↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 588 << 1 2 … 586 587 588 589 590 … 1,881 1,882 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Who is George Gascon, LA’s newly-elected DA?

The New Neo Posted on December 22, 2020 by neoDecember 22, 2020

I wrote about LA’s Soros-backed DA George Gascon previously in this post, and you can read more here. In summary, Gascon supports a sweeping leftist overhaul of the entire prosecution system in LA County in a way similar to that of other Soros-funded prosecutors – which is to say, he wants to practically dismantle that system by expanding prosecutorial discretion to the breaking point.

The policy advocated by prosecutors (or should we call them unprosecutors?) such as Gascon is the opposite of “broken windows.” The latter idea was to prosecute even minor crimes in order to get across the message that chaos and lawlessness will not be tolerated. The Gascons of the world believe in shrugging their shoulders instead. One of my favorite (and that’s a sarcastic use of the word “favorite”) policies he plans to implement in LA is this one, which appears to put in place a bail sliding scale:

When cash bail is being requested under the limited circumstances delineated in this memo (felony sexual assault, violent felonies), DDAs shall recommend cash bail amounts that are aligned with the accused’s ability to pay.

LA County, where Gascon holds sway, is bigger than many states and is the biggest county in the US, encompassing not just the city limits of LA but most of the suburbs. It has a population of over 10 million people.

Looking at Gascon’s Wiki page, I was surprised to see that he is the child of Cuban immigrants and that he came here at the age of thirteen. So many Cuban immigrants lean right, but not Gascon. Gascon also was in the Army, and then a police officer. That’s not exactly the classic leftist profile. So, what happened? Perhaps some clues are here:

During his tenure with the Los Angeles Police Department, he attained the rank of Assistant Chief of Police under Chief William Bratton. In 2006, Gascón was appointed as Chief of Police for the Mesa Police Department. He had frequent clashes with Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio over immigration sweeps targeting Latinos. In 2009, then-Mayor Gavin Newsom appointed Gascón as the Chief of Police for the San Francisco Police Department. In 2011, after Kamala Harris was elected California Attorney General, Newsom appointed Gascón to be the San Francisco District Attorney. In 2019, Gascón announced he was running to be the District Attorney for Los Angeles County.

So perhaps he became more radicalized over the immigration issue.

Gascon had gotten a law degree in 1996 from Western State College of Law, while he was with the LAPD.

In 2000, he took command of the LAPD training unit at the height of the Rampart scandal.

That was a huge case of police corruption. Gascon was in charge of an overhaul:

One of his first orders as training commander was to create an ethics training manual for the LAPD. He also implemented problem-based learning and posted a copy of the bill of rights in every LAPD classroom. Michael Gennaco, the former head of the United States Justice Department’s civil rights division said at the time: “He fundamentally changed the way the LAPD teaches its officers about civil rights.”

It seems that experience must have been formative. But once he became San Francisco’s DA, he was in another role entirely:

During Gascon’s time as [SF] District Attorney, property crime increased by 49%. Some of Gascon’s critics have blamed this increase on his office’s reluctance to file charges against low-level offenders; during Gascon’s tenure, misdemeanor charges were only filed in 40% of cases presented by the San Francisco Police Department. Having worked with Gascon, San Francisco Mayor London Breed and City Attorney Dennis Herrera declined to endorse him in his bid to become the District Attorney of Los Angeles County; Breed and Herrera instead endorsed his opponent, the incumbent Jackie Lacey.

But it’s this that especially stuns me about Gascon’s tenure as SF’s head prosecutor [emphasis mine]:

…Gavin Newsom appointed him the interim District Attorney when Kamala Harris was elected to Attorney General. Even though he’d never tried a case, let alone prosecuted a case, Gascon’s statement on his qualification to be the District Attorney was telling. He stated, “Running a D.A.’s office is not the same as prosecuting cases on the floor. They’re different skill sets. I believe I have the organizational skills, and I have an understanding of the criminal justice system not only today, but where we need to be in the future.”

Herein lies one of the most basic flaws with George Gascon being the chief prosecutor in San Francisco — the gross misconception that being the head of an office of prosecutors is little more than a management position…

For those of you who have been in the trenches, who know what it’s like to do battle in the courtroom, who know that our role is to do what’s right, you know that your elected District Attorney is your leader, not a manager. When the head of your office hasn’t spent a day in your shoes (and never cared to understand what a courtroom prosecutor does), as a line prosecutor, you don’t get what you need to succeed and it’s demoralizing….

