↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 227 << 1 2 … 225 226 227 228 229 … 1,864 1,865 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

All you WordPress whizzes out there

The New Neo Posted on February 22, 2024 by neoFebruary 22, 2024

Maybe you can help me with a persistent problem I’m having setting up a website on WordPress for selling Gerard’s book. I’ve designed blogs before – obviously – but this bookselling website has a different format and I’m struggling with a glitch that I can’t seem to remove.

When I was first fiddling around with it, I apparently loaded a particular photo on the sidebar. Later on I decided I wanted neither the photo nor the sidebar, and got rid of both – that is, I thought I got rid of both. The photo is gone from the media library and the sidebar is gone from the page – except a little something remains. There’s a small black lozenge-shaped mark to the right of each post, and if you click on that mark it takes you to the original photo that I deleted. I can’t delete the photo from the media library because it’s not in the media library anymore, but obviously it’s still somewhere on the site (as is the sidebar, I suppose). But if I can’t find the source I can’t get rid of it.

On the home page, where I have photo-links to each post (a post about the book, a post with Gerard’s bio, and so forth), there are also little gray squares above each link. I believe that these are also remnants of the early sidebar photo (“placeholders”?). I want them gone, too, and nothing I’ve done so far has fixed the problem, including putting some CSS into the mix which is supposed to do something-or-other but did nothing. Also, when I try to click on these little gray squares, they don’t lead anywhere.

Hiring someone to design a site would be incredibly expensive, whether one wants a simple site (as I do) or a more complicated one. A friend has offered to help but is terribly terribly busy and so far hasn’t gotten around to it. I’m getting very close to finished with all the other minutiae involved in this endeavor, and it occurs to me that some of you readers might have an idea of what to do. Thanks in advance!

Posted in Blogging and bloggers, Me, myself, and I | Tagged Gerard Vanderleun | 12 Replies

Open thread 2/22/24

The New Neo Posted on February 22, 2024 by neoFebruary 22, 2024

Posted in Uncategorized | 59 Replies

What did I ever do to deserve those “worms coming out of the body” ads?

The New Neo Posted on February 21, 2024 by neoFebruary 21, 2024

A while back I noticed that I was getting disgusting ads on several ordinary websites. I mean really revolting, most of them featuring hundreds of worms coming out of parts of someone’s body such as, most often, feet. At first I thought it was a fluke. But they kept coming and coming.

I had no clue as to why. It’s not like I’d clicked on anything even remotely connected to such a thing. I finally managed to block them; I hope for good.

And doing some research, I found this:

Have you ever wonder WHY IN THE WORLD do you keep seeing those disgusting ads on websites that just make your skin crawl? Well, I do, and I’m going to tell you all about it.

Those grid-like ads composing of disgusting, repulsive images are coined by theawe.com way back in 2015 as “chumbox ads.” What is a chum box, you ask? Here’s what they wrote:

“A Chum is decomposing fish matter that elicits a purely neurological brain stem response in its target consumer: larger fish, like sharks. It signals that they should let go, deploy their nictitating membranes, and chomp down blindly on a morsel of fragrant, life-giving sustenance. Perhaps in a frenzied manner.”

I’m not going to show you these ads because we’ve all seen it. Those “hair growth” banner ads or “small balls pressed on fingers or knees” (sorry to give you those image — nightmares). But the question is, WHY? It’s rather simple, really.

First of all, it’s business. Websites that offer these ads get paid by the network. The network collects money from these so-called “Advertisers” by impressions or clicks. These “advertisers” gets money when people visit their page from chumbox ads. It’s now a whole loop. You can’t leave. Everything is connected. …

Still, the question remains, why would anyone click on these ads? Turns out, humans are weird. Going back to the chum box analogy, a lot of us are drawn to these disgusting ads because we can’t look away. We can’t figure our why it irks us, so we just keep looking. Remember, they also make money off of ad impressions — so by just you looking at it already counts.

