden was born in Oxford, the daughter of a stableman, Robert Burden, and his wife Ann Maizey, who was a laundress…Her mother Ann was illiterate and probably came to Oxford as a domestic servant. Little is known of Jane Burden’s childhood, but it was poor and deprived.

In October 1857, Burden and her sister Elizabeth, known as “Bessie”, attended a performance of the Drury Lane Theatre Company in Oxford. Jane Burden was noticed by Dante Gabriel Rossetti and Edward Burne-Jones who were members of a group of artists painting the Oxford Union murals, based on Arthurian tales. Struck by her beauty, they asked her to model for them. Burden sat mostly for Rossetti as a model for Queen Guinevere and afterwards for William Morris, who was working on an easel painting, La Belle Iseult, now in the Tate Gallery. Like Rossetti, Morris used Burden as the model for his painting of Queen Guinevere. During this period, Morris fell in love with Burden and they became engaged, though by her own admission she was not in love with Morris.

Burden’s education was limited and she was probably destined to go into domestic service like her mother. After her engagement, she was privately educated to become a rich gentleman’s wife. Her keen intelligence allowed her to recreate herself. She was a voracious reader who became proficient in French and Italian and became an accomplished pianist with a strong background in classical music. Her manners and speech became refined to an extent that contemporaries referred to her as “Queenly”. Later in life, she had no trouble moving in upper class circles. She was possibly the model for the heroine in the 1884 novel Miss Brown by Vernon Lee upon which was based the character of Eliza Doolittle in Bernard Shaw’s play Pygmalion (1914) and the later film My Fair Lady. She also became a skilled needlewoman who would be later renowned for her embroideries.

Here’s a painting by Rossetti for which Jane modeled:

She has the “look” beloved by the pre-Raphaelite group of painters. The features and hair seem exaggerated, don’t they, to create a certain dramatic impression? But actually, Burden really did look like that. Here’s a photograph of Burden taken in 1865:

An even more dramatic description of her reversal of fortune, and her looks, can be found in Paris Review:

…Janey’s habitual unsmiling expression, seen in paintings and photographs alike, conveys neither regret nor contrition. Instead, Rossetti captures the very quality that made this reserved and intelligent woman so captivating as a model: the suggestion of a complicated, closely guarded inner life behind the saturnine composition of her features…

[After her discovery by the pre-Raphaelites] a career as a domestic servant, the likeliest future for a stable hand’s daughter, had been averted. For Janey, the fact that her appearance proved the catalyst may have been the most surprising part. “It is likely,” observes her biographer, Jan Marsh, “that no one had ever said she was beautiful ” and may indeed have described her as plain or even ugly.”…But Rossetti and his circle put forth an ideal of female beauty entirely at odds with prevailing tastes, which, in the early Victorian era, favored petite blondes with childlike features and hourglass figures. Pale, lanky, and black-browed Janey, once immortalized by the Brotherhood, launched a revolution: by the 1870s, the writer Mary Eliza Haweis was marveling that, on account of the Pre-Raphaelites, “certain types of face and figure once literally hated [are] actually the fashion”…In fact the pink cheeked dolls are nowhere; they are said to have ”˜no character.’ ”

…“I was a holy thing to them,” she reminisced of her early days with the Pre-Raphaelites.

Some of her embroidery can be found here.

[NOTE: When I clicked on that last link today, I found a pop up that had “The Starry Night” on it – the subject of my open thread for the day – and an ad lower down with the Magritte apple painting on it. Odd coincidences – unless those things were based on my browsing history and specially tailored to me.]

Posted in Fashion and beauty, Painting, sculpture, photography, People of interest | 14 Replies

More lies from Biden, and no one should ever be surprised

The New Neo Posted on September 24, 2021 by neoSeptember 24, 2021

Biden repeats the Whipgate lie, and follows it up with his trademark macho bluster:

Biden on the lie that border patrol were using whips on illegal immigrants at the border:

"To see people treated like they did? Horses running them over? People being strapped? It's outrageous. I promise you, those people will pay." pic.twitter.com/Jx79KoYTy9

— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) September 24, 2021

See also this.

