Biden gives amnesty to illegal-alien spouses of citizens

The New Neo Posted on by

We’ve been told that it was going to happen, and here it is:

Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., vowed to investigate President Biden’s “lawless plans for amnesty” and Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas’ “ongoing abuse of parole authority” hours after the administration unveiled new immigration rules shielding migrant spouses of U.S. citizens from deportation.

“Amnesty for illegal aliens is absolutely unacceptable,” Hawley wrote in a letter to Mayorkas on Tuesday morning. “It is a lure that will drive millions more illegal immigrants to flood across our southern border. It is a slap in the face to U.S. taxpayers. And it is totally unfair to immigrants who entered the U.S. legally. But apparently, you and President Biden now plan to do just that.”

Hawley called for Mayorkas to “immediately end” the new policy and said the administration “baldly defied” current immigration law, which permits parole for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit. …

Hawley warned the administration’s new amnesty proposal “is transparently an attempt to curry favor with far-left activist groups, who opposed even President Biden’s toothless rhetoric about border security,” and that “the far left always gets what it wants from this administration—amnesty and a functionally open border.”

The non-citizen spouses must have lived in the US for 10 years or more, which sounds like a somewhat limiting factor. However, I think it’s a case of the camel getting its nose into the tent, in that once this is implemented it can be expanded to include those who have been here a lot less than ten years. Or perhaps it won’t be properly enforced in the first place if it follows the path of so many of our other rules about entry into this country.

It also seems to me that this announcement can be looked at as an expansion of DACA, the policy resulting from an executive action of Obama’s in 2012. Trump tried to end DACA and there were a number of court challenges, but the policy is still in place. DACA didn’t involve spouses, and this new policy of Biden’s does. My guess is that this is another case of Biden trying to placate the left flank of his party – but they always want more.

Bounces off me and sticks to you! says the left of Biden and Trump and their mental and physical sharpness

The New Neo Posted on by

It gets more and more difficult for our Pravda-esque media to cover up for Biden’s increasing frailties, and so they’ve adopted a new tactic. In a way, it’s an old tactic, because it reminds me of the game we used to play as children when someone insulted us: “Bounces off me and sticks to you!”

A couple of weeks ago I suddenly noticed a large increase in the number of Democrat spokespeople and media outlets implying or outright stating that Donald Trump is senile. Or, as a variation on the theme, that he’s crazy. Or senile and crazy – and “crazy” not just as in “mildly eccentric” (which he’s long been) but “crazy” as in “demented and out of touch with reality.” Now, Trump is many many things, and a lot of those things are things a lot of people don’t like or even hate. But “senile” and/or “crazy” are not among them.

The message about Trump as crazy old coot was disseminated from too many people and in too many places to be an accident; it was obviously a coordinated approach. And now the Biden-defenders have unveiled a new tactic, which is to claim that videos showing Joe Biden to be old, infirm, addled, confused, or any of the things that have been readily apparent for a long time are fakes. It is Joe who’s actually sharp as a tack and able to leap off tall buildings in a single bound.

I now notice that, just a moment ago, Ace has put up a post on this very same topic, saying that the tactic is now just about everywhere in the MSM:

This is a full-court press throughout all the Regime media — they’re all claiming, at once, all using the same language, that all the videos showing Biden wandering off, freezing, and sitting (or shitting) in invisible chairs are “cheap fakes” spread by “right-wing media.”

They’re simultaneously claiming that Trump, who gives two hour speeches without a single note-card, is the Real Mental Invalid Here.

As I said earlier, I first noticed the MSM claiming the latter, starting maybe about two weeks ago. Then just in the last day or two, mostly since the G7 Summit, we’ve gotten the follow-up approach stating that the videos that make Biden look bad are right-wing fakes.

Of course, videos of that nature about Biden have been around for his entire presidency and – funny thing – it’s not been claimed till now that they are fakes. But the left counts on people to have a poor memory or no memory, just as the Soviets counted on their people. Actually, that’s not true; the left knows (and the Soviets knew) that many people do remember, and it doesn’t care. Its propaganda is aimed either at those who don’t pay attention, those who are gullible, and/or those who believe what they wish to believe and are adept at saying 2 plus 2 equals 5.

Orwell knew a lot about that sort of thing. The left practices a form not just of simple lying, but of truth inversion. And it often works.

The Gates of Vienna are open: Muslim schoolchildren in Vienna

The New Neo Posted on by

[NOTE: Hat tip, commenter “Snow on Pine.”]

The Gate of Vienna are wide open:

More than one-third of primary school children in Vienna are Muslims, representing the largest religious group among elementary schools in the Austrian capital.

