↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 1478 << 1 2 … 1,476 1,477 1,478 1,479 1,480 … 1,917 1,918 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Tempus fugit: when you’re a Jet you stay a Jet

The New Neo Posted on December 29, 2011 by neoDecember 29, 2011

Indulging in one of my favorite pastimes, surfing on YouTube, recently led me to a clip of a 2007 rehearsal of a new production of the musical “West Side Story.” The sequence begins with the cast of the 2007 revival, who are later joined by 22 members of the original 1957 production.

That’s a passage of 50 years. Most of the originals would have to have been at least 70 years old when the video was made. Carol Lawrence, the original Maria, would have been about 75 years old in the clip, and Chita Rivera, the original Anita, nearly the same age. The guys who were in the chorus of Jets—including the original Riff, who’s the first older person to appear—are there, as well as a great many of the female dancers/singers of the original chorus, who join in performing “Tonight” at the end of the segment.

There’s something about this video that makes tears well up in my eyes—something about the passage of time and the coming of old age, and the contrast between the extraordinarily agile young people who sail through the choreography with flair, and the old people who used to be just like them but move so differently now.

Because dancers’ bodies are their instruments (and finely honed, athletic instruments at that), they experience physical decline much earlier than most people. What’s more, they can easily measure it. Even as soon as the 30s and 40s, the jump gets tamer, the leg can’t kick quite as high, and it becomes apparent that it’s time to stop, often long before the performer is mentally ready to do so. The same is true at a slower pace for singers—for most, it happens at some point well before extreme old age. The high notes go and the tone changes, and the power diminishes.

But despite all that’s been lost, here they are, gamely strutting their stuff once more. The setting is casual, a rehearsal hall. They’re mere shadows of their former performing selves—and yet, and yet…something indomitable and quite wonderful remains. Carol Lawrence (red hair, black sweater, long red and black skirt) is still extraordinarily beautiful, although her famous pellucid soprano is faded and quavery. Chita Rivera (all in black, with coal black hair) remains a firecracker:

We can’t really travel back in time. But we can do the next best thing, and watch a clip of Carol Lawrence and her original Tony (Larry Kert, who died in 1991), eternally young and singing “Tonight:”

And just in case your appetite for the 1957 production isn’t yet sated, here are a bunch of still photos accompanied by some of the songs. You may find that you recognize quite a few of these people from their more ancient manifestations in that 2007 clip:

…Overhead, overhead
Rushes life in a race,
As the clouds the clouds chase;
And we go,
And we drop like the fruits of the tree,
Even we,
Even so.

Posted in Best of neo-neocon, Dance, Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe, Music, Poetry, Theater and TV | 9 Replies

Cheetah dead

The New Neo Posted on December 28, 2011 by neoDecember 28, 2011

Or was it some impostor?

The real Cheetah always liked a good joke:

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Replies

Spambot of the day

The New Neo Posted on December 28, 2011 by neoDecember 28, 2011

I’m not sure whether this bot is complimenting me or not:

The site loading velocity is amazing. It kind of feels that you are doing any distinctive trick.

On another, completely unrelated topic: I can’t wait till the holidays are over. I’ve even started my New Years diet a few days early. I’m just all holidayed out. And you?

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Replies

About that fire

The New Neo Posted on December 28, 2011 by neoDecember 28, 2011

Officials think they’ve found the cause of that horrific Christmas house fire I wrote about a few days ago:

A Christmas morning fire that killed a couple and three of their grandchildren was accidentally started by fireplace embers that had been discarded near a first-floor entryway, officials said Tuesday.

The officials also said it wasn’t clear if the home had working smoke detectors. Stamford Mayor Michael Pavia called the fire a “tragic accident,” not the result of foul play.

Sometime between 3 a.m. and 3:30 a.m., a friend staying in the home put fireplace ashes in a bag and left it either in or outside a mudroom and trash enclosure attached to the rear of the house, said Barry Callahan, Stamford’s fire marshal. The fire was reported just after 4:40 a.m.

“The fire entered the house quickly and spread throughout the first floor and up two interior vertical openings, trapping the occupants on the upper floors,” Callahan said.