Even worse — we click on the ads to find out what the heck is going on, only to find even more disgusting ads. …

In summary, these ads are, unfortunately, working. They are making money, paying a lot, and we all know money talks. They are disgusting and immoral to the core, but just like the war we’re waging on clickbaits, it’s not going to be an easy feat.

Did I ever click on one? I doubt it; but maybe, just maybe, at the start when I didn’t know what I was seeing and I got curious? If so, I don’t recall doing so – I’m ordinarily very careful about that sort of thing. But consider yourself warned.

Posted in Me, myself, and I, Pop culture | 37 Replies

Roger Pielke on the Mann trial

The New Neo Posted on February 21, 2024 by neoFebruary 21, 2024

Recommended:

Even so, in a trial that most neutral observers would surely see as favoring the arguments of the defense, Mann walked away with a resounding, comprehensive victory.7 How did that happen?

In my view, there were two absolutely pivotal moments in the trial.

One occurred when Mann was testifying and he explained that he felt that the bloggers were not just criticizing him, but they were attacking all of climate science, and he could not let that stand. As the world’s most accomplished and famous climate scientist, Mann intimated that he was simply the embodiment of all of climate science.

For the jury, this set up the notion that this trial was not really about Mann, but about attacks on all of climate science from climate deniers.

The second pivotal moment occurred when in closing arguments Mann’s lawyer asked the jury to send a message to right-wing science deniers and Trump supporters with a large punitive damage award.

I’ve written about Pielke before, in this post from 2007.

Posted in Law, Science | Tagged climate change | 43 Replies

Roundup

The New Neo Posted on February 21, 2024 by neoFebruary 21, 2024

(1) Is the Engoron verdict against Trump a violation of the 8th Amendment against the imposition of “excessive fines”? And if so, is Trump required to post the excessive fine and go through the entire state appeal process before getting to a federal court?

(2) I thought the British royal family didn’t comment on politics. Why did William make an exception?

(3) As if this all weren’t enough, now we have zombie deer, a prion disease.

(4) CAIR, which to the best of my recollection came into prominence in the US after 9/11 in the fight against so-called “Islamophobia,” is a front for the Muslim Brotherhood.

(5) The Muslim threat in France.

Posted in Uncategorized | 33 Replies

Open thread 2/21/24

The New Neo Posted on February 21, 2024 by neoFebruary 21, 2024

Posted in Uncategorized | 22 Replies

The intricacies of Judge Engoron’s vindictive ruling on Trump

The New Neo Posted on February 20, 2024 by neoFebruary 20, 2024

Judge Engoron is quite creative in discovering ways to tie Trump into knots. It’s not just the verdict and the monetary award. There’s also this (emphasis mine):

But before any other court can review Engoron’s decision, Trump will have to pay hundreds of millions out of a portfolio based mainly on residential properties, commercial buildings, and resort holdings in New York City and around the world. …

“The amount he will have to put up will be in excess of $450 million, just to appeal,” a person familiar with the case told The Post.

In civil matters, it’s customary for judges to require up to 120% of a fine to be held in escrow while the case wends its way through the court system.

“The defense can propose a different amount to be held in escrow,” the source explained. “But the ultimate decision on that is up to the judge.”

Engoron’s ruling slapped a 9% interest charge on top of Trump’s fine, which will accrue daily until it’s paid.

Has there ever been a civil case with an award of such magnitude against an individual, brought by the government in which there were no damages of any sort? Apparently not. Also, of course, this case is an act of political vengeance.

More (emphasis mine):

And Trump will have to collect the money fast: he has just 30 days to come up with the cash, or to find a surety company to guarantee it for him – using some of his properties as collateral.

No bank that does business in New York is permitted to lend to the former president, under the terms of Engoron’s ruling.

“By imposing an astronomical award, Engoron made it difficult to even appeal his decision,” Turley said, calling it “one of the most insidious aspects of the ruling.”

