↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 882 << 1 2 … 880 881 882 883 884 … 1,935 1,936 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Trump, the NFL players, and the pardons

The New Neo Posted on June 9, 2018 by neoJune 9, 2018

Like Paul Mirengoff, you may think that Trump’s latest offer to the NFL players is absurd, a circus, and bizarre:

I understood from the beginning that the Trump presidency would be a circus, but I didn’t expect a sideshow this bizarre. President Trump has asked NFL players to recommend which criminals he should pardon.

Suddenly, the NFL kneelers have been transformed from unpatriotic sons-of-bitches to Trump’s partner in doling out justice and righting wrongs. I never thought the players were sons-of-bitches (unpatriotic, yes at least in some cases), but they certainly deserve no special standing when it comes to the clemency process.

Being the homey of an NFL player should not qualify a criminal for consideration for clemency. Indeed, the mindless, knee-jerk quality of the players’ protest (remember, it started with the shooting of Michael Brown whom even the Obama administration could not find to be a victim) suggests they are the last people Trump should seek guidance from.

Although I often agree with Mirengoff, we’re going to have to disagree on this one.

I don’t disagree on the “circus” aspect, I just don’t necessarily see the word as pejorative. A circus is theater, and politics is theater as well. If you’re going to play it successfully you have to understand that fact.

Football is a sport, but it’s also theater. The NFL players who kneel for the anthem most definitely understand that. And Trump does, too.

What he’s done here is a sort of ju-jitsu, at least potentially—an attempt to negotiate at an unexpected level and grant the more reasonable of the players’ requests, if such requests actually are reasonable. It’s somewhat akin to listening to the recommendation of Kim Kardashian in granting clemency to Alice Johnson. Disagree or agree with the action on the merits, but the fact that it was Kardashian who brought it to Trump’s attention should, IMHO, be irrelevant.

The same with the NFL players and their possible recommendations. There are plenty of ways in which attention is drawn to supposed miscarriages of justice, and presidents are required to evaluate each case in terms of whether a pardon, commutation, or nothing at all is deserved.

Obviously, presidents can’t examine every case in the world. Time and attention are limited. Here, Trump has scored some possible political points with a group that usually is not real happy with the GOP, and he’s doing it in a dramatic fashion. Seems to me to be a good idea, and his decisions about pardons and the like also seem to me to have been pretty good so far.

Of course, this could turn against him, particularly if he receives a roster of names and says “no” to them all. But my guess is that (if the NFL players cooperate at all) some of the suggested prisoners will actually be deserving of some sort of action, and that he’ll take it.

Posted in Baseball and sports, Law, Trump | 18 Replies

The trouble with talking about the uptick in suicides as a reflection of trouble in our culture

The New Neo Posted on June 9, 2018 by neoJune 9, 2018

Let me get a couple of things straight: the first is that there has been a recent uptick in suicide rates in the US, as I wrote about yesterday.

The second is that there have been plenty of things about our society that I believe have been increasingly going wrong in recent years, as well: for example, lack of community, a breakdown in the stability of the family, weakening of shared values, and the rise of social media as a substitute for face-to-face community.

As a result of the news about the suicide states, we’ve seen quite a few articles like this one making claims such as this:

But why are so many more Americans getting to this level of emotional despair than in the past? As journalist Johann Hari wrote in his best-selling book Lost Connections: Uncovering the Real Causes of Depression ”” and the Unexpected Solutions, the epidemic of depression and despair in the Western World isn’t always caused by our brains. It’s largely caused by key problems in the way we live.

We exist largely disconnected from our extended families, friends and communities ”” except in the shallow interactions of social media ”” because we are too busy trying to “make it” without realizing that once we reach that goal, it won’t be enough.

All of these observations are useful and true, but there’s one thing everyone seems to be ignoring, something I wrote about in yesterday’s piece but no one so far seems to have commented on. So I thought I’d emphasize it here: the rise in suicide rates follows a fall, and the present-day rates in the US mimic the rates in the 1950’s through the 1990’s.