So, Los Angeles County, take a look at the state that Gascon left San Francisco as a cautionary tale. It’s no wonder he didn’t seek re-election in the county where he was an incumbent. It’s because he could never win another term here. He left the city in such shambles that even San Francisco’s Mayor and City Attorney took the unusual step of endorsing his competitor, incumbent DA Jackie Lacey. George Gascon wreaked havoc on the San Francisco DA’s Office and the City as a whole. I just hope he doesn’t get an opportunity to ruin Los Angeles as well.

Obviously, that was written prior to November 3, 2020.

Posted in Law, Violence | 13 Replies

I guess maybe Austin is still part of Texas after all

The New Neo Posted on December 21, 2020 by neoDecember 21, 2020

There’s a lot of news every day, much of it depressing. There’s the usual “Trump is going to kill us all” type of thing. There’s the “Biden is a great healer” variety, often coupled with the latest leftist appointment he’s made or the latest hypocritical move of Pelosi’s. There’s lockdown after lockdown. There are various people on the right railing against the latest thing the GOP has done, which at the moment is to help pass a COVID relief bill. There’s Barr dashing whatever remained of hopes that he might appoint a special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden.

And then there’s this good news from the super-blue city of Austin:

In a stunning upset, Republican Mackenzie Kelly defeated Democrat incumbent Jimmy Flannigan in Austin’s District 6 [City Council] runoff Tuesday. Kelly ran on a platform that includes restoring police department funding and ending the city’s permissive homeless camping ordinance. She won with 52% to Flannigan’s 48%, a margin of just about 700 votes overall.

Kelly’s win, and Republican Jennifer Virden’s near-win in District 10, may signal a major shift in Austin voters’ thinking. The Democrat-dominated city was already up in arms over the homeless camping ordinance, which allows homeless people to camp just about anywhere they want all over the city (except city hall) since the council passed it unanimously in the summer of 2019…

Then the pandemic struck, and Mayor Steve Adler took an authoritarian approach that has, among other things, badly damaged the city’s once-vibrant live music scene (and his own credibility). #SaveOurStages became a force in the city because Adler and the city council’s policies are harming one of Austin’s trademarks, destroying many residents’ ability to make a living at all.

Then the riots struck, and the Austin city council sprinted without thinking at all toward defunding its already short-staffed police department. The city council sliced about $140 to $150 million, about a third, from that budget. The mayor and city council never considered the likely consequences on crime rates or the city’s living and business climates. They just did what the radical activists told them to do. Crime soared. The city council has shown no signs of caring about it.

Logic would dictate that of course the citizens of Austin would turn on the leftist City Council members. But such logic hasn’t been a dominant characteristic of the reaction of many blue cities to similarly disastrous policies put in place their leftist rulers – and I use the word “rulers” purposely.

It has been stunning to watch the people tasked with running a city do everything in their power to destroy that city (short of taking torches to it and burning it down themselves) in the name of righteousness (or self-righteousness). But we’ve gotten used to it, haven’t we?

Posted in Election 2020, Politics | 36 Replies

There’s a new strain of COVID in the UK – so, what does it mean?

The New Neo Posted on December 21, 2020 by neoDecember 21, 2020

These days, when I see headlines saying that there’s a new strain of COVID in the UK, my kneejerk reaction is to think: “it wouldn’t surprise me if they’re hyping this because they want people to become more scared again, now that the vaccine is here.” And I don’t think that represents paranoia on my part; I think it’s something that various government agencies and officials and the MSM have fully earned by their behavior for the past ten months.

In CNN’s story, you can see that the first few paragraphs emphasize the fear:

The United Kingdom has identified a new, potentially more contagious coronavirus variant linked to a recent surge in cases in England.

The new variant is being called VUI-202012/01 — the first “Variant Under Investigation” in the UK in December 2020. While scientists hunt for more information about the variant, its impact is already being felt.

Multiple countries have now imposed restrictions on travelers from the UK. British Health Secretary Matt Hancock said Sunday that the variant was “out of control” and Prime Minister Boris Johnson chaired an emergency meeting Monday as his government tried to manage the fallout.

I bet most people wouldn’t even read past that point, but they’d certainly get a frightening impression from it. You have to read quite far down in the article before you get to this:

Multiple experts have also suggested that this new variant could have been amplified because of a superspreader event, meaning the current spike in cases could also have been caused by human behavior.

