In the UK, there has been widespread child sacrifice on the altar of diversity and tolerance
Yes, we already knew some of what is revealed in the recent report issued by British MP Rupert Lowe on the so-called “rape gangs” that exploited British girls for decades. To illustrate, note that I wrote my first post on the subject in 2015, and in it I quoted this:
The sex-trafficking ring in Rotherham may well be the worst in the West ever, or so one would hope. British officials have now identified at least three hundred suspects in a crime syndicate that raped and trafficked underage British girls for years, while local police ignored signs and clues for years…
It was already known that the perps were almost exclusively what the Brits call “Asian men” – in this case, Pakistani – and the victims were underage white girls, mostly poor and often neglected. So, what’s new?
It’s the stunning scope of the abuse and the extent to which the system of police and social services, tasked with helping the girls, ignored or often exacerbated the problem. The initial abuse was really only the first step for many of these girls and families.
The numbers are staggering. A summary:
Here are eight essential quotes from @RupertLowe10’s Rape Gang Inquiry.
1) This was a nationwide, not merely local, phenomenon.
“…that this was never a series of isolated local failures. It was a coordinated, nationwide pattern of organised child sexual exploitation that repeated in town after town, city after city, from the far north to the south coast.”
2) The scale was enormous, more than anyone dared to think.
“The scale of the crimes committed is staggering. It has been previously established that, at the very least, 250,000 young white girls have been subjected to repeated rape, gang rape, trafficking, torture, pregnancy, forced Islamic conversion, and lifelong trauma. The true number is probably higher.”
3) As has been reported, the vast majority of perpetrators were Pakistani Muslims.
“In court records and official inquiries, around 87% of those convicted in these group-based child sexual exploitation (‘CSE’) cases bore distinctively Muslim names… Dr. Taj Hargey, an imam with the Oxford Islamic Congregation, believes the true proportion of gang members who are Muslims to be around 95%.”
4) Vulnerable girls were targeted using a consistent method.
“Organised networks of perpetrators built coordinated operations that transported victims between locations, supplied them with drugs and alcohol, recorded abuse for distribution and blackmail, and passed girls between multiple adult men.”
5) The police, and other institutions, knew what was happening and ignored it.
“Police forces ignored repeated reports, criminalised victims instead of perpetrators, destroyed evidence, and allowed known rapists to walk free on bail. Social care services undermined protective parents, placed children in trafficking hubs inside children’s homes, closed cases despite clear indicators of exploitation, and retaliated against whistleblowers. The NHS recorded genital injuries, multiple sexually transmitted infections in children as young as 13, pregnancies caused by rape, and suicide attempts, yet discharged victims back to their abusers without safeguarding referrals or trauma care. Schools observed older men collecting girls at the gates, heard disclosures of rape on school premises, and responded by excluding victims rather than protecting them.”
6) Those in these institutions did so because they were afraid of being called ‘racist’.
“Political correctness, fear of accusations of racism, and fear of losing electoral support from certain demographics have taken precedence over the protection of British children.”
7) Parts of the foster and orphan care system became exploitation hotspots.
“Children’s homes became trafficking hubs where staff failed to stop older men collecting girls at night. Local authorities often returned children to unsafe homes and placements despite repeated disclosures of grooming… Social care across England systematically enabled organised grooming and the rape of children. Children’s services, local authorities, foster carers, children’s homes, and independent units repeatedly returned vulnerable children to known risk.”
8) Multiple offenders explicitly linked their treatment of these girls with their own religious and cultural beliefs, and the girls’ white ethnicity.
“They were taken to houses, flats, restaurants, and hotels where they were raped repeatedly by groups of men, tortured, filmed for blackmail, and told they were “white trash” or “kuffar” who merited punishment.”
