One “good” thing about looking at Drudge, CNN, and MS Now every day is that I learn amazing new things. For example, did you know Trump had a stroke in early 2025?? Who knew?
Strike of good fortune, no doubt.
– – – – – – –
In the meantime, the good state of Minnesota should probably change the state motto to “Please u-rip-us offum”…
California, too, for that matter…though maybe they can tweak it slightly to “Please u-rip-us offumer”…
Sister states—as befits that historic DPOTUS presidential election ticket of 2024…
ah raw story, the den of scum and villainy, presided over by the scorpion kimberlin,
you can’t hate these people enough (I know we aren’t supposed to hate) but strong disgust is warranted,
‘the two minute rant,’ against scott adams has been referred to,
yes because a wealth tax, requires one to sell assets, and deincentivizes capital recovery,
so it appears that miss good, had no known address, in minneapolis, according to very preliminary research, much as what julie kelly noted, she wasn’t married to her partner, which makes you wonder, the nature of this maskirovna, (the major broadsheets still cling to this fiction
agent ross, by contrast, is apparently an afghan veteran of the Guard, and a member of the counter terror section of the bureau
so he might have certain feelings of dejavu with the warlords of kandahar
and their opposite number,
as we know miss nur is the daughter of a Siad Barre political officer, and closely associated with another figure, the late General Morgan
(only the daily mail has followed this lead) he was responsible for a brutal massacre in the village of Hargeisa, but by that time, Barre had at least tacity turned to the West, not enough to save him,
as with Ahmed Wali and the Kandahar strike force, they were employed to keep order in that sector of the Red Sea
“Antiques Roadshow”
Great show !!
Re: Calif. Wealth Tax
One must be a moron to believe this will only be a “one time” tax on the super wealthy.
As far as the super wealthy fleeing Ca. ; yea, some will leave.
Most will not.
CA will easily make up any lost revenue by “extending” the “one time” tax to, at first every, say, every 5 years, then 3 years, then 2 years then one year, as well as lowering the wealth bar to have more folks required to fork over their $$$.
on the positive side, the blocking action against effendi khalil seems to have faded with the appeals court decision, it does seem like ground hog day, all over again
Wealth taxes force people to sell assets they don’t want to sell otherwise. Somebody has to have money to buy those assets or the government can’t collect any tax. The people lined up to buy these assets of the superwealthy, who are they? Most likely other superwealthy or big corporations.
And suppose you are a founder/owner of a company and your stock is worth enough to trigger the wealth tax? You would be forced to give up control of your company to someone if the wealth tax went on long enough. Vanguard, Blackrock, whoever, will be calling the shots eventually…
Nothing about a wealth tax seems set up do anything except for other wealthy people, or for financial institutions and big corporations.
Partisan Democrats are susceptible to complaints from figures like Bernie Sanders about ‘billionaires’ &c. (while Reid Hoffmann and George Soros leave them unbothered). It’s pushed on Facebook frequently. IIRC, Robert Reich is another contributor to this. One of these characters in our circle complained that his house had been reassessed every few years and he’d had to pay taxes on the adjusted value so why shouldn’t people who own securities pay taxes on unrealized gains? There are a number of answers to that question in re the comparative utility of real property taxes in financing local government, in re the volatility of equity prices, in re the modesty of real capital gains v. personal income flows, and in re the comparative rate architecture on real property taxes v. capital gains taxes. I doubt he would find any of them persuasive because the motor of the question is that that guy over there owns something I don’t.
==
Yikes. Am so glad I don’t live in CA anymore. The “one time” tax isn’t going to be a one-off, and it will eventually reach people who are merely affluent. As I’ve said, there’s a reason Neiman Marcus isn’t the world’s largest retailer, Amazon is. Because the middle is where the money is. A guy with a billion dollars probably has enough liquidity that he can come up with $50,000,000 one time. For a guy with a “only” a million dollars that probably is mainly tied up in his home equity and he might even have to take out a HELOC to raise the funds to pay the “wealth tax.”
