A couple of days ago I looked up J. D. Vance’s height online, and it said he was 5’7″. I was thinking that he and Trump would look rather Mutt-and-Jeffish next to each other. Then last night I was watching clips of the convention, and Vance looked plenty tall to me – not just next to Trump, but next to Trump’s sons and just about everybody else.
So, what’s the scoop? Is he actually tall? What’s this 5’7″ business?
I’ve not followed the details, but Menendez was found guilty of corruption and says he will appeal:
Menendez pleaded not guilty to federal charges that he accepted an array of bribes in exchange for helping foreign governments. Jurors deliberated for three days. The conviction on all 16 counts against him exposes Menendez to a sentence of more than 200 years in prison, though such a heavy sentence is unlikely.
The judge scheduled the senator’s sentencing date for Oct. 29.
Menendez condemned the decision in a statement outside the courtroom, so far refusing to resign despite overwhelming calls to do so. His attorneys say they plan to appeal the verdict.
“I am deeply disappointed in the decision,” Menendez said, claiming that he “never violated a public oath,” and that he had “never been a foreign agent.”
The Democrats may force him out, because there is no risk of his seat not staying in Democrat hands:
Shortly after a jury read off the verdict that he was guilty on all counts, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer ended months of resistance and called on Menendez to resign, joining more than half of Senate Democrats who have already done so.
More than a dozen of Menendez’s Senate colleagues had resisted calling for him to step down, with many resolved to allow the New Jerseyan his due process. Now that he’s convicted, even the most reserved Senate Democrats are hardly eager to serve aside a convicted felon, even if it’s only for the remainder of the term.
That’s garbage. They could not care less about “convicted felon.” They care about getting a better and more viable Democrat in there:
If Menendez did step down, New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy (D), whose wife also briefly ran for Menendez’s seat, would be tasked with appointing a successor. He could appoint Kim [who is already the Democrats’ nominee for the seat; Menendez has been planning to run as an Independent], allowing the congressman to then run as an incumbent, or he could choose another placeholder. In a statement following the verdict, Murphy said he would make “a temporary appointment” for the Senate seat if Menendez’s seat became vacant.
Menendez may try to cling to power, but I think he’s doomed. And that is true even if his appeal were to be ultimately successful.
[Hat tip: commenter “Brian E.”]
Dan Bongino claims to have some very disturbing information about Saturday’s assassination attempt. Is this true? If so, it reflects very very poorly on the Secret Service:
"Why was President Trump even on stage at that point?"
New from @dbongino: Sources tell him that “they had been monitoring [the sh*oter] since he came in around that external perimeter area…they lost track of him, apparently, and he was hiding in a building about 300 yards… pic.twitter.com/I6d3As7vEU
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) July 15, 2024
Are they now more afraid of delaying things than of a leading candidate being shot? Are they also afraid of shooting a possibly innocent bystander – even when that bystander is crawling on a nearby roof with a rifle?
More good news for Trump, more bad news for the left.
The bottom line is this: The Appointments Clause is a critical constitutional restriction stemming from the separation of powers, and it gives to Congress a considered role in determining the propriety of vesting appointment power for inferior officers. The Special Counsel’s position effectively usurps that important legislative authority, transferring it to a Head of Department, and in the process threatening the structural liberty inherent in the separation of powers. If the political branches wish to grant the Attorney General power to appoint Special Counsel Smith to investigate and prosecute this action with the full powers of a United States Attorney, there is a valid means by which to do so. He can be appointed and confirmed through the default method prescribed in the Appointments Clause, as Congress has directed for United States Attorneys throughout American history, see 28 U.S.C. § 541, or Congress can authorize his appointment through enactment of positive statutory law consistent with the Appointments Clause.
Haste makes waste, and Garland thought he could bypass the usual process. I think it would have worked just fine in DC or New York, but not in Florida.
The ruling will be appealed, of course.
Here’s what Justice Thomas wrote in the immunity case:
In this case, the Attorney General purported to appoint a private citizen as Special Counsel to prosecute a former President on behalf of the United States. But, I am not sure that any office for the Special Counsel has been “established by Law,” as the Constitution requires. Art. II, §2, cl. 2. By requiring that Congress create federal offices “by Law,” the Constitution imposes an important check against the President—he cannot create offices at his pleasure. If there is no law establishing the office that the Special Counsel occupies, then he cannot proceed with this prosecution. A private citizen cannot criminally prosecute anyone, let alone a former President.
The left considers this a mere trifling detail – when they are doing the appointing, that is.
Judge Cannon has been the target of relentless criticism by the Democrats. It will now increase.
This is why I put up that clip from The Day of the Jackal yesterday:
Former President Donald Trump can’t stop thinking about the way he moved his head in the split second before a gunman, intent on assassinating him, pulled the trigger during his speech in Pennsylvania Saturday evening. Trump was standing at the podium and began to refer to a large screen, hanging to his right, that showed statistics about immigration. To better see the screen, Trump turned his head to the right and a little up, and at the millisecond in which his head was at just the right angle for the bullet to graze his ear but not enter his skull — at that moment, the bullet whizzed by. Trump suffered a bloody wound to his ear, but no other injuries. It seemed like a miracle.
“The most incredible thing was that I happened to not only turn but to turn at the exact right time and in just the right amount,” Trump said Sunday afternoon in a talk aboard his 757 as he flew to Milwaukee for the start of the Republican National Convention. “If I only half-turn, it hits the back of the brain. The other way goes right through [the skull]. And because the sign was high, I’m looking up. The chances of my making a perfect turn are probably one tenth of one percent, so I’m not supposed to be here.”