I wrote a post recently about the absurdity of the lies of the left, the reasons that the left feels immune from criticism about those lies, and the function of the lies. But this lie about the border isn’t in the category of “absurd,” it’s a more traditional type of leftist lie aided and abetted by the press. It rests on a kernel of truth: a photo of the border authorities on horseback, trying to deal with some illegal immigrants (Haitians, I’m pretty sure). The photo was misinterpreted right off the bat, and given a much more pernicious spin (whipping) than was the case (reining the horses).

But the lie (it may have started as a mistake, perhaps, but once a correction was issued it became a lie) is a very useful one, so it is repeated and repeated. Biden and company know that the MSM is unlikely to expose this – lies such as “border police whipping poor black Haitians” play really really well with the public. And we have the photos, right? – so it must be true.

Biden has always been one of the most flagrant of political liars, and that’s saying something. So why would he stop now, in his dotage? And make no mistake about it – although his aides feed him many of his lines, and he is very cognitively challenged, he’s not so far gone that he doesn’t know what he’s doing quite a bit of the time, at least in some basic way. He simply doesn’t care about the truth and never did. He cares about what’s expedient for Joe and for the Democrats, that’s all.

Remember, this is the guy who launched his campaign with the Charlottesville lie, the gift to the Democrats that keeps on giving, and he doubled down on it again and again:

The first words Joe Biden spoke as he announced his presidential campaign on Thursday were “Charlottesville, Virginia.”

The former vice president entered the race with a video that framed the 2020 campaign as a battle to redeem the soul of the nation from a Donald Trump presidency he cast as “an aberrant moment in time.” And he chose to highlight the President’s reaction to white supremacists’ August 2017 march in Charlottesville and the killing of a counter-protester…

In the aftermath of the violence in Charlotesville, Biden wrote in The Atlantic that Trump’s willingness to divide the United States “knows no bounds,” and that Trump had “emboldened white supremacists with messages of comfort and support.”

“If it wasn’t clear before, it’s clear now: We are living through a battle for the soul of this nation,” Biden wrote then. “The giant forward steps we have taken in recent years on civil liberties and civil rights and human rights are being met by a ferocious pushback from the oldest and darkest forces in America.”

I very much doubt Biden actually wrote those words, but that’s more or less irrelevant. Biden lies repeatedly, whether the lies are generated by him or whether they are given to him by others. And these are not just tangential lies of the type that’s typical for politicians – bragging or exaggeration, for example – although they certainly include that sort of lie. They also feature huge material lies, and obvious lies such as his repeated lying about Afghanistan.

Lies have been the centerpiece of Biden’s political career, his 2020 campaign, and his presidency.

[NOTE: So far the “fact-checkers” of the MSM have avoided fact-checking this particular lie.]

Posted in Biden, Immigration, Violence | 17 Replies

More questions about the January 6th surveillance videos

The New Neo Posted on September 24, 2021 by neoSeptember 24, 2021

This RedState post, including the comments, raises further questions about January 6th and what the surveillance videos released so far show – and what they don’t show. Here’s a point I really didn’t discuss in yesterday’s post about the videos:

Tucker calls out the fedbois pic.twitter.com/mXcveej6r0

— Jewish Deplorable (@TrumpJew2) September 24, 2021

We know from court filings that there were federal agents there on January 6th. We still don’t know their roles or how many, or who in the videos were agents and who were not. There has been no attempt to tell us, either, and yet it’s very important information.

At RedState author Bonchie also points out:

And while the narrative for a long time on the right was that these were Antifa operatives, that was always the wrong assumption, in my opinion. It always made much more sense that the men in black were federal agents, FBI or otherwise. Remember, this is the same FBI that essentially orchestrated the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping attempt. It’s the same FBI that had more agents at last week’s “Justice for January 6th” rally than there were actually protesters…

The government could clear this up in an instant. After all, they can track down random people across the country who stole a beer from Pelosi’s office, but we are to believe they just don’t know who those men are? Give me a break.

