↓
 
Home » The New Hampshire primary and the continuing saga of Jeanne Shaheen

Comments

The New Hampshire primary and the continuing saga of Jeanne Shaheen — 8 Comments

  1. They’re so used to the media just accepting everything they say without question, they’re shocked when someone challenges them with minor details like “facts”, “evidence” or “your own words”.

  2. Two pet peeves of mine in the same post: political dynasties in what’s supposed to be a representative democracy, and old news recycled and spread through the online world as though it just happened.

    I realize that neo herself did not say this was recent news, but the Shaheen clip is from October 2025, and all the right-wing media is talking about it today just like they were talking about it the day it happened. Not sure why the right-o-sphere picked today for this one, they probably could have found a new one or at worst waited a bit for a new one.

    Once in a while you can see the machine at work. Yes, there is one on our side of the fence too.

  3. Robert Kerry once said that Bilge Clinton was ‘an unusually good liar. Unusually good’. Richard John Neuhaus replied that an unusually good liar would not have a reputation for being an unusually good liar. The unusually good liar is Jeanne Shaheen.

  4. Except that facts and evidence are racist, oppressionist, colonialist, and white supremacist.

    Pretty sure one can add the law and the Constitution to that…

    File under: Make Medea Great Again!

  5. @neo:I think perhaps because the NH primary to replace her was yesterday?

    You got me, I don’t know why the Batsignal went out, but it did. There’s a constellation of websites all owned by the same content provider that all have it today as though it just happened and don’t mention the primary at all. Salem Media’s websites brought it out again today, but usually marking it old news. I don’t know if those were independent but I doubt it. One went with it and got a strong response and the other followed suit, is my guess, probably the Salem people saw it trending on X.

    That’s the reality we’re living in, that there are people who make their living successfully injecting things into the discourse. The blogosphere used to be amateurs in pajamas writing about what interested them, X used to be people who had something to say followed by people who wanted to read it. Those days are long gone, and there’s lots of money to be made in faking that things are still the same in order to shape what we talk and think about. Engagement goes up a tenth-point and somebody can buy a Lambo.

  6. Those days are long gone. . . .

    Well, yeah. “Behold, [man] travaileth with iniquity, and hath conceived mischief, and brought forth falsehood.”

    It is ever thus. Surely this is not news to you?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Web Analytics
↑