↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 263 << 1 2 … 261 262 263 264 265 … 1,865 1,866 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Euthanasia in Canada

The New Neo Posted on November 1, 2023 by neoNovember 1, 2023

Our humane and friendly neighbor to the north:

[In 2015] Canada’s highest court determined that assisted suicide would be ethical only “with respect to voluntary adults who are competent, informed, grievously and irremediably ill,” and only when it would be “clearly consistent with the patient’s wishes and best interests, and [provided] in order to relieve suffering.” …

When critics argued that the ruling would result in euthanasia being offered to the mentally ill, the depressed, those with disabilities, or other vulnerable persons, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau dismissed such concerns, saying, “this simply isn’t something that ends up happening.” He was wrong. In 2021, Parliament removed the law’s previous requirement that a person’s natural death must be imminently foreseeable for him to elect suicide. …

The expanded MAID [Medical Assistance in Dying] policy did not distinguish between medical infirmities and avoidable suffering caused by neglect or poverty. Bioethicists Kayla Wiebe and Amy Mullin contended that Canada should not deny people assisted suicide if living conditions make their lives intolerable. Physicians have offered MAID to people who cannot afford housing or find proper medical care. A rogue bureaucrat within Canada’s department of veterans affairs offered MAID to an elderly veteran struggling to make ends meet; the matter was turned over to the police.

Canada’s euthanasia regime has grown rapidly since 2021. According to the Fourth Annual Report on Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada 2022, “the most commonly cited sources of suffering by individuals requesting MAID were the loss of ability to engage in meaningful activities (86.3%), followed by loss of ability to perform activities of daily living (81.9%) and inadequate control of pain, or concern about controlling pain (59.2%).”

Back in the late 1990s, when I was having chronic pain from several nerve injuries, I was in an internet discussion and support group for people with similar problems. At the time, I knew nothing about health care in Canada or Britain. But within that group it did not escape my notice that participants from those countries with chronic pain were suffering more, and longer, than people in the US, for the simple reason that their strained government health care systems gave such problems an extremely low priority. They were underdiagnosed and undertreated, and although that was sometimes the case in the US it was quite clear that it was far worse in Canada and Britain

I guess this “solves” the problem:

More than 13,000 people in Canada were euthanized in 2022, an annual rise of 31.2 percent since 2021. In 2022, 4.1 percent of all deaths in the country were the result of euthanasia; MAID could now be listed as the nation’s fifth-leading cause of death. Nearly 45,000 people have been euthanized since 2016, when Parliament first introduced MAID legislation. This number will keep rising as stigma disappears and MAID advocates continue to push for relaxed standards. The Canadian government seems to be on board with that agenda, as it reportedly plans to make MAID available to anorexics and drug users.

The slippery-slope argument that Trudeau scoffed at has proved true. Simons, a Canadian fashion company, released a disturbing advertisement presenting 37-year-old Jennyfer Hatch’s decision to die as a posh lifestyle choice. A funeral home in Montreal notably offers a $700 “turnkey” package of MAID and funeral.

It’s a bargain, both for the person and for the state.

Many people criticize slippery-slope arguments, but it seems clear to me that they are often valid. We’ve seen time and again that in the case of euthanasia the policy nearly always (perhaps even always?) follows that downward trajectory. There’s really very little to stop it.

Posted in Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe, Health | Tagged Canada | 35 Replies

Open thread 11/1/23

The New Neo Posted on November 1, 2023 by neoNovember 1, 2023

November already? November already.

Posted in Uncategorized | 78 Replies

It’s Halloween, and you know what that means

The New Neo Posted on October 31, 2023 by neoOctober 31, 2023

Candy corn.

I’ve already had my annual fix of the stuff. When I went to the market to buy it, I noticed it’s far more expensive than it used to be. A fairly large bag of candy corn always seemed to cost between 99 cents and $1.99, and that was for the primo brand, Brachs. Now it’s between $3.99 and $4.99. Not exactly going to break the bank, but it makes one stop and think.

For a moment, anyway.

Happy Halloween.