I haven’t read the actual report; it’s over 200 pages long. It can be found here, if you care to wade through it. I assume that summary hit the most salient points, but I hope to read the report soon or at least skim it heavily. In the meantime, here are some of my thoughts and questions (the full report may answer some of the questions, however):
(1) Was this multi-culti virtue-signaling run amok, or some even greater evil on the part of British authorities?
(2) Note that there were whistleblowers, so not everyone was a cowardly enabler. But there were “retaliations” against whistleblowers, and this almost certainly had what in the law biz is called a “chilling effect” on further whistleblowing.
(3) What finally changed and resulted in the news coming out?
(4) And what of Starmer? This tweet mentions that Starmer himself let off 13,000 of the perps.
(5) Will there be any further consequences now, or will the whole thing be a case of, “we’ve aired it and it’s time to move on”?
Some quotes from the report can be found at Ace’s. Here are some:
The behaviour is deeply tied to tribal structures prevalent in parts of Pakistan, Afghanistan, the Middle East, North Africa, and Somalia:
– Family honour is primarily vested in the conduct, modesty, and virginity of girls and women. Strict codes require obedience, covering, and restricted interaction with outsiders. Breaches within the community trigger severe sanctions, including honour killings or collective retaliation by male clan members.
– When the target is a non-Muslim girl — particularly White British girls perceived as unguarded, dressed in Western styles and lacking male protectors — the risk calculation shifts. No retaliation is expected from the girl’s family or community, so some young men feel emboldened to treat her as property and then approach, assault, groom, share among the group, and sell her services.
– This proprietorial view of women escalates into organised networks that traffic girls across regions. Impunity fuels the cycle: initial assaults without consequences create a perception of Britain as a place where such behaviour carries no risk, turning vulnerable girls into commodified products.
I would say it wasn’t just a perception of Britain as a place where such behavior is risk-free. The perception was correct for a long long time.
More:
While the foundational system is tribal rather than purely religious, Islamic elements provide ideological justification, communal shielding, and strategic expansion. Perpetrators sometimes hide actions from families, mosques, and imams because the behaviour brings disgrace to the community. Yet remorse toward British victims is limited because non-Muslim girls are not viewed as fully human individuals deserving protection, but as unprotected outsiders available for abuse without moral consequence. This fosters widespread silence within affected communities.
The Inquiry evidence points to a fundamental clash of worlds. Across the West, our historic respect for the individual has, thanks to mass immigration, been overpowered by the more primitive attitudes that prevail elsewhere, according to which group membership matters first and foremost. The elite obsession with diversity has invited the latter to take advantage of the former. Scare-words like ‘Islamophobia’ and ‘racism’ have been deployed to exploit the good will of Western host societies, paralysing investigation and enforcement.
Again, there’s nothing really new there – except for the scale of the horror. And horror it was.
There’s also the class issue; these girls were not from rich families. They were disposable, according to the politicians, sacrifices to the need not only to virtue-signal as a non-bigot, but to get the votes of the growing population of “Asian” voters.
I see no indication that the present government in Britain will change anything, and I’m not even sure that a replacement on the right would do much. Democrats here are fully capable of similar enabling, although I don’t think the problem here is anything like it was across the pond. Here it seems to take the form of winking at massive fraud and theft of government largesse, and the red cities and states are not immune.
What a terrible mess.
NOTE: In 2008 I wrote two posts on cultural and moral relativism. I believe this one is particularly apt. An excerpt:
But somehow the idea that we cannot, and should not, judge other cultures at all has taken hold in recent years; not just in anthropology but in the West as a whole, and especially in our school system. The proper name for this is moral relativism, as opposed to cultural relativism. This phenomenon is a combination of a decline in our own previous attitude of celebration of Western civilization—and an emphasis instead on its sins, its mea culpas—combined with a romantic Rousseauvian attitude toward the other, of which the “noble savage” is a familiar subset.
