The Iran Deal and how it relates to Ukraine and to the Middle East in general:
Open thread 3/19/22
I decided to try…
…to take the day off today from posting about the Ukraine war. I have a big post brewing and hope to get it published tomorrow, but today I thought I’d just put up this general thread for people who want to talk about Ukraine.
Wisconsin schools: keeping parents in the dark
Remember back when transgender rights was about adults, and there was lengthy screening by the medical and therapy professionals involved to make sure that those adults were not making the choice because of other mental health issues?
Now it’s about keeping kids’ secrets from parents whose rights diminish every day:
“Parents are not entitled to know their kids’ identities,” Wisconsin teachers were told in a February training session. “That knowledge must be earned.”
Empower Wisconsin publicized the slide used in the Eau Claire district in western Wisconsin.
Superintendent Michael Johnson defended the training saying the district “has a responsibility to maintain an educational environment that is equitable, safe and inclusive,” reports M.D. Kittle on Wisconsin Spotlight.
“A district court in 2020 issued a partial injunction against Madison Metropolitan School District’s policy allowing children of any age to transition to a different gender identity at school — without parental consent,” reports Kittle. “The full case is now before the Wisconsin Supreme Court.”
That case is known as Doe v. MMSD:
The policy includes the following provisions:
–Children of any age can transition to a different gender identity at school, by changing their name and pronouns, without parental notice or consent.
–District employees are prohibited from notifying parents, without the child’s consent, that their child has or wants to change gender identity at school, or that their child may be dealing with gender dysphoria.
–District employees are even instructed to deceive parents by using the child’s legal name and pronouns with family, while using the different name and pronouns adopted by the child in the school setting.
The lawsuit alleges the district’s policy violates constitutionally protected parental rights. Transitioning to a different gender identity is a significant psychotherapeutic intervention that requires parental notice or consent, the attorneys said in a press release. “Public school districts, like Madison, do not have the right to make those decisions for parents.”
A case to watch.
With Iran Deal 2.0 we are fully in Looking Glass World
I’ve read a lot about what might be behind this deal, and I’ve even written about what might be behind it (see this as well as this).
But I’m still having trouble believing it, because it is so terrible. In that latter post I quoted a piece by Caroline Glick, who explains the motives behind the Iran deal in this way:
The Biden administration justifies its pro-Iranian and anti-Israel/Sunni Arab policy by claiming it is a means to disengage the U.S. from the Middle East at a time that Washington is keen to concentrate its resources and attention on Asia and the rising threat of China…
Biden’s policies are the polar opposite of Trump’s policies both conceptually and substantively. Biden’s policies represent a reinstatement and escalation of Barack Obama’s policies for Iran and the wider Middle East. In contrast to Trump, Obama, Biden and their advisors believe that the U.S.’s Middle Eastern allies – Israel and the Sunni Arab Gulf states – maliciously worked for decades to entangle the United States in the wars of the Middle East. To disentangle America from the region and its pernicious “allies” the Obama-Biden doctrine posits the U.S. must realign itself away from its allies and weaken them, and towards Iran, which it must empower.
That’s probably as good an explanation as any, in the sense of logic. Nevertheless I still can’t wrap my mind around it, even as an explanation for behavior I think is stupendously unwise and destructive to US interests. The logic exists only as a surface logic, because even if one were to accept the “Israel and the Arab Gulf states have maliciously worked to entangle the United States” part of the reasoning, the “so instead let’s embrace a country dedicated to our destruction and the spread of Islamic terrorism around the world” part doesn’t really follow as a good alternative. The only explanation for taking that road, it seems to me, is the desire to destroy the US and the West or at least weaken it immensely, and to empower the Iranian mullahs as well as the terrorists they sponsor.
Everything I’ve read so far about this new Iran Deal – one that’s apparently set to be announced every day now – is frightening and profoundly disturbing. Here’s some of the latest:
Russia’s top state-controlled energy company is set to cash in on a $10 billion contract to build out one of Iran’s most contested nuclear sites as part of concessions granted in the soon-to-be-announced nuclear agreement that will guarantee sanctions on both countries are lifted.
Russian and Iranian documents translated for the Washington Free Beacon show that Rosatom, Russia’s leading energy company, has a $10 billion contract with Iran’s atomic energy organization to expand Tehran’s Bushehr nuclear plant. Russia and the Biden administration confirmed on Tuesday that the new nuclear agreement includes carveouts that will waive sanctions on both countries so that Russia can make good on this contract.