“A higher genomic growth rate in the samples sequenced, may not necessarily mean higher transmissibility…

Hmmmm. And you have to read even further to get to this:

There is no evidence to suggest that the new variant is more deadly as of now, according to Whitty, who said that “urgent work” was underway on Saturday examining the implications for mortality. “We are not seeing any increased virulence (clinical severity) or any gross changes in the [spike protein] that will reduce vaccine effectiveness — so far,” Tang told the Science Media Centre (SMC.)…

Multiple experts have pointed out that for some viruses increasing transmissability can accompany decreasing virulence and mortality rates. This may mean that the variant is less lethal, though it’s currently too early to tell…

Whitty said Saturday that current vaccines should still work against the new variant. His remarks were echoed in the US by the head of Operation Warp Speed. “Up to now, I don’t think there has been a single variant that would be resistant to the vaccine,” Moncef Slaoui told CNN on Sunday. “We can’t exclude it, but it’s not there now.”

I would bet a large amount of money that most people who have heard of this virus have not heard the news that it may not be more transmittable, it almost certainly is not more virulent, and the vaccine should remain effective against it.

Posted in Health, Press | Tagged COVID-19 | 28 Replies

Why would any parent pay big bucks to send a child NY’s Dalton School?

The New Neo Posted on December 21, 2020 by neoDecember 21, 2020

Read the description at Legal Insurrection of what’s happening these days at NYC’s Dalton School. It’s worth taking a look at the entire article, the gist of which is that it appears this exclusive private school is in the process of being utterly revamped in complete devotion to an “anti-racist” model. Whether or not Dalton adopts the entire set of demands (or “thought-starters”), it’s clear that the mindset of a huge number of faculty and staff there is dedicated to indoctrinating students in the most extreme version of the poisonous – and poisonously racist – pedagogy known officially as “anti-racism.”

Just to take one example of these policies that might be adopted there, we have: “Elimination of AP courses if black students don’t score as high as white.” That’s the drift of the last decade or so of education, in a nutshell.

Some parents are already pulling their kids out of Dalton. My question is: why would anyone stay and pay for the privilege of having their kids being excoriated and humiliated for their race (if white), or coddled and humiliated for their race (if black) by the implicit assumption that black children of today (even those of the rich) are incapable of doing well and the educational world must be organized to accommodate that supposed fact? It’s a pernicious educational philosophy for children of all races.

My guess is that some parents want to make their children into sacrificial lambs for wokeness in order to showcase their own virtue. But hopefully, not that many.

Posted in Education, Race and racism | 70 Replies

How to write a hook

The New Neo Posted on December 19, 2020 by neoDecember 19, 2020

For the last week or so I’ve been periodically entertaining myself by journeying back in time through the popular music of my earlier days (and they’re all earlier days, aren’t they?). It’s a good distraction from the angst of contemplating the current situation.

But I never was one of those people who obsessively focused on rock or pop music and their stars, even when I was young. It seems odd to say, but I didn’t even buy records until I was in college, and then I only had a few. I played them on friends’ or roommates’ record players. It wasn’t until I was in law school that I bought my own record player, the simplest model made by KLH and which I seem to recall cost $99 at the time.

Quaint, isn’t it? In junior high and high school I kept up with popular music, though, by listening to the radio when I did my homework. I remember the suspense of the weekly countdown of the top twenty hits. Always exciting to hear my favorites played, all the more delicious and precious because of the wait.

Nor did I pay much attention to visuals. Of course, I knew what the Beatles looked like (had a slight crush on Paul, purchased all their records till the split), and also the Stones and various others like Jefferson Airplane and Bob Dylan. But my record collection and even my knowledge was shallow compared to that of other members of my generation who were pretty much obsessed.

Music is almost as evocative of memory as scent is. Hearing a song from those years – especially one I’d somewhat forgotten but whose notes and lyrics are utterly familiar to me as they start playing now, after fifty years or so – is an intensely emotional journey as well as a cerebral one.

Why do we like or even love the songs we do? For me, melody is probably more central than it is for some others, but rhythm is definitely in there too. As an ex-dancer, I know I gravitate towards something that makes me want to move, if only to sway in the case of ballads. And then there’s the phenomenon of the elusive but all-important “hook” :

In music, a hook is simply the part of the song that catches the ear of the listener.

The part of the song that hooks you in.

It’s a lyrical line or melodic phrase that makes the song memorable and stand out…

If you’ve ever had a song stuck in your head for what feels like an eternity, the part that you keep playing on repeat in your head is more than likely the hook of the song.

It can be any of the following:

The first few lines of the chorus
A riff in the song
Or a distinct sound, like whistling or a cowbell.