You can look at the charts if you don’t believe me. I linked to them yesterday and I’ll link to them again, but I wasn’t able to embed them here when I tried, now I’m having trouble getting there at all because it seems to suddenly be behind a paywall. Here’s the chart for the rates in the US from the 1950s till 2015; click on “Death rate for suicide in the US 1950-2015 and it indicates that suicide rates from the middle to the end of the 20th century were similarly high, and then there was a dip. The present rise seems to be restoring suicide rates to something similar to the older levels. The recent report uses rates from 2015 and 2016, which corresponds pretty much to the endpoint of the chart I just linked.

Anyone trying to analyze and understand the phenomenon of suicide needs to take the actual statistics into account.

Posted in Health | 18 Replies

Manafort hit with new charge

The New Neo Posted on June 8, 2018 by neoJune 8, 2018

Mueller has now charged him with obstruction of justice:

The new charges ”” the first public ones against Kilimnik ”” track with allegations Mueller’s team leveled earlier this week that Manafort and an associate tried to influence the testimony of two men involved in a public relations campaign several years ago to buff up the image of Ukraine and its president at the time, Viktor Yanukovych.

Legal experts said Mueller’s latest move could be particularly damaging for Manafort, predicting that the judge could soon rescind the former campaign chairman’s current house arrest arrangement.

Once again, the charges have nothing to do with Trump, at least on the face of it. The connection is that it’s hard to believe Manafort would have been charged with anything if Mueller hadn’t seen him as a way to get to Trump. But Manafort—who is always identified in stories as having been Trump’s campaign manager—doesn’t seem to have any beans to spill on Trump, so now it’s just down to Mueller getting Manafort as a stand-in for Trump, his real quarry.

Manafort was indeed Trump’s campaign manager, but not only do the indictments against him have nothing to do with that role, but his tenure as manager was far more fleeting than MSM articles ordinarily let on:

He joined Donald Trump’s presidential campaign team in March 2016 and served as campaign manager from June to August 2016.

I doubt that Manafort has much to give Mueller on Trump. Of course, he can always try to make something up; maybe that’ll work. In the meantime, I refer you to this article by Andrew C. McCarthy from last October, dealing with the previous indictments against Manafort. McCarthy hasn’t yet weighed in on the more recent indictment.

Posted in Law, People of interest | 19 Replies

More sad news: Charles Krauthammer is dying

The New Neo Posted on June 8, 2018 by neoJune 8, 2018

This news is not completely unexpected. I was thinking about Krauthammer the other day, who has had undisclosed but obviously serious health problems for almost a year, and wondering how he might be and when we might be hearing from him. Well, now he’s written a note:

“I have been uncharacteristically silent these past ten months,” the letter began. “I had thought that silence would soon be coming to an end, but I’m afraid I must tell you now that fate has decided on a different course for me.”

Krauthammer, who graduated from Harvard Medical School in 1975 despite a first-year diving accident that left him a quadriplegic, explained that he had a malignant tumor removed from his abdomen last August. Although a series of setbacks left him in the hospital in the ensuing months, he believed until recently that he was on the road to recovery.

“However, recent tests have revealed that the cancer has returned,” Krauthammer wrote. “There was no sign of it as recently as a month ago, which means it is aggressive and spreading rapidly. My doctors tell me their best estimate is that I have only a few weeks left to live. This is the final verdict. My fight is over.”

Krauthammer added that he has no regrets, and that he’s had a wonderful life.

As a young man, Krauthammer experienced a blow that might have derailed his life. But he ultimately regrouped and made a life full of achievement, love, and friendship. Being a quadriplegic must have led to a host of huge problems and challenges, but Krauthammer seems to have met them all in spectacular fashion.

It’s a mystery how lives go, isn’t it? One person’s unrecoverable setback is another person’s small and temporary speed bump. I have very much missed Krauthammer’s mostly witty and insightful commentary, and I am very sorry that he’s facing what appears to be a terminal illness.