They’re also trying to figure out a way to undo Prop. 13. If they ever succeed in doing that, you will have millions of middle class homeowners all scrambling to sell their homes at the same time, with a crash of the CA real estate market being the very predictable result. There are actually some lefty academics who say this a good thing, because it will allow people at the bottom of the ladder to finally be able to afford to buy a home. Excuse me? How are people going to buy a home, even at a steeply discounted price, when they’re out of work because Great Depression 2.0 has been triggered? And the states surrounding CA or nearby (like my adopted home of ID) will no how, no way be prepared for a flood of people looking for a place to live.
X postings here and there claim that $1 trillion of the $2 trillion “billionaire” tax base already left CA before the end of this year, since the proposition was to be backdated to Jan. 1, 2026. Plus, as written, it would tax effective voting control, not just actual dollar value of holdings. This meant that a few people would lose far, far more than the proposed 5%.
Reminds me of the “mansion tax” that passed in CT just before I left….CT defined “mansion” as any house worth more than 350k.
Just heard from my CT friends they are now proposing a 300% increase in agrarian tax…the idea is to drive farmers out so the land can be used for affordable housing. CT quickly following CAs lead and becoming another People’s Republic
Was anyone else taken aback by the odd usage “Tudor or Elizabethan”?
Maybe “Tudor” meant Henry VII through Mary, and then the long reign of Elizabeth as another mini-era.
Via RealClearMarkets, an article on Trump’s proposal to prohibit institutional investors from buying up residential property:
“If we had an audience with the president, we’d first remind him that the government in a free country has no authority to determine who is allowed to buy homes and who isn’t.”
In my opinion: Exactly!
But the article provides additional substantive reasons.
Maybe the billionaires should raise an army, conquer Sacramento and hang all the commies they can catch.
we’d first remind him that the government in a free country has no authority to determine who is allowed to buy homes and who isn’t
Well, good luck with that plan idiots. Business is regulated. Ask Bill Boeing.
People buy starter houses, sell and move up. Kids leave home and the parents sell and move down. Regular turnover of most housing stocks. Corporations may never sell.
Very informative speech by James Rickards on MAGAnomics at Hillsdale College.
What is MAGAnomics.
The three arrows of Secretary Bessent– deficit not more than 3% of GDP; real GDP growth of 3%; and an additional 3 million b/d of oil production.
Tariffs and the American system 2.0 from the history of tariffs in the US and the benefit to the country today.
The Mar-a-Lago Accord and the global trading system.
“If we had an audience with the president, we’d first remind him that the government in a free country has no authority to determine who is allowed to buy homes and who isn’t.” – Watt
Trump’s proposal is directed to the large institutional investors.
Chases Eagles points out, the government has the authority to do lots of things.
What to make of it?
No way to know if it’s real or if it’s misdirection.
If it IS real, there’s no way to know if it’s because Israel knows something DC doesn’t; or if Israel feels it isn’t quite ready yet (home front and/or militarily); or if Israel is getting ready to make some kind of delicate deal or quid pro quo; or if Israel is still getting its ducks in order in other ways…
…Or maybe it’s “just”** the weather. (Things have been pretty stormy of late in the region and the system may be moving westward…)
No way to know, unless someone is REALLY plugged in.
** Ask Eisenhower about the weather…
@Chases Eagles, Brian E:Corporations may never sell…the government has the authority to do lots of things
That’s why there was the Statutes of Mortmain under Edward I, almost 900 years ago. Corporations are people for some legal purposes but not for others. The government has been in the “telling which people who can own what” business for a very long time.
I do think it would be more effective, though, to understand why so many institutional investors are buying residential properties, if in the past they didn’t do so, and address whatever that problem is. I think if there’s truth to this, it’s likely that somebody broke something and institutional investors have put their money there as a response. If we don’t let them do that, what’s their likely response and will that be worse than what we have now?
Ny cursory web search indicates that it may have been due to the JOBS Act passed in 2012 with huge majorities under the Obama Administration, but I haven’t figured out the chain of causation.
Niketas C., I haven’t looked at the issue of real estate, but does the wholesale purchase of single family homes inflate the market beyond normal market forces?
It looks like there was a surge of corporate purchase post-Covid, but it’s effects very much depend on locality.
Here’s what Grok had to say about it as an investment strategy:
Recent trends: Institutional purchases declined 90%+ since 2022 peaks (per Blackstone/others), yet prices remain elevated due to supply shortages and low inventory.