“I had to be at the exact right angle,” Trump said at another point in the conversation, which included the New York Post’s Michael Goodwin. “Because the thing was an eighth of an inch away. That I would turn exactly at that second, where he [the gunman] wouldn’t stop the shot is pretty amazing. Pretty amazing. I’m really not supposed to be here.”
You can’t have such a thing happen to you and not be at least somewhat changed by it. Does Trump think it was merely good luck, or divine intervention, or fate?
The relevant part of the Jackal clip is here:
In the movie, the would-be assassin gains access to a cleared building by masquerading as an elderly war veteran on crutches, but the audience knows that he has a high-powered weapon disguised as one of the crutches. The moment in which DeGaulle moves his head out of the way of the shot is preceded by a scene much earlier in the movie when the Jackal tests out the same weapon by firing it at a watermelon, which explodes and is a stand-in for DeGaulle’s head. At the time the movie was first released, the frame of the Zapruder film that showed something similar happening to JFK had not yet been shown to the public, but anyone who was familiar with the Warren Commission report knew that something similar must have happened to JFK. So the horror was quite fresh.
Here’s the movie scene with the watermelon. Although it only involves a watermelon, it’s incredibly horrifying:
Trump says he’s changed his speech as a result of his experience on Saturday:
Trump explained that before Saturday night, he had finished the speech he planned to give later this week at the Republican convention. “I basically had a speech that was an unbelievable rip-roarer,” he said. “It was brutal — really good, really tough. [Last night] I threw it out. I think it would be very bad if I got up and started going wild about how horrible everybody is and how corrupt and crooked, even if it’s true. Had this not happened, we had a speech that was pretty well set that was extremely tough. Now, we have a speech that is more unifying.”
Good luck with that.
The Republican convention has started in Milwaukee. Trump plans to announce his VP today, rumored to be J. D. Vance.
Details are slowly emerging. One of the better sources is the NY Post.
The shooter was 20-year-old Thomas Crooks, reported to have been a “bullied loner” in high school Of course, that was also the initial report on the Columbine shooters and it turns out to have been wrong in their case. My guess is that few people were friendly with Crooks and therefore few knew him. I’ve also read that the gun was purchased by his father, and that Crooks was registered as a Republican but contributed to a far left cause at around the time of Biden’s inauguration.
The shooter’s car is reported to have contained explosives, which I would assume were meant to injure or kill the law enforcement officials who found it.
Various witnesses saw the shooter on the roof – which was about 130 yards from where Trump was speaking – and reported a man crawling there with a rifle, but authorities were slow to respond. Here’s one interview:
One of my first thoughts on hearing of the shooting was “how did someone get a firearm into the rally?” I quickly learned that was not the case, and that the shooter was outside the venue on a nearby rooftop. This prompted my next thought, “Why weren’t all the rooftops cleared?” I’ve read enough about security to know that’s standard, especially because this wasn’t a city with many rooftops, but an outdoor area with just a few. Many people are asking the same question, because this seems like a clear screwup. And of course, conspiracy theories abound.
One spectator was killed; 50-year-old ex-volunteer fire chief Corey Comperatore:
[His daughter] Allyson said that when the gunshots rang out, Comperatore quickly threw her and her mother to the ground to try to protect them after Trump was shot.
“He truly loved us enough to take a real bullet for us,” Allyson wrote on Facebook.
“And I want nothing more than to cry on him and tell him thank you.”
Terrible. RIP. Two others were badly wounded; I haven’t seen anything about their identities except that they were adult men.
Biden and other Democrats have mouthed words deploring the violence. And yet there is no question in my mind that their rhetoric set the scene for this type of attempt, whether it actually motivated Crooks himself or not. I have heard Democrats casually talk about wanting Trump assassinated; the idea has been normed (see this).
Many people have remarked on Trump’s heroic defiance just a moment after coming within a inch of death, and there are the photos and videos to prove it. I’ll just say it doesn’t surprise me; he’s a tough guy. He’d better be.
The news is everywhere, but we have few details so far. It does appear he’s basically okay.
I’m away from my computer and can’t post at length till this evening.
Here he is, Fabrice Calmels, at over 6 feet 6 inches tall:
Here’s a short article about him.
He’s a fairly good dancer, too, although his feet are a bit scrunched in the toes rather than in the arch. A video:
How does he do it? You may or may not be aware that it’s much harder to be a tall ballet dancer than a short one, and that in the case of male dancers, “tall” means anything over 5’10”. The tallest ballet dancer I’d ever heard about prior to this guy was Peter Martins, at 6’2″, and he was already unusually tall for a ballet dancer.
NOTE: Here’s a previous article I wrote about height and ballet dancers.
Phillips’ assessment is sobering, but I’m in total agreement with her and have thought the following myself since October 7:
We have to face without flinching what is now undeniable: There is a war across the globe raging against the Jewish people. It’s a war not just to destroy their national homeland but to drive them out of people’s heads, their conscience and their world.
Led by Muslims and the left, with its base in the universities, this war has extended much further than these circles into professional and commercial life.
Phillips goes on to explain that it’s a combination of Iranian and Muslim Brotherhood propaganda, allied with the left, that’s driving the spread of this toxic hatred.
While many Muslims don’t subscribe to fanaticism or fundamentalism, far too many do—and the overwhelming majority subscribe to the demonization and delegitimization of Israel that flow from Muslim Jew-hatred.
The reason the Oct. 7 pogrom in Israel sparked immediate and triumphant Muslim demonstrations was the ecstatic belief that, having destroyed Israeli invincibility by murdering and capturing so many Jews, the way was now open to destroy Israel, wipe out the Jews and conquer the West for Islam.
The far-left, who have latched on to the anti-West aims of this campaign, also believe that their revolutionary time has come.
For those who have been puzzled as to why Jew-hatred has risen in the wake of the barbaric October 7 attack, that’s the reason: evil triumphant.