In music, the hook is similar to the hook in fishing.

A good hook will catch your audience’s ear and reel them in.

We’re talking earworms, folks. And I’m very susceptible to earworms and to hooks.

I started wondering how on earth someone writes a hook. Writing music is something I can’t imagine anyway, and I’m in awe of those who can do it. Even more so for those who can write a catchy hook that reels them in and makes for a hit. How, how, how do they keep their tune from being just some formless humming and meandering?

Here’s what Tom Snow, who wrote the Pointer Sisters’ catchy “He’s So Shy” (not a song of my youth, but one quite hook-laden for me) had to say about the genesis of that one:

Tom Snow would recall of “He’s So Shy”: “It was the first time I’d actually written a melody that I knew in my heart was a smash”…

On his website, Snow recalls that the song was written very quickly after an extended period of struggling to come up with a hit:

“This one originated with the music and a working title, ‘She’s So Shy’. I had been plugging away for weeks trying to find a ‘hit’ hook. Everything I came up with sounded like derivative, melodic babble. Reduced to desperation one night I went into my studio after dinner and a few glasses of wine, set the Roland TR-808 to 120 beats per minute and started playing G minor arpeggios on my Prophet-5 synth. At least that was some viable form of music! That did the trick. Not having the pressure anymore of trying to come up with a smash hit, the vault opened up and within 30 minutes I had the melody, chord changes and a working title “She’s So Shy”. I knew immediately that I had come up with something very, very commercial. The feeling was intense. I remember leaving the studio three hours later after playing the tune hundreds of times and feeling like I was walking two inches above the floor. Not taking any chances I called Cynthia the next day and asked her to write the lyric. We both thought the song would be a smash and our instincts were right. “He’s So Shy” sold 1.5 million copies. I will be forever indebted to those G minor arpeggios.”

I could play G minor arpeggios all day (if someone showed me how), and even with the addition of some wine I wouldn’t be coming up with any hooks. So in the end I think it’s one of those mysteries of the human spirit and brain coupled with drive and training.

Posted in Me, myself, and I, Music, Pop culture | 37 Replies

Summary of election fraud allegations

The New Neo Posted on December 19, 2020 by neoDecember 19, 2020

Quite a few people have recommended this article, and although I haven’t had a chance to read it yet, I thought I’d spotlight it here so you can discuss it in this thread. The intro:

This report assesses the fairness and integrity of the 2020 Presidential Election by examining six dimensions of alleged election irregularities across six key battleground states. Evidence used to conduct this assessment includes more than 50 lawsuits and judicial rulings, thousands of affidavits and declarations, testimony in a variety of state venues, published analyses by think tanks and legal centers, videos and photos, public comments, and extensive press coverage.

It should come as zero surprise how the MSM is handling this. For example, highly typical is the Forbes headline: “White House Advisor Peter Navarro Releases Dubious Voter Fraud Report.” In other words, don’t bother to read what Navarro wrote, we’ll tell you what to think of it. Don’t engage the report on the merits; it’s a waste of your precious time and you needn’t bother your pretty little head.

And by the way, that’s a very effective approach. People are busy and eager to do something more pleasant than wade through that report and think long and hard about it, especially if it contradicts what they already believe and what they want to believe and what all their friends believe.

And even I haven’t read it, as I stated at the onset. I do intend to, because it looks interesting, but I don’t see it as vital for me to read because I’ve been following most of the allegations right along, in some detail. But I do understand that reluctance of most people to do a deep dive into this stuff. They probably turn the page (or click away towards something more fun) with relief. Thus, propaganda works its magic.

Posted in Election 2020, Press | 23 Replies

A look back at Obama’s plans for his post-presidency

The New Neo Posted on December 19, 2020 by neoJuly 23, 2021

If you have a mordant sense of humor, looking back at this piece makes for amusing reading – both for the fulsome fawning of its author Jeff Stein at Vox, and for the delicious irony of certain claims (that Trump’s “wiretapping” accusation was “without proof”). But to me it’s not the least bit amusing.

Written in March of 2017, the article – called “Barack Obama has a plan for the Trump era” – is notable for the light it sheds on Obama’s post-presidency plans. Obama “aides” weren’t shy about telling us what those plans were, at least in general terms. The article is quite informative, although you’ll have to ignore a lot of hogwash along the way.

It starts with what’s labeled a joke:

In the cafes of New York City and the offices of Chicago, blue America seeks [Obama’s] wisdom like he’s a prophet or a sage. What should we do? they ask. Show us the path.

