Taking away the keys to Grandpa Biden’s car

The New Neo Posted on by

That’s what the current dilemma the Democrats face reminds me of: an elderly relative is fading and yet clings to the independence represented by driving, and relatives realize that person is a danger to himself and others and wish to take the car away. In families this often causes a great deal of conflict before the relatives win. Persuasion often doesn’t work, and the task must be accomplished by selling the car and giving away the keys so that the elderly person has no access anymore.

That latter process is the equivalent of using the 25th Amendment for Joe Biden. I’ve already written about how that might work, but so far they don’t seem inclined to go that route, although as time goes on that might change. Right now they’re doing a kind of public shaming, saying that’s he’s about to quit and having Democrat luminaries [sic] gently coax him in that direction. But Joe isn’t obliging.

The thing that amazes me is how transparent the Democrat’s lies about Joe are. Just a few short weeks ago he was supposedly sharp as a tack and Republican suggestions that he wasn’t were dismissed and reviled as lies. One little debate showed a naked emperor and the polls started being scary for Democrats, and just like that Joe is suddenly rejectable. What’s it all about? Winning.

But Joe has a point. It’s not at all clear that any other Democrat would do much better. The polls are slippery things. Then again, I doubt any other Democrat would do much worse. For example, I can’t think of a single Democrat I know (and I know a great many of them) who won’t be voting for the Democrat nominee, whether it be Biden or a player to be named later. It’s astounding how successful the demonization of Trump and other Republicans has been for so many people.

Speeches at the Republican Convention

The New Neo Posted on by

Peter Navarro delivered quite the barn-burner.

I’ve noticed varied YouTube comments on different postings of the speech. When posted by outlets neutral or friendly to the right, there was a great deal of praise for Navarro. At versions from leftist sites there was a lot of this sort of thing: “He’s a crook!” “The GOP is a party of cons and felons!” Interesting approach – and similar to the “Trump is a convicted felon!” meme – use a kangaroo court and charges for which no one on the left would be prosecuted, convict your opponents, and then criticize them for being felons. It’s so incredibly and transparently dishonest, and yet it seems to resonate with a lot of people on the left.

Another powerful speech was this by a woman whose son was killed in New York and who accused Bragg of inappropriately reducing the charges against the assailants:

There were also the heartbreaking Gold Star parents:

And of course there was J. D. Vance. I don’t much care for political speeches in general, but I see that people seemed to find him natural, energetic, and relatable. I think his rust belt appeal is real and important.

Tonight is Trump’s night.

ADDENDUM: See also this about Vance.

Will Joe give in?

The New Neo Posted on by

We have the rather odd spectacle of the Republicans rooting for Biden to stay in the race, and Democrats trying to push him out and replace him. Biden himself seems weak and frail at the moment, suffering from COVID – which I think he actually has, because there’s a mini-surge – and being barraged by requests and even demands that he step down.

How firmly can Biden cling to power, and for how long? As I’ve written before, he’s a stubborn old cuss. But as time goes on and the number of Democrat leaders calling – publicly – for his abdication increases, it seems he will probably waver. My sense is that the final result will depend on how many people tell him to pull out, and in what ways they threaten him if he doesn’t. If they make it clear that, if he doesn’t withdraw, they will challenge him at the convention and make it impossible for him to be nominated, then I believe he will see that he has no alternative but to quit before he’s forced out. But will they say that? And can they accomplish it? I have little doubt they would like to do so.

Lastly, of course, is the question of whether a replacement such as Kamala would do better. Polls are fairly useless at this point, although state polls in swing states are most helpful and national polls least helpful. And even though this campaign season may already seem endless, there are still over three months to go, and three months is a long time in politics. Do people really know Kamala Harris, and would more exposure to her over time enhance her appeal or detract from it? That’s just one of so many many unanswered questions. And for that matter, whom would Harris choose as her VP, and would it matter?

And then there’s fraud …

Changing one’s mind about Trump

The New Neo Posted on by

I’ve noticed that, in the coverage of the Republican Convention, the MSM seems to paint those who have changed their minds about Trump since 2016 as fickle hypocrites. For example, Trump’s current running mate J. D. Vance was basically a NeverTrumper back then, and the media wants us to remember that and distrust him for it.

On the other hand, one of the themes of the convention has been such mind-changing. That was the point of the speech given by Amber Rose, a model I’d never heard of before but who gave an interesting “changer” speech the other day:

The message is clear: do your own research on Trump and you’ll find that much of what you thought you knew – and hated – about the man is a lie.

It’s a clever approach – although because a mind is a difficult thing to change, it probably won’t work with most people. But it’s intriguing, and I can identify because although I was never a NeverTrumper I was extremely Trump-skeptical during the 2016 campaign. Trump won me over pretty quickly by his performance as president, but that’s because I kept an open mind to begin with.

Reports are that Iran wants to assassinate Trump

The New Neo Posted on by

Of course Iran hates Trump and doesn’t want him to win the election. They can’t believe their good luck with Biden as president, and would like it to continue. Therefore:

Iran has for years considered a plan to get back at Trump for his killing of top Iranian general Qassem Soleimani in 2020. But the officials said the intelligence has ratcheted up in recent months and officials have become more confident in Tehran’s intentions. They also said there may be more attempts on Trump’s life in the coming weeks.

Both officials were granted anonymity to speak about sensitive intelligence.