“This award should shock the conscience of any objective jurist,” he said.

Indeed it should – and that’s why Turley, not a Trump supporter, expresses his own shock. He is pretty close to objective on this matter. But objective jurists are very hard to find these days.

This aspect of Engoron’s ruling is like Catch-22: you must do the impossible before you even get to appeal, and one of the things you want to appeal is the fact that the judge has made it nearly impossible to appeal. I wonder whether there is any procedural way around this. Could Trump somehow fast-track the case to SCOTUS, and would they accept it?

Posted in Finance and economics, Law, Trump | 48 Replies

It’s a mad mad mad mad world: US is the lone vote in the UN Security Council against a ceasefire in the Israel/Palestine war

The New Neo Posted on February 20, 2024 by neoFebruary 20, 2024

My title is a riff on this 1963 movie. The film was a comedy, but what we’re seeing in the world these days isn’t funny. It’s a pathetic inversion in which we have a country with a history such as Algeria’s asking that Israel stop fighting the entities that invaded its borders, and murdered and tortured its civilian citizens when there already was a ceasefire in effect.

And to top it all off, the US was the only country voting against that resolution although the Security Council is made up of powers such as France and the UK, the latter of which at least abstained and therefore was only semi-cowardly and semi-destructive of Israel’s right to defend itself. Other Security Council permanent members (I should probably put “security” in scare quotes) are China and Russia; ’nuff said about that. The way the council is structured is that there are also ten non-permanent members elected by the General Assembly for two-year terms, and at the moment those members consist of Algeria, Ecuador, Guyana, Japan, Malta, Mozambique, Republic of Korea, Sierra Leone, Slovenia, and Switzerland. An interesting cast of characters, all of whom voted for the ceasefire.

More Orwellian inversion:

Before the vote, Algeria’s U.N. Ambassador Amar Bendjama, the Arab representative on the council, said: “This resolution stands for truth and humanity standing against the advocates for murder and hatred.”

But don’t think that the US was really standing up for Israel; such things are relative:

U.S. Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield said the United States understands the council’s desire for urgent action but believes the resolution would “negatively impact” sensitive negotiations on a hostage deal and pause in fighting for at least six weeks. If that happens, “we can take the time to build a more enduring peace,” she said.

The proposed U.S. resolution, Thomas-Greenfield said, “would do what this text does not — pressure Hamas to take the hostage deal that is on the table and help secure a pause that allows humanitarian assistance to reach Palestinian civilians in desperate need.”

The US is asking for a temporary ceasefire in order to help obtain the release of the hostages. I assume that Thomas-Greenfield and her mentors in the Biden administration know this is unrealistic. Or perhaps they are in some sort of hazy pipe dream. Hamas has been adamant in stating that it has tons of demands before the hostages are released, and those demands include Israel’s surrender and Hamas staying in power and being rewarded. The Biden administration is continuing to try to walk a tightrope that offends neither of its flanks, Israel-haters and Israel-supporters.

The US resolution also strongly supports another pipe dream, the 2-state solution.

The rest of the nations have a range of motives for voting for the Algerian resolution or not opposing it. Among them are being overtly on the side of Hamas and wanting Israel’s destruction, just wishing Israel would go away and shut up, being secretly at least sort of pro-Israel but wanting to placate its own large Muslim population (that would be the UK, for example).

None of these votes on resolutions are anything but theater at the moment because the UN has no way to compel Israel to obey. Netanyahu has made it clear that the Israelis are uninterested in suicide and that the UN can go pound sand. But the UN has long been trying to isolate Israel among the nations of the world, and that campaign is well advanced.

The UN, of course, has anything but clean hands in this business. Not only did it participate in the original partition that established the nation of Israel – something I think was a good thing, but which I’m pretty sure the UN as an institution and most of its member nations regret – but it has been instrumental in fomenting the vicious hatred of the current population of Palestine towards Israel and Jews, through the tender ministrations of UNRWA and its murder-inciting propaganda.