Posted in Health, People of interest, Press | Leave a reply

More sad news: Charles Krauthammer is dying

The New Neo Posted on June 8, 2018 by neoJune 8, 2018

This news is not completely unexpected. I was thinking about Krauthammer the other day, who has had undisclosed but obviously serious health problems for almost a year, and wondering how he might be and when we might be hearing from him. Well, now he’s written a note:

“I have been uncharacteristically silent these past ten months,” the letter began. “I had thought that silence would soon be coming to an end, but I’m afraid I must tell you now that fate has decided on a different course for me.”

Krauthammer, who graduated from Harvard Medical School in 1975 despite a first-year diving accident that left him a quadriplegic, explained that he had a malignant tumor removed from his abdomen last August. Although a series of setbacks left him in the hospital in the ensuing months, he believed until recently that he was on the road to recovery.

“However, recent tests have revealed that the cancer has returned,” Krauthammer wrote. “There was no sign of it as recently as a month ago, which means it is aggressive and spreading rapidly. My doctors tell me their best estimate is that I have only a few weeks left to live. This is the final verdict. My fight is over.”

Krauthammer added that he has no regrets, and that he’s had a wonderful life.

As a young man, Krauthammer experienced a blow that might have derailed his life. But he ultimately regrouped and made a life full of achievement, love, and friendship. Being a quadriplegic must have led to a host of huge problems and challenges, but Krauthammer seems to have met them all in spectacular fashion.

It’s a mystery how lives go, isn’t it? One person’s unrecoverable setback is another person’s small and temporary speed bump. I have very much missed Krauthammer’s mostly witty and insightful commentary, and I am very sorry that he’s facing what appears to be a terminal illness.

Posted in Health, People of interest, Press | Leave a reply

More sad news: Charles Krauthammer is dying

The New Neo Posted on June 8, 2018 by neoJune 8, 2018

This news is not completely unexpected. I was thinking about Krauthammer the other day, who has had undisclosed but obviously serious health problems for almost a year, and wondering how he might be and when we might be hearing from him. Well, now he’s written a note:

“I have been uncharacteristically silent these past ten months,” the letter began. “I had thought that silence would soon be coming to an end, but I’m afraid I must tell you now that fate has decided on a different course for me.”

Krauthammer, who graduated from Harvard Medical School in 1975 despite a first-year diving accident that left him a quadriplegic, explained that he had a malignant tumor removed from his abdomen last August. Although a series of setbacks left him in the hospital in the ensuing months, he believed until recently that he was on the road to recovery.

“However, recent tests have revealed that the cancer has returned,” Krauthammer wrote. “There was no sign of it as recently as a month ago, which means it is aggressive and spreading rapidly. My doctors tell me their best estimate is that I have only a few weeks left to live. This is the final verdict. My fight is over.”

Krauthammer added that he has no regrets, and that he’s had a wonderful life.

As a young man, Krauthammer experienced a blow that might have derailed his life. But he ultimately regrouped and made a life full of achievement, love, and friendship. Being a quadriplegic must have led to a host of huge problems and challenges, but Krauthammer seems to have met them all in spectacular fashion.

It’s a mystery how lives go, isn’t it? One person’s unrecoverable setback is another person’s small and temporary speed bump. I have very much missed Krauthammer’s mostly witty and insightful commentary, and I am very sorry that he’s facing what appears to be a terminal illness.

Posted in Health, People of interest, Press | Leave a reply

More sad news: Charles Krauthammer is dying

The New Neo Posted on June 8, 2018 by neoJune 8, 2018

This news is not completely unexpected. I was thinking about Krauthammer the other day, who has had undisclosed but obviously serious health problems for almost a year, and wondering how he might be and when we might be hearing from him. Well, now he’s written a note:

“I have been uncharacteristically silent these past ten months,” the letter began. “I had thought that silence would soon be coming to an end, but I’m afraid I must tell you now that fate has decided on a different course for me.”

Krauthammer, who graduated from Harvard Medical School in 1975 despite a first-year diving accident that left him a quadriplegic, explained that he had a malignant tumor removed from his abdomen last August. Although a series of setbacks left him in the hospital in the ensuing months, he believed until recently that he was on the road to recovery.

