↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 1576 << 1 2 … 1,574 1,575 1,576 1,577 1,578 … 1,917 1,918 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

2010: the whiplash election

The New Neo Posted on November 3, 2010 by neoNovember 3, 2010

The results of this election represent a backlash against the machinations of President Obama and Congress. But it isn’t just backlash; it’s whiplash.

Whiplash in the medical sense is caused not just by a sudden wrenching movement, but by a one-two jerking: first violently in one direction, and then violently in the other: “the head snaps forward and then back again.”

Despite the fact that the Senate remains (barely) in Democratic hands, this election is being compared to other large and sudden transfers of power in Congress, such as occurred in 1994, 1948, and even 1894, which was the biggest change of all (see this and this if you want some of the details). I’m not an election history expert, but I wonder whether there have ever been two such dramatically opposed consecutive Congressional elections as 2008 and then 2010. That’s where the whiplash would come in.

In the double whammy of 2006 plus 2008, control went from the Republicans to the Democrats in a pretty conclusive repudiation of the earlier Bush congresses. But the pendulum has swung forcefully back again in only two years.

But as I mentioned in this post, the Republicans are only on probation. They seem to realize it, at least for now (as the Democrats did not in 2008-2010); Boehner’s victory speech reflected that knowledge in a subtle way; Rubio’s in a more obvious one.

And here are some words from one of my favorite voices from the past:

Posted in Politics | 8 Replies

Some post-election reflections

The New Neo Posted on November 3, 2010 by neoNovember 3, 2010

(1) It’s not enough for candidates to be conservative. They need to be good, as well. Surely such candidates can be found, but many of the Republican candidates who lost last night (especially in the senatorial races) were not among them.

(2) The rift between red and blue parts of the country—and within many states—seems more sharply differentiated than ever.

(3) This split is mirrored by a similar split in Congress, where the Republican and Democrat parties have grown more conservative and more liberal, respectively.

(4) It’s very difficult to flip a Senate from a 60-vote majority for one party to a majority for the other party in a single election.

(5) California, New York, and Massachusetts will remain strongly liberal enclaves for the foreseeable future. (One caveat: rule 1 above may at least partly apply here. Republican candidates in each state were not generally strong. For the House it was different—see Bielat vs. Frank—but despite some good Republican candidates in those contests, the liberals were barely threatened. New Jersey and Christie, Massachusetts and Brown—both seem to be the anomalies rather than evidence of a growing trend in strongly liberal states.)

(6) The emergence of Republican women and minorities is one of the many pleasures of this election.

(7) The flip of many state legislatures to Republican is one of the so far untold stories of this election.

(8) The Republicans have their work cut out for them. They are now, as many have said, on probation.

Posted in Politics | 35 Replies

Reid wins

The New Neo Posted on November 3, 2010 by neoNovember 3, 2010

Just heard it on Fox; can’t find a decent link as yet.

This is bad news. He retains his seat, and probably the Majority Leader position, too.

Chuck Schumer may be sad about it, though. No Majority Leader spot for him.

Other random good news:

The margin of Rubio’s victory. Rubio gets it:

We make a great mistake if we believe that tonight these results are somehow an embrace of the Republican party,” Rubio told supporters at a rally, referring to his and other GOP wins around the country. “What they are is a second chance, a second chance for Republicans to be what they said they were going to be not so long ago.”

Allen West.

Kirk in Illinois. An especially sweet pickup.

Buh-bye, Grayson.

Buck of Colorado, who was behind a little while ago, seems to have pulled ahead.

Posted in Politics | 32 Replies

It’s still election night

The New Neo Posted on November 3, 2010 by neoNovember 3, 2010

Well, I’m back at my computer. Not a moment too soon. I’m writing this very quickly; apologies if it’s kind of sketchy.

Expectations were so high that reality couldn’t quite match it (particularly upset at how badly my guy Bielat did against Barney Frank).

On the other hand, it’s still pretty darn good. Most of the races have gone as expected so far, and it looks as though the accepted wisdom—Republicans control the House, Democrats retain slight majority in the Senate—may be exactly the way it goes down.

I haven’t had time to really think hard about it, but my first impression is that many of the blue states that went red tonight were blue collar blue states—Ohio and Pennsylvania, for example, as well as Illinois. Non-blue-collar blue states such as Massachusetts remain every bit as blue as ever (Scott Brown the lone island of red), and my prediction is that California will remain true blue as well, when all the returns are in.

This indicates to me that Democrats who switched were paying attention almost entirely to the economy, in particular their own jobs, rather than some permanent switch to a more conservative way of thinking. And many of the Republicans and Independents who flirted with the idea of Obama as moderate, healing force have learned their lesson.

The governorships are going strongly Republican, but that’s not a surprise, either. Governorships tend to be slightly more conservative in general (even Massachusetts has had the odd Republican governor, as have New York and California). This year, with its enormous fiscal challenges, people want to try some belt-tightening