In concentrated local markets (e.g., parts of Atlanta or Charlotte), yes—corporate buying has exacerbated supply tightness and pushed prices/rents higher than otherwise. Nationally and in most markets, though, it’s a minor factor amid the bigger structural shortage. Policies targeting institutions (e.g., recent proposals/bans) might modestly help in hotspots but could reduce rental supply or liquidity elsewhere without addressing root causes like zoning reform or boosting construction.
Return Profile:
Agency MBS: Lower but stable yields (often 50–100 bps over Treasuries historically, with OAS around 50 bps long-term). Attractive for income-focused, low-risk portfolios.
Corporate SFR: Potentially higher total returns (rental income + appreciation), but with more volatility. Institutional SFR has shown resilient demand and rent growth in affordable segments, but recent data (2025–2026) shows muted institutional buying (down sharply since 2022), higher borrowing costs, and focus on build-to-rent. Returns depend on leverage, location, and management—often 7–12% unlevered yields, but net after expenses and risks can be comparable or lower than MBS on a risk-adjusted basis.
I know you’re skeptical about AI, but this seems about right. People got burned on MBS and CDS during the great recession, but those issues have been (corrected?)??
You can make a decent return on rentals, but with the added market risks.
I think President Trump is looking to promote quick fixes to aid in the 2026 elections (like limiting interest rates). The policies he was put in place are going to reap dividends and benefit the American wage earner, but the average blue collar worker isn’t going to recognize the effects to a sufficient level this year.
I’ll add, institutional investors can mess up a market quickly, but they can’t fix a market quickly.
@Barry Meislin:What to make of it?
No way to know if it’s real or if it’s misdirection.
From what I’ve read it’s motivated to prepare for revenge attacks by Iran on Israel. Yet one more reason why there’s no “instant regime change” button that Trump is just failing to push; people who wield enormous military power need to think through potential consequences a bit.
I didn’t see anyone here mention it, but one consequence of an American attack on Iran could be deaths, not just of Iranians but also of Israelis. Maybe some of our more hawkish folks will mull that over. Now, it would be the mullahs who would be morally at fault, but the Israelis would still be dead.
@Brian E:does the wholesale purchase of single family homes inflate the market beyond normal market forces
It doesn’t matter why there’s more demand, prices would go up if supply didn’t adjust, and we all know why supply of housing is so hard to adjust… I would call that normal market forces.
In my neck of the woods prices are driven more by people with California money; if you sell a house in California you can buy the same house much cheaper even in Western Washington…
Here’s what Grok had to say about it as an investment strategy:
I have a Grok subscription of my own if I ever want to know what Grok says. I can tell you what I know from my day job:
Hedge funds invest in residential real estate because it’s high risk and high reward and they are exempt from the usual SEC rules. They want the properties managed and collecting rents.
Other institutions invest in real estate as a hedge against inflation, but I think when done for that reason it’s largely commercial real estate because rents are more easily adjusted with the market and can quickly respond to inflation. It’s easy to see why this works: when you borrow the money to buy the property you have debt at a fixed rate but your income can adjust with inflation because commercial leases renew all the time and get renegotiated all the time much more easily than with people renting homes. Your debt inflates away and your income doesn’t, ideally.
When an institutional investor buys houses they want the cookie-cutter houses in big developments, newish construction, all alike, only certain areas. The whole point is that no one has to judge each individual house the way a family looking for a primary residence would. They want to be able to buy and sell these houses like interchangeable widgets. Probably no one at the hedge fund ever lays eyes on any of the houses, they just characterize them with various metrics. They can and do buy all the data for real estate transactions, since these are public record, and they have algorithms to tell them what to buy and what to sell.
Non-institutional investors are generally playing a completely different game, but I think that would be too far afield to go into.
So, Fauci knew what I –a community practicing physician– knew in August 2021.
The shots were not safe, nor effective–actually increased risk of infection. The more shots, the higher likelihood of infection. That previous infection was more protective than the experimental mRNA injections. Myocarditis was a real risk. It was impossible not to see the consequences of the clots–strokes, pulmonary embolisms, heart attacks, ischemic limbs, deaths. Stillbirths. The turbo cancers came a bit later. People were not getting informed consent.
Fauci committed a crime against humanity.
I am concluding that thousands of academic physicians knew–in August of 2021; before the first “boosters” rolled out— as well.