Posted in Food | 47 Replies

From Daniel Pearl to October 7 and beyond

The New Neo Posted on October 31, 2023 by neoOctober 31, 2023

Remember Daniel Pearl? Why do I start this post with him? He was the first terrorist victim – at least the first I can remember – whose death contained that special element of horrific sadism and psychopathic brutality crossed with modern technology, in that his beheading was videoed and purposely broadcast by the perpetrators. This was way before ISIS, but it foreshadowed the behavior of that group. It was something out of a psychological horror movie, and yet it was real.

Pearl was held hostage first, too. And then before the terrorists killed him he was forced to say things such as, “I am a Jew.” That was very very important to the terrorists, although the US seemed to be their main target for the moment.

Here’s an interesting fact that I never knew before, about Daniel Pearl’s mother, which is that she was an Iraqi Jew who fled that country in the 1940s because of persecution and violence:

Pearl was born Eveline Rejwan on November 11, 1935, in Baghdad, Iraq. Her father, Joseph, was a tailor who ran an import business, and her mother, Victoria (Abada) Rejwan, was a homemaker. … When Pearl was 5, she lived through the Farhud, an outbreak of anti-Jewish violence in Iraq following a failed nationalist coup. She and her family hid in their home for days, protected by their Arab neighbors who told rioters that no Jews lived there.

Her family then moved to a suburb of Baghdad but anti-Jewish attacks persisted and she herself witnessed the bodies of Iraqi Jews hanging from gallows in a square. Her father lost vision in one eye after an assault and he had to bribe a police officer to free his two sons after they were arrested on false charges.

In the late 1940s, Pearl worked with an underground Zionist movement that facilitated the emigration of Jews, then illegal, to British-controlled Mandatory Palestine. At this time, Pearl began using the Hebrew name Ruth. Around 1948, her two older brothers were smuggled into Palestine from Iraq. In 1949, Ruth’s oldest brother was killed fighting for the Israeli army, which she did not learn about until years later as her father had withheld the information from his family. In 1951, Pearl arrived with her family in Israel as part of the mass exodus of Iraqi Jews.

So the horror of Arab anti-Semitism was one of her earliest experiences, long before the nightmare returned in a very personal way.

Pearl’s mother met her husband Judah Pearl in Israel, and they moved to the US in 1950 for graduate studies. Both were scientists. Ruth Pearl died in 2021, but her husband is still alive at 87, and he was born in Tel Aviv in 1936 to Polish-Jewish immigrants who had had the prescience and good fortune to be able to emigrate to Israel.

Daniel Pearl was abducted, held hostage, and murdered by various jihadi groups in 2002, when he was 38 years old. That was over 20 years ago, so you may have forgotten some of the details that perhaps didn’t seem so important at the time. But here are a few:

On February 21, 2002, a video was released titled The Slaughter of the Spy-Journalist, the Jew Daniel Pearl. The video shows Pearl’s mutilated body …

The Jew Daniel Pearl. And of course there was the broadcasting, with great pride, of not just the killing but the mutilation. What seemed so unusual back then stopped being unusual a long time ago, because we’ve seen many such videos over the years. And now, with social media, we have refinements such as this: filming the murder of a young man on his cellphone, and sending the video to his mother.

But back to Pearl and the video of his killing. During the video, Pearl was made to say at the outset:

My name is Daniel Pearl. I’m a Jewish-American from Encino, California, USA. I come from, uh, on my father’s side the family is Zionist. My father’s Jewish, my mother’s Jewish, I’m Jewish. My family follows Judaism. We’ve made numerous family visits to Israel.

Jewish, Jewish, Jewish; Israel, Israel, Israel. That was no mere detail to Pearl’s killers. It’s not that they won’t kill non-Jews; they certainly will, and with relish. But it is Jews they wish to eliminate from the earth first. One can argue about what the Koran says about Jews; it says a lot of contradictory things, many of them not good. But you can’t argue about what hadith Hamas chose to put in its charter as inspiration:

The Day of Judgement will not come about until Muslims fight the Jews, when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Muslims, O Abdullah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him

So do not be surprised when Palestinians and Palestinian sympathizers in Western countries stand in public squares and celebrate the killing of Jews and scream that they want to kill more. As courageous Ayaan Hirsi Ali writes:

In short, anti-Semites the world over have been emboldened by this crisis, and Jews are once again being blamed for their own massacre. And I am not remotely surprised. In my childhood, I was steeped in the Islamist movement’s noxious anti-Semitism — which has been on such ugly display this week.

