I wrote about LA’s Soros-backed DA George Gascon previously in this post, and you can read more here. In summary, Gascon supports a sweeping leftist overhaul of the entire prosecution system in LA County in a way similar to that of other Soros-funded prosecutors – which is to say, he wants to practically dismantle that system by expanding prosecutorial discretion to the breaking point.
The policy advocated by prosecutors (or should we call them unprosecutors?) such as Gascon is the opposite of “broken windows.” The latter idea was to prosecute even minor crimes in order to get across the message that chaos and lawlessness will not be tolerated. The Gascons of the world believe in shrugging their shoulders instead. One of my favorite (and that’s a sarcastic use of the word “favorite”) policies he plans to implement in LA is this one, which appears to put in place a bail sliding scale:
When cash bail is being requested under the limited circumstances delineated in this memo (felony sexual assault, violent felonies), DDAs shall recommend cash bail amounts that are aligned with the accused’s ability to pay.
LA County, where Gascon holds sway, is bigger than many states and is the biggest county in the US, encompassing not just the city limits of LA but most of the suburbs. It has a population of over 10 million people.
Looking at Gascon’s Wiki page, I was surprised to see that he is the child of Cuban immigrants and that he came here at the age of thirteen. So many Cuban immigrants lean right, but not Gascon. Gascon also was in the Army, and then a police officer. That’s not exactly the classic leftist profile. So, what happened? Perhaps some clues are here:
During his tenure with the Los Angeles Police Department, he attained the rank of Assistant Chief of Police under Chief William Bratton. In 2006, Gascón was appointed as Chief of Police for the Mesa Police Department. He had frequent clashes with Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio over immigration sweeps targeting Latinos. In 2009, then-Mayor Gavin Newsom appointed Gascón as the Chief of Police for the San Francisco Police Department. In 2011, after Kamala Harris was elected California Attorney General, Newsom appointed Gascón to be the San Francisco District Attorney. In 2019, Gascón announced he was running to be the District Attorney for Los Angeles County.
So perhaps he became more radicalized over the immigration issue.
Gascon had gotten a law degree in 1996 from Western State College of Law, while he was with the LAPD.
In 2000, he took command of the LAPD training unit at the height of the Rampart scandal.
That was a huge case of police corruption. Gascon was in charge of an overhaul:
One of his first orders as training commander was to create an ethics training manual for the LAPD. He also implemented problem-based learning and posted a copy of the bill of rights in every LAPD classroom. Michael Gennaco, the former head of the United States Justice Department’s civil rights division said at the time: “He fundamentally changed the way the LAPD teaches its officers about civil rights.”
It seems that experience must have been formative. But once he became San Francisco’s DA, he was in another role entirely:
During Gascon’s time as [SF] District Attorney, property crime increased by 49%. Some of Gascon’s critics have blamed this increase on his office’s reluctance to file charges against low-level offenders; during Gascon’s tenure, misdemeanor charges were only filed in 40% of cases presented by the San Francisco Police Department. Having worked with Gascon, San Francisco Mayor London Breed and City Attorney Dennis Herrera declined to endorse him in his bid to become the District Attorney of Los Angeles County; Breed and Herrera instead endorsed his opponent, the incumbent Jackie Lacey.
But it’s this that especially stuns me about Gascon’s tenure as SF’s head prosecutor [emphasis mine]:
…Gavin Newsom appointed him the interim District Attorney when Kamala Harris was elected to Attorney General. Even though he’d never tried a case, let alone prosecuted a case, Gascon’s statement on his qualification to be the District Attorney was telling. He stated, “Running a D.A.’s office is not the same as prosecuting cases on the floor. They’re different skill sets. I believe I have the organizational skills, and I have an understanding of the criminal justice system not only today, but where we need to be in the future.”
Herein lies one of the most basic flaws with George Gascon being the chief prosecutor in San Francisco — the gross misconception that being the head of an office of prosecutors is little more than a management position…
For those of you who have been in the trenches, who know what it’s like to do battle in the courtroom, who know that our role is to do what’s right, you know that your elected District Attorney is your leader, not a manager. When the head of your office hasn’t spent a day in your shoes (and never cared to understand what a courtroom prosecutor does), as a line prosecutor, you don’t get what you need to succeed and it’s demoralizing….
So, Los Angeles County, take a look at the state that Gascon left San Francisco as a cautionary tale. It’s no wonder he didn’t seek re-election in the county where he was an incumbent. It’s because he could never win another term here. He left the city in such shambles that even San Francisco’s Mayor and City Attorney took the unusual step of endorsing his competitor, incumbent DA Jackie Lacey. George Gascon wreaked havoc on the San Francisco DA’s Office and the City as a whole. I just hope he doesn’t get an opportunity to ruin Los Angeles as well.
Obviously, that was written prior to November 3, 2020.