Their collective silence–the silence of every dean, every chief of infectious disease, and definitely every residency director who pushed useless, dangerous shots on young doctors– is a crime against humanity.
Leave a Reply
HTML tags allowed in your
comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>
One “good” thing about looking at Drudge, CNN, and MS Now every day is that I learn amazing new things. For example, did you know Trump had a stroke in early 2025?? Who knew?
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-health-2674896382/
Very interesting catch of a significant technicality:
https://hotair.com/john-s-2/2026/01/14/the-california-wealth-tax-is-much-worse-than-i-thought-n3810853
Remarkable find.
Strike of good fortune, no doubt.
– – – – – – –
In the meantime, the good state of Minnesota should probably change the state motto to “Please u-rip-us offum”…
California, too, for that matter…though maybe they can tweak it slightly to “Please u-rip-us offumer”…
Sister states—as befits that historic DPOTUS presidential election ticket of 2024…
ah raw story, the den of scum and villainy, presided over by the scorpion kimberlin,
you can’t hate these people enough (I know we aren’t supposed to hate) but strong disgust is warranted,
‘the two minute rant,’ against scott adams has been referred to,
yes because a wealth tax, requires one to sell assets, and deincentivizes capital recovery,
so it appears that miss good, had no known address, in minneapolis, according to very preliminary research, much as what julie kelly noted, she wasn’t married to her partner, which makes you wonder, the nature of this maskirovna, (the major broadsheets still cling to this fiction
agent ross, by contrast, is apparently an afghan veteran of the Guard, and a member of the counter terror section of the bureau
so he might have certain feelings of dejavu with the warlords of kandahar
and their opposite number,
as we know miss nur is the daughter of a Siad Barre political officer, and closely associated with another figure, the late General Morgan
(only the daily mail has followed this lead) he was responsible for a brutal massacre in the village of Hargeisa, but by that time, Barre had at least tacity turned to the West, not enough to save him,
as with Ahmed Wali and the Kandahar strike force, they were employed to keep order in that sector of the Red Sea
“Antiques Roadshow”
Great show !!
Re: Calif. Wealth Tax
One must be a moron to believe this will only be a “one time” tax on the super wealthy.
As far as the super wealthy fleeing Ca. ; yea, some will leave.
Most will not.
CA will easily make up any lost revenue by “extending” the “one time” tax to, at first every, say, every 5 years, then 3 years, then 2 years then one year, as well as lowering the wealth bar to have more folks required to fork over their $$$.
on the positive side, the blocking action against effendi khalil seems to have faded with the appeals court decision, it does seem like ground hog day, all over again
Wealth taxes force people to sell assets they don’t want to sell otherwise. Somebody has to have money to buy those assets or the government can’t collect any tax. The people lined up to buy these assets of the superwealthy, who are they? Most likely other superwealthy or big corporations.
And suppose you are a founder/owner of a company and your stock is worth enough to trigger the wealth tax? You would be forced to give up control of your company to someone if the wealth tax went on long enough. Vanguard, Blackrock, whoever, will be calling the shots eventually…
Nothing about a wealth tax seems set up do anything except for other wealthy people, or for financial institutions and big corporations.
Partisan Democrats are susceptible to complaints from figures like Bernie Sanders about ‘billionaires’ &c. (while Reid Hoffmann and George Soros leave them unbothered). It’s pushed on Facebook frequently. IIRC, Robert Reich is another contributor to this. One of these characters in our circle complained that his house had been reassessed every few years and he’d had to pay taxes on the adjusted value so why shouldn’t people who own securities pay taxes on unrealized gains? There are a number of answers to that question in re the comparative utility of real property taxes in financing local government, in re the volatility of equity prices, in re the modesty of real capital gains v. personal income flows, and in re the comparative rate architecture on real property taxes v. capital gains taxes. I doubt he would find any of them persuasive because the motor of the question is that that guy over there owns something I don’t.
==
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAsHp80_31I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWnrh40_2m4
Yikes. Am so glad I don’t live in CA anymore. The “one time” tax isn’t going to be a one-off, and it will eventually reach people who are merely affluent. As I’ve said, there’s a reason Neiman Marcus isn’t the world’s largest retailer, Amazon is. Because the middle is where the money is. A guy with a billion dollars probably has enough liquidity that he can come up with $50,000,000 one time. For a guy with a “only” a million dollars that probably is mainly tied up in his home equity and he might even have to take out a HELOC to raise the funds to pay the “wealth tax.”
