Home » Vance reveals himself, and it’s not pretty

Comments

Vance reveals himself, and it’s not pretty — 8 Comments

  1. There are all sorts of foreign-government-funded campaigns to influence American public opinion. At least this one, funded by Israel, is out in the open.

    It is discouraging to see Vance taking TIME Magazine seriously.

  2. Had never considered – ‘But if he doesn’t get the nomination, I can easily imagine a situation in which he goes third-party to ally with Tucker and Tucker’s followers’. Had thought 3rd party for Trump tho if he hadn’t been GOP nom.

    Had stated my views here on J. D. “Bootlicker” Vance many times, and would vote for AOC before him – GOP has MANY MANY GREAT CANDIDATES and Vance is not one of them.

    Geez…he’s even worse than I thought he was!?!

  3. My impression: Vance went out on quite a limb to convince Trump that the new Iranian leadership had changed and were ready to rejoin the international community as responsible players, leading to the MOU. But then it turned out – shockingly – that the Iranians had, in fact, not changed a bit and had played Vance like a fiddle. Not good, and embarrassing for Trump. So what should an ambitious VP do in this predicament? Blame the Jews, of course!

  4. Sadly, he has become Tucker Carlson lite.

    I am now in full support of Marco Rubio in 2028–he has the gravitas and the wisdom that Vance lacks.

  5. So Mossad was behind the Iranian attacks on tankers in Hormuz? Yeah, Vance stopped making sense to me a while ago.

    I do wonder, like Road Warrior, if this is blame-casting for the failure of the MOU negotiations. Vance was the face of those negotiations. A serious black eye for him.

    But then Vance has been overly friendly with the Tucker world before this.

  6. Assuming he was assigned to do the negotiating, that was okay. If he actually believed, based on what we saw happening, that the negotiators were either in charge in Iran and that they were credible, then that’s another problem.

    Side note: Karmi is back? Taking advantage of the new log-in regime, I guess.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Web Analytics