The resolution rests on several fictions. The first is that such a vote matters. The second is that Hamas would abide by a ceasefire if one were implemented. But the third and most important is the idea of the suffering Palestinians as being separate from Hamas. But Hamas is not a rogue group; it is in charge of the government of Gaza and was elected by the people of Gaza, who strongly support it. The people of Gaza also strongly support the massacre of October 7. What’s more, the only reason they are at risk is that Hamas wishes them to be, by placing Hamas’ military in civilian and even humanitarian venues such as hospitals.

All of this is ignored by the UN and so many of its member countries, even those Western ones that should know better – because it is inconvenient (and depressing, actually) to think how dire the situation is and how difficult it would be to fix it. Better to pretend, and blame Israel.

Posted in Biden, Israel/Palestine, War and Peace | 47 Replies

More recommended videos on Israel and Palestine

The New Neo Posted on February 20, 2024 by neoFebruary 20, 2024

This one is about the PA and its relation to Hamas, and what would happen if there was a Palestinian state:

This is about the mendacious and sadistic charge that Israel acts like Nazi Germany:

Posted in Israel/Palestine, Jews, Terrorism and terrorists, War and Peace | 1 Reply

Open thread 2/20/24

The New Neo Posted on February 20, 2024 by neoFebruary 20, 2024

Posted in Uncategorized | 24 Replies

Presidents’ Day poetry

The New Neo Posted on February 19, 2024 by neoFebruary 19, 2024

[NOTE: Today is Presidents’ Day, and this is a repeat of a previous post.]

I’m not that old, but pedagogical practices in my youth seem absolutely archaic compared to whatever passes for education these days. For starters, we had Washington’s Birthday and Lincoln’s Birthday, and they were on their actual real birthdays: Lincoln on February 12, and Washington on February 22.

Two days off! But they didn’t necessarily fall on Mondays; they fell whenever they fell, and sometimes – alas – they fell on a Saturday or a Sunday.

We also had to memorize terrible patriotic poetry back then, and lots of it. When I say “terrible” I’m not referring to its patriotism, I mean that it just wasn’t very good poetry. I suppose kids weren’t supposed to care about that aspect of it. Also, in those days I was very quick at memorizing poetry and so those early poems have tended to stick. Therefore I have a relatively large load of memorized doggerel to draw on.

One of those poems was about George Washington. To give you an idea of the flavor of what I’m talking about, it started this way: “Only a baby, fair and small…” and then filled the reader in on all the stages of Washington’s life, verse by verse. I had never looked it up online and was skeptical that it could be found, but voila! Here it is; isn’t the internet great?

And I now present it to you as an example of what the New York City schoolchild used to have to memorize and recite. I seem to recall this was in fifth grade:

Only a baby, fair and small,
Like many another baby son,
Whose smiles and tears came swift at call,
Who ate and slept and grew – that’s all,
The infant Washington.

I’ll let you go to the site and see it for yourself. The next verse is for the schoolboy Washington, then we have the lad Washington, then finally man/patriot and a lot of generalities with the only specifics being “surveyor, general, president.” Why so much emphasis on Washington’s boyhood I don’t know; maybe to go with the cherry tree story. But still, at least we were taught to think highly of Washington.

And Lincoln had a poem for memorization, too. It was a better effort than the Washington one, I think, although still not very good and rather creepy at that. I see now that the poem was by Rosemary Benet, apparently the wife of Stephen Vincent Benet.

I have no idea why the poem they had us memorize about Lincoln was not about his accomplishments at all, but rather about the mother who died when he was nine years old. In the poem, she comes back as a ghost and inquires about him. But here it is:

If Nancy Hanks
Came back as a ghost,
Seeking news
Of what she loved most,
She’d ask first
“Where’s my son?
What’s happened to Abe?
What’s he done?”