There are other heartbreaking details in the story, if you go to the link.

[ADDENDUM: See also this for a more complete story.]

Posted in Disaster | 11 Replies

Romney endorsements, yea and nay and just okay

The New Neo Posted on December 28, 2011 by neoJune 7, 2012

John Hinderaker of Powerline has endorsed Mitt Romney, and John Hawkins of RightWingNews has said why he won’t be doing the same.

Tigerhawk has summarized and compared the positions of both men, so I don’t have to do it. But I’ll add—as I think I’ve been saying right along—that if in fact current front runner Romney is nominated, I plan to vote for him—and in doing so I won’t be having an experience that’s all that different from my vote in all the elections I’ve ever participated in, which is to compromise and vote for an imperfect candidate.

I’ve never been all that pleased with the offerings of either party for president. I think I’ve mentioned before that my most favored candidate ever was Paul Tsongas in 1992—and he didn’t even win the nomination, and then it turned out he would have become gravely ill in office.

I’ve been even less pleased with third party offerings, and even if I’d liked someone like Ross Perot (which I did not), I am a practical sort who wants to make my vote count. The fact that it tends to count as a vote for the lesser of two evils is something I’ve grown accustomed to, and although I haven’t given up hope of someone I can truly admire, trust, like, and even agree with being nominated, I’m practical enough to realize that in politics that’s a longshot.

Sometimes I think that in that I differ from those who voted for Reagan during the 80s. It should come to no surprise to readers of this blog that I voted for Carter twice but that I also was never keen on him, and never hated Reagan either (in fact, I seem to recall having a sneaking admiration for much of Reagan’s foreign policy, although in those days I tended to keep mum about that in polite company). But to conservatives at the time, the emergence of Reagan as a national figure and then president must have seemed nearly miraculous. Voting for him might even have been a pleasure. No wonder so many of those who remember doing so would like to have that sort of feeling again, and those too young to have had the experience would like a similar one.

Well, it’s almost certainly not going to happen this year, unless you don’t mind writing in the name of the person who’s your particular champion and thereby wasting your vote. Of course, you may think that voting for Romney or Gingrich (or whomever is nominated; I think it will almost certainly be one of those two, and probably Romney) is already wasting your vote.

I do not. I think either represents a choice, not an echo (a phrase popularized in Goldwater’s 1964 bid) compared to Obama, although I prefer Romney over Gingrich because of Romney’s far more stable personal life and his lengthy and successful record in the private sector. I like the fact that each man is smart and a good debater, because these skills will be needed to face Obama.

As for Romney’s history with the Massachusetts health care program that’s come to be known as Romneycare, I keep promising a larger post on it. But that post would be so large that I haven’t yet had time to tackle it. Here’s the short version:

Many people consider it specious sophistry when Romney claims that an individual mandate in Massachusetts was okay whereas it’s not okay for the federal government to impose the same thing. But that argument makes sense to me. There are many powers forbidden to the federal government by the constitution that are allowed the states. That is one of the bases of federalism, which is certainly a conservative principle to uphold.

Whether or not you think an individual mandate is a good idea, even for a state, is another question entirely. You may think it’s a bad one. But it almost certainly is not unconstitutional for states.

When so-called Romneycare was enacted in the very liberal state of Massachusetts, the individual mandate was considered (even by conservative think tanks at the time) to be a conservative solution to the problem of extending coverage—a substitute for a government-operated single-payer type system which Massachusetts might have otherwise enacted, and a way to provide a private sector alternative to the then-current practice of treating the indigent for free and passing the bill to the rest of the population via increased hospital bills for those who could pay. Romney also wanted to impose some limits on the bill that the liberal Massachusetts legislature would not countenance, overriding his vetoes.

And Hawkins criticizes Romney for, among other things, not having been a popular governor in Massachusetts. But I’m puzzled as to why that would be a drawback; isn’t it instead a possible testament to his conservatism rather than his unelectability? After all, Massachusetts is hardly representative of the US electorate as a whole—fortunately.