“However, recent tests have revealed that the cancer has returned,” Krauthammer wrote. “There was no sign of it as recently as a month ago, which means it is aggressive and spreading rapidly. My doctors tell me their best estimate is that I have only a few weeks left to live. This is the final verdict. My fight is over.”

Krauthammer added that he has no regrets, and that he’s had a wonderful life.

As a young man, Krauthammer experienced a blow that might have derailed his life. But he ultimately regrouped and made a life full of achievement, love, and friendship. Being a quadriplegic must have led to a host of huge problems and challenges, but Krauthammer seems to have met them all in spectacular fashion.

It’s a mystery how lives go, isn’t it? One person’s unrecoverable setback is another person’s small and temporary speed bump. I have very much missed Krauthammer’s mostly witty and insightful commentary, and I am very sorry that he’s facing what appears to be a terminal illness.

Posted in Health, People of interest, Press | Leave a reply

More sad news: Charles Krauthammer is dying

The New Neo Posted on June 8, 2018 by neoJune 8, 2018

This news is not completely unexpected. I was thinking about Krauthammer the other day, who has had undisclosed but obviously serious health problems for almost a year, and wondering how he might be and when we might be hearing from him. Well, now he’s written a note:

“I have been uncharacteristically silent these past ten months,” the letter began. “I had thought that silence would soon be coming to an end, but I’m afraid I must tell you now that fate has decided on a different course for me.”

Krauthammer, who graduated from Harvard Medical School in 1975 despite a first-year diving accident that left him a quadriplegic, explained that he had a malignant tumor removed from his abdomen last August. Although a series of setbacks left him in the hospital in the ensuing months, he believed until recently that he was on the road to recovery.

“However, recent tests have revealed that the cancer has returned,” Krauthammer wrote. “There was no sign of it as recently as a month ago, which means it is aggressive and spreading rapidly. My doctors tell me their best estimate is that I have only a few weeks left to live. This is the final verdict. My fight is over.”

Krauthammer added that he has no regrets, and that he’s had a wonderful life.

As a young man, Krauthammer experienced a blow that might have derailed his life. But he ultimately regrouped and made a life full of achievement, love, and friendship. Being a quadriplegic must have led to a host of huge problems and challenges, but Krauthammer seems to have met them all in spectacular fashion.

It’s a mystery how lives go, isn’t it? One person’s unrecoverable setback is another person’s small and temporary speed bump. I have very much missed Krauthammer’s mostly witty and insightful commentary, and I am very sorry that he’s facing what appears to be a terminal illness.

Posted in Health, People of interest, Press | Leave a reply

More sad news: Charles Krauthammer is dying

The New Neo Posted on June 8, 2018 by neoJune 8, 2018

This news is not completely unexpected. I was thinking about Krauthammer the other day, who has had undisclosed but obviously serious health problems for almost a year, and wondering how he might be and when we might be hearing from him. Well, now he’s written a note:

“I have been uncharacteristically silent these past ten months,” the letter began. “I had thought that silence would soon be coming to an end, but I’m afraid I must tell you now that fate has decided on a different course for me.”

Krauthammer, who graduated from Harvard Medical School in 1975 despite a first-year diving accident that left him a quadriplegic, explained that he had a malignant tumor removed from his abdomen last August. Although a series of setbacks left him in the hospital in the ensuing months, he believed until recently that he was on the road to recovery.

“However, recent tests have revealed that the cancer has returned,” Krauthammer wrote. “There was no sign of it as recently as a month ago, which means it is aggressive and spreading rapidly. My doctors tell me their best estimate is that I have only a few weeks left to live. This is the final verdict. My fight is over.”

Krauthammer added that he has no regrets, and that he’s had a wonderful life.

As a young man, Krauthammer experienced a blow that might have derailed his life. But he ultimately regrouped and made a life full of achievement, love, and friendship. Being a quadriplegic must have led to a host of huge problems and challenges, but Krauthammer seems to have met them all in spectacular fashion.

It’s a mystery how lives go, isn’t it? One person’s unrecoverable setback is another person’s small and temporary speed bump. I have very much missed Krauthammer’s mostly witty and insightful commentary, and I am very sorry that he’s facing what appears to be a terminal illness.

