Home » Will Platner stay or will he go?

Comments

Will Platner stay or will he go? — 29 Comments

  1. But he’s not a party animal – that is, he’s not a Party animal.

    Funny! I’d say, he is a party animal, just not a Party animal.

  2. Platner will remain far more famous if he doesn’t drop out. Maybe with a book deal, or movie rights.
    40 nights with Graham.

    I really don’t know about the laws in Maine over a Party nominee, but suspect once he won the Primary, paid for by the govt, his nomination as a Democrat Party nominee became legally binding, tho allowing him to withdraw.

  3. Don’t you love it when the Democrats get themselves in such a mess? Just a month ago everyone was all for him. Popcorn time.

  4. Phone call 07/09/26
    “Hi Graham, George Soros here.”
    “Hi George what’s up?”
    “How about $10 million for dropping out of the Senate race?”
    “Sure when it hits my account I’m out.”

    One week later

    “Hey It’s George again – I paid you and you didn’t drop out.”

    “I changed my mind and from one Nazi admirer to another, how does it feel to be a sucker.?”

  5. Devon Murphy-Anderson doesn’t seem to have a very good grasp of negotiating leverage. Moreover, Platner doesn’t strike me as the kind of guy who will take a public spanking by an unelected party functionary well. He may still withdraw, but the price of poker went up when Devon grabbed her 15 minutes of fame.

  6. The Democrat Party of Maine could try to bluff him by saying they will withhold any money, resources, etc from his campaign and even covertly encourage the party faithful to support Collins just to ensure he endures the most humiliating loss possible. Although I don’t see this happening we must remember politics is one of the dirtiest, low down, slimiest endeavors on this planet. Because Collins is center-left the Democrats won’t be losing all that much so it’s at least a possibility. Maybe Platner’s ego might cause him to drop out under this threat. Nah!

  7. By far the greatest lesson in the Platner blow-up is that it further exposes just how virulent this cancer has become. Not so much in the depth of depravity but in the number of democrats who voted in the primary for Platner

    Arguably, Platner is an unintentional wake-up-call…

  8. …OK as long as the attacker has the same political beliefs as you…

    File under: #MeDepends
    – – – – – –
    As for how DPUSA might be able to pry him off the ticket (should he refuse to fall on his oyster knife) they could always threaten him—privately—to go public with the accusation that he has at least one Zionist grandparent…and that they’ve left no stone unturned to prove it.

    (None of it has to be true, of course—since they are, after all, Democrats…besides, what’s a little bit a’ blackmail between best buds…?)

  9. Barry Meislin:

    Apparently – I kid you not – Platner’s unfortunate wife is Jewish.

  10. I suspect he’s holding out for a payout, he is unlikely to win and so this is his only way to make some bank. Boy did the Dems eff up choosing him. It’s bucket of popcorn time.

  11. Fascinating…

    OTOH, so is Bernie Sanders…with whom Platner seems to be joined at the hip… (now how’s THAT for a chavruta?!—sorry…in-joke).

    Ahem…the question is, I would imagine: does the missus support Israel’s right to exist (and defend itself from its enemies)?

    To be sure, Platner may well belong to the “I Decide Who’s A Jew And Who Isn’t” School of Interfaith, um, Relations…. There are precedents…

    (Or maybe it’s an issue to raise at their next seance with the marriage counsellor…who could well be Bernie Sanders, at this point in the game…unless it’s Susan Collins—hmm, was THAT the card she was going to play?)

  12. As a former Democrat who would now vote Democrat over my dead body, I hope he stays. But if I were in his shoes, and George Soros offered me $10 million to get out, I would “take the money and run.”

  13. Having a Jewish wife (ergo MIL) you would think would be the one viable get out of jail card for having a swastika tattoo.

  14. Kindly do NOT use my nom de grrrr for any of your MIL-blogging!!!

    With respect, I am etc., etc.

    (BTW, get a life, whydoncha’?…Oh wait. I guess this IS yer life… Woops..)
    (BTW-2, you can do MUCH better than the tripe you’ve been spewing of late. You used to be able to do MUCH better…well, OK, with a few idiosyncracies, true… Lord, how the mighty have face-planted….)
    (BTW-3, as long as we’re on-topic, for extra credit do you have any idea who put the OY! in “oyster”?)

  15. Here’s an interesting, comprehensive take that delves deeply into some of the issues and ramifications already discussed:

    ‘”We’re Gonna Win Someday”: Graham Platner Suspends His Senate Campaign’—
    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/contrary-popular-belief-platner-has-all-leverage

    Short version: what a scummy bunch of people…

    + Bonus:

    Canada’s “Libs” decide—NO surprise here—to go down the Starmer / EU / WEF rabbit hole:

    ‘Canada Considered Suing Citizens Over “False And Misleading” Social Media Posts’—
    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/canada-considered-suing-citizens-over-false-and-misleading-social-media-posts

  16. Z:

    Don’t you have anything better to do with your life?

