I’m still out west, staying in an airbnb. Last night I was trying to relax – fat chance! – and watched some TV I thought might be soothing. It was the first episode in the Netflix series “Our Planet.” What beautiful photography! Absolutely stunning stuff, and all the better because there’s one of those really big HD screens here.
But the program pushed on the “we’re ruining the planet” message so very very hard. In fact, if you go to that website I just linked, you’ll see it’s one of the main messages of the series. I had been thinking it would be a good thing to watch with my very young grandchildren, until I realized that it would probably frighten them a lot. No need to rush that; they’ll get enough of it when they start attending school. The educational system is heavily engaged in frightening young children and influencing them politically in every possible way, indoctrinating them in the tenets of leftist thought.
I wouldn’t mind if it was a balanced, fact-based point of view that they were given. But “Our Planet” had the familiar stuff about how all the arctic ice will melt, complete with visuals of polar bears that are supposedly highly theatened. It doesn’t take much research to discover the exaggerations there. For example, from 2016, quite a few years before the series was made:
This year, as every year, there has been much excitement in the media about ‘catastrophic’ melting of Arctic sea-ice, run-away melting, tipping points, death spirals and “ice-free” summers…
Claims of ‘ice-free’ conditions at some time in the summer have been bandied about for years in various forms but as the reality sinks in that it’s not as bad as some had claimed, the dates when this is expected happen have often been pushed out beyond the life expectancy of those making the claims.
The meaning of “ice-free” has also been the subject of some serious goal-post relocation efforts, we are now told that ‘ice-free’ does not actually mean free of ice, it means there will be less than one million square km of ice left.
This special branch of mathematics is apparently based on the axiom that zero = 10 6
The problem with this obsessive focusing on one single data point out of 365, is that there is a lot of short term, weather driven variability that can affect the exact timing and size of the minimum in ice coverage. Since the main interest ( outside maritime navigational requirements ) is the hope to find some indications of long term changes in climate, this is not a very instructive way to use the detailed data available.
It’s too long to summarize, so please read the whole thing.
More articles that are interesting and not too lengthy: this as well as this. I long ago fastened on Judith Curry’s site as the best and most reliable source for climate information. She has impeccable credentials and no political bone to pick, which is more than I can say for most people on either side.