And what of the men who scaled the side of the Capitol – apparently at the same time it was easy to just walk right in? A commenter at RedState asks more questions:

Who were the six (6) young men who grappled their way up the front of the Capitol Building for the staged photo op?

Stairways to the building were clear at the same time. They did this for pre-planned effect, with cameras ready.

Why did they suddenly become drama queens – in coordination with the Capitol police firing flash bangs at the milling and peaceful crowd?

I’d like a statement on who those men were, too. Surely there are witnesses, even if the video doesn’t show their identities?

And I’d like a timeline of how the violence began, based on a comprehensive look at the videos (probably impossible at this point, since the feds have stonewalled their release so far and even now only a small portion have been released). Were the feds reacting to something the crowd did in terms of violence, or did the crowd react to something the feds did in terms of violence? This would seem to be important information, as well. I’ve yet to see an attempt to analyze this, although it’s certainly possible I’ve missed something.

If anyone knows where any of this is discussed in depth, please give a link.

Posted in Election 2020, Liberty, Violence | 4 Replies

The Biden administration wants Big Brother IRS to get even bigger

The New Neo Posted on September 24, 2021 by neoSeptember 24, 2021

It seems to me that the Biden administration’s proposal to expand the spy powers of the feds and the IRS wouldn’t be popular even with most Democrats, if they knew about it:

The Biden proposal would drop the dollar threshold for transactions at which federal tax agents would be allowed to examine an individual’s private bank account from the present $10,000 to only $600.

Biden also wants to double the IRS workforce by adding 87,000 new government agents under the President’s “The American Families Plan Tax Compliance Agenda.”

Biden and Democratic allies in Congress claim the actions are needed to close the “tax gap,” the difference between what current federal law requires to be collected by the government and how much actually goes into the Treasury.

Boozman [R-Ark] said Biden’s unprecedented explosion of new federal spending is the major reason behind Biden’s push to double the size of the IRS and give it virtually unlimited power to monitor how much income Americans earn and where they spend it, said Boozman…

Boozman said the $10,000 threshold was approved decades ago to enable the IRS to assist federal law enforcement efforts against drug cartels, terrorist groups, and organized crime rings.

Boozman and some other Republican senators have introduced a bill to stop it, but I can’t imagine that the bill can pass the Senate these days. I assume it would require 60 votes, because the filibuster is still in place, so even if Manchin and Sinema wanted to join the Republicans, I don’t think that would be enough. And all the other Democrat senators – whether they bill themselves as leftists or not – seem to march in lockstep with the left on virtually every bill.

You can cynically say that you don’t think the Republicans really care, either, and that it’s all theater, yada yada yada. But I disagree. I think the Republicans realize exactly how this will be used: to go after the Democrats’ enemies (the right), plus the middle class kulaks.

At Instapundit it’s been pointed out that the WaPo and the NY Times, those stalwart newspapers of record, have been somewhat silent on the matter. No surprise there, because I think they know this would be unpopular with some Democrats, as well, who don’t mind screaming “tax the rich” but who themselves are not all that keen on being monitored and on the idea of so many more IRS agents.

If you have any reasonably moderate Democrat friends and family, you might run this one by them and ask if they’re in favor of the administration’s plans. I’d be curious to hear their responses.

Posted in Finance and economics, Liberty | Tagged IRS | 17 Replies

Open thread 9/24/21

The New Neo Posted on September 24, 2021 by neoSeptember 24, 2021

Posted in Uncategorized | 13 Replies

Roundup: Whipgate and other border news

The New Neo Posted on September 23, 2021 by neoSeptember 23, 2021

There’s so much news about the southern border that I’m just going to do a roundup:

(1) Child sexual abuse.

(2) The government promotes the false Whipgate narrative. Why not? After all, lying comes naturally to them, and right now their illegal immigration policy isn’t meeting with public favor. So something out of a Hollywood movie is what they fall back on.

(3) The administration’s Haitian policy is being criticized, as well.

