The Karmelo Anthony trial in Texas
You may recall the case: 17-year-old Austin Metcalf was stabbed by then-17-year-old Karmelo Anthony (now 19) at a track meet in front of many witnesses. Metcalf was white; Anthony is black.
The trial is not about whether Anthony stabbed him; it’s about why. And in that respect the Anthony defense is very much like the argument Vickrum Digwa tried to mount: that the stabbing was self-defense. Anthony’s definition of self-defense, much like that of Digwa, is the perception of danger even when no real danger was present or even arguably present. In other words, it rests on feelings.
That’s not the way the law of self-defense goes, even if you buy that that’s what Anthony felt in his heart. Mere perception is not enough; there must be some valid and objective reason for that perception. Karmelo’s defense lawyers are presenting this approach, and tomorrow will be closing arguments:
Prosecutors say the stabbing was an unjustified attack stemming from an argument over whether Anthony could be under the tent of Metcalf’s team.
Anthony’s attorneys have argued that he acted in self-defense and reacted in fear during a “split-second” moment after Metcalf made physical contact.
The jury heard from defense witnesses on Monday, including one of Anthony’s former teammates who was at the track meet when the fatal confrontation unfolded.
One of Anthony’s teammates, testifying Monday, said Anthony was “distraught” after the stabbing.
“I was hearing him say, ‘I told him not to touch me,’” the witness said.
So what?
From what I’ve read, evidence in this trial paints a picture of Anthony as the aggressor. He had come into the other team’s tent and refused to leave although asked many times, and then this happened:
Prosecutors previously called more than 20 witnesses, including students who were at the meet and a medical examiner who testified that Metcalf was stabbed through the heart. …
One teen recalled Anthony telling Austin, “Touch me and find out,” and described both teenagers as angry, though he characterized Anthony as the one provoking the situation. He said Austin eventually pushed Anthony, after which Anthony pulled a knife from his backpack and stabbed Austin in the chest.
It seems to me that, both in the Digwa case and this case, the person doing the stabbing was highly reactive and ready to kill at the slightest provocation, which included anything perceived as “dissing” him. That’s not self-defense in the legal sense. That’s a murderer in the making.
Anthony has his champions among the public, and jury selection and race has been an issue. If Anthony is sentenced, I bet that will be one set of grounds for his appeal:
The trial, which is expected to last about two weeks, has drawn significant political scrutiny, with racially charged demonstrations calling for Anthony to ‘walk free.’
A panel of 12 jurors and six alternates was selected after roughly 600 prospective jurors were questioned during a selection process that began Monday. No black jurors were seated on the final jury.
Why no black jurors? Here’s some information on that:
Dewey had to remind panelists that nobody would get “in trouble” for revealing their feelings about the hot-button case, which the Anthony family, who are black, claimed is a product of “white supremacy.”
With that sort of attitude on the family’s part, it’s not hard to see why Anthony might have been so primed to strike.
As for the potential jurors:
“He looks like a child,” several said in questioning relayed by WFAA, when asked if they could consider a life sentence for the teen, who has been charged with first-degree murder.
“I don’t think I can make a decision about somebody so young. One mistake, one argument, one conflict, you can’t say he’s a bad person,” one potential juror told Assistant District Attorney Dewey Mitchell. …
Mitchell asked panelists how they feel about this statement: “I don’t feel comfortable finding an African American male guilty of murder.”
“I don’t know if I feel right putting a brother in jail,” one candidate stated, according to WFAA.
Perhaps they’re also afraid of being doxxed if they’re on a jury that convicts Anthony.

It’s a sad commentary on contemporary black culture in which a request to leave a restricted area and a push on the shoulder are considered valid excuses for murder. At no time was Anthony in danger for his life, and he knew that.
Fortunately this trial is in Texas, not Minneapolis.
Wait and see. It’s going to be hard for there not to be “payback” (i.e. riots and juror doxxing) if the jury convicts.
Large swathes of the black community doesn’t know what else to do.
I have not found a mainstream news outlet that has pointed out that while no blacks were selected for the jury, the jury has a rather varied composition. Here is one report that makes a false claim.All-White Jury in Karmelo Anthony Trial Draws Immediate Backlash
THE JURY IN THE KARMELO ANTHONY TRIAL IS NOT “ALL WHITE.”
Photo included.
Marla Hohner