    You’re a smart guy. Younger than most here, I believe. Maybe there’s a book you could write, a company you could found, a love you could find, or, at minimum, a blog you could create.

    Isn’t it a bit pathetic to waste your time annoying a kaffeeklatsch of conservative Boomers you don’t like?

  17. @ The Real Barry Meislin – the Zerohedge post hit some interesting points, but like everyone else I’ve read, “Durden” hedged his bets: he only told us what paths were possible, rather than predicting which one would be taken.

    But, Platner understands the mechanics of his own situation better than his critics do. He has every reason to believe he can either insist on the candidate of his choice to replace him (he’s reportedly urging Maine State Representative Valli Geiger, (D-Rockland) to take his place, but there’s no guarantee the party will back her) or stay in and carry on by simply denying the allegations, and his DSA-aligned supporters are already framing the pressure campaign as a hit job

    If Platner drops out, his political career ends with him.

    He knows that.

    If he stays, national Democrats face an unpleasant choice: abandon a Senate seat they have spent a year calling essential, or hold their noses and back a nominee they cannot control and increasingly cannot defend.

    Maine primary voters already absorbed most of what is now scandalizing Washington, and forcing Platner off the ballot risks convincing his base that the accusations are simply the latest excuse from a party establishment that never wanted him in the first place. Platner’s defiance is a clear sign that he knows he has all the leverage here, and the establishment must decide what to do about it.

    So, this is what the establishment decided – and it wasn’t to “hold their noses”:

    He argued the real threat was never the allegations themselves, but what the political establishment plans to do with them. Cut off his fundraising. Cut off his voter data. Starve the campaign of everything it needs simply to function. He made his read on their real preference painfully clear.

    Whether Platner was finally sufficiently bribed to leave, or seriously threatened if he had decided to stay in the race, or both, may never be known.

    Bumping a link I posted n July 6: Childers’ analysis is still valid IMO; he didn’t know which of Schrodinger’s Candidates would appear when the box was opened, but he did argue what the result would demonstrate about the internal power struggles of the Dems (and a few more interesting items about Platner, unrelated to the relationship drama).
    They determined they would not “back a nominee they cannot control.”

    https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/clash-of-civilizations-tuesday-july

    It’s not Democrats v. Platner. It’s establishment Democrats v. Democrats’ DSA wing. The drama in Maine isn’t about one flawed candidate being thrown under the bus; it’s about whether the Democrat establishment can drive the bus over the DSA’s most ambitious 2026 experiment, even at the cost of a Senate seat.

    I don’t think they believe it will cost them the seat.

    That he did decide to suspend his campaign with the noble-but-grieved excuse that he couldn’t win without official support (aka money) is an indication to me that the Democrat Establishment is still the superior power against the Democrat Socialists; they do not yet fear enraging “the base” that actively championed him. IOW, that “base” may be only a small portion of his voters, those who wanted a DSA candidate above all else, compared to the Democrats who wanted any Democrat above Collins.

    The latter will easily vote for a replacement candidate of the Party’s choice because they only voted for Platner because he was the Party’s choice.
    Maybe the Dems think that will be enough.

    Or they could be resigned to another term with Collins, who they had never originally expected to beat anyway.
    As chazzand said, “Because Collins is center-left the Democrats won’t be losing all that much so it’s at least a possibility.”

  18. “Z, Don’t you have anything better to do with your life?”

    With all due respect huxley, you have a mistaken assumption in there.

  19. “Because Collins is center-left the Democrats won’t be losing all that much so it’s at least a possibility [ that Dems won’t mind losing to her that much]”.

    Without claiming Collins is anything but a RINO that may not be the case. “Moderate” establishment Dems have at least one thing in common with the DSA crowd – all they *really* care about is power. A vote or two is nothing compared to not having organizational control of the US Senate.

  20. On second thought, huxley, I now see your entire post was mocking irony. “Younger than most” … “a love you could find”. How did I miss it?

  21. I find it hugely entertaining that the unscrupulous party that will do anything to win has discovered that one of its pet nominees, groomed and fitted for the position, is unscrupulous and will do anything to win.

    It’s like the management of a baseball team being shocked to discover that the players they recruited actually play baseball.

  22. The history of the Democratic party controlling its own ticket line is a very interesting one. They utterly failed to do it for Hillary in 2008. They succeeded in doing it for Hillary in 2016. The succeeded in doing it for Biden in 2020. The succeeded in doing it against Biden in 2024. And now they’ve also done it against Platner.

    But even when they succeed, they often fail. The only one of their “interventions” that I can recall working was the one for Biden in 2020.

    And stepping in AFTER the primaries just looks bad. If Democrats were able to pull this move now, one week before the deadline, why couldn’t they do it two months ago before the primary? It couldn’t be that they were hoping he would lose the primary. He the only candidate who had ever been close to him in the polls had dropped out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Web Analytics