There’s also this:
Days after Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) fired missiles aimed at the U.S. consulate in northern Iraq, President Joe Biden’s administration is reportedly planning to remove the Iranian outfit from the list of international terrorist organizations.
The decision to drop the IRGC — Iranian regime’s military arm — from the terror list, appears to be yet another concession made by the Biden White House to restore the Obama-era nuclear deal with Tehran.
This last point seems to have been what’s delaying the deal somewhat at the moment – but once again chances are that the Biden administration will concede on this, too, or already has done so. In fact, it may not even be over then, because there may be a continuing series of escalating demands from Iran, as it sees the utterly compliant Biden group willing to give them everything they ask for in order to get them to acquiesce.
It’s as though malevolent beings representing the US have hatched this plan in order to laugh maniacally at the world and to greatly harm the United States and the West. I don’t usually write in such extreme terms but that’s the way this appears to me, and I’m reduced to a desperate and almost certainly vain hope that the real thing will be nowhere near as bad as the advance reports predict.
So what happens if an administration – and the mostly unelected and unvetted by Congress “diplomats” who are doing the negotiating of a deal with a foreign power that is our enemy – are tantamount to Benedict Arnolds squared, on a global scale? Is there any recourse? The obvious one would be Congress somehow getting in the way or even impeaching and removing that president. But that won’t happen because it would need many Democrats to cooperate, and the requisite numbers will not be doing that. There are a few who will probably object, but they almost certainly can’t meet the 60-vote threshhold to invoke cloture. And wouldn’t Biden be able to veto any bill that might be passed, which would mean there would then be a 67-vote threshold?
What’s in it for Biden and company? What constituency does a deal like this appeal to, except for the Israel- and US-hating far left? How large is that group?
However large the public support may be – and I continue to think it’s significantly less than a majority – there are too many people in positions of power in this administration (just as in the Obama administration) who appear to be fully in favor of this insanity. Are they all moles? Are they all being blackmailed or paid off? And/or do they all want to harm the West and the US that much? Despite how cynical and skeptical and suspicious I’ve become over the years, I just can’t bring myself to answer “yes” to that last question, even though I think that’s likely to be the correct answer.
It feels like the crazy Queen of Hearts is president and that deck of playing cards her courtiers, and we – the American people – are Alice trying to wake from this nightmare:
Or maybe the president is the Mad Hatter and the rest of them are attendants at the mad tea party where logic gets twisted and things spin wildly out of control:
That’s funny. What’s happening now is not.
Open thread 3/18/22
This is a good story, but really the most amazing thing about it is how young this woman looks at 50:
If Biden isn’t going to be removed, can he at least go back to not answering questions?
I think it would be better that way.
Biden on Wednesday called Putin a “war criminal” for the first time, upping American rhetoric and jumping ahead of a legal process that can take years.
“I think he is a war criminal,” Biden told reporters at an event at the White House….
The Senate on Tuesday unanimously passed a resolution backing a war crimes investigation into Putin and Russian forces.
The bipartisan resolution urged the International Criminal Court in The Hague and other nations to launch an investigation of war crimes committed by the Russian military during its invasion of Ukraine.
Actually, Biden initially seemed to say that Putin isn’t a war criminal, and then changed his mind:
The headline doesn’t mention that he first said “no,” then seems to have thought better of it and came back to change his answer.
The issue I have with all of this is that, in addition to the seeming vacillation within just a few moments, no good can come of it. The point isn’t whether Putin actually is a war criminal or not. He may very well be. But one of our goals should be to give Putin the opportunity for some sort of face-saving exit. Whether he would avail himself of such an exit is anyone’s guess, but it has to be something he at least thinks is open to him. That he has already been judged a war criminal can only have the effect of making him figure he may as well act that way even if he hasn’t already. Why not continue the war as brutally as possible, if he’s already going to be judged as a war criminal?
Biden’s remark also gives Putin the golden opportunity to accuse Biden of having been a war criminal, and his spokesman predictably did something of the sort:
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov called the Biden’s statement “unacceptable and unforgivable rhetoric on the part of the head of a state whose bombs have killed hundreds of thousands of people around the world,” according to Russian state news agency TASS.
I’m not even big on what Congress did in terms of asking for a war crimes investigation of Putin. At this point it’s premature and all it does is up the ante and make it harder for Putin to come up with an exit strategy. Maybe he doesn’t want one, but it’s worth it to give him a chance, and there’s nothing to be gained from screaming “war criminal” at this early date. Do people think he’ll desist from bombing civilians if we call him names?