One of the reasons that judgment of other cultures has been nearly abandoned is that one of our highest values has become that of tolerance. But tolerance was only meant to mean that we not look down on others merely because of the fact that they are different from us. It does not mean we need to tolerate their destructiveness, their hatred, or their intolerance—the latter of which should always define the limits of “tolerance,” or tolerance would become a value that would lead inevitably to its own contradiction and destruction.
So far as I know this is not a “government” report. Labour leadership refused to set up a formal inquiry. This report is from former Reform, now Restore Britain, leader Rupert Lowe. How widely it will be seen and responded to in the UK, which engages in heavy censorship, is a question.
California may be circling the drain, but GB is down in sewer and being flushed out sea.
Kate:
Yes, it is his report, not an official government report.
I sent the report to my “upper class” family in London this morning. They couldn’t be less interested. “Tragic but I try to think of positive things.”
My family there is disgusted by Tommy Robinson, probably the most famous whistleblower and also a victim of the corrupt UK judicial system. Tommy had a family member who was repeatedly raped by Muslim gangs. My family in London think Tommy is the problem. He’s lower class and a criminal, you see.
This is anecdotal of course but at the same time very telling to me. If you live in a country where few people lift a finger when their own women are being raped on industrial scale by foreign men who hate your religion and culture and this goes on for decades – you are in the deepest of trouble.
My family there are very successful, well connnected and oblivious. I love them, but they are definitely part of the problem. If they can ignore this so can everyone else at the top. It is this callousness among other things that has led to the downfall of both the Tories and Labour. The UK has 3 years before the next election and now that the word is out, it will be totally transforming.
Got started on it, but haven’t got back to it today. It is gut wrenching to read.
Already read a few accounts in last few years so not totally surprised except the scale of these crimes.
Said before here spent end of 78- 80 in England ( East Anglia) and went to London dozens of times as well as Scotland at New Years.
Winston Marshall has a long interview with the woman mentioned was a victim turned reporter.
Once upon a time, at least three years ago, on this blog, I got into a debate with a commentator about NATO – whether we should be in it or not. I believe the commenter was Fredrick. He thought we shouldn’t be, I thought we should. Fredrick, if you’re lurking, you may have been right. I suppose it’s possible that the UK could redeem itself in the next election, but otherwise, I do not want to be allied with these people. Apologies to Fredrick if I’ve misremembered who I had this debate with.
There will be a reckoning. Nothing happens in a vacuum.
Seen on the internets: “Britain is the Epstein Island of Pakistan”
close enough for government work
John Galt
That’s pretty horrific.
Never in my life has the phrase “There are no words…” been more accurate. I suppose times of past great war were worse than now, but I cannot think of a single precedent for what is occurring now. Britain has become a war zone, where the enemy is the government and half the population. Better or worse than the American civil war? The Russian? And as I always like to ask, where are the feminists? ?
250,000 victims! 250,000 victims!
Let that incredible number of victims sink in.
It has rightly been diagnosed that the UK is a powder keg, and I’m sure that the government knows that if they do an official, truthful, and complete Report on this horrific Pakistani Muslim rape gang situation–which has reportedly been going on for many decades now–which the local police, local government, social workers, the church, the media, politicians, and national level officials and leaders deliberately ignored–the fury it will invoke will be the destruction of any legitimacy any of these actors might claim, any remaining trust in government and the ruling elite, and likely the fuse which sets off that powder keg, and perhaps ignites a Civil War.
Thus, I expect the government to do everything in it’s power to bury and ignore this Parliament member’s Report, and to continue to refuse to do their own official government Report.
It might also be remembered that Starmer, the current PM, was the Director of Public Prosecutions and head of the Crown’s Prosecution Service from 2008 through 2013, and essentially did nothing about this massive and utterly horrific crime.
Plenty of blame to go around, starting with Starmer. And as for the police: they took an oath to serve and protect. They’re behaving worse than any stereotypical whore could have ever done. All to preserve their 30 pieces of silver. No self respect whatsoever.