“Poor little Abe,
Left all alone.
Except for Tom,
Who’s a rolling stone;
He was only nine,
The year I died.
I remember still
How hard he cried.”

“Scraping along
In a little shack,
With hardly a shirt
To cover his back,
And a prairie wind
To blow him down,
Or pinching times
If he went to town.”

“You wouldn’t know
About my son?
Did he grow tall?
Did he have fun?
Did he learn to read?
Did he get to town?
Do you know his name?
Did he get on?”

The urge that rose in me was to shout, “Yes, YES, don’t you know?” into the void.

Instead of that one, we might have been asked to memorize this poem – or at least the very last part of it, which I’ve always liked:

And when he fell in whirlwind, he went down
As when a lordly cedar, green with boughs,
Goes down with a great shout upon the hills,
And leaves a lonesome place against the sky.

Or what about this old chestnut by Walt Whitman? Schmaltzy, but it still gives me a little shiver when I read it:

O Captain! my Captain! our fearful trip is done,
The ship has weather’d every rack, the prize we sought is won,
The port is near, the bells I hear, the people all exulting,
While follow eyes the steady keel, the vessel grim and daring;
But O heart! heart! heart!
O the bleeding drops of red,
Where on the deck my Captain lies,
Fallen cold and dead.

O Captain! my Captain! rise up and hear the bells;
Rise up—for you the flag is flung—for you the bugle trills,
For you bouquets and ribbon’d wreaths—for you the shores a-crowding,
For you they call, the swaying mass, their eager faces turning;
Here Captain! dear father!
This arm beneath your head!
It is some dream that on the deck,
You’ve fallen cold and dead.

My Captain does not answer, his lips are pale and still,
My father does not feel my arm, he has no pulse nor will,
The ship is anchor’d safe and sound, its voyage closed and done,
From fearful trip the victor ship comes in with object won;
Exult O shores, and ring O bells!
But I with mournful tread,
Walk the deck my Captain lies,
Fallen cold and dead.

Posted in Historical figures, Me, myself, and I, Poetry | 24 Replies

Netanyahu channels Churchill and says Israel will “finish the job”

The New Neo Posted on February 19, 2024 by neoFebruary 19, 2024

Fortunately, Netanyahu et al in Israel aren’t listening to anyone who tells them it’s time to lose:

Addressing American Jewish leaders Sunday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu argued that the Israeli army was going to unprecedented lengths to protect civilians in Gaza during the war with Hamas, while insisting: “We have to finish the job.”

Speaking before the annual meeting of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations in Jerusalem, Netanyahu blasted South Africa and Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva for accusing Israel of committing genocide in Gaza.

The prime minister lambasted Lula for comments he had made earlier on Sunday, in which he compared Israel to the Nazis, saying the only historical equivalent to events in Gaza was “when Hitler decided to kill the Jews.”

“He should be ashamed of himself,” Netanyahu said to applause.

One of the many many problems we have today is that people such as Lula are not only not ashamed of saying such a heinous thing; they are proud of saying it.

More:

Netanyahu promised that none of the accusations would stop Israel’s offensive against the Gaza terror group, pledging “total victory against [Hamas] savages,”

“When we set out to do this, even our best friends said to us, ‘It can’t be done,’” …

One thing Israel cannot agree to is an international diktat that would… force a Palestinian state on Israel after the horrors of October 7,” he said, insisting the Israeli people were united around this. Netanyahu called on the Conference of Presidents to adopt the same resolution his cabinet passed earlier in the day against any unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state.

Speaking before Netanyahu, US Ambassador Jack Lew sought to downplay talk that the US could recognize a Palestinian state unilaterally.

“We have never said there should be a unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state,” says Lew.

Instead, he called for an “over-the-horizon process that includes a vision for a demilitarized Palestinian state.

“Now is a moment in time when there is a real possibility that by engaging in normalization and negotiations with Saudi Arabia” along with reforms in the Palestinian Authority, “there can be a demilitarized Palestinian state. But Israel will have to make that choice,” Lew said.