Born in Mogadishu, Somalia, I spent my early years escaping political strife after my father was imprisoned for being an anti-government activist. We moved between countries before settling in Kenya.

The worst insult in the Somali community was to be called a ‘Jew’, not that any of us actually knew one. To be called a ‘Jew’ was so abhorrent, some felt justified in killing anyone who so dishonoured them with this ‘slur’.

As a teenager in Nairobi in the 1980s, I joined the Muslim Brotherhood — the strict Sunni Islamist movement, founded in Egypt in 1928, from which Hamas ultimately descends.

I vividly remember sitting with my female fellows in mosques, cursing Israel and praying to Allah to destroy the Jews. We were certainly not interested in a peaceful ‘two-state solution’: we were taught to want to see Israel wiped off the map.

When I was 16, my school’s teacher of religion was Sister Aziza. She read to us the Koran’s lurid descriptions of the everlasting fire that burns flesh and dissolves skin — the place reserved for Jews.

Sister Aziza described Jews as physically monstrous, with horns coming from their heads, out of which flew devils that would corrupt the world. Jews controlled everything, she told us, and it was the duty of Muslims to destroy them.

It was a lot to take in for a teenager who read Western romance novels in secret, but I believed every word. …

[Much later] I abandoned my religion, but I have never lost my clear-sighted understanding, forged in my childhood, of Islamism’s pathological hatred of Jews, as well as Muslims considered as heretics and non-Muslims in general.

The former Egyptian president Mohamed Morsi — a one-time leader of the Muslim Brotherhood — declared that Muslims should ‘nurse our children and our grandchildren on hatred’ of Jews.

One of the most chilling things about the 10/7 terrorist attacks was that for several previous years Hamas pretended to be backing away from violence, and fooled Israel into thinking that actually was true. Now they are bragging about the success of their deception, which caused the Israelis to give them travel permits and also to let down their guard somewhat. According to a Hamas official:

“We made them think Hamas was busy with governing Gaza, and that it wanted to focus on the 2.5 million Palestinians [there] and had abandoned the resistance altogether. All the while, under the table, Hamas was preparing for this big attack.”

And they want this to be a worldwide effort. They’ve been preparing the ground for decades: emigrating to Western nations, using propaganda in the MSM, and enlisting many allies in academia (see this). Perhaps they have overestimated their support and overplayed their hand, causing at least some of their erstwhile allies in the Western Left to recoil in horror. Perhaps. But perhaps not. There is no mistaking their intent anymore, nor the lengths to which they are willing to go to achieve it.

9/11 was a wakeup call for a lot of people. And so is this. The question is whether it will be heeded.

Posted in Terrorism and terrorists, Violence, War and Peace | 38 Replies

Roundup

The New Neo Posted on October 31, 2023 by neoOctober 31, 2023

I find myself doing more of these roundups these days because there’s just so much news.

(1) I’m surprised to learn that there actually were some writers at The NY Times who are reported to have urged caution on the headline and placement of that blame-Israel hospital bombing story, and that they were lower down on the hierarchy rather than higher up. Lower down tends to mean younger, but I would have imagined that it would be the older editors rather than younger people who were urging caution.

(2) Funny stuff on new Speaker Mike Johnson [hat tip: commenter “AesopFan”].

(3) Another change story, this time in Israel.

(4) The ACLU surprisingly defended Trump’s free speech rights in the Jack Smith trial:

“The obvious and unprecedented public interest in this prosecution, as well as the widespread political speech that it has generated and will continue to generate, only underscores the need to apply the most stringent First Amendment standard to a restraint on Defendant’s speech rights,” ACLU attorneys wrote in a friend-of-the-court brief.

The group urged Chutkan to reevaluate her order, calling it both vague and overbroad, with aspects of its meaning “unknown and perhaps unknowable.” One particular uncertainty the ACLU seized on was the meaning of Chutkan’s prohibition on statements that “target” Smith, his prosecutors, court personnel, defense attorneys or witnesses.