He likes to respond with a joke — a dad joke.

“Well, you could move to Wyoming or North Dakota,” Barack Obama has taken to telling city liberals, according to one of his senior aides.

Actually, it might not have been bad advice, considering what was about to happen in New York and other large blue cities, circa 2020. But obviously, Obama was not thinking about their quality of life when he made the joking suggestion – one that I have to conclude was at least half serious. He was thinking about how relatively easy it would be to turn low-population red states blue. He was thinking about changing the voting profile of America to favor Democrats gaining permanent or at least lengthy ascendancy and power. Even in jokes, that was his focus.

The writer goes on [additions in brackets mine]:

But even as Obama tries to [make it appear as though he wishes to] transcend partisanship, his jokes suggest political aims [do they ever!]. This is the tension that already dominates his post-presidency, as revealed by interviews with six current and former aides to the former president: Obama wants to [make it appear as though he wishes to] rise above the partisan muck, but he’s also eager to accomplish goals that are inescapably political in nature.

The following is a telling paragraph [emphasis added and additions in brackets mine]:

Obama’s aides say he believes that if he can take [seemingly] politically neutral steps to improve democracy — by bringing [leftist] people together through “civic engagement,” or by giving grassroots [leftist] activists the tools for community organizing — then that will change the political landscape that culminated in Donald Trump’s election, while also [seemingly] keeping Obama himself above the fray.

In other words, continue the fundamental transformation of the United States through what Obama knows best, community organizing, while now wearing the mantle of lofty eminent ex-president. Furthermore [emphasis and bracketed comments added]:

That model, as Obama envisions it, appears to require him avoiding the public resistance movement against Trump. Obama views it as a priority to not get dragged down into a personal back and forth with the current president, or to openly criticize the Republican Party, six aides to the president said in separate interviews. Even when Trump asserted without proof [sic] that his predecessor had “wiretapped” Trump Tower, Obama relied on an aide to knock down the charge in a statement rather than speak out publicly himself [directing things from behind the scenes and keeping his public hands clean].

“It’s a return to the president’s core principle of grassroots activism. That principle is going to be what drives a lot of his activity in the post-presidency,” says Eric Schultz, an Obama adviser…

Obama’s post-presidency will involve leading an an attack with former Attorney General Eric Holder on Republican gerrymandering, encouraging young progressive political talent, and shaping the Democratic Party.

He certainly has had a huge hand in doing just that – mostly from behind the scenes while preserving his facade, just as described in the article. I have long seen the selection of Joe Biden as nominee as Obama’s doing, and I strongly suspect he is one of the main people coordinating the efforts to relax the laws for voting when COVID presented the Democrats their golden opportunity. More I cannot say, although I would not be surprised if he also had a hand in the voting fraud efforts. Obama must figure that thwarting a Trump second term and installing Biden guarantees both the preservation of Obama’s own legacy and the furtherance of his overarching leftist goals.

Posted in Election 2020, Obama | 14 Replies

We are seeing the triumph of Foucault over Chomsky

The New Neo Posted on December 19, 2020 by neoDecember 19, 2020

We sometimes think – or used to think – of professors and/or philosophers and/or intellectuals as people living in ivory towers, and that most of their battles are over arcane matters that matter not all that much to the rest of us.

But oh, they matter. How some of them do matter! Think of Marx, writing and thinking and writing and thinking. And think of Michael Foucault, a man of whom most people have never heard. His philosophy is determining a great deal of the turmoil we’re now experiencing, because of its influence on universities and on the modern left [emphasis mine]:

[Foucalt’s] “politics” were consistently foolish, a combination of solemn chatter about “transgression,” power, and surveillance, leavened by an extraordinary obtuseness about the responsible exercise of power in everyday life. Foucault was dazzled by the thought that the word “subject” (as in “the subject who is reading this”) is cognate with “subjection.” “Both meanings,” he speculated, “suggest a form of power which subjugates or makes subject to.” Foucault posed as a passionate partisan of liberty. At the same time, he never met a revolutionary piety he didn’t like. He championed various extreme forms of Marxism, including Maoism; he supported the Ayatollah Khomeini, even when the Ayatollah’s fundamentalist cadres set about murdering thousands of Iranian citizens. In 1978, looking back to the postwar period, he asked: “What could politics mean when it was a question of choosing between Stalin’s USSR and Truman’s America?” It tells us a great deal that Foucault found this question difficult to answer.

