Home » The left isn’t changing its mind on Fauci

Comments

The left isn’t changing its mind on Fauci — 18 Comments

  1. The leftists I follow are all about how Trump pleaded the 5th X number of times, therefore it’s fine Fauci did it. His crimes are ignored.

  2. I have almost never seen a Democrat, leftist or a Muslim arguing in good faith on a hot button issue.

    There are a few, but they tend to switch sides eventually.

  3. Yet many of Leftists died from Covid but Leftists don’t blame their Demigod but will blame something else.

    huxley – they turn against their side gets them tossed outside.

  4. I’ll confess that I’m not very good or practiced at doing AI queries, but I tried a few times to get an itemized list of contradictions from the Fauci diary, via Co-Pilot. All I could get was some blather about how it was a matter of perception and context.

  5. All I could get was some blather

    AI will just regurgitate what it reads on the net, it is the cheapest reaction. You have to engage and get it to do research on specific topics, point out problems, that sort of thing. It isn’t intelligent, but it holds a lot of content if you can get to it. And if you change topics without warning, it will go over the edge.

  6. For instance, I asked Grok how the notes were obtained:

    In a later clarification (including on Glenn Beck’s show), Kennedy explained that Fauci had kept the notes—intended as material for a book/memoir—on government systems. Near the end of his tenure as NIAID director, Fauci emailed the full set to himself. HHS recovered them while searching Fauci’s emails and other official files in response to congressional oversight requests/subpoenas. An HHS spokesperson emphasized that these were government records created and maintained on government servers (not purely private materials), making them subject to retention, oversight, and production under applicable law.

  7. Many of our “liberal” friends are, at best, crazy.

    Just returned from dinner in Beverly Hills with a Jewish liberal Democrat Party member.?He brought up the issue of politics, so I felt free to ask him this hypothetical:?
    You are about to vote in a Democrat Party primary to nominate a Democrat Party candidate for Congress.?Your choices are as follows: one is a Democrat Socialists of America member who is an avowed antisemite and the other is a hypothetical incumbent who is your regular run-of-the-mull Democrat Party member of Congress.
    His response: “There is insufficient information in the hypothetical to make a decision.”
    To make sure he heard the hypothetical, I asked him if he understood that in the hypothetical the first of the two candidates is an avowed antisemite and if remembered that he (my liberal friend) is a Jew.
    He said, “Yes, and yes.
    “?So,” I asked, “Which one would you vote for?”
    ?He responded, “I still don’t have enough information to choose.”

  8. @ Charles R Harris – thanks for the information; NONE of the stories I have read to date explained WHY Sen. Paul had the diaries.

    Obviously Fauci does not read enough (a) spy novels; (b) news reports about other people caught incriminating themselves electronically.

    As for the Democrats (normies as opposed to lying Lefties): how can you ever come to any kind of understanding with people who deny and even avoid plain evidence just because it didn’t come from their Regime Media — and likely even then: easier to claim “the NYT caved to MAGA intimidation” than to admit their tin-plated gods are frauds.

    Scott Adams used to say the left and right were watching different movies on the same screen; now we are not even in the same theater, and theirs is not even showing the same films!

    https://www.scottadams.wiki/frameworks/two-movies-on-one-screen

    Core Idea
    The two movies framework describes how people watching the same events reach opposite conclusions – not because one side is stupid or evil, but because they’re processing information through different cognitive filters.

    Adams traces this back to his training as a hypnotist. Hypnosis taught him that people don’t perceive reality directly. They perceive reality through mental frameworks that determine what information gets through and how it gets interpreted. The same facts pass through different filters and produce different conclusions.

    What makes the two movies phenomenon different from simple disagreement is that evidence won’t change minds. Both sides incorporate new information in ways that reinforce their existing movie. The filter determines the conclusion, not the evidence.

    The Mechanism
    How do two people watching the same events end up in different movies? Adams identifies several factors:

    Confirmation Bias: Once you’re in a movie, you notice evidence that supports it and dismiss evidence that contradicts it. This isn’t stupidity – it’s how human cognition works. The brain seeks coherence, and coherence means fitting new information into existing frameworks.

    Social Pressure: Your movie determines your tribe. Changing movies means potentially losing friends, family, and career opportunities. The cost of switching is high, so people rationalize staying.

    Media Environment: Cable news and social media algorithms serve content that reinforces your movie. You’re not seeing the same information as the other side because information is filtered before it reaches you.

    Emotional Investment: Once you’ve publicly committed to a position – especially a morally charged one – admitting error feels like admitting you were the bad guy. If you called someone a racist for years and then learned you were wrong, what does that make you?

    The Tells
    Adams identifies several signs that someone is deep in their movie:

    Word Salad: Responses that use sophisticated vocabulary but don’t form coherent arguments. When someone’s filter gets challenged with contradictory evidence, they don’t update their belief – they generate noise.

