I often use Wiki for reference, although I’m aware that it’s better for some things than for others. It’s pretty good on non-political topics, and some historical events. It’s an easy shortcut to getting the gist of a topic, and it’s mostly an amalgam of quotes from other sources, which can be found in the bibliography for each entry. For politicians, it’s especially handy for finding out birthdays and ages, and what years the person held certain offices.
But it has a decidedly leftist cast when it enters into any sort of editorializing on some of its entries, in particular modern-day pundits and politicians. In line with today’s earlier post featuring a James Lindsay video on Gramsci, I decided to look up Lindsay’s Wiki page. I’ve listened to many of Lindsay’s videos, and I ordinarily find them comprehensive and informative. Yes, he has a point of view, but it seems fairly grounded in reality and in line with my own observations. I wouldn’t doubt that he’s said a line or two with which I might disagree, but I don’t often hear anything like that from him.
And yet on Lindsay’s Wiki page he is discounted as a “conspiracy theorist” right in the very first sentence: “James Stephen Lindsay (born June 8, 1979, known professionally as James A. Lindsay), is an American author, cultural critic, mathematician and conspiracy theorist.” I guess it’s a case of nothing to see here; move along.
And what are his supposed conspiracy theories, according to the extremely objective folks at Wiki? Why, this sort of thing:
(1) “He is a proponent of the right-wing LGBT grooming conspiracy theory and has been credited as one of several public figures responsible for popularizing ‘groomer’ as a slur directed at LGBTQ educators and activists by members of the political right.”
I happen to have heard Lindsay expound on that, and I recall his explanation being that those who push early sex education in public schools go way beyond the sort of sex education that most people would support: the dangers of STDs and that sort of thing. Now, says Lindsay, they are getting very explicit about sex practices, encouraging children to talk about their own sexuality and to acknowledge their own sexual needs, and pushing hard on transgender ideology at younger and younger ages. Lindsay has explained that his use of the word “groomer” is not meant to accuse them of actively molesting young children, but to say that getting very young children accustomed to talking to strangers about sex is to “groom” them in ways that will make them more susceptible to actual molesters, and also to undermine whatever their parents might have to say on the subject.
Here’s a quote from Lindsay:
They are bringing up sexual topics with children, normalizing discussions of sex with children, telling children to hide it from their parents. These are all behaviors that if it was predatory pedophiles, we would immediately apply the word ‘groomer,’ but they’re doing it for cult purposes, using the same subjects….
The goal is to destabilize people. The goal is to destabilize these kids. It’s to make them unsure of their identity, to put them in a position where there’s going to be conflict with their family, where there’s going to be conflict with their faith. Many will withdraw from family and faith. And the reason that they’re using this technique is because they know it works…
Once those seeds of doubt are planted in a potential target, Lindsay said, the next step is to have them recite humiliating in-group creeds, such as stating their “preferred” personal pronouns or citing land acknowledgements, stating that the land Americans live on was stolen from Native Americans.
(2) According to Wiki, Linday supposedly said that if CRT goes much further there will be a genocide of white people. However, Wiki doesn’t provide the actual quote; it just mentions one of his critics – Claire Lehmann – and what she said about what Lindsay said. I believe I’ve located Lindsay’s quote, which is here:
I said that the Woke ideology contains the seed of a genocide. The evidence for that is actually overwhelming. Perhaps Claire doesn’t know what seeds are or how they work.
(3) Another example Wiki provides of Lindsay’s conspiracy theories is this:
Lindsay has promoted the far-right Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory, which alleges a concerted effort by Marxist critical theorists to infiltrate academic and cultural institutions in order to destroy Western civilization. The theory has been wholly rejected by mainstream scholars…
Why, that does it! The “mainstream scholars” – many of whom are probably on the left – have rejected it! So we should ignore the evidence right before our eyes, because of course it isn’t happening at all.
Wiki adds that this theory “has been characterized as antisemitic by the Southern Poverty Law Center and others.” So if that other bastion of objective analysis, the SPLC, has declared something to be antisemitic, that’s all ye need to know.
The sad thing is that, if I were to recommend Lindsay’s work to most people I know, and they looked Lindsay up, they would probably discount anything he said as being wild crazy conspiracy stuff. That’s the aim of a Wiki entry like that, and Lindsay is hardly alone. And the SPLC knows exactly what it’s doing to further the leftist line.