“Reading the order, Defendant cannot possibly know what he is permitted to say, and what he is not,” the group wrote.

Chutkan nevertheless reinstated the order. No surprise there.

(5) One of the Israelis kidnapped by Hamas has been freed by the IDF:

The Times of Israel reported that Megidish, a private who had served as an “observation soldier,” was captured during Hamas’ raid of Israel’s Nahal Oz base. She had likely been held alone by Hamas and a mission to bring her home had been planned for “several” days, the outlet reported. Israeli forces were reportedly met with resistance from Hamas, but no troops were injured or killed.

We’ll probably never know the details, but it’s good news.

(6) Shani Louk, the woman whose seemingly lifeless and broken body was barbarically paraded in front of joyous Gazan crowds, has been confirmed dead by the finding of a piece of skull matching her DNA. Of all the terrible horror stories connected with October 7, hers was one of the earliest to be known, and that was because the terrorists were so very proud of it. RIP.

Posted in Uncategorized | 29 Replies

It seems that a lot of people would like the Jews to just let themselves be killed

The New Neo Posted on October 31, 2023 by neoOctober 31, 2023

Jews are criticized for contradictory things. They are excoriated for supposedly not realizing they were targets during WWII and not escaping or fighting back. Although the truth is quite different, this is a persistent accusation. But they are also criticized when they fight back in normal (or even relatively restrained) fashion, as Israel does.

Many people seem to think that now they should just absorb being massacred on an enormous scale:

This has a historical precedent about which most people are unaware: Gandhi agreed that the Jews should allow themselves to be massacred, although his reasoning for the recommendation was completely different. Gandhi, you ask? Surely not Gandhi! So let me refresh your memory by suggesting you read this post of mine from 2005.

Posted in Israel/Palestine, Jews, People of interest, Violence | 15 Replies

Open thread 10/31/23

The New Neo Posted on October 31, 2023 by neoOctober 31, 2023

Posted in Uncategorized | 32 Replies

An eye for an eye, and forgiveness

The New Neo Posted on October 30, 2023 by neoOctober 30, 2023

I keep noticing references to “an eye for an eye,” but I’ve also noticed a lot of misunderstanding around the phrase.

It was actually meant not literally but as a corrective to previous much harsher codes of justice. See this. It was not about Hatfield-McCoy vengeance, tit for tat; it was about a legal code and setting the proper compensation – which was NOT in kind. There actually weren’t eyes for eyes as far as the Jews were concerned. And yet the phrase is often contrasted with later legal developments and sometimes with Christianity, the idea being that Christian forgiveness replaced Jewish vengeance. No, it did not, because vengeance is not what “an eye for an eye” was about.

However, it is indeed true that Jewish guidance on forgiveness is somewhat different than Christian ideals. Please see this former post of mine for a discussion, but here’s an excerpt:

I’m not sure when the following distinctions began, but in ancient traditional Judaism there have been at least three different words for forgiveness, only two of which are interpersonal and the last of which (kapparah) is the realm of God only. Of the two human ones, the first is “mekhilah,” required only if the offender has taken steps to correct the wrong: “The principle that mekhilah ought to be granted only if deserved is the core to the Jewish view of forgiveness.” Another Jewish word for (and type of) forgiveness is selikhah, which is basically empathy with the transgressor. In Judiasm, it is considered wrong to withhold forgiveness (mekhilah) if the person has asked for it, shown remorse, and demonstrated the desire to act differently in the future. Short of that, forgiveness is not required, although it is certainly permitted (selikhah). The idea is that mekhilah without the person showing remorse and change just encourages further bad behavior.

Makes sense to me.

Posted in Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe, Jews, Religion | 46 Replies

Roundup

The New Neo Posted on October 30, 2023 by neoOctober 30, 2023

(1) Here’s an interesting briefing on developments in Gaza.

(2) And here’s a DeSantis speech that’s worth watching.

(3) Erdogan does some saber-rattling.

(4) As predicted, the Democrats go after Mike Johnson. Blah blah blah.

(5) One Israeli hostage freed by the IDF. Good.