Posted in Health, People of interest, Press | 22 Replies

Celebrity suicide (Spade, Bourdain), and suicide rates in general

The New Neo Posted on June 8, 2018 by neoJune 8, 2018

There have been two suicides of prominent celebrities in the news in the past few days: Kate Spade and Anthony Bourdain. I’ll talk about them a bit later in this post, but I want to start with something more general—this news of an across-the-board rise in the suicide rate:

Suicide rates rose in all but one state between 1999 and 2016, with increases seen across age, gender, race and ethnicity, according to a report released Thursday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In more than half of all deaths in 27 states, the people had no known mental health condition when they ended their lives.

In North Dakota, the rate jumped more than 57 percent. In the most recent period studied (2014 to 2016), the rate was highest in Montana, at 29.2 per 100,000 residents, compared with the national average of 13.4 per 100,000.

Only Nevada recorded a decline ”” of 1 percent ”” for the overall period, although its rate remained higher than the national average.

Increasingly, suicide is being viewed not only as a mental health problem but a public health one. Nearly 45,000 suicides occurred in the United States in 2016 ”” more than twice the number of homicides ”” making it the 10th-leading cause of death. Among people ages 15 to 34, suicide is the second-leading cause of death.

The most common method used across all groups was firearms.

I don’t quite know what to make of this. An explanation such as the recession, which may in fact be accountable for some small part of the increase, doesn’t really cut it in my book as an overall explanation. I have a gut feeling that it has something to do with a general societal reduction in the sense of community, and a weakening of the prohibition (religious or otherwise) against taking one’s own life, but I simply don’t know and don’t have empirical evidence to back me up.

The increase is highest in white males. That makes perfect sense, considering that they are now fair game for verbal attack as well as being passed over in the job arena more often than in the past in favor of other preferred groups.

An increase in substance abuse involving opioids is certainly part of the picture, as the article acknowledges. And the rates for female suicide are rising too, which is troubling and gives the lie to the idea that women’s lives are more satisfying as their equality—and even dominance, in some cases—in society advances.

Kate Spade’s recent suicide is an example of this. I didn’t follow her fashion career and didn’t know anything about her bags except that there was someone named Kate Spade who made high-end handbags. But the coverage of her death by suicide has highlighted the problem of female suicide. Spade’s death also highlights a fact I think is important in understanding the rise of suicide rates in females, which is that they are increasingly using more lethal methods of suicide instead of the traditional female approach, pills, which is iffier and tends to leave more suicide attempt survivors.

The fact that female suicide has risen does not mean it begins to approach the rate of male suicide, which has long been higher and remains higher. The difference in male and female suicide rates has always been at least partially attributable to the difference in method chosen:

There are different rates of completed suicides and suicidal behavior between males and females. While women more often have suicidal thoughts, men die by suicide more frequently. This is also known as the gender paradox in suicide.

Globally, death by suicide occurred about 1.8 times more often among males than among females in 2008, and 1.7 times in 2015. In the western world, males die by suicide three to four times more often than do females. This greater male frequency is increased in those over the age of 65. Suicide attempts are between two and four times more frequent among females. Researchers have attributed the difference between attempted and completed suicides among the sexes to males using more lethal means to end their lives.

Of course, rates of suicide depend on how much actual suicide is reported as such. The difference among countries, and/or increases or decreases in rates within a country or between genders, might have more to do with reporting issues and reporting changes than actual shifts of rates. As the stigma of suicide declines, are more suicides reported as such when they used to be covered up?

Chef, TV star, and author Anthony Bourdain’s suicide seems even more puzzling than Spade’s. She is reported to have suffered from depression, as did did Bourdain, but there’s no report of recent relationship problems in his life although there were some in hers (separated from husband). He had a history of drug addiction, but that was apparently in the past, although he still drank. How much, and how honest he was about all of that, I haven’t a clue, but he lived a fast-paced life. He’d been divorced about two years ago, but had a beautiful girlfriend.