That’s the tightrope on which the Biden administration is walking. The MSM keeps saying that the administration wants a Palestinian state and that Israel won’t agree, but Lew is saying something more – nuanced. The administration wants to throw a fish to all the Israel-hating and Jew-hating leftists, of whom there are many, while still keeping Democrats who support Israel in the Democrat camp. To do, they must express unrealistic thoughts such as “reforms in the Palestinian Authority.”

But the PA doesn’t want to reform and, more importantly, the Palestinians don’t want it to reform. They want Israel gone and Israelis (and Jews in general, for many of them) dead. You don’t “reform” that overnight, nor do you do it by talking. You do it by winning a war and then totally revamping an educational system that has marinated generations in the worst sort of murderous hate, backed by religious beliefs as well. Underestimate the task and you are asking for defeat.

Netanyahu’s language in the speech reminded me – a bit – of Churchill’s “give us the tools and we will finish the job.” The Israelis also need to start making more of their own “tools,” of course.

Churchill was addressing President Roosevelt in 1941 but prior to the US’s entry into the war:

Here is the answer which I will give to President Roosevelt: Put your confidence in us. Give us your faith and your blessing, and, under Providence, all will be well.

We shall not fail or falter; we shall not weaken or tire. Neither the sudden shock of battle, nor the long-drawn trials of vigilance and exertion will wear us down. Give us the tools, and we will finish the job.

Right before that, Churchill quoted Longfellow, who had been quoted by Roosevelt in a letter to the British leader:

The other day, President Roosevelt gave his opponent in the late Presidential Election [Mr. Wendell Willkie] a letter of introduction to me, and in it he wrote out a verse, in his own handwriting, from Longfellow, which he said, “applies to you people as it does to us.” Here is the verse:

…Sail on, O Ship of State!
Sail on, O Union, strong and great!
Humanity with all its fears,
With all the hopes of future years,
Is hanging breathless on thy fate!

Indeed.

Posted in Historical figures, Israel/Palestine, Middle East, Terrorism and terrorists, War and Peace | Tagged Benjamin Netanyahu | 27 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • om on Open thread 3/16/2026
  • BrooklynBoy on Pundits unbound
  • physicsguy on Pundits unbound
  • Kate on Pundits unbound
  • Phil G on Pundits unbound

Recent Posts

  • Pundits unbound
  • Still another update on the SAVE Act
  • I actually watched the Oscars last night
  • Open thread 3/16/2026
  • One movie after another

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (318)
  • Afghanistan (97)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (161)
  • Best of neo-neocon (88)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (581)
  • Dance (286)
  • Disaster (238)
  • Education (319)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (565)
  • Election 2018 (32)
  • Election 2020 (510)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (13)
  • Election 2028 (4)
  • Evil (126)
  • Fashion and beauty (323)
  • Finance and economics (1,000)
  • Food (316)
  • Friendship (47)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (724)
  • Health (1,132)
  • Health care reform (545)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (329)
  • History (699)
  • Immigration (426)
  • Iran (402)
  • Iraq (223)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (785)
  • Jews (414)
  • Language and grammar (357)
  • Latin America (202)
  • Law (2,882)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (124)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,271)
  • Liberty (1,097)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (386)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,465)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (902)
  • Middle East (380)
  • Military (308)
  • Movies (344)
  • Music (524)
  • Nature (254)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (176)
  • Obama (1,735)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (126)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,015)
  • Poetry (255)
  • Political changers (176)
  • Politics (2,765)
  • Pop culture (392)
  • Press (1,610)
  • Race and racism (857)
  • Religion (411)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (621)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (967)
  • Theater and TV (263)
  • Therapy (67)
  • Trump (1,575)
  • Uncategorized (4,332)
  • Vietnam (108)
  • Violence (1,394)
  • War and Peace (961)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