They’re also trying to figure out a way to undo Prop. 13. If they ever succeed in doing that, you will have millions of middle class homeowners all scrambling to sell their homes at the same time, with a crash of the CA real estate market being the very predictable result. There are actually some lefty academics who say this a good thing, because it will allow people at the bottom of the ladder to finally be able to afford to buy a home. Excuse me? How are people going to buy a home, even at a steeply discounted price, when they’re out of work because Great Depression 2.0 has been triggered? And the states surrounding CA or nearby (like my adopted home of ID) will no how, no way be prepared for a flood of people looking for a place to live.
X postings here and there claim that $1 trillion of the $2 trillion “billionaire” tax base already left CA before the end of this year, since the proposition was to be backdated to Jan. 1, 2026. Plus, as written, it would tax effective voting control, not just actual dollar value of holdings. This meant that a few people would lose far, far more than the proposed 5%.
Reminds me of the “mansion tax” that passed in CT just before I left….CT defined “mansion” as any house worth more than 350k.
Just heard from my CT friends they are now proposing a 300% increase in agrarian tax…the idea is to drive farmers out so the land can be used for affordable housing. CT quickly following CAs lead and becoming another People’s Republic
Was anyone else taken aback by the odd usage “Tudor or Elizabethan”?
Maybe “Tudor” meant Henry VII through Mary, and then the long reign of Elizabeth as another mini-era.
Via RealClearMarkets, an article on Trump’s proposal to prohibit institutional investors from buying up residential property:
https://issuesinsights.com/2026/01/13/investors-should-not-be-barred-from-buying-homes/
“If we had an audience with the president, we’d first remind him that the government in a free country has no authority to determine who is allowed to buy homes and who isn’t.”
In my opinion: Exactly!
But the article provides additional substantive reasons.
Maybe the billionaires should raise an army, conquer Sacramento and hang all the commies they can catch.
we’d first remind him that the government in a free country has no authority to determine who is allowed to buy homes and who isn’t
Well, good luck with that plan idiots. Business is regulated. Ask Bill Boeing.
People buy starter houses, sell and move up. Kids leave home and the parents sell and move down. Regular turnover of most housing stocks. Corporations may never sell.
What to make of this?
Netanyahu asked Trump to pump brakes on US strikes in Iran, NYT reports
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-883548
Very informative speech by James Rickards on MAGAnomics at Hillsdale College.
What is MAGAnomics.
The three arrows of Secretary Bessent– deficit not more than 3% of GDP; real GDP growth of 3%; and an additional 3 million b/d of oil production.
Tariffs and the American system 2.0 from the history of tariffs in the US and the benefit to the country today.
The Mar-a-Lago Accord and the global trading system.
Can We Escape the Debt Trap? | MAGA Economics | James Rickards
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pb1Ls8fyi4s
“If we had an audience with the president, we’d first remind him that the government in a free country has no authority to determine who is allowed to buy homes and who isn’t.” – Watt
Trump’s proposal is directed to the large institutional investors.
Chases Eagles points out, the government has the authority to do lots of things.
What to make of it?
No way to know if it’s real or if it’s misdirection.
If it IS real, there’s no way to know if it’s because Israel knows something DC doesn’t; or if Israel feels it isn’t quite ready yet (home front and/or militarily); or if Israel is getting ready to make some kind of delicate deal or quid pro quo; or if Israel is still getting its ducks in order in other ways…
…Or maybe it’s “just”** the weather. (Things have been pretty stormy of late in the region and the system may be moving westward…)
No way to know, unless someone is REALLY plugged in.
** Ask Eisenhower about the weather…
@Chases Eagles, Brian E:Corporations may never sell…the government has the authority to do lots of things
That’s why there was the Statutes of Mortmain under Edward I, almost 900 years ago. Corporations are people for some legal purposes but not for others. The government has been in the “telling which people who can own what” business for a very long time.
I do think it would be more effective, though, to understand why so many institutional investors are buying residential properties, if in the past they didn’t do so, and address whatever that problem is. I think if there’s truth to this, it’s likely that somebody broke something and institutional investors have put their money there as a response. If we don’t let them do that, what’s their likely response and will that be worse than what we have now?