Both Spade and Bourdain were in late middle age (55 and 61, respectively). That can be rough territory, but both seemed to have enviable lives. Both had daughters (13 and 11) who will almost undoubtedly bear a heavy heavy burden. People say that potential suicides should think about their families, but of course they mostly do, and that can keep them from suicide for a long long time. But suicide by hanging (both of them apparently used that method) is probably often an impulsive act. It requires little planning—just solitude and items everyone has around the house—and therefore lends itself to a sudden and seemingly overwhelming urge. Usually (at least, this is my impression), the person has found life so intensly painful that it feels almost literally unendurable, and that is the impetus for the act. The person may deeply love his or her family and children, but that becomes background to the intensity of the pain and the desperate feeling of need to escape.

RIP. Suicide is a terrible thing, and very terrible for survivors.

I will close with a famous poem that seems especially apropos. It was written in 1897, which shows you that this is not a recent phenomenon:

Whenever Richard Cory went down town,
We people on the pavement looked at him:
He was a gentleman from sole to crown,
Clean favored, and imperially slim.

And he was always quietly arrayed,
And he was always human when he talked;
But still he fluttered pulses when he said,
“Good-morning,” and he glittered when he walked.

And he was rich ”“ yes, richer than a king ”“
And admirably schooled in every grace:
In fine, we thought that he was everything
To make us wish that we were in his place.

So on we worked, and waited for the light,
And went without the meat, and cursed the bread;
And Richard Cory, one calm summer night,
Went home and put a bullet through his head.

[ADDENDUM: I am pretty sure that some commenters on this post will suggest that anti-depressants were involved in or even caused the deaths of Spade or Bourdain or both, as well as being implicated in the more general rise in suicides. That’s a common internet meme, but there’s poor evidence for it, something that has been discussed on this blog before, most notably here (see also this).

It’s also important to note that although the suicide rates have been rising lately they are very similar to historic highs. Here’s a chart for the rates in the US from the 1950s till 2015 (I can’t seem to embed it so you’ll have to follow the link), and you can see that suicide rates in the middle to the end of the 20th century were similarly high, and then there was a dip. The present rise seems to be restoring suicide rates to something similar to the older levels. The recent report uses rates from 2015 and 2016, which corresponds pretty much to the chart I just linked.]

Posted in Health, Poetry | 29 Replies

Annals of race: stale grievances

The New Neo Posted on June 7, 2018 by neoJune 7, 2018

Here’s an excellent article by Coleman Hughes. I’d not heard of Hughes before today, but I plan to follow his work with interest, because this article shows much common sense (of the type that has become more and more uncommon) as well as courage.

Hughes is an undergraduate philosophy major at Columbia. If that’s an underwhelming recommendation to you, just read the essay and it may restore your faith in undergraduates, philosophy majors, and/or Columbia University. He also is a Julliard-trained musician. Oh, and he’s black, which is significant given the subject matter of his piece:

…[I]n an ultimate philosophical sense, none of us can claim to be the prime movers of our own behavior. We don’t choose our genes and we don’t choose the environment into which we are born. Yet we have every reason to believe that genes and environment combine to create the psychological profile that determines our cognition and behavior in each moment. In this narrow sense, we are all products of an unchosen past. But this is true of all people, regardless of race. The white criminal is no more deeply responsible for the mixture of causes that led him to offend than his black counterpart. Why is it, then, that historical forces are only ever invoked to explain the behavior of blacks?

Though we have not consistently lived up to the principle, liberal democracies decided long ago that the individual was to be the primary unit of moral concern and responsibility…

Only a black intellectual, for instance, could write an op-ed arguing that black children should not befriend white children because “[h]istory has provided little reason for people of color to trust white people,” and get it published in the New York Times in 2017. An identical piece with the races reversed would rightly be relegated to fringe white supremacist forums. In defense of such racist drivel, it won’t suffice to repeat the platitude that ”˜black people can’t be racist,’ as if redefining a word changes the ethical status of the thing that the word signifies. Progressives ought not dodge the question: Why are blacks the only ethnic group routinely and openly encouraged to nurse stale grievances back to life?

