I am heartily sick of writing about Kamala Harris or even thinking about her. Likewise with the 2024 election as a whole.
I sometimes believe that some combination of rigging and fraud moots everything I might say about the candidates anyway. I sometimes think well, perhaps not.
I didn’t want Trump to run again; he has too much baggage. But I plan to vote for him. However, I don’t fool myself into thinking the press and the left/Democrats wouldn’t have tried to destroy anyone on the right who might have run instead of Trump. We can see, for example, what they’re doing to Vance. But we also saw what they did to Romney, one of the most moderate of Republicans.
Contrast that to how they suddenly find themselves entranced with Harris. It reminds me of nothing so much as those old-time movies in which the eyeglassed secretary finally takes off those glasses and voila! Turns out she’s irresistible.
The MSM will cooperate fully in making Harris into something wonderful in many voters’ eyes. They may be low information voters who haven’t paid any attention to what Kamala has or hasn’t done as VP or earlier, and the press will make sure that only the right is discussing those negatives. And of course, Kamala would be the first female president as well as the first black female president. So she’s demographically even better than Obama, in a way.
The point Trump made the other day, that Harris is far more Indian than black, doesn’t matter with most people. She is at least part black, and that may be good enough – with the full cooperation of the media.
Also, the Democrats will make sure she isn’t too exposed, just as with Biden in 2020. They never would have swapped Biden out for Harris if Joe’s mask hadn’t dropped for all to see, but that’s what happened and now they are determined to keep Kamala’s mask on until Election Day.
So what of Harris’ running mate? Josh Shapiro, governor of Pennsylvania, makes some sense because the Democrats need Pennsylvania. But Shapiro has a big negative in terms of this particular race by this particular Democrat Party: he’s Jewish. He also has gone on record with some pro-Israel remarks – in particular, something he wrote long ago at the age of 21:
“Palestinians will not coexist peacefully,” Shapiro wrote in the piece. “They do not have the capabilities to establish their own homeland and make it successful even with the aid of Israel and the United States. They are too battle-minded to be able to establish a peaceful homeland of their own.”
Shapiro’s spokesperson, Manuel Bonder, told Newsweek that the decades-old comments are not indicative of what Shapiro believes today. He said the governor supports a two-state solution to the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians.
Half of the Democrats are pro-Palestinian, anti-Israel, and anti-Jewish, and even that waffling by Shapiro would probably not be enough for them to approve of him. But would it matter? Would the costs of a Shapiro as VP candidate be greater than the benefits? That’s the calculus Harris and her advisors must weigh. She may end up avoiding the problem by choosing someone else, but it must be tempting to go with Shapiro because he would almost certainly deliver Pennsylvania.
The choice of Shapiro, who is what passes for a moderate Democrat these days, would also be a signal from Harris that she is moving to the center – or, more correctly, pretending to move to the center. But there are other “moderate” Democrats who aren’t Jewish, and they probably would be safer bets.