According to figures published by the Education Directorate and cited by the Exxpress news site, 35 percent of primary school students are Muslims, while 21 percent are Catholic, 13 percent are Orthodox, and 2 percent are either Protestant or belong to another denomination.

Just over one in four pupils (26 percent) are classified as non-religious.

The figures show a considerable increase in the number of Muslim children frequenting Austrian primary schools compared to data published for the 2016/2017 academic year when Catholics remained the largest religious group at 31 percent compared to 28 percent of Muslims.

By my calculations, there are a couple of missing percentages. But the general trend is pretty clear, if the figures are basically correct.

Christianity has been experiencing a falling-off in many Western European countries, at the same time that Muslim immigration has been increasing. There is also a differential birthrate:

According to the Federal Agency for Migration and Refugees, between 2014 and 2021 over 2.3 mln alleged “refugees” came to Germany (first and following asylum applications). Around 86 percent of them were of Muslim faith, i.e., 2 mln, which is around 2.5 percent of Germany’s population in 2014. From all the applicants only 6.3 percent were actually deported, i.e., only 147 thousand.

During the same period over 263 thousand alleged “refugees” came to Austria, of which only 11.8 percent (31 thousand) were deported. Given that 72 percent of the asylum seekers were of Muslim faith, this results in a gross influx of 190 thousand Muslims, which corresponds to 2.2 percent of Austria’s population in 2014.

Research by Stonawski et al. (2015) shows that Muslim immigrants have more children on average than their native counterparts: in Germany and Austria the fertility rate for ethnic Germans was 1.4, while it was 2.4 for Muslims. In 2022 the total fertility rate of both nations was 1.5 and 1.44 respectively.

So immigration in these countries is predominantly Muslim, most of the people who come are not deported, and their birthrates are over the replacement rate whereas the birthrates of the native populations are significantly under replacement rate.

The concern isn’t racist, it is cultural. The immigrants tend to bring their culture with them, and it includes anti-Semitism, homophobia, and the like – including, for a not-small percentage, the desire for sharia law in their new home countries.

NOTE: It’s not always easy to get statistics on this, either. For example, Belgium has a law against religious censuses. So estimates are all they’ve got.

Further thoughts on the hostage rescue: their survival was almost miraculous

The New Neo Posted on by

Here’s a much more detailed description of the Israeli hostage rescue. I’m sure important facts have been left out for security reasons, but enough have been revealed to give a fuller picture than the one we got earlier.

That fuller picture makes it seem almost a miracle that the hostages and their rescuers got out alive. Maybe it actually was a miracle, depending on your belief system.

I suggest you please read the whole thing now, because I’m going to discuss some of my reactions and observations.

(1) When I had just the bare bones of the story, before I had read the article, one thing I wondered was – in the firefight that occurred during the rescue of the three male hostages, when the head of the operation was mortally wounded – how did the Israeli troops somehow manage to protect the hostages and themselves while carrying his body out of the building and bringing him home? The article doesn’t explain exactly how that was done, but it does make clear that he was carried out of there on a stretcher, and that there were medics as part of the original team. So not only did the Israelis prepare for that sort of contingency, but they used precious time and resources to make sure no one was left behind to the tender mercies of the savage Gazan crowd. This was all done under extremely heavy fire.

(2) Prior to reading the article I had already heard of some of the intelligence work prior to the rescue, involving a team of Israelis posing as Arabs and speaking fluent Arabic with a Gazan accent. It had struck me, and not for the first time, that the reason the Israelis could successfully pull that off was that the members of the team probably were Arabs – Israeli Arabs, that is. About 20% of Israeli citizens are Arabs, and I’d wager that most of them have no desire for Hamas to take over Israel and take away the freedoms they enjoy there.

(3) The article makes it crystal clear that the type of combat in which the Israeli team had to engage was enormously difficult and more dramatic than most movies. They were met with an unexpected amount of armed resistance not just on the streets of Gaza as they were trying to get the hostages through the town. but even when they first entered the home where the hostages were being kept.

(4) The hostages had to be very brave, as well, during this operation.

