A little late, I’d say. But the MSM, as fully expected, is busy minimizing the crime in Waukesha with their usual clever use of language, referring to it repeatedly and widely as an “accident” or a “crash” (which seems to … Continue reading →
The verdicts are as follows: Travis McMichael (who actually shot Arbery) guilty on all counts, including malice murder, and the rest are guilty of various types of felony murder. You can read the details at the link. As I’ve written … Continue reading →
I previously knew only the bare bones of the Arbery case and hadn’t followed it at all closely. But here’s what Andrew Branca has to say at Legal Insurrection about the closing arguments (also please read this from Branca). In … Continue reading →
Darrell Brooks is the career felon who killed five people and injured over 40 by purposely barreling through a barricade and driving through a Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wisconsin on Sunday. Not only does Brooks have the proverbial rap sheet … Continue reading →
For quite a while I’ve been featuring videos with attorney Robert Barnes, and especially the ones about the Rittenhouse case. He’s not only thorough, he’s also lively and interesting. In addition, it turns out that he’s been about 97% correct … Continue reading →
A person of interest is in custody in connection with a red SUV that plowed through the crowd at a Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wisconsin, causing many casualties: Calling what happened “a tragic incident,” Chief Thompson went on to say … Continue reading →
The title of this post promises far more than I will deliver today. The left’s lies is a topic I’ve visited many times before, and probably will visit many times again. So consider this just a short sketch, and an … Continue reading →
There’s an almost endless supply of topics related to the Rittenhouse trial and verdict. Impossible to cover them all, but here are a few that I find of special interest: (1) The Rittenhouse case in a nutshell: Incredible that we’re … Continue reading →
I was in transit yesterday out west, so I’m still catching up with yesterday’s news in the Rittenhouse case. Fortunately, others have done excellent work summing things up. If you haven’t seen these yet, I highly recommend them: Andrew Branca … Continue reading →
It’s waiting time, and I’ve been reflecting on the big picture of where we are right now. I don’t think there’s any way the Rittenhouse trial would have occurred ten years ago and certainly not twenty years ago, and the … Continue reading →
Andrew Branca has posted his analysis of the day’s proceedings in the Rittenhouse trial. It contains the jury instructions and is quite detailed, and I suggest you read it or at least skim it. I wish I could say it … Continue reading →
I probably will write more about this over the weekend, because I need more information on it in order to say something more intelligent about it. But I’ve been appalled at two things recently in the Rittenhouse trial – in … Continue reading →