Posted in Election 2012, Health care reform, Me, myself, and I, Romney | 42 Replies

Singing a good song: from Empty Chairs to Killing to Grammys and back

The New Neo Posted on December 27, 2011 by neoDecember 9, 2019

Here’s the story of the life of a song that most of you know, or think you know:

A minor fact: I met Lori Lieberman briefly around the time the song first became popular or even before that. She was very young, and seemed extremely shy. But I never forgot her softer, gentler rendition of “Killing Me Softly,” nor the lovely quality of her introspectively melodic delivery.

Here’s the Roberta Flack version that made the song famous, and which most people think is the original:

And here’s Lieberman again with “Killing Me Softly,” singing it softly (but in 2011). My how time does fly—softly (and I have no idea what’s up with pumpkinman in the background):

Posted in Music | 7 Replies

Kindle bestsellers

The New Neo Posted on December 27, 2011 by neoDecember 27, 2011

[Hat tip: Althouse.]

Here’s a list of the one hundred top Kindle books. Actually, you get two, two, two lists in one: the books for sale, and the books available for free.

The Bible does well in both categories. And I’m pleased to note that Alice in Wonderland is 7th right now in the free book ranks. Sisters Charlotte and Emily Bronte are running neck and neck for honors with each other, but older sis Charlotte’s Jane Eyre wins out by a well-groomed hair over Emily’s wilder Wuthering Heights (#25 vs. #32). In the paid category, a book I’ve already written about, Stephen King’s 9/11/2001, takes eighth place.

Suzanne Collins’ and her mockingjay trilogy are dominant in the paid category. I happen to have read all of them for my book group, and although I can see why they’re popular among teenagers and are going to be made into movies (in fact, their cinematic plots, combining violence and fashion in equal measure, appear to have been written expressly with the movies in mind), they are pretty much claptrap.

I’d be curious to know how the Kindle freebies stack up in absolute numbers against the Kindle paids. But Amazon’s not telling.

[NOTE: Oh, and if you want to order anything from Amazon, please use your friendly neighborhood neoneo portal, on the right sidebar or here (I included the extra link because one reader wrote in to say that the Amazon widgets on my blog weren’t showing up on his computer).]

Posted in Literature and writing | 12 Replies

The California Bar tries to bar Glass

The New Neo Posted on December 27, 2011 by neoDecember 27, 2011

Stephen Glass, notorious liar of “Shattered Glass” and TNR journalistic fame, is a Georgetown Law School graduate and paralegal who is currently fighting to be admitted to the California Bar. He passed the Bar Exam there a few years ago, but the Committee of Bar Examiners “judged him morally unfit for his new profession.”

If you look at the comments section of the article about Glass’s efforts (910 comments and counting as of this writing), the jokes are coming a mile a minute. The gist of the humor goes like this: Lawyer, liar? He’d be perfect!

And several commenters have highlighted the following highly ironic sentence in the article, a statement by California Bar spokesperson Rachel Grunber that gets a lot of laughs:

Law and journalism “share common core values ”” trust, candor, veracity, honor, respect for others…He violated every one of them.”

As for Glass—I would not now, nor ever, believe a word the man says. His m.o. was not just to lie, but to lie egregiously, blatantly, and repeatedly; to create an entire world of lies to back up his other lies though “research” to fool the magazine’s fact-checkers; to involve his brother in his lies; and to get everyone else around him to defend and feel sorry for him when he was accused.

Remorse was really not in this guy’s vocabulary, but lying about having remorse was. In other words, a sociopath.

But don’t take my word for it. Charles Lane, TNR‘s head editor who finally figured out what Glass was doing and blew the whistle on him, had this to say afterward about Glass’s personality:

We [at TNR] extended normal human trust to someone who basically lacked a conscience… We busy, friendly folks, were no match for such a willful deceiver… We thought Glass was interested in our personal lives, or our struggles with work, and we thought it was because he cared. Actually, it was all about sizing us up and searching for vulnerabilities. What we saw as concern was actually contempt.

Not everyone agrees with Lane’s observations, at least not any more. Glass has amassed a great many character witnesses to vouch for his change of heart:

His appeal [against the Bar ruling] included character references from 22 witnesses, including two judges who had employed him, two psychiatrists, and Martin Peretz, who owned The New Republic when Glass’ deception occurred.