Please read the whole thing.

I happen to be engaged in the process of re-reading Stephen Hicks’ densely-packed must-read book Explaining Postmodernism. Because of that, as I read Hughes essay I immediately thought of Hicks’ book, which details the rise to dominance of postmodernism in the academy and increasingly in the world, a postmodernism that has declared war on reason—the reason that Hughes displays so prominently—and that defines people by their group identity rather than by the individualism the Enlightenment championed (and that Hughes also emphasizes).

Here are two quotes from Hicks:

“Nasty political correctness as a tactic then makes perfect sense [to postmodernists]. Having rejected reason, we will not expect ourselves or others to behave reasonably. Having put our passions to the fore, we will act and react more crudely and range-of-the-moment. Having lost our sense of ourselves as individuals, we will seek our identities in our groups. Having little in common with different groups, we will see them as competitive enemies. Having abandoned recourse to rational and neutral standards, violent competition will seem practical. And having abandoned peaceful conflict resolution, prudence will dictate that only the most ruthless will survive.”

“The contemporary Enlightenment world prides itself on its commitment to equality and justice, its open-mindedness, its making opportunity available to all, and its achievements in science and technology. The Enlightenment world is proud, confident, and knows it is the wave of the future. This is unbearable to someone who is totally invested in an opposed and failed outlook. That pride is what such a person wants to destroy. The best target to attack is the Enlightenment’s sense of its own moral worth. Attack it as sexist and racist, intolerantly dogmatic, and cruelly exploitative. Undermine its confidence in its reason, its science and technology. The words do not even have to be true or consistent to do the necessary damage. And like Iago, postmodernism does not have to get the girl in the end. Destroying Othello is enough.”

Posted in Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe, Race and racism | 27 Replies

“Should Brazil keep its Amazon tribes from taking the lives of their children?”

The New Neo Posted on June 7, 2018 by neoJune 7, 2018

That’s the subtitle of an article in Foreign Policy. It describes traditional but still-existent customs of many Amazon tribes in Brazil that dictate killing handicapped children and even those one might define as transgendered, and a controversy in Brazil over whether a law should be passed that bans such practices (it already has passed one legislative body in that country and is being considered by the other):

The Kamayuré¡ are among a handful of indigenous peoples in Brazil known to engage in infanticide and the selective killing of older children. Those targeted include the disabled, the children of single mothers, and twins ”” whom some tribes, including the Kamayuré¡, see as bad omens. Kanhu’s father, Makau, told me of a 12-year-old boy from his father’s generation whom the tribe buried alive because he “wanted to be a woman.”

One would think the answer to the question in this post’s title, and the article’s subtitle, would be “of course”—unless it’s being answered by cultural and/or moral relativists:

The Brazilian Association of Anthropology, in an open letter published on its website, has called the bill an attempt to put indigenous peoples “in the permanent condition of defendants before a tribunal tasked with determining their degree of savagery.”

Indigenous people around the world have been increasingly assimilated during the last century or more, but the Amazon remains one of the last holdouts to the process, for rather obvious reasons connected with their environment. Even if the law were to be passed, it might be somewhat moot if Brazil doesn’t exercise all that much influence over its indigenous Amazon tribes at this point. And in fact Brazil doesn’t exercise that influence over all its tribes:

In 1973, Brazil passed the Indian Statute, which groups indigenous individuals into three categories: those who live in complete isolation, those in limited contact with the outside world, and those who are fully integrated into mainstream society. The statute states that tribes such as Kanhu’s are only subject to federal laws depending on their degree of assimilation into Brazilian life. It is thanks to this language that indigenous people do not face prosecution for child killing…

If the bill passes the Senate, it will be tacked on as an amendment to the Indian Statute and require the government agencies that oversee indigenous communities to take a series of proactive measures. One will be the creation of an up-to-date registry of certain pregnant women so that the government can keep an eye on those (such as single mothers or women carrying twins) whose newborns might be targeted for death by their tribes. Another measure will require that the public prosecutor’s office be notified immediately of reports of human rights violations committed against newborns or any other stigmatized members of indigenous communities, including the elderly. The amendment also stipulates that any citizen who learns that an indigenous person’s life or safety is at risk but does not report it to the authorities will “be penalized under the applicable laws.”