(6) The Arabs have given tons of money over the years to the Ivies to set up propagandist Middle East programs. Not a surprise.

Posted in Uncategorized | 27 Replies

Savagery is contagious

The New Neo Posted on October 30, 2023 by neoOctober 30, 2023

Mob violence has been part of human behavior for a long long time, and that hasn’t changed in any fundamental way. Anyone who studies the reality of human history rather than some sanitized or woke version is aware of that. Sacked cities, Indian (native American) raids, the Rwandan genocide, and so often the massacre of Jews, all part of a long sorrowful and savage story. The Nazis were extremely brutal, but because they had been part of modern Western civilization they for the most part tried to keep their brutality somewhat hidden from the German people, because they were afraid that they might protest.

What Palestinians did on October 7 in Israel shocked much of the world, but it inspired many people. I believe that such inspiration was part of the calculation Hamas made before unleashing such barbaric violence: that it would terrify the right people (the non-Left West) and motivate others with the lust for imitation. We saw that latter group rejoice all around the world almost as soon as the violence happened. And since then we have seen mobs screaming for the death of Jews and even going around to airports trying to find some Jews to kill.

As far as I know, there have been no copycat massacres – yet. But don’t be at all surprised if they occur. For example, it is my belief that Hamas wanted the Arab population of Israel, which is two million strong, to rise up in more violence within Israel itself. That hasn’t happened yet and perhaps it won’t; I hope that’s the case, anyway.

Kurt Schlichter has written a related column entitled, “Accept That Savagery Is the True Nature of the World – and Deal With It.” An excerpt:

The true nature of the world is savagery.

The world’s true nature is that good is forever pitted against evil.

That has never changed. What happened over the last 70 years or so was an interregnum of peace in the West, created by violence against barbarians and facilitated by people willfully looking away from the butchery still continuing at the fringes of the map. The West managed to build a civilization that was – for the first time in history since perhaps the Pax Romana – generally internally peaceful. And the West convinced itself that this was normal.

However, those first two sentences contradict each other. The true nature of the world is that savagery is a big part of human nature’s potential, and that peace must be earned and guarded and at times requires war for its defense. But when Schlicter says that good is forever pitted against evil, he is also saying that good is another part of human nature. Societies can emphasize and foster one part at the expense of another. And one of the drawbacks of a long peace is that we forget – especially, our younger generations forget – that savagery is always possible and we sometimes must fight fiercely against it, and that we must be able to tell good from bad. We’ve fallen down on that vital latter ability, as well.

When the October 7 massacre happened, I quickly published a post that quoted Kipling’s The Gods of the Copybook Headings. Kipling himself was quite aware of these harsh truths, and here are two verses of that poem again [emphasis mine]:

When the Cambrian measures were forming, They promised perpetual peace.
They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
But when we disarmed They sold us and delivered us bound to our foe,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “Stick to the Devil you know.” …

And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins
When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins,
As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn,
The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!

But in addition to the poem itself we should pay attention to the concept of copybook headings, which were maxims schoolchildren used to be taught by making them copy them over and over in penmanship lessons:

A copybook was used to teach penmanship in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries because it was considered an important business skill. A student’s copybook had a different, perfectly handwritten phrase or statement at the top of each blank, lined page–thus, copybook headings. The student was required to copy the heading down through the lines on the page, attempting to reproduce it faithfully.

Inasmuch as moral education and citizenship were features of education at that time, the copybook headings often reflected that focus. Instead of isolated words or random phrases, the copybook headings were more often proverbs or maxims. Kipling included examples in the poem. Every teacher and parent surely expected that, by the time a child had written, “A stitch in time saves nine,” down the entire page, they would have internalized the lesson.

Thus, the “gods” of the copybook headings were the dictates of a culture attempting to live in peace with itself, knowing one of the requisites of educating children was to explain the realities of getting along with others and thinking of more than oneself, whether one had faith or not.

We don’t teach penmanship anymore as far as I know. But that’s the least of it. Our attempts at “moral education and citizenship” are either feeble or counterproductive. And as Kipling knew, that won’t teach us the necessary lesson of how to keep the forces of savagery at bay, or how to recognize and fight them when they do appear.

