↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 1638 << 1 2 … 1,636 1,637 1,638 1,639 1,640 … 1,917 1,918 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Paul Krugman, up close and personal—if you can stand it

The New Neo Posted on February 22, 2010 by neoFebruary 22, 2010

I’m not sure whether this New Yorker piece about Paul Krugman is meant to be admiring or denigrating. But I would sum its message up as follows:

Krugman used to be an insufferable intellectually arrogant and politically clueless person gifted in a particular (non-political) area of economics, who has almost no non-academic real-world experience. Since 2000, with the help of his wife and a whopping case of Bush Derangement Syndrome, he’s become a very angry insufferable intellectually arrogant and politically clueless person gifted in a particular (non-political) area of economics, who has almost no non-academic real-world experience.

Oh, and he’s always right, and those who disagree with him are idiots.

Any questions? Class dismissed.

Posted in People of interest | 13 Replies

Fighting with one hand tied behind your back

The New Neo Posted on February 22, 2010 by neoFebruary 22, 2010

Fighting the PC war in Afghanistan.

Posted in Afghanistan | 9 Replies

Still working on that comments preview function

The New Neo Posted on February 21, 2010 by neoFebruary 21, 2010

A great many commenters here have asked for a comments preview capability. I’ve tried before to find one that works, but there were a number of glitches.

Recently someone suggested this one. But alas, it seems to not be compatible with this blog design, although it’s a WordPress plug-in. For some reason, it gives an error message. So I (along with my trusty tech helper) am still working on the problem, but it hasn’t been fixed yet. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Posted in Blogging and bloggers | 11 Replies

The undead: the public option, rising from the grave?

The New Neo Posted on February 20, 2010 by neoFebruary 20, 2010

Let’s see if I can follow this: Harry Reid says that if reconciliation is used to pass health care reform, he’ll cooperate and work for a public option provision.

And you thought the public option was through. Seems the stake has not been driven into its heart after all.

What’s really going on here? One possibility is that Reid knows his re-election chances are virtually nil in 2010, so freedom’s just another word for nothin’ left to lose. Why not help in ramming through something people don’t want? (And yes, in manipulated polls that posit some sort of ideal generalized public option, people seem to favor it. But in real-life bills, they don’t.)

Another factor in the push is the enormous importance health care reform and the public option has for liberal Democrats; they would do almost anything to finally pass it, and their days are numbered right now so they think this is their last best chance for the foreseeable future.

Another possibility is (and these are not mutually exclusive choices) that they still believe that, if only a public option were to actually be put into law, the American people would realize how much they love it and how very well it works.

Still another is that the whole thing is a strategic bluff designed to trap the Republicans into a position where they can be accused of blocking a bill pretending to be bipartisan but actually completely crafted by Democrats.

This latter theory is aptly described here:

This bill is really designed to get Republicans to say “NO” and stymie the reconciliation process with amendments. The true goal is to give Obama and the Democrats cover with their base by saying: “the Republicans killed healthcare reform”.

If there were 51 votes in the Senate and 217 votes in the House to pass ObamaCare 2.0, why even bother having the Healthcare Summit with Republicans? If bi-partisanship is the reason for the summit, then why craft a bill design to be passed with reconciliation? Again, the answer is to blame the Republicans. Obama and the Democrats cannot have their base realize the truth, healthcare reform died because of Democrat bungling and Democrat cold feet.

So perhaps the Democrats are crafting a plan whereby nothing ends up happening, but they can say, “We tried our best, we really did. But those mean old Republicans…”

This might have worked a year ago. It might even have worked six months ago. But I’d be very surprised at this point if it convinced anyone who’s not already firmly of that opinion anyway.

[NOTE: In a related story, Reid and Obama seem to be playing a game of chicken on the subject.]

Posted in Health care reform, Politics | 79 Replies

Twin stories

The New Neo Posted on February 20, 2010 by neoFebruary 20, 2010

These two things are not exactly related, but they seem to go together.

First, the good news: Lawyers Yoo and Bybee will face no discipline for writing their memos (my take on a related issue here).

Next, the bad: nine Justice Department officials worked to defend and/or free terrorists (please read the whole thing).

Posted in Law, Terrorism and terrorists | 10 Replies

Rejoice, Emanuel

The New Neo Posted on February 20, 2010 by neoFebruary 20, 2010

Dana Milbank argues that, irascible and difficult though he might be, Rahm Emanuel is actually the best of Obama’s close advisers, not his worst.

I came to a similar conclusion here. Of course, being the best in Obama’s Gang of Four isn’t saying much.

Posted in Obama | 5 Replies

The confessions of Hitler’s secretary

The New Neo Posted on February 19, 2010 by neoFebruary 19, 2010

Last night I watched “Blind Spot,” a filmed interview with Traudl Junge, who was Hitler’s secretary during his last year and final days.