(5) Every single story I’ve read about the hostage rescue operation refers to the site where the hostages were being kept as the “Nuseirat refugee camp,” and that includes the one I’m writing about now. Words matter. The Palestinians and the UN and the NGOs have managed to use these sort of terms to conjure up the image in the readers’ minds of a bunch of makeshift tent cities, full of squalor and lacking basic facilities. But the vast majority of dwellings in the permanent “refugee camps” of Gaza are not like that. They are towns, with shops and homes and all the usual accouterments that towns contain. We should stop calling them “camps” because they are not camps. For that matter, most of the people in them are not “refugees”; they are the children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren of people who for the most part chose to leave Israel when the UN created the original two-state solution that the Arab world rejected in favor of trying to destroy Israel. And lastly, they’re not really “Palestinians,” they appropriated that term back in the 1960s:

Polls show Trump gaining black voters

The New Neo Posted on by

With the usual caveats regarding polls, take a look:

Trump has significantly shrunk his deficit with President Joe Biden among black Americans in the six battleground states, with the current president leading the former president 70% to 18%, a May New York Times/Siena College poll found. Enten, on “CNN News Central,” was stunned by how Trump is performing with black Americans as a Republican candidate, as well as how unpopular Biden is becoming with these voters.

Seventy to eighteen isn’t exactly doing poorly, of course. And it’s not nearly as unpopular as Biden should be. But it’s potentially very important, because any decline in black support for Democrats is potentially devastating.

More:

“I keep looking for this to change, to go back to a historical norm and it, simply put, has not yet.”

Depends, of course, on what “history” you’re going back to in order to find your “norm.” For a long time after the Civil War, black voters were Republicans.

More:

In 2020, Joe Biden was getting 86% of the African American vote. Look at where it is now. It’s 70%, that’s a 16-point drop, John,” Enten told host John Berman. “And more than that, it’s not just that Joe Biden is losing ground. It’s that Donald Trump is gaining ground. You go from 7%, single-digits at this point in 2020, to now 21% and again, John, I keep looking for signs that this is going to go back to normal and I don’t see it yet in the polling of anything right now. We’re careening towards a historic performance for a Republican presidential candidate, the likes of which we have not seen in six decades.”

Six decades ago it was 1964, the year of the passage of the Civil Rights Act.

Most of the current movement of black voters towards Trump seems to come from men and in particular younger men (I read that earlier but can’t find the exact source in a quick search at the moment). But again, I would be cautious about believing overmuch in polls.

One thing that occurs to me, though, is that once a previously politically monolithic ethnic group starts turning in the other direction even a little, it could have a cascade effect in which it becomes less shocking for a person in that group to consider affiliating with a previously-despised party and its candidates.

Update on Gerard’s book: the proof is on its way

The New Neo Posted on by

I finally turned in the PDF of Gerard’s book to the printing company. I had long been formatting and fixing things and proof-reading and fiddling with this and that. There are a nearly infinite number of decisions to make when printing a book, and I have zero experience with any of them.

It’s interesting, though. Change the font and the margins – I finally made both bigger, the better for elderly eyes to take in – and BAM! You’ve added quite a few pages, and therefore quite a bit of expense, to the book. I reduced that by changing the distance between lines and making that a bit smaller. Voila! Back to fewer pages again. And on and on with that sort of thing.

But by far the biggest time-consumer, the largest generator of tooth-gnashing hair-pulling, is copy editing. That means paying attention to typos, commas, grammar, the form to use for quotes, and a host of other nit-picky details and errors that the eye and mind can easily miss. Our human brains like to fill in the blanks of a mistake, but that’s a no-no for copy editing. I found that, no matter how many times I’d gone through the book already, I could always find an error I’d missed.

So I finally had to just – as one might say – close the book on it and send the PDF out to be made into a physical book in the real world. They say I should be receiving the print proof copy on Monday. I’m somewhat nervous to see what it will look like. But whatever I see, I’m inclined to accept it unless there’s some egregious flaw. I’ve had it with copy editing that thing.

Once I do approve it, the books are printed, and after I tweak the website a bit I’ll announce that they’re for sale. That’s the plan, anyway.

Our very own Jew-haters, left and right

The New Neo Posted on by

I find this sort of news intensely depressing:

And there’s plenty more where that came from, including a “Long live October 7” banner:

On Tuesday, a mob took over a New York City subway car and chanted, in a call and repeat fashion, “Raise your hands if you’re a Zionist. This is your chance to get out.”

Two nights ago, the homes of Brooklyn Museum’s director Anne Pasternak and several of the museum’s Jewish board members, were defaced with fake blood and a sign that accused Pasternak of being a “White-Supremacist Zionist.”

I’ve been writing in these pages about the growing antisemitism in New York for years.

But this is the worst it has ever been. It’s no longer random attacks, that could be blamed on the mentally unwell.

There is now a coordinated threat to Jewish presence in this city.

“Hate doesn’t have a home in our city,” former mayor Bill de Blasio said in 2019 after eight attacks on Jews within one week happened in New York.

