Spambot of the day
Accusative, but in a tecky sort of way: Dang site owner you have lots of odd error codes on your blog that says parse error unexpected T String in line 19
Continue reading →neo
More Rahm: he’s no LBJ, except for the naked intimidation part
Still another piece on Rahm Emanuel, this one by Peter Baker and appearing in the NY Times Magazine. Reading it made me think once again that it’s a good thing Obama has been too full of himself and his own … Continue reading →
Tamoxifen decisions
Is it at all surprising that, given these odds, many women who are judged to have a higher risk of getting breast cancer are refusing to take tamoxifen as a preventative? The only surprising thing is that anyone would find … Continue reading →
The Obama administration: who’s weeping now?
Simon Heffer remarks on the apparent fracture of the Obama in-crowd, and sees it as a sign that things are going very badly indeed for the administration: The descent of Barack Obama’s regime, characterised now by factionalism in the Democratic … Continue reading →
All Oscared out
In brief (although little about the Oscars is ever brief): it was a long-winded self-congratulatory bore. But that’s what I’ve come to expect. I watch the Oscars for the fashions. That’s just how shallow a person I am. Oscar observations: … Continue reading →
Notes from the circular firing squad
Representative Eric Massa (D-NY) accuses the Democratic leadership of forcing him out to save health care reform. He says the target has actually been on his back since he voted against cap and trade: “When I voted against the cap … Continue reading →
Remember Romania?
Michael Totten does.
Continue reading →Liberals and “it’s not fair!”
Yesterday in the thead about the deficit there appeared this thought-provoking comment by Geoffrey Britain, in which he described the prevailing liberal/left mindset. Here’s an excerpt We’re not really dealing with Machiavellian malevolence, we’re dealing with immature, arrested emotional development … Continue reading →
David Axelrod: again with the message
It’s not the message, stupid! But the New York Times, a goodly portion of Obama’s remaining supporters, and the Obama administration itself seem to continue to think (or to pretend?) that it is. This Times piece focuses on how David … Continue reading →
The deficit: the Obama administration…
…has mortgaged our future, saying it’s okay because the good times will start rolling soon. Or are they aiming for the collapse of the economy?
Continue reading →White House jello
What is White House jello? No, it doesn’t refer to Obama’s spine. It refers to this work of jello art, constructed by Liz Hickok, and sent to me by a thoughtful reader:
Continue reading →Has Obama done any irreversible damage so far?
I saw the above question in the comments section of a post at Althouse, and I believe the answer is “yes.” But the reason I say this may surprise you. It’s not any one action or decision, or even several. … Continue reading →