It’s a remarkable document, although a very simple one: Ms. Junge, aged eighty or so at the time of the interview, talks into the camera with no interruption in what appears to be three different sessions (marked by changes of outfit and the slight passage of time).

That’s all. But it’s quite a bit. The young and relatively apolitical Junge was selected for her job almost by chance—and the fact that she scored high in a typing test—but ended up being a witness to a very dark history. She describes her isolation from information other than Nazi propaganda, the growing desolation of the people in the bunker, and her own increasing numbness in the bizarre and grisly atmosphere.

Junge is quite composed and even dignified; the only time she breaks down at all is when she describes the Goebbels children (see this). She says that it is mostly since the 1960s, and then increasingly as time went on, that she has come to deeply reflect on her own guilt, and to be shocked at her failure to question what she saw and her hero-worship of a Hitler who seemed avuncular to her (she had been raised without a father).

Because I am particularly concerned with how people come to question previous assumptions and ultimately to change their minds, especially about politics, the part of Junge’s narrative that interested me most came during the war’s immediate aftermath. She had been given a cyanide pill in the bunker at her request, and had considered ending her own life because she had heard stories of what would happen at the hands of the Allies post-war: like something out of Hieronymous Bosch, she said. The men would be castrated, the women raped, and Germany would be returned to a very primitive technological existence by the vengeful victors.

But she took her chances and escaped, and although she was imprisoned (for a fairly short time, it turned out) by first the Russians and then the Americans, she encountered a world of Care packages and was well-treated by good people, especially the Americans, and saw Germany (she escaped to the West) become a free country. Junge observes that it was the beginning of her discovery that what she had been told by Hitler, “was all a lie.” In fact, she learned that the premise for the war itself was a big lie, and spent the rest of her life trying to come to terms with how she could have believed in, gotten caught up with, denied the warning signs of, and participated in such a grievous set of lies that perpetrated so much evil in the world.

Traudl Junge died not long after the film was made. She is reported to have said shortly before her death, “Now that I’ve let go of my story, I can let go of my life.”

Posted in Evil, People of interest, Political changers, War and Peace | 61 Replies

Tiger Woods: mea culpa

The New Neo Posted on February 19, 2010 by neoFebruary 19, 2010

I’ve not written about Tiger Woods before, and I’m not going to write much about him now. But I just turned on the news and happened to catch the last half of his public apology, in which he said “I am sorry” multiple times to multiple people.

It struck me that he sounded sincere. But it also struck me that he’s always sounded sincere, even when he was living a double life.

Woods has been in therapy, he reports. But compulsive behavior such as his is difficult to treat. I wish him good luck; as he says, it’s his future behavior that will tell the tale:

I convinced myself that normal rules didn’t apply…I thought only of myself…I felt I was entitled…I was wrong…It’s up to me to start living a life of integrity.

Yes.

Posted in Baseball and sports | 34 Replies

Remembering jokes

The New Neo Posted on February 18, 2010 by neoFebruary 18, 2010

I often hear someone tell a really funny joke and think, “I must remember that one.”

But I almost never do; they seem to evaporate almost as soon as I hear them. I’ve tried practicing, but it rarely helps.

Some people (my brother, for example) have a vast repertoire of set pieces and can entertain others for hours with them, doing all the voices and acting out the parts just right. But I’m fortunate even to be able to access and deliver the five or six I’ve laboriously managed to retain over the years.

It’s not that I’m not humorous. But whatever wit I have tends to be of the ad-lib, spontaneous variety (not that there’s anything wrong with that). And I’m pretty decent at telling funny stories about things that happened to me, events from my own life.

But both seem to tap into a different skill than telling the joke that’s a set piece. Anyone have any pointers on how to improve in that arena?

A guy walks into a bar…

Posted in Me, myself, and I | 90 Replies

Nightfall in America

The New Neo Posted on February 18, 2010 by neoFebruary 18, 2010

Well worth reading, including the comments.

[ADDENDUM: Here’s another good one: “the last bull capitulates.”]

Posted in Finance and economics, Obama | 8 Replies

Obama the blame(less) duck

The New Neo Posted on February 18, 2010 by neoFebruary 18, 2010

Today two columnists try to dish out the tasteless old pap claiming that, although Obama and the Democratic Party are tanking, it’s not the President’s fault.

The dauntless Obama apologist E.J. Dionne claims that it’s the Senate’s fault, as well as the fact that the Republicans somehow grabbed hold of the bully pulpit and got their message across while the Democrats (despite the help of most of the MSM) unaccountably failed to explain things properly. Now, where have we heard that before?