I’ll be busy for a while now…
…but I’m planning another post tonight.
Till then – nice view, but I wouldn’t trust Foxie overly much:
Smollett released pending appeal
Anyone surprised by this? Not me.
Smollett was granted a release on bond from the Cook County Jail in Illinois pending the appeal of his conviction. A panel of three appellate judges came down with the ruling in a 2-1 decision granting the former “Empire” star’s release after posting a personal recognizance bond of $150,000.
It is nearly the amount of the $120,106 restitution Smollett was ordered to repay after he was convicted of lying to Chicago police about being the victim of a hate crime in 2019.
The article goes on to discuss grounds for appeal – mainly double jeopardy – and the opinions of various lawyers on whether an appeal could work.
I predict that Smollett will not be seeing any more jail time.
The Babylon Bee observes: “Jussie Says He Fears For His Life As His Attackers Have Been Released.”
The NY Times wakes up from its long and refreshing slumber and decides that Hunter Biden’s laptop is for real after all
The New York Times has released a major report on Hunter Biden detailing the authenticity of his now-infamous laptop and confirming details about the ongoing criminal investigation into Joe Biden’s son.
As for the question “why now?”, I think the answer might be found in that phrase “ongoing criminal investigation into Joe Biden’s son.” That investigation certainly doesn’t seem to have been fast-tracked, does it? But my guess is that the Times is now trying to get ahead of the story.
Back in October of 2020 the MSM and social media outlets insisted that the Hunter laptop was bogus and not worth any attention. All of those who relied on that and shrugged it off – and their numbers are legion – or never even heard about it at the time because the blackout was so pervasive, should be outraged now. Absolutely outraged and questioning so much of what they hold dear in the political sense.
I predict that will not happen, except for a few isolated people.
Here’s what the NY Post has to say about it today, in an editorial with the bitter title “Now that Joe Biden’s president, the Times finally admits: Hunter’s laptop is real” [emphasis mine]:
In the heat of the presidential race of 2020, the Times never missed a chance to cast doubt on the laptop, saying the information was “purported” and quoting a letter from former Democratic officials who claimed — with no evidence — that it was Russian disinformation.
Why was it unsubstantiated? Because of willful ignorance and the Times’ curious lack of curiosity…
Now we’re 16 months away from the 2020 election, Joe Biden’s safely in the White House, and the Times finally decides to report on the news rather than carry the Biden campaign’s water. And they find that hey, Hunter Biden’s business interests benefited from Joe Biden’s political status to a suspicious degree. Perhaps this is a topic worthy of examination.
How did the Times “authenticate” the laptop? It doesn’t say. Unlike The Post’s reporting, which detailed exactly how we got the files and where they came from, the Times does a hand wave to anonymous sources. No facts have changed since fall 2020. They knew the laptop was real from the start. They just didn’t want to say so.
You may recall that the NY Post was the paper that took the revelations seriously and published stories about the laptop. For its pains it was banned for a while from Twitter, and its reporting was discounted and squelched. The Post gets the last laugh, but I’m afraid it’s a hollow one, because Biden came to power anyway – and the rest, as they say, is history.
Open thread 3/17/22
I’m happy to say that I’m now able to identify which Bach piece I learned after that Chopin waltz, as described in this previous post.
Actually, it was two Bach pieces, two minuets. Easy ones but very lovely. If your piano skills are rudimentary and your sight-reading is poor – like mine – you should still be able to learn these.
First we have the Minuet in G minor:
And next the Minuet in D Minor, which was my favorite:
Roundup
(1) Zelensky addresses the US Congress.
(2) There’s a new Omicron variant, but so far it seems to be more or less the same in its effects as the older Omicron variant.
(3) No wonder the Democrat are afraid of DeSantis. Reports are that he’s got +7 majority approval in usually-blue Miami-Dade County.
(4) Further ominous rumbling about the new Iran deal:
In a desperate attempt to save the nuclear deal, President Joe Biden appears to have surrendered to last-minute Russian demands, allowing Moscow to trade with Iran despite sanctions imposed in wake of Ukraine invasion.
“We received written guarantees. They are included in the text of the agreement itself on the resumption of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action on the Iranian nuclear program,” Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told reporters at a press briefing on Tuesday.
It wouldn’t surprise me, but I hope it’s not true. Actually, nothing this administration does would surprise me – except perhaps if it does something that isn’t destructive.
(5) The planners planned, but the caravan moved on.