So as I see it, the real subject matter of the law is how assertive the prevailing culture in Brazil is going to be in extending its legal reach to the indigenous peoples who have not really been part of it up till now.

It goes almost without saying—although I suppose it’s necessary to say it—that indigenous peoples develop customs that for the most part are motivated by and adapted to the conditions they face. But the conditions that prevailed long ago are not the conditions of today, and these people are now living in Brazil. The broad question that this issue raises is not limited to Brazil and is not limited to child-killing, but has to do with whether a country or a culture that is dominant has the courage of its own convictions and moral codes, and believes there are also universal moral codes that need to be enforced under all circumstances if possible.

You may have already heard this relevant story from the days of British colonialism in India:

…[W]hen told of an actual Sati [widow-burning] about to take place, [General Sir Charles James Napier] informed those involved that he would stop the sacrifice. The priests complained to him that this was a customary religious rite, and that customs of a nation should be respected. As recounted by his brother William, he replied:

“Be it so. This burning of widows is your custom; prepare the funeral pile. But my nation has also a custom. When men burn women alive we hang them, and confiscate all their property. My carpenters shall therefore erect gibbets on which to hang all concerned when the widow is consumed. Let us all act according to national customs.”

This story pits the customs of the victors against the customs of the vanquished, in an era in which the victors had the courage of their convictions. That’s no longer as true in the west as it used to be, but there is also the following:

…[T]he Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, ratified by Brazil in 2002…stipulates that indigenous peoples “shall have the right to retain their own customs and institutions, where these are not incompatible with fundamental rights defined by the national legal system and with internationally recognised human rights.”

According to [human rights lawyer] Barreto, under international law the way forward is obvious. “Certain cultural practices here are incompatible with human rights,” she says. “They need to be thwarted. There’s no middle ground.”

There is no contradiction between recognizing that the custom originally had utility and saying that the time has come to end it, and that the latter is the right thing to do. The real question is whether Brazil has the courage of its own convictions and a commitment to universal human rights, and the will to actually back the law up in practice, if passed.

Posted in Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe, Latin America, Law | 21 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • AesopFan on Veterans Day; Armistice Day
  • R2L on Fatal shooting in DC
  • R2L on Trump takes Vance off the Iran case
  • Gregory Harper on Trump takes Vance off the Iran case
  • R2L on Open thread 11/12/2026

Recent Posts

  • Fatal shooting in DC
  • Trump takes Vance off the Iran case
  • On the topic of election fraud in 2026
  • Open thread 11/12/2026
  • News roundup

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (330)
  • Afghanistan (98)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (164)
  • Best of neo-neocon (91)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (599)
  • Dance (292)
  • Disaster (244)
  • Education (329)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (566)
  • Election 2018 (33)
  • Election 2020 (514)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (404)
  • Election 2026 (126)
  • Election 2028 (14)
  • Evil (130)
  • Fashion and beauty (324)
  • Finance and economics (1,054)
  • Food (319)
  • Friendship (48)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (737)
  • Health (1,170)
  • Health care reform (546)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (338)
  • History (720)
  • Immigration (452)
  • Iran (468)
  • Iraq (227)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (836)
  • Jews (445)
  • Language and grammar (365)
  • Latin America (216)
  • Law (2,997)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (125)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,335)
  • Liberty (1,119)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (394)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,524)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (935)
  • Middle East (385)
  • Military (327)
  • Movies (355)
  • Music (534)
  • Nature (262)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (185)
  • Obama (1,740)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (132)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,051)
  • Poetry (259)
  • Political changers (179)
  • Politics (2,797)
  • Pop culture (397)
  • Press (1,636)
  • Race and racism (885)
  • Religion (431)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (642)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (983)
  • Theater and TV (266)
  • Therapy (71)
  • Trump (1,639)
  • Uncategorized (4,637)
  • Vietnam (109)
  • Violence (1,466)
  • War and Peace (1,037)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