CNN previously reported that the U.S. received intelligence about an Iranian plot to assassinate Trump before Thomas Matthew Crooks, 20, tried to kill the former president at his rally in Pennsylvania Saturday. The two officials stressed to POLITICO that there was no evidence Saturday’s shooting had a connection to Iran.

Absolutely no connection. Crooks is the last person Iran would choose. But, as in a detective story, there are an awful lot of people who wish Trump dead.

Schiff joins the chorus saying Joe must go

The New Neo Posted on by

From Adam Schiff:

Fresh on the heels of the story regarding Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s (D-NY) recent visit to Delaware to confab with President Joe Biden (presumably to encourage him to bow out of the 2024 presidential race) comes news of the most prominent Democrat to formally call for Biden to exit stage left: Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) has now formally called for Biden to drop out of the race.

This follows Schiff’s prediction that the Democrats would lose if Biden remained atop the ticket, and possibly lose the House and Senate as well.

Note that all Schiff cares about is whether Biden can beat Trump, and also how a continuing Biden candidacy will affect other races in November. He (like mot Democrats) ignores the fact that if Biden shouldn’t run in 2024 he also shouldn’t be president now, because the issue is not solely winning or losing but mental and emotional competence.

Meanwhile, Biden had some sort of angry meltdown during a phone call with Democrats, and the contents were leaked – which means a Democrat who wants Biden to get out of the race was almost certainly the leaker:

In a leaked Zoom call with moderate House Democrats on Sunday, President Joesph Biden once again used his dead son, Beau Biden, this time, to insult and denigrate the military and combat service of Colorado Congressman Jason Crow (D). Biden was unhinged as he told Crow to “tell me who did something that you’ve never done with your Bronze Star like my son!” President Biden was attempting to convey the message that he was fit and able to continue on with his campaign and snapped at Crow when he politely expressed his concerns to the president.

Instead of addressing Crow’s and other moderate Democrats’ concerns, Biden snapped at Crow and went on a full-blown assault, which ended with an attack on his Army and combat service and comparing it with his son Beau’s service. Biden specifically ridiculed Crow’s Bronze Star in a pathetic and out-of-bounds attack, which the campaign did not deny or dispute.

I think they’re afraid Biden will embarrass them further, after he is locked in as the nominee.

Is Biden wavering?:

… [I]n a new interview with BET, the president directly stated that he would drop out if medical professionals advised him to.

The 81-year-old president made the remark in a BET interview taped Tuesday when asked what it would take to prompt him to reconsider his candidacy.

“If I had some medical condition that emerged, if somebody, if doctors came to me and said, you got this problem and that problem,” Biden said in an excerpt released Wednesday.

Biden must be polling significantly worse than Kamala these days.

More on the shooter’s movements and possible motives

The New Neo Posted on by

Strange stuff:

So Crooks was spotted early on with a rangefinder. I wonder if security had ever considered whether a rangefinder – in the absence of a weapon – would be allowed. At any rate, the officials who were alerted lost track of him. And in fact Crooks seemed to have been sighted several times by different officers, flagged as suspicious for different reasons each time, and lost by law enforcement. Did they communicate with each other? Did anyone ever realize this was the same person over and over? Did they have a clue what level of suspiciousness would be enough to stop the proceedings or delay them, until the suspicious person was identified and in custody or ascertained to be non-dangerous?

These reports only solidify my original notion that what went on in Butler, PA, last Saturday was a case of gross incompetence, terrible communication and coordination, stupidity, complacency, and lack of imagination.

We also have learned that Crooks’ parents had reported him missing hours before the shooting. They seem to have been alarmed:

His father told law enforcement he assumed his son had gone to the shooting range at the The Clairton Sportsmen’s Club to practice with his rifle and would be back by 1pm on Saturday, CNN reported. …

But as time went on he grew more concerned and phoned local law enforcement. …

Both of Crooks’ parents are behavioral therapists and Crooks’ father said he was baffled by his son’s actions.

That article also contains a pretty good timeline of Crooks’ movements and interactions with security.

I have a strong suspicion that Crooks revealed very little of his true self to his parents. He was a secretive cipher, quiet but with an internal life that finally exploded in the assassination attempt – which I see as his way to be famous and make history. We also have this from an ex-classmate, who says that Crooks didn’t like any politicians:

A former classmate of would-be assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks says the 20-year-old gunman once mocked him over his support of former President Donald Trump and had a general disdain for mainstream politicians across the political aisle.

“I brought up the fact that I’m Hispanic and, you know, I’m for Trump. And he said, ‘Well, you’re Hispanic, so shouldn’t you hate Trump?'” Vincent Taormina told Fox News Digital Tuesday. “No. He’s great. He was a great president. He called me stupid – or insinuated that I was stupid.” …

Taormina [said] that Crooks was usually quiet, except on certain topics that he seemed passionate about, including math and politics. And on those issues, he could be “smug [and] arrogant,” he added.

This fits exactly with my current theory, which is that Crooks had grandiose ideas about himself and that he committed the crime to overcome the fact that despite his great superiority he was still a nonentity. This is very similar to Oswald, who found that JFK was a target of opportunity due to the motorcade route but who had no special animus towards JFK but was hostile towards many public figures, including General Walker, whom he had tried to assassinate earlier. Oswald had a very firm sense of his own superiority but was also a failure and nonentity – and was a relatively young man as well, only just turned 24 years old.

Here’s an interesting video on security at Butler: