(1) The Biden administration does an Emily Litella on “Trump ignored Chinese balloons too.” The change:
The Washington Free Beacon‘s Chuck Ross revealed that the Pentagon wouldn’t name the official who provided misleading information about three supposed Chinese spy balloons during President Donald Trump’s administration.
The senior official said on Saturday:
PRC [People’s Republic of China] government surveillance balloons transited the continental United States briefly at least three times during the prior administration and once that we know of at the beginning of this administration, but never for this duration of time. We spoke directly with Chinese officials through multiple channels, but rather than address their intrusion into our airspace, the PRC put out an explanation that lacked any credibility.
The media and Democrats ate it up. During his administration, Trump and his former officials, including John Bolton, denied knowledge of Chinese spy balloons.
Officials in the Pentagon changed their story on Sunday, but honestly, they made it worse. They told the media the balloons were discovered after Trump left office.
(2) Speaking of the Chinese balloon, it was about the size of a 20-story building.
(3) The Grammys happened, and as usual in recent years I know very few of the contenders. And yet, in the interests of keeping my finger on the pulse of the decline of Western civilization, I’m featuring the fashions this year – the men’s fashions, for a change. An interesting mix with a few relatively classic looks, many sparkles, and just about everything in-between. One guy seems to have a Bobby Kennedy campaign button on his jacket.
(4) Speaking of cultural decline, I haven’t written much about the sad degeneration of the Disney brand, but Ace has been following it for ages. The latest is that the company is fighting a proxy takeover.
(5) Seems like Kamala Harris may be toast:
Of all the similar reports that have come out since Harris first assumed the role in 2021, Monday’s New York Times article is the bleakest. The authors of the piece — who say they spoke to “dozens of Democrats in the White House, on Capitol Hill and around the nation” — walked away from their reporting with this conclusion: Many believe Harris has not risen to the challenge of establishing herself as the future leader of the party.
That hardly qualifies as “news.” Then again, the fact that the Times is saying it might be the news.