In his own statement to the bar, Glass said he was “greatly ashamed and remorseful about my lying” but “forthright and candid about my years of misconduct.”

It’s not that I don’t believe people can reform. They can; it’s not “once a liar, always a liar.” But Glass was—and probably still is—in a particular category of liars who seem conscienceless, although they can fake consciences when it suits them (and always after they are caught). Beware.

Posted in Law, People of interest | 19 Replies

“We don’t have our ‘A’ team”

The New Neo Posted on December 26, 2011 by neoDecember 27, 2011

Agreed: Republicans don’t have their “A” team in the field this election cycle.

But you go to the primaries with the field you have, and then you go to the election with the candidate you have. Paul Ryan, Allan West, Marco Rubio, Sarah Palin, Chris Christie—or whomever it is that you think might be able to wipe the floor with Obama—just isn’t running, and the convention is unlikely to be brokered and a draft just won’t be happening unless that’s the case.

So, are you reconciled to a Romney candidacy? Or is it “anyone-but-Romney” for you?

I think you know where I stand: I will hold my nose and vote for Romney, if he’s the nominee. He’s competent and conservative enough for me, especially compared to Obama.

[ADDENDUM: Socially conservative Romney.]

Posted in Election 2012 | 88 Replies

Almost unimaginable grief

The New Neo Posted on December 26, 2011 by neoDecember 26, 2011

This story is horrific:

A [mother] climbed onto the roof of her burning house and tried to smash the windows of her daughters’ bedrooms in a bid to save them from the flames ravaging her home.

Madonna Badger, 47, and friend Michael Borcina survived the horrific Christmas day fire at her Stamford, Connecticut home that claimed the lives of her three daughters and their grandparents.

Lily, 10, and seven-year-old twins Sarah and Grace perished in the 5 a.m. fire with Mrs Badger’s parents, Lomer and Pauline Johnson, who were to celebrate their 49th wedding anniversary today.

Ms. Badger is a wealthy executive, as many articles are eager to point out, and the house was a huge and expensive waterfront Victorian she’d bought a year ago for almost two million dollars. Her father had just finished a stint as department store Santa at Saks; he really looked the part (go to the article to see the photos), natural white beard and all.

There are strange anomalies about the situation, which have caused a lot of gossipy speculation in comments sections of newspaper reports on the fire. For example, Borcina was the contractor in charge of renovating the home, and was overnight staying there (I’m not going to get into these aspects of the tragedy, but I note them).

To me the most important question involves the fire itself. By all reports, it swept through the mansion incredibly quickly. In this day and age of smoke detectors, we like to think that horrific events like this can be avoided through technology. What went wrong here? Were there no smoke detectors in a house of the magnitude? Were they disabled because of the ongoing renovations? Or were they overwhelmed by the ferocity of a Christmas tree fire?

Home fires that start with Christmas trees tend to be more deadly than typical home fires. A recent study by the National Fire Prevention Association found that one in 18 home Christmas tree fires from 2005 to 2009 resulted in a death, compared with one in every 141 home fires.

“A Christmas tree fire is a fairly uncommon occurrence, but when it does occur, it can be particularly serious and more deadly than another type of house fire,” spokesperson Lorraine Carli says.

Trees provide an unusually large amount of fuel, and the fire can spread through a room in seconds, leaving little time to get out of the house, says Tom Olshanski of the U.S. Fire Administration. That’s especially true if the fires happen when people are sleeping, he says.

The key to prevention is to water the tree well and to turn off the lights when you go to sleep.

Whatever the cause of the fire, I cannot imagine that Ms. Badger will ever recover, except physically. Nor will her estranged husband. Even the firefighters seem to have been traumatized. The deepest desire is to go in and save the victims. And yet the knowledge that, if you do, you not only stand a good chance of not surviving, but you will not survive and your life will be forfeited in vain, is enough to stop virtually anyone. But the guilt can be tremendous, as well as the grief.

If you’re the praying type, please say a few prayers for this family.