(4) Although these next two are unrelated to immigration, since I’m doing a roundup I thought I’d put them in here anyway. The House overwhelmingly votes funds for Iron Dome for Israel’s defense system, but the Squad votes against and AOC weeps – perhaps because political realities forced her to break from the other Squad members and vote “present.”

(5) Something’s going on in China – maybe a leftward pull, maybe not.

Posted in Uncategorized | 37 Replies

Behold, some of the January 6th “insurrection” surveillance video

The New Neo Posted on September 23, 2021 by neoSeptember 23, 2021

We’ve seen a few carefully selected amateur videos of the events of January 6th at the Capitol, most of them of the more violent aspects – including the moment in which Ashli Babbitt was killed. However, although we’ve known that tons of official surveillance video was taken, we’ve seen little of it till now because the government has fought its release.

That is beginning to change:

There has been a wealth of video evidence in connection with the insurrection, including videos recorded by rioters that were posted online and footage recorded by police body cameras. According to the US Capitol Police, the CCV system captured more than 14,000 hours of footage between noon and 8 p.m. on Jan. 6, creating the most complete video archive of events inside the building that day. USCP has strictly controlled who can access the footage and how much of it can be released to the public; some of it was shared during former president Donald Trump’s impeachment trial in February…

The government opposed making the videos public. In response to a petition filed by the media coalition, prosecutors wrote that the videos featured nonpublic information about entrances and exits around the Capitol, and that releasing them would “compromise the security of the United States Capitol and those who work there.”…

Lawyers for the media coalition argued the government’s national security concerns were too speculative and undermined by the fact that prosecutors in a few other cases had voluntarily released some surveillance footage.

Howell sided with the media coalition, writing in a Sept. 15 opinion that the national security concerns weren’t specific enough. The government might have a stronger case for keeping videos secret that revealed “sensitive” parts of the building, but that wasn’t at issue, she wrote — anyone taking a public tour could see the areas shown in these videos.

“Hundreds of cases have arisen from the events of January 6, with new cases being brought and pending cases being resolved by plea agreement every week,” Howell wrote. “The public has an interest in understanding the conduct underlying the charges in these cases, as well as the government’s prosecutorial decision-making both in bringing criminal charges and resolving these charges by entering into plea agreements with defendants.”

At the link you can find five videos the court forced the government to release. They are, of course, the tip of the iceberg.

I’d like every single video to be released, and then people with far more patience than I can examine them and decide what percentage of the people are violent, how the violence began (who instigated it, and how much was aggressive and how much defensive), how most of the people entered (were they let in?), and even perhaps the ratio of undercover FBI agents to demonstrators (and the role of the agents) can be pointed out.

Here’s one of the videos:

Prosecutors Lost A Fight To Keep A Set Of Jan. 6 Capitol Surveillance Videos Under Seal https://t.co/IwJekF6hSX pic.twitter.com/FTnNPoyuPU

— Zoe Tillman (@ZoeTillman) September 22, 2021

I’ve looked at each video – although not the entire video for the longer ones – and what I see is people milling about, some carrying flags and some taking photos, and then a fairly stable crowd forming outside the Senate wing doors, behind which the Capitol Police stand guard. The particular videos released don’t reveal an insurrection or a riot.

Posted in Election 2022, Violence | 18 Replies

Vast and conspiratorial: more Durham fallout; plus Hunter Biden

The New Neo Posted on September 23, 2021 by neoSeptember 23, 2021

I keep “circling back” (as Psaki would say) to the Durham investigation and its fallout and possible future fallout.

On the one hand, I expected nothing from it. Oh, perhaps at the very beginning – it seems so long ago, doesn’t it? – I thought “maybe.” But for the last year or so I expected zero from Durham, and had mostly forgotten about him and whatever it was that he was supposedly still doing.

So my initial response to the Sussman indictment was basically to shrug. Nothing would come of it; nothing ever seems to when a Democrat wrongdoer is involved. But as time has gone on and people have done more analysis on it, I have come to realize that, even if no one is ever punished, the revelations (in the sense of things being revealed) are still edifying in terms of how the left works in Washington DC.