Ny cursory web search indicates that it may have been due to the JOBS Act passed in 2012 with huge majorities under the Obama Administration, but I haven’t figured out the chain of causation.
Niketas C., I haven’t looked at the issue of real estate, but does the wholesale purchase of single family homes inflate the market beyond normal market forces?
It looks like there was a surge of corporate purchase post-Covid, but it’s effects very much depend on locality.
Here’s what Grok had to say about it as an investment strategy:
I know you’re skeptical about AI, but this seems about right. People got burned on MBS and CDS during the great recession, but those issues have been (corrected?)??
You can make a decent return on rentals, but with the added market risks.
I think President Trump is looking to promote quick fixes to aid in the 2026 elections (like limiting interest rates). The policies he was put in place are going to reap dividends and benefit the American wage earner, but the average blue collar worker isn’t going to recognize the effects to a sufficient level this year.
I’ll add, institutional investors can mess up a market quickly, but they can’t fix a market quickly.
@Barry Meislin:What to make of it?
No way to know if it’s real or if it’s misdirection.
From what I’ve read it’s motivated to prepare for revenge attacks by Iran on Israel. Yet one more reason why there’s no “instant regime change” button that Trump is just failing to push; people who wield enormous military power need to think through potential consequences a bit.
I didn’t see anyone here mention it, but one consequence of an American attack on Iran could be deaths, not just of Iranians but also of Israelis. Maybe some of our more hawkish folks will mull that over. Now, it would be the mullahs who would be morally at fault, but the Israelis would still be dead.
@Brian E:does the wholesale purchase of single family homes inflate the market beyond normal market forces
It doesn’t matter why there’s more demand, prices would go up if supply didn’t adjust, and we all know why supply of housing is so hard to adjust… I would call that normal market forces.
In my neck of the woods prices are driven more by people with California money; if you sell a house in California you can buy the same house much cheaper even in Western Washington…
Here’s what Grok had to say about it as an investment strategy:
I have a Grok subscription of my own if I ever want to know what Grok says. I can tell you what I know from my day job:
Hedge funds invest in residential real estate because it’s high risk and high reward and they are exempt from the usual SEC rules. They want the properties managed and collecting rents.
Other institutions invest in real estate as a hedge against inflation, but I think when done for that reason it’s largely commercial real estate because rents are more easily adjusted with the market and can quickly respond to inflation. It’s easy to see why this works: when you borrow the money to buy the property you have debt at a fixed rate but your income can adjust with inflation because commercial leases renew all the time and get renegotiated all the time much more easily than with people renting homes. Your debt inflates away and your income doesn’t, ideally.
When an institutional investor buys houses they want the cookie-cutter houses in big developments, newish construction, all alike, only certain areas. The whole point is that no one has to judge each individual house the way a family looking for a primary residence would. They want to be able to buy and sell these houses like interchangeable widgets. Probably no one at the hedge fund ever lays eyes on any of the houses, they just characterize them with various metrics. They can and do buy all the data for real estate transactions, since these are public record, and they have algorithms to tell them what to buy and what to sell.
Non-institutional investors are generally playing a completely different game, but I think that would be too far afield to go into.
VDH Shares His Gratitude and the Latest on His Recovery
https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/01/15/a-health-update-from-victor-davis-hanson/
https://hotair.com/david-strom/2026/01/15/fauci-knew-that-natural-immunity-was-superior-to-vaccine-and-pushed-to-require-it-anyway-n3810834
So, Fauci knew what I –a community practicing physician– knew in August 2021.
The shots were not safe, nor effective–actually increased risk of infection. The more shots, the higher likelihood of infection. That previous infection was more protective than the experimental mRNA injections. Myocarditis was a real risk. It was impossible not to see the consequences of the clots–strokes, pulmonary embolisms, heart attacks, ischemic limbs, deaths. Stillbirths. The turbo cancers came a bit later. People were not getting informed consent.
Fauci committed a crime against humanity.
I am concluding that thousands of academic physicians knew–in August of 2021; before the first “boosters” rolled out— as well.
Their collective silence–the silence of every dean, every chief of infectious disease, and definitely every residency director who pushed useless, dangerous shots on young doctors– is a crime against humanity.