    Topic Switching: When presented with evidence against one claim, the person immediately pivots to a different claim. “Well what about that time he…” becomes a refuge.

    Too Many Reasons: Strong arguments tend to have one or two good reasons. When someone offers two hundred reasons against something, they likely started with the conclusion and worked backwards.

    Emotional Escalation: As cognitive dissonance increases, so does the emotional temperature. The person gets angrier, not more curious.

    Why This Matters
    The two movies framework helps explain why winning arguments doesn’t work. If half the country is watching a different movie than you, persuasion doesn’t mean showing them better evidence. It means changing their filter.

    And filters don’t change easily. They’re built on identity and emotion and social pressure. They’re reinforced daily by media and social groups. They feel like reality because perception is reality.

    But knowing that you’re in a movie – that’s the first step toward seeing clearly.

    He also lists a number of ways to escape your filters when they are leading you into error.

    Related content, this being the genesis of his theory.
    https://www.scottadams.wiki/cases/fine-people-hoax

    Scott Adams considers this “the biggest scandal of my lifetime” – not the events themselves, but the fact that a demonstrably false story could be believed by half the country for years despite the evidence being publicly available.

    We lost a great explainer when he passed away!

  9. I did not always agree with Scott Adams, but I routinely viewed his hour-long video postings daily. He was very insightful on many topics and even when I disagreed with him, I found his arguments cogent. I really, really miss him. Almost as much as Limbaugh.

  10. Follow up on my first comment above on the leftists I follow. Besides the “what about Trump…” deflection, the line now is that MAGA is smearing someone who should be rejoiced in being an honorable man who saved us all. And then they start in with the revival of all the crap we saw during Covid: of course masks work, social distancing is needed, the virus came from the market, etc, etc. Even a few years out and with all the investigation into covid, they haven’t changed at all.

    Once again, confirmation ( I hope I’m no falling into the Adams trap that AesopFan points out) of Neo’s basic premise.

  11. I scanned a couple of posts and comments on my FB feed, mostly from what appeared to be medical people, who indignantly insisted that Fauci had saved lives, was a miracle worker, and a reputable scientist, blah-blah-blah. I would concede that someone working in a hospital and who did deal with the desperately ill from Covid would have a different recollection of the whole thing. But the rest of us – who were living out in the real world and for whom the Covid was nothing more than an ordinary seasonal flu – had a rather different and bitter experience of the very cruel idiocies perpetrated on us by authority-crazed bureaucrats and politicians.

    My niece didn’t have her college graduation. My daughter didn’t have visitors to her maternity ward room when she gave birth to my grandson. (And I couldn’t go with her to all of her pre-natal appointments.) My little brother’s father in-law isolated himself in his condo for 2 years, and essentially scared himself to death. Any kind of public market or convention event came to a screeching halt for more than a year. People lost businesses, children lost at least two years of schooling, and most of us became extremely skeptical of “expert” opinions.

    And I lived through all of this in Texas, where at least we could leave the house and go walk in the neighborhood, visit a park, work in the garden. We counted ourselves lucky that we weren’t in a place where the authorities insisted that you stay put in your house for days, weeks, months … because of something which for most people without pre-existing issues, was no worse than a seasonal flu.

  12. I’m a strongly assert that people believe what they want to believe-oftentimes irrespective of reality (or the truth). I know many, many Jewish people and exactly 1 who in the aftermath of Oct. 7 2023, over time, opened her eyes and has completely left the hive. She is the lone member of her family to do so and has broken off friendships and association with some people because of the change. She completely sees it now. Happily, she is not a nut and has not disavowed her college age daughters who, though they have suffered for the crime of being Jewish and had to leave one prominent university for another, remain deluded. She in turn only knows 1 person who came to her senses.

  13. The next time a masking mafia comes out, I suspect someone will make a lot of money producing clearly gossomer masks that also read “Masks Don’t Work!”

  14. The only queer I know well enough to talk to, hates Fauci with a white hot passion . Blames him for the death of thousands in the queer community . He is about as far left as anyone I know and raises hell with his fellow leftist about worshiping Fauci . I assume most leftist don’t know about Fauci and the aids epidemic. I wouldn’t either I guess , except for Lou.
    But it’s still Trumps fault for not firing Fauci.

  15. huxley – they turn against their side gets them tossed outside.

    Skip:

    Tell me about it.

  16. I don’t know what you mean, the Left changes their mind all the time, usually when they start accusing the Right of what the Left did or when they start their “old news, let’s move on” shtick. “We’ve always been at war with Eastasia.”

  17. @ Nate > The Left does not change its mind. The mind remains directed toward whatever leads to more power and money. The utility of different positions changes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Web Analytics