De Blasio had famously blamed Trump-supporters for these increased attacks saying “I want to be very, very clear, the violent threat, the threat that is ideological, is very much from the right.”

He never explained how the shadowy MAGA fans existed in such large numbers in his deep blue New York and were able to disguise themselves so well.

To his credit, Mayor Adams visited the Nova exhibit after the hateful protest outside.

But he said similar words to his hapless predecessor, “Hate has no place in our city,” when it is clear “hate” has developed quite a foothold in New York where Jews are concerned.

“Hate” – that is, hatred of Jews – has found a very cozy place indeed in New York City, a place with a large Jewish population. New York City is presently 16% Jewish, but that’s ethnically Jewish; religious Jews are probably 8% or less, and Orthodox Jews less than that. The Jewish population of New York has been declining since the 1950s, when it constituted approximately one-quarter of the city.

Then again – in the year 1900, Jews constituted 25% of the population of Baghdad. You can read some of the history at the link, but here are a few details:

In the 1930s, the situation of the Jews in Iraq deteriorated. Previously, the growing Iraqi Arab nationalist sentiment included Iraqi Jews as fellow Arabs, but these views changed with the ongoing conflict in the Palestinian Mandate and the introduction of Nazi propaganda. Despite protestations of their loyalty to Iraq, Iraqi Jews were increasingly subject to discrimination and anti-Jewish actions.

The article goes on to describe just how bad it got for the Jews of Iraq. And the Nazis had a huge influence on the Arabs of the Middle East, continuing to this day, although it’s certainly not the only influence. You can see that influence in our own Jew-hating crowds, which openly praise Hitler.

Remember the brownshirts?:

Its primary purposes were providing protection for Nazi rallies and assemblies, disrupting the meetings of opposing parties, fighting against the paramilitary units of the opposing parties … and intimidating Romani, trade unionists, and especially Jews.

We also have this sort of thing, as well as this lesser but still troubling phenomenon.

NOTE: The greatest danger to Jews in America these days comes from the left – in particular the university-educated homegrown left – as well as students and residents of Arab origin. I don’t think there’s much doubt about that; they speak openly of wanting Jews dead. However, there are some people on the right who hate the Jews’ guts as well, although their hatred takes a different form, and as far as I know they’re not demonstrating in the streets, nor do they like Hamas or what happened on October 7. At the moment, their Jew-hatred seems of a less lethal variety than that displayed by the left plus jihadi-supporting Muslims.

Here are just a few examples of the sort of thing I mean, however, from the right. I often see this sort of thing in blog comments on the right; these particular ones were posted at Instapundit in response to an article on the subject of the Jew-hatred in New York City:

When the Jews who vote D reflexively start loving their children more than they hate white rural Christian people (and stop considering white rural Christians to be subhumans) this mess will get sorted out right quick.

Another:

They still vote D, so they hate you more than they fear the Muzzies.

Still another:

Boo hoo.

You flooded this country with third worlders. Enjoy what you created.

The “you” meant by the commenter there is Jews in general.

The accusations are not just that Jews vote for Democrats (although of course all Jews don’t vote for Democrats, so far 2/3 tend to do so, although the great majority of religious Jews vote for Republicans). The claims are that Jews hate Christians and consider them subhuman, hate white people (Jew are racially protean, white when the left needs them to be and brown when the right needs them to be), and that Jews are extremely powerful and responsible for our open border policies.

Roundup

The New Neo Posted on by

(1) Has Joe Biden ever had a good idea? Of course, it’s hard to say these days which of his policies actually are Joe’s ideas. But the Gaza pier had his telltale fingerprints on it, the mark of sheer stupidity. Here’s the latest on the fiasco that is the pier, aka Joe’s Folly.

(2) Oakland is removing its traffic lights because thieves keep stealing components of them.

(3) The rules for the presidential debate have been set. I wonder whether RFK Jr. will somehow make it. I doubt that either Trump or Biden wants him there.

(4) I keep reading polls that say Trump is doing well. It’s somewhat encouraging, but I haven’t linked to them and don’t pay them much mind because I think the wild card is “rigging” and fraud.

(5) A NY Post editorial says: “it looks downright cruel to keep trotting Biden around under the pretense that he can possibly serve four more years in the world’s most grueling job.” I find the statement a bit cryptic: cruel to whom? Not to Trump, whose chances of winning are increased by Biden’s obvious decrepitude. Not to Jill, who clearly relishes the thought of four more years with all that power and all those perks. I think Joe himself is very happy about it, too, as is the rest of his family. I suppose it might be most cruel to the casual onlooker, who might feel sorry for Biden, but in particular to those Democrats who plan to vote for him but look on his decline with dismay.