And the AP does its thing. I’m referring to the article’s headline: “US vetoes widely supported resolution backing full UN membership for Palestine.” You see, it’s “widely supported” – by the many tyrannies, corrupt banana republics (except ours), failed nations, and enabling and cowardly first-world countries.
The lede:
The United States vetoed a widely backed U.N. resolution Thursday that would have paved the way for full United Nations membership for Palestine, a goal the Palestinians have long sought and Israel has worked to prevent.
Nasty US, nasty Israel, harming the poor suffering Palestinians who so very much deserve UN membership. Actually, the Palestinians are already the greatest beneficiaries of the UN, having been financially supported by UNRWA – and educated in Jew-hatred by UNWRA – for pretty much the duration of Israel’s existence.
More:
The vote in the 15-member Security Council was 12 in favor, the United States opposed and two abstentions, from the United Kingdom and Switzerland. U.S. allies France, Japan and South Korea supported the resolution.
The UK and Switzerland have shown modified and tepid good sense by at least not voting for the measure.
Here’s the official position of the Biden administration:
Since the attacks of October 7, President Biden has been clear that sustainable peace in the region can only be achieved through a two-state solution, with Israel’s security guaranteed. There is no other path that guarantees Israel’s security and future as a democratic Jewish state.
There is no other path that guarantees Palestinians can live in peace and with dignity in a state of their own. And there is no other path that leads to regional integration between Israel and all its Arab neighbors, including Saudi Arabia.
We also have long been clear that premature actions here in New York, even with the best intentions, will not achieve statehood for the Palestinian people.
“With Israel’s security guaranteed” is the important part. Until that happens, Palestinians will not be living “in peace and with dignity in a state of their own.” And I see no path to that except obliteration of Hamas, and occupation by some entity or entities that will be reshaping the minds of the people there and in particular the coming generations. Tall order, to say the least – taller, I believe, than in postwar Germany and Japan, although at least the number of people involved is much smaller.
At the moment I can’t find the link where I read it, but apparently the US announced in advance of the vote that it intended to use its veto. This had the effect of giving cover to the other nations to vote for admittance or to abstain, saying to the terrorist crocodile: “Please, Mr. Crocodile, please eat me last!” It also allowed the European nations in the Security Council to placate their sizable Muslim populations, knowing that because of the US’s veto there would be no real consequences.
I’m actually surprised that the Biden administration had the cojones to veto the resolution.
The UN has long been in the business of rewarding the worst terrorist attacks of the Palestinians, beginning with the Munich massacre that got so much notoriety and Arafat’s subsequent 1974 appearance there. He addressed the General Assembly, saying, among other things:
Our resolve to build a new world is fortified — a world free of colonialism, imperialism, neo-colonialism and racism in each of its instances, including zionism.
That’s what the Soviets taught him to say, and he learned his lesson well.
More:
Our world aspires to peace, justice, equality and freedom. It wishes that oppressed nations, bent under the weight of imperialism, might gain their freedom and their right to self-determination.
Sure thing; that’s what the Palestinians want. Every leftist buzzword is there – as far back as fifty years ago.
Actually, Arafat was laughing at them all:
In an article last week about dramatic moments at the United Nations (“Laughter at Trump among a long line of shocking U.N. moments“), the Associated Press covers up the most dramatic element of Yasser Arafat’s 1974 United Nations address: that he brought a gun to the international body and even delivered the address while openly sporting the holster.
In his Sept. 26 article, Tamer Fakahany obscures that Yasser Arafat actually brought his gun to the United Nations and wore the holster during his address, instead presenting the unprecedented nature of his appearance there as relating only to the statement: “Today, I have come bearing an olive branch and a freedom fighter’s gun.Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat: Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand.” …
(According to an earlier AP report, he was forced to deposit the gun before mounting the rostrum.)
AP’s Sept. 28 2012 account of the same speech explicitly stated in the heading “Yasser Arafat brings his gun to the U.N.” It also contained the key information omitted from last week’s report: “Arafat appeared wearing his gun belt and holster, reluctantly removing his pistol before mounting the rostrum.”
It was a threat from Arafat. He knew how to do political theater, and it has served the Palestinians in their bid to gain sympathy and support from the West while they nurture and act out their destructive and violent hated of Israel, the Jews, and the West.