One thing that is refreshing about Foucault’s political follies, however, is that they tend to make otherwise outlandish figures appear comparatively tame. In a debate that aired on Dutch television in the early Seventies, for example, the famous American radical and linguist Noam Chomsky appears as a voice of sanity and moderation in comparison to Foucault. As Miller reports it, while Chomsky insisted “we must act as sensitive and responsible human beings,” Foucault replied that such ideas as responsibility, sensitivity, justice, and law were merely “tokens of ideology” that completely lacked legitimacy. “The proletariat doesn’t wage war against the ruling class because it considers such a war to be just,” he argued. “The proletariat makes war with the ruling class because … it wants to take power.”

You can substitute any number of identity groups for the outdated phrase “proletariat” (it’s no longer seen as a class struggle at all) and you have what’s going on today. And this is not hidden; it’s overt. One of the main problems is that so many people have been indoctrinated in this claptrap for so long that many of them hold the reins of power and are in the position of being Trojan horses painted in high-sounding phrases such as “social justice” and “equality of outcome,” helping to unlock the gates to let the destroyers of Western Civilization in.

Roger Kimball, who wrote that essay in 1993, is still writing today. But if he were to compose it now, I think the tone would read very differently. At the time, it’s clear that he thought Foucault’s ideas had been marginalized to the university, that the 60s were as dead and buried as Foucault, and that they would not rise up again with the sort of force we’re seeing today. I’m not blaming Kimball; I would have thought the same. But we would have both been wrong.

ADDENDUM:

Nothing in this post was meant to indicate that Chomsky had a benign influence. Leftists and leftism are destructive. However, Chomsky represented the old left type that was prevalent for a while in the US and is for the most part no more. Foucault and his intellectual descendants have taken over.

Posted in Academia, Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe, Politics | 55 Replies

Racism, anti-racism, and ballet

The New Neo Posted on December 18, 2020 by neoDecember 18, 2020

[Hat tip: A whole bunch of readers sent me links to this.]

Heather Mac Donald is a writer I admire who knows a lot about the anti-racist movement as it relates to policing. Now she tackles the subject of how the anti-racists have come for classical ballet. Mac Donald writes that until now:

Classical ballet has largely escaped the revisionist destruction that hit the opera and theater stages years ago. Amazingly, audiences could still see Swan Lake and La Bayadere as their choreographers and composers intended them, with all the conventions and costumes of nineteenth-century fairytale intact. To be sure, feminists have been agitating against the ethereal body type championed by choreographer George Balanchine, sadly to intermittent success. But the adolescent politicizing that has been inflicted on defenseless operas has been absent from the ballet stage. That immunity has undoubtedly now ended. Expect to see classical ballets wrenched awkwardly into dumbshows about social justice.

The rest of the article is mostly about a 2018 incident at the Staatsballett Berlin in which a black dancer accused the company of discrimination, and the company issued “a groveling apology”:

The company has promised to hire the usual phalanx of diversity trainers to provide mandatory antiracism workshops. The organization will also examine its repertory for “outdated and discriminatory ways of performing” and will “re-evaluate” its “longstanding traditions,” it says.

But Mac Donald might be unaware of the fact that race has actually been somewhat of an issue in ballet since at least the 1950s. I’m not going to do an exhaustive history here, but in the US one of the 50s trailblazers in breaking the color barrier was Arthur Mitchell, who was a renowned and popular soloist with Balanchine’s NYC Ballet and who was featured in many Balanchine ballets partnering white ballerinas back then, to much acclaim and I’m sure some condemnation.

Those ballets and much of Balanchine’s repertoire didn’t rely on the traditional full-length classics, particularly the so-called “white” acts of “Swan Lake” and “Giselle”, a term referring to costuming and atmospheric effects rather than race. This is where a black ballet dancer in the corps would have been somewhat of issue – and yet I remember, even in the 60s and 70s, seeing American companies that used a black dancer or two even in the corps of these traditional “white” works.

In ballet it’s physically necessary to start training young, especially for women. and for decades black youngsters were less likely to gravitate in a balletic direction, due either to lack of exposure, lack of money for the training (although scholarships were often available if a dancer had special talent), or another controversial issue: body configuration. Simply put, ballet dancers – especially female ones – need extreme flexibility as well as strength. One type of flexibility absolutely required for ballet technique is in the hip joint and regards turnout.

Turnout and black female dancers is another complex issue, and of course now PC dictates probably cloud or even forbid the discussion as well. The gist of it is that in black female dancers the type of hip structure and flexibility required appears to be less commonly found than it is in white dancers. That doesn’t mean it’s never present in black dancers; it’s just that the favorable body structure is seemingly less common in black women. This is not some arbitrary requirement, either, because turnout is very basic. Any physical endeavor – including sports, of course – rests in part on body type, and there is some correlation with race.

Looking online right now, however, I can’t find any studies on the subject of whether black ballet dancers in fact have on average a hip structure that is less favorable to the study of ballet at a very high level. And although I personally have known black ballet dancers with excellent turnout, I have to say that my own observations over the three decades that I took ballet classes was that it is not a myth that turnout is more difficult for a higher percentage of black dancers than it is for white dancers, although a lot of people of both races struggle with it because the amount of turnout required in ballet is so very extreme. Training, even early training, can only go so far.

Arthur Mitchell founded the Dance Theater of Harlem about 50 years ago, in 1969. It was a showcase for black ballet dancers, and they did the classics, Balanchine works, and new works as well. I saw them many times in the 70s and they were a highly professional and enjoyable group to watch. They caused somewhat of a sensation at the time, if memory serves. I also recall an innovation they pioneered, which was that they used tights and pointe shoes of different colors on the brown spectrum, each dancer wearing ones that approximately matched her skin color, rather than the traditional pink. They’re still in operation, and I see from their website that one of their top ballerinas from the past, Virginia Johnson, is now their director.

Naturally, ballet isn’t going to be immune from the much more extreme “anti-racist” demands that seem to be engulfing every institution today both in the arts and elsewhere. But the basic issue of black people finding a home in ballet isn’t new, it’s pretty old.

Here’s a video of one of Arthur Mitchell’s early performances in one of the roles that was choreographed on him by Balanchine in the 50s. I remember liking Mitchell, but I’ve never cared for the ballet:

And here’s a clip of Dance Theater of Harlem featuring Johnson in her prime as Giselle in the company’s version set in Louisiana (this is either from the 70s or 80s, I believe):

Posted in Dance, Race and racism | 36 Replies

Shutting the door on voting fraud investigations

The New Neo Posted on December 18, 2020 by neoDecember 18, 2020

From Sarah Hoyt, on the failure of the courts to hear any evidence in the election fraud cases:

You know what could have fixed it? The courts taking the cases and allowing for an examination of the evidence. The fact that cases keep getting dismissed on “standing” issues, and/or delayed indefinitely, and that social media has banned any mention of fraud? It only makes absolutely sure we have no doubts at all that there was massive fraud. Because no honest system would behave the way the left and its surrogates are behaving. Every time they ban mention of something? It’s because it’s a truth they’re trying to hide.

And yet it has worked quite well for them in the past, hasn’t it?

Posted in Election 2020, Law, Uncategorized | 52 Replies

Joe Biden and Hunter’s towering intellect

The New Neo Posted on December 18, 2020 by neoDecember 18, 2020

I think this is taking fatherly devotion a mite far:

President-elect Joe Biden on Thursday appeared on “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,” where he told the comedian that he has “great confidence” in his son Hunter.

If that were a true statement by Joe, he should be impeached just on those grounds alone, because it would show abysmally poor judgment. You can say many things about Hunter, but it is crystal clear that the only “great confidence” any person should have in him is that he will find a way to act out and screw things up.

Joe Biden added:

“He’s a grown man. He is the smartest man I know … in pure intellectual capacity and as long as he’s good, we’re good,” Biden said.

So, everyone else Joe knows is dumber than Hunter? Shudder.

And this statement was not a one-off for Joe. On October 29th of this year, Joe said much the same thing, calling Hunter “the smartest guy I know.” It seems to be one of Joe’s stock phrase talking points: “Hunter-the-smartest-guy-I-know.”

Posted in Politics | Tagged Hunter Biden, Joe Biden | 28 Replies

No, Justice Roberts wasn’t screaming at the other justices about Bush v. Gore and riots

The New Neo Posted on December 17, 2020 by neoDecember 17, 2020

At Red State, streiff writes the following. It concerns the story going around that Justice Roberts pressured the conservative justices not to take up the Texas case, screaming in a meeting among the nine justices that, “I don’t give an eff about that [Bush v. Gore], I don’t want to hear about it. At that time, we didn’t have riots”:

…[T]here is a huge factual error in the account related by Mr. Patrick. The Supreme Court justices have not met in person for a conference since March. So there is no closed room from which shouting could be heard. If someone were outside the doors of Roberts or any of the other liberal justices, they could have heard one person screaming. If they were outside the conservatives’ doors, they would not have heard anything unless one or more of those justices had a kick-ass sound system.

Makes sense to me.

This tale about Roberts screaming at the conservatives on the Court is the type of story we seem to read about almost constantly. The format has been especially popular during Trump’s presidency, and usually features Trump raging at someone and/or sulking like Achilles in his tent. Some staffer is said to have been privy to these events and is reporting – anonymously, of course – to the media.

You may notice that I usually don’t report such stories, and it’s not just because ordinarily we’re unable to ascertain their truth or falsehood. It’s because it’s my default position that they are probably false. I felt the same about the Roberts story even before I read streiff’s piece. In this case, I think the purpose of the story and the intention of whoever leaked it is to sow even further division and confusion and frustration on the right.

What do I really think is happening with Roberts? The same thing I’ve thought almost from the start, which is that for most situations if he can find any way to avoid changing the status quo he will. For him, it seems to have little to do with the policy itself and whether it’s conservative or liberal, it’s about refusing to try to change things that have already occurred. For example, Roberts turned himself into a pretzel with the tax/penalty question in order to avoid the disruption of overturning or curtailing Obamacare. Two years ago, I described Roberts’ pattern this way:

I’ve noticed a tendency in Roberts—long before Trump became president—to vote in the way that is least likely to upset the status quo apple cart. For example, in the case of Obamacare, Roberts found a “creative” way to avoid a bold overturning of a bill that had been passed by Congress. In yesterday’s injunction case, the path of least resistance was to let the injunction stand rather than to overrule it.

No doubt there are exceptions to the rule, but the recent Texas case certainly isn’t one of them. Even without riots, even without threats, Roberts would go with the low energy state of letting things slide along the way they’ve been going. To do anything out of the ordinary and even hear the case Texas raised – which is, among other things, a case of first impression – goes utterly against Roberts’ grain. Hearing the Texas case could have had immense consequences and could even have ended up ultimately leading to state legislative actions that overturned the results of the 2020 election.

You might say that Roberts is a “conservative” judge if you define (or redefine) “conservative” as meaning keeping things the way they are. The irony is that, in this case. the consequences of keeping things as they are (Biden declared the winner) might end up leading to an enormous and fundamental change in America by utterly empowering the activist left. It might even lead to changes in the composition of SCOTUS itself – court-packing – that one would think Roberts wouldn’t want. Then again, perhaps he’d welcome the dilution of personal responsibility that would go with a greatly expanded number of justices on the Court.

[NOTE: Recall also that in Bush v. Gore the Court voted to keep the status quo; Bush had already been ahead when the Court halted the counting Gore had demanded.]

Posted in Election 2020, Law | Tagged John Roberts | 49 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • AppleBetty on Young versus old: the politics of generational envy
  • F on Young versus old: the politics of generational envy
  • om on Young versus old: the politics of generational envy
  • SD on Open thread 5/7/2026
  • Robert Sendler on California dreaming: have the voters had enough of the left for now?

Recent Posts

  • Open thread 5/8/2026
  • Young versus old: the politics of generational envy
  • Gavin Newsom gave taxpayer money to CAIR
  • California dreaming: have the voters had enough of the left for now?
  • Open thread 5/7/2026

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (319)
  • Afghanistan (97)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (162)
  • Best of neo-neocon (90)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (583)
  • Dance (287)
  • Disaster (239)
  • Education (320)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (565)
  • Election 2018 (32)
  • Election 2020 (511)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (26)
  • Election 2028 (5)
  • Evil (127)
  • Fashion and beauty (323)
  • Finance and economics (1,018)
  • Food (316)
  • Friendship (47)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (729)
  • Health (1,138)
  • Health care reform (545)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (331)
  • History (700)
  • Immigration (432)
  • Iran (439)
  • Iraq (224)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (799)
  • Jews (423)
  • Language and grammar (361)
  • Latin America (203)
  • Law (2,914)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (124)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,283)
  • Liberty (1,102)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (388)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,476)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (910)
  • Middle East (381)
  • Military (318)
  • Movies (347)
  • Music (526)
  • Nature (255)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (177)
  • Obama (1,736)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (128)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,024)
  • Poetry (255)
  • Political changers (176)
  • Politics (2,775)
  • Pop culture (393)
  • Press (1,618)
  • Race and racism (861)
  • Religion (419)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (625)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (967)
  • Theater and TV (264)
  • Therapy (69)
  • Trump (1,601)
  • Uncategorized (4,395)
  • Vietnam (109)
  • Violence (1,412)
  • War and Peace (993)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