There really does seem to be a vast left wing conspiracy that operates with boldness and the confidence that it is impervious to any negative consequences. And the conspirators may be right about the latter – after all, they haven’t faced any consequences yet. So what does it matter to them that a bunch of people on the right are now reading about their machinations to destroy Donald Trump? First of all, their machinations have been successful so far. And secondly, the conspirators are the ones who control the levers of power, and they may now be confident that they control the all-important voting apparatus as well.

In the above paragraph I wrote “a bunch of people on the right” because I doubt that most of my Democrat-voting friends have even heard of the Sussman indictment, and if they have heard of it they probably have only learned the leftist spin on it and will pay the whole kerfluffle no mind. So I doubt there will be major consequences with that voting bloc.

I suppose if anything happens to Sussman of any consequence as a result of this indictment, it might make the other people who were involved nervous. Maybe they’re even a bit nervous now. But more likely, in my opinion, they’re used to fixing things through the media and social media, and their friends in high places (especially the judiciary), and therefore trust that all this smoke will produce no real fire.

Nevertheless, for your reading pleasure:

(1) More on how the Russiagate hoax was concocted and disseminated, from the Durham charging document against Sussman, can be found here.

(2) Here’s Jonathan Turley on the role of “journalist” Franklin Foer, who may be “Reporter 2” in the Sussman indictment.

(3) Biden’s White House National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan is supposedly implicated in Russiagate as well.

(4) And for extra credit, we have Glenn Greenwald on how the conspiracy to suppress the Hunter and Joe Biden story worked. In addition, here’s some information on a scheme Hunter (and Joe?) cooked up to get money from frozen Libyan assets.

It’s a lot to read and digest, I know.

Two years ago I wrote a post entitled “Is Russiagate worse than Watergate?” It began this way: “Yes, it is. And not just worse; much worse.” I suppose I could now add another “much” or two – or three or four – to that second sentence. At the time I wrote that post, most of what we knew had to do with the co-opting of government agencies into the Russiagate hoax. Now we’re learning more about individuals such as lawyers and “journalists” and their roles, and of course Hillary Clinton and her aides, and how the whole thing fit into the seamless whole of a hugely influential and corrupt power structure.

Posted in Election 2020, Hillary Clinton, Law | Tagged Russiagate | 25 Replies

Open thread 9/23/21

The New Neo Posted on September 23, 2021 by neoSeptember 23, 2021

Posted in Uncategorized | 38 Replies

The computer may be the best tool tyranny ever had

The New Neo Posted on September 22, 2021 by neoSeptember 22, 2021

When I saw this news story about a Biden administration proposal for the feds to monitor “all business and personal accounts from financial institutions, including bank, loan, and investment accounts,” it struck me – and certainly not for the first time – that the internet has enabled a degree of governmental control heretofore only dreamed about.

Orwell envisioned telescreens constantly monitoring the public. But in his dystopia, the telescreens had to be manned by humans. That would be labor-intensive, to say the least. But now things like that can be automated, and computers can do a comprehensive job through AI. Any tyranny that manages to put such practices into law would be able to keep a much tighter grip on the public in terms of surveillance. It can put the “total” into “totalitarian state.”

China has gone in that direction with social credits. We are trending that way, too. Civil disobedience and backlash can occur, but I’m not at all sure how many people are troubled by these developments and these possibilities. So many people seem to have the extremely worrisome attitude that if surveillance is done for a cause they consider good, it’s okay.

If you’re seen the movie “Idiocracy,” you probably recall that each citizen had to be tattooed with an ID that could be scanned. That movie, which is a satire and a comedy, unfortunately seems more and more relevant as a serious forecast as time goes on.

Here’s the scene in which the main character – a man of our time who accidentally is catapulted into the Idiocracy future – receives his tattoo:

Posted in Liberty, Movies | 46 Replies

Melanie Phillips: on the desire to end “forever wars”

The New Neo Posted on September 22, 2021 by neoSeptember 22, 2021

This piece by Melanie Phillips packs a lot into a fairly short essay. Phillips is a British writer who is a former liberal and who is not the least bit “woke” in her opinions. I believe she is spot on about the Western dream of ending “forever wars” against Muslim extremists who are committed to waging war forever – or until they win:

….[T]he west has continued to repeat its fiascos by indulging in the same fantasies that it will end the “forever wars” — whether through the Israel-Palestine “peace process,” the Iran nuclear deal or abandoning Afghanistan, where both British and American governments are now spinning themselves the fantasy that Taliban “realists” will keep the Taliban jihadists in check.