Meanwhile in France:
https://x.com/ThaisEscufon/status/2066611261505151471
“…not a government report…”
The UK government?
They’ve had…how many decades?…to come up with a report…
They should just continue to persecute—and prosecute—anyone daring to raise awareness of their unalloyed “virtue”.
After Tommy Robinson, here’s VILLAIN #1 (and #2 and #3…):
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/musk-supports-nuremberg-style-trials-after-uk-rape-gang-inquiry-release
I would be skeptical of his claims in re the scale, prevalence, and duration of the issue absent a close reading. No doubt, however, that the culture of the police, the social work trade, and the courts is deeply awful in Britain.
==
What we’re understanding now is that anti-discrimination law and mass immigration have a similar point of origin: a contempt by the professional-managerial element (especially lawyers) for ordinary people. One aspect of that contempt is to have everyone’s business decisions second-guessed by lawyers, but to actually allocate liability only to those outside preferred strata and occupations. Another is to import masses of people to reduce the share of the despised in the population and turf them out.
Note, the British public is allowing this. Somewhere between a quarter and a third favor Britain’s patriotic parties. It should be an outright majority at this point.
Various commenters and observers have blamed the managerial/professional/upper/middle classes for their contempt for the Lower Orders which is so virulent that they literally don’t care what happens to these kids, almost all of whom are Not Our Kind, Dear.
Initially, I found it difficult to thing humans after the Enlightenment could actually do that. After poking around, it seems they can. And do. The sluts deserved it, anyway.
I was reminded of some military footage from a few years back. About a dozen company-grade Brit Infantry officers were being shown a new munition–flare gun or something. Senior guy, maybe a captain, showing it, said if it were fired here, the range might be as far as the sergeants’ mess. The last words dripped with contempt and scorn. Don’t know if he felt that or thought it was required whatever he thought. Speaking this way about HIS OWN PEOPLE. So the casual contempt of unfamiliarity could extend as far as the report and other comments and observations show.
Also, the social and professional cost of being charged with “racism” or “islamophobia” were huge. Search, if you wish, starting with “rotheham” and “rock the multicultural boat”. Lots of hits.
But the point is, nobody had the guts or compassion to do anything about these poor kids besides harass the parents into keeping quiet.
I have read that the “250,000” is an extrapolation, not a number from reported cases, so it should be viewed with caution. Nonetheless, it’s clear that the extent of this abuse was very large, and the police cover-up and participation indefensible.
@Richard Aubrey: the managerial/professional/upper/middle classes for their contempt for the Lower Orders which is so virulent that they literally don’t care what happens to these kids…
I’ve heard that a lot too. But that class does not include the cops. Cops are part of the Lower Orders in Britain, always have been. What was their motive for being the muscle? to be the ones who actually see the faces of and lays their hands on children they know are the real victims–children of people like themselves–not the guy who sends out a memo and cc’s everybody and lives in a gated community?
Well, they wanted to get paid, and they do what they’re told, and being a cop is better than not being a cop. I don’t think the blame solely rests with them, but it sure doesn’t just rest with “upper classes”.
Cops here are the same way: they want to get paid, and they do what they’re told, and being a cop is better than not being a cop.
That country has.had a very.turbulent past,this was not thought of.
They are all going to hell.
Niketas
Cops may come from the lower classes in the UK, but apparently they try to identify with the uppers, at least one level. And their careers, professionally and personally, reflect their attitudes. So it seems from this side.
More broadly, it is hard to see this happening by simply looking the other way, or ignoring what you see, or being so detached you don’t see it. Has to be somebody’s idea of what to do. Is it possible a group, people in positions to make this happen, actually thought it should? Can it happen by accident?
Assuming that they’ll all receive—down the line—some sort of punishment, one must insist that it be proportional—the key word of the age…
(Admittedly, sigh, they may well receive a reward instead…for upholding—courageously—“standards” of the realm, etc.)