And then there’s this by Steve Chapman, who says that Obama has lost ground because of “things he can’t control.” I’ve read the piece twice, and I still can’t figure out exactly what those things might have been. Chapman cites presidential predecessors who had low popularity at a similar point in their terms, but he fails to mention that all of them showed far more flexibility at course correction than Obama, and that none of them had the advantage of the excessively fawning press that Obama has enjoyed till quite recently (some of them had the disadvantage of the exact opposite).

Both articles are similar to many others that have appeared ever since the January day one month ago when Scott Brown was elected. At the time everyone who was paying objective attention realized that a seismic shift had occurred in the Democrats’ fortunes, and that the only way Democrats could possibly reverse this trend would be to face reality. But neither of these columnists (nor the Democratic leaders, nor Obama) seems interested in taking such an approach.

But I wonder what they think will be accomplished by maintaining this high a level of denial. Do they really believe that staying the ultra-liberal course they’re on, and just “communicating the message” better, or trusting to chance, will turn things around? If so, they are delusional.

Or do they just believe that we’ll believe whatever they tell us, if they just phrase it better and more forcefully? If so, they are contemptuous of the voters. Why do they not realize that the common sense of the American people tells them otherwise, and that people don’t respect or trust those who continually lie to them?

Or are they just trying to keep their own base from panicking? If so, it is hard to know why this would be of that much help, or whether it’s even effective. I’ve spent enough time on liberal and left blogs to see that some pundits and commenters there definitely parrot the same message as these columns. But surely this cannot represent a sizable enough group to matter in the election of 2010.

You can fool some of the people some of the time….

Posted in Liberals and conservatives; left and right, Obama, Politics, Press | 19 Replies

Those White House books on socialism

The New Neo Posted on February 18, 2010 by neoFebruary 18, 2010

A blogger reports that he went on a White House tour and saw some books on socialism in a library stocked by Michelle Obama.

I say: big deal. That has no particular meaning. In fact, if both Obamas were dedicated to fighting socialism in all its shapes and forms, you certainly would expect them to have read up on the subject. Know thine enemy, and all that.

The more significant point is that here we are, a year after Obama’s inauguration and several years after he began his campaign, still speculating about the true nature of the Obamas, especially Barack. And by the word “we,” I’m not just referring to the right; the left and the middle are trying to figure him out as well.

Have we ever before had a deliberately cloaked mystery man as president, about whose goals we must continually speculate? No. Everyone wonders about Barack Obama, although some of us think we know.

I, for example, believe him to be a leftist ideologue dedicated to the redistribution of wealth even if the American electorate turns on him and his fellow Democrats in the process, and even if he has to lie through his teeth about who he is and what he intends. And I don’t need a couple of books here and there to tell me that—although in fact, these books tell me nothing. His actions are what determine my viewpoint, combined with his multiple lies and obfuscations.

Remember this, from July of 2008? It wasn’t very funny then, and it’s not all that funny now:

obamas.jpg

The only difference between then and now is that we have much more evidence of Obama’s true nature, and we also have more evidence that the American people have woken up and are onto the program, and may be able to stop it.

Posted in Obama | 28 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • whatever on The AfD does very well in the recent German elections in Saxony-Anhalt
  • om on The AfD does very well in the recent German elections in Saxony-Anhalt
  • AesopFan on Open thread 9/7/2026
  • John Galt III on The AfD does very well in the recent German elections in Saxony-Anhalt
  • AesopFan on Open thread 9/7/2026

Recent Posts

  • The AfD does very well in the recent German elections in Saxony-Anhalt
  • Happy Labor Day
  • Open thread 9/7/2026
  • A restrained AI spam comment
  • A lost skill

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (328)
  • Afghanistan (98)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (164)
  • Best of neo-neocon (91)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (595)
  • Dance (292)
  • Disaster (244)
  • Education (323)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (566)
  • Election 2018 (33)
  • Election 2020 (513)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (93)
  • Election 2028 (13)
  • Evil (129)
  • Fashion and beauty (324)
  • Finance and economics (1,042)
  • Food (317)
  • Friendship (48)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (734)
  • Health (1,161)
  • Health care reform (545)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (337)
  • History (716)
  • Immigration (448)
  • Iran (464)
  • Iraq (227)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (821)
  • Jews (437)
  • Language and grammar (365)
  • Latin America (212)
  • Law (2,975)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (124)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,321)
  • Liberty (1,117)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (394)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,498)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (929)
  • Middle East (384)
  • Military (324)
  • Movies (353)
  • Music (533)
  • Nature (261)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (183)
  • Obama (1,738)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (131)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,043)
  • Poetry (258)
  • Political changers (178)
  • Politics (2,793)
  • Pop culture (397)
  • Press (1,635)
  • Race and racism (882)
  • Religion (428)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (641)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (971)
  • Theater and TV (266)
  • Therapy (71)
  • Trump (1,630)
  • Uncategorized (4,555)
  • Vietnam (109)
  • Violence (1,445)
  • War and Peace (1,027)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