For Islamists, war is indeed forever. For such fanatics, defeat is only ever temporary.

For the west, however, there are no “forever wars.” Its wars are either won or lost; there are victors and vanquished.

And military strength matters less than belief. The 9/11 attackers didn’t use sophisticated military hardware. They hijacked civilian aircraft and turned them into ying human bombs of enormous destructive potential.

What fuels the jihad is the power of an idea. That idea is the cult of death.

To overcome a cult of death, the west needs a belief in life. Its own life. That is the way to draw the necessary courage and resolve from this most sombre anniversary [of 9/11]; but alas, it seems the most difficult of lessons to learn.

It is understandable to yearn for peace. But if the enemy doesn’t believe in it, we cannot pretend – actually, we can pretend, but the results will be disastrous. Sometimes the only way to get the enemy to believe in peace is to vanquish that enemy. That may seem paradoxical to some people, but it’s not.

This might be a good time to call your attention to a discussion between Victor Davis Hanson and H. R. McMaster on Afghanistan. In it they touch on why we were in Afghanistan, how long we should have stayed there, and how the situation was rarely properly explained to the American public over the years. It’s a long video, but it’s not necessary to watch the whole thing to get something out of it:

One thing Hanson and McMaster discuss in that video is a speech Trump gave on Afghanistan on August 22, 2017. They think it was a good one; you can find the text here if you’re interested. I didn’t recall writing about it, but indeed I did, and here’s my post on the subject.

[NOTE: I also wrote a somewhat relevant post in 2007 about the general belief that “war is not the answer.”]

Posted in Afghanistan, War and Peace | 30 Replies

Open thread 9/22/21

The New Neo Posted on September 22, 2021 by neoSeptember 22, 2021

Ozzy Man:

Posted in Uncategorized | 15 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Chases Eagles on Indiana RINOs go down in primaries
  • huxley on Today’s worthless news on Iran
  • SHIREHOME on Today’s worthless news on Iran
  • AesopFan on Today’s worthless news on Iran
  • R2L on Indiana RINOs go down in primaries

Recent Posts

  • Indiana RINOs go down in primaries
  • Today’s worthless news on Iran
  • Lenient plea deal for man responsible for the death of Paul Kessler during an anti-Israel demonstration
  • Open thread 5/6/2026
  • News roundup

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (319)
  • Afghanistan (97)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (162)
  • Best of neo-neocon (90)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (583)
  • Dance (287)
  • Disaster (239)
  • Education (320)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (565)
  • Election 2018 (32)
  • Election 2020 (511)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (25)
  • Election 2028 (5)
  • Evil (127)
  • Fashion and beauty (323)
  • Finance and economics (1,016)
  • Food (316)
  • Friendship (47)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (728)
  • Health (1,138)
  • Health care reform (545)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (331)
  • History (700)
  • Immigration (432)
  • Iran (439)
  • Iraq (224)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (798)
  • Jews (423)
  • Language and grammar (361)
  • Latin America (203)
  • Law (2,914)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (124)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,283)
  • Liberty (1,102)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (388)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,476)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (910)
  • Middle East (381)
  • Military (318)
  • Movies (346)
  • Music (526)
  • Nature (255)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (177)
  • Obama (1,736)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (128)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,024)
  • Poetry (255)
  • Political changers (176)
  • Politics (2,775)
  • Pop culture (393)
  • Press (1,618)
  • Race and racism (861)
  • Religion (418)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (625)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (967)
  • Theater and TV (264)
  • Therapy (69)
  • Trump (1,601)
  • Uncategorized (4,393)
  • Vietnam (109)
  • Violence (1,412)
  • War and Peace (993)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