Posted in Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe, Israel/Palestine, Jews, Poetry, Violence, War and Peace | 33 Replies

Open thread 10/30/23

The New Neo Posted on October 30, 2023 by neoOctober 29, 2023

Posted in Uncategorized | 48 Replies

Sharing food: do you care?

The New Neo Posted on October 28, 2023 by neoOctober 28, 2023

Here’s someone who does not enjoy sharing his food at a restaurant:

When I accept an invite to eat out, I’m not cuffing myself to my dinner or lunch or brunch companion(s). I’m simply saying sure, I’ll go to the restaurant, eat with you and enjoy each other’s company. Yet, once seated, I’m routinely asked to share.

Quelle horreur!

To friends, family, and colleagues — past, present, and future — I don’t want to be rude. In fact, assuming that we’ll each order what we’d personally like for ourselves and that we’ll pay for those things on our own is the polite thing to do. On the other hand, putting me in the uncomfortable position of potentially having to say, “No, I don’t want to split the raw ground beef you’ve just referred to as ‘steak tartare’”— well, that may require some self-reflecting on your part.

I am puzzled by this person and his seeming inability to Just Say No.

There is apparently some widely held belief that agreeing to dine out with others comes with the expectation that splitting different things is part of the fun — the experience. Someone tell me where exactly that is written.

For some people, it is fun. But actually there is apparently some widely held belief that a question is a question, and an answer in the negative is perfectly all right.

If someone asks me to share food, it’s a negotiation. Sometimes it’s great, especially when I’m having trouble deciding between two dishes, and each of us orders one of them and we share. But if we don’t agree on whatever it is we might be sharing, I don’t have a moment’s hesitation to say no to the whole idea. I have no problem if the other person says no, and I’ve never known anyone else who gets upset by that, either.

I once knew a man who did not like to share food, even in a Chinese restaurant when dining out with a group at one of those round tables. He announced at the outset that he was ordering a certain dish and would not share it, nor would he take some of anyone else’s dish. It was a bit odd – he sat there and guarded his food, looking around suspiciously as though we were a pack of dogs about to grab it. But it’s not as though anyone stopped being his friend because of it.

I cannot imagine getting bent out of shape about this, and yet apparently some people do.

Posted in Food, Friendship, Me, myself, and I | 77 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • TR on Open thread 3/18/2026
  • physicsguy on Open thread 3/18/2026
  • Chris Stoneking on Nick Shirley visits California
  • Niketas Choniates on Open thread 3/18/2026
  • Sharon W on Open thread 3/18/2026

Recent Posts

  • Open thread 3/18/2026
  • Nick Shirley visits California
  • Is Iran approaching a tipping point?
  • Power out. Internet out.
  • Open thread 3/17/2026

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (318)
  • Afghanistan (97)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (161)
  • Best of neo-neocon (88)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (581)
  • Dance (286)
  • Disaster (238)
  • Education (319)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (565)
  • Election 2018 (32)
  • Election 2020 (510)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (13)
  • Election 2028 (4)
  • Evil (126)
  • Fashion and beauty (323)
  • Finance and economics (1,001)
  • Food (316)
  • Friendship (47)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (724)
  • Health (1,132)
  • Health care reform (545)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (329)
  • History (699)
  • Immigration (426)
  • Iran (403)
  • Iraq (223)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (785)
  • Jews (414)
  • Language and grammar (357)
  • Latin America (202)
  • Law (2,882)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (124)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,271)
  • Liberty (1,097)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (386)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,465)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (902)
  • Middle East (380)
  • Military (308)
  • Movies (344)
  • Music (524)
  • Nature (254)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (176)
  • Obama (1,735)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (126)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,015)
  • Poetry (255)
  • Political changers (176)
  • Politics (2,765)
  • Pop culture (392)
  • Press (1,610)
  • Race and racism (857)
  • Religion (411)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (621)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (967)
  • Theater and TV (263)
  • Therapy (67)
  • Trump (1,575)
  • Uncategorized (4,335)
  • Vietnam (108)
  • Violence (1,394)
  • War and Peace (962)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