Posted in Disaster | 11 Replies

The Ron Paul newsletters

The New Neo Posted on December 26, 2011 by neoDecember 26, 2011

I haven’t paid a whole lot of attention to this story because frankly, I’ve never thought Ron Paul had a chance of winning the nomination to begin with. And the newsletter story certainly won’t be enhancing those chances.

But I will say that it appears that on this matter Paul is either (a) negligent, or (b) lying. Perhaps even both.

How could he not know what was a recurrent theme in his own newsletters, missives that he personally promoted and lauded several times during the 90s?

Ace nails it:

But in Ron Paul’s case, we’re to believe that ghostwriters and collaborators just go off on their own personal bugaboos, pursuing their own hateful agendas, before singing your name at the bottom of an article.

And then they keep doing it, and doing it, and doing it some more; and then they do it some more; and some more, and more. And you never notice, because you don’t even bother to read the headlines of your own first-person magazine.

Maybe Paul should give a speech about racism, the way Obama did after the Reverend Wright revelations. Of course, there are big differences between Obama’s situation then and Paul’s now. One is that the press was in Obama’s corner, and eager to let him off the hook. Another is that Reverend Wright’s racist speeches were against white people rather than black—the former is the semi-acceptable racism in PC-land, the latter not.

But more importantly, Obama was at worst a mere spectator and disciple of Wright’s, not the originator of the remarks. They were preached from the pulpit and also published under Wright’s name in the bulletins of the church in which Obama was a long-term member. Obama’s denial of any knowledge of them seemed (and still seems) highly umplausible; but still, it is considerably more credible than Paul’s disclaimers of work published under his own name.

Posted in Election 2012, Race and racism | 20 Replies

Christmas greetings!

The New Neo Posted on December 25, 2011 by neoDecember 25, 2011

Merry Christmas!

For those of you who thought this post from yesterday too long to wade through, I thought I’d just put up a portion of the last video in that post here so you can enjoy it for Christmas. It’s a scene from the old Met production of the Humperdinck opera “Hansel and Gretel,” where the children have gotten lost and fallen asleep in the dark and scary forest after saying their prayers with childlike trust. Angels come to guard them in the night (and please watch it in full screen mode to get the impact of the special effects; they can be very difficult to see when the picture is small, and they take a little while to get going):

Posted in Music | 7 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • M Williams on A lost skill
  • FOAF on A restrained AI spam comment
  • TJ on Open thread 9/5/2026
  • Niketas Choniates on A restrained AI spam comment
  • Chases Eagles on A lost skill

Recent Posts

  • A restrained AI spam comment
  • A lost skill
  • The Lindsay Clancy possibilities
  • Open thread 9/5/2026
  • The new AI spam comment generator is very very clever

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (328)
  • Afghanistan (98)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (164)
  • Best of neo-neocon (91)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (595)
  • Dance (292)
  • Disaster (244)
  • Education (323)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (566)
  • Election 2018 (33)
  • Election 2020 (513)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (92)
  • Election 2028 (13)
  • Evil (129)
  • Fashion and beauty (324)
  • Finance and economics (1,042)
  • Food (317)
  • Friendship (48)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (734)
  • Health (1,161)
  • Health care reform (545)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (337)
  • History (716)
  • Immigration (448)
  • Iran (464)
  • Iraq (227)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (821)
  • Jews (437)
  • Language and grammar (365)
  • Latin America (212)
  • Law (2,975)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (124)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,321)
  • Liberty (1,117)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (394)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,498)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (929)
  • Middle East (384)
  • Military (324)
  • Movies (353)
  • Music (533)
  • Nature (261)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (183)
  • Obama (1,738)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (131)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,043)
  • Poetry (258)
  • Political changers (178)
  • Politics (2,793)
  • Pop culture (397)
  • Press (1,635)
  • Race and racism (882)
  • Religion (428)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (641)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (971)
  • Theater and TV (266)
  • Therapy (71)
  • Trump (1,630)
  • Uncategorized (4,553)
  • Vietnam (109)
  • Violence (1,445)
  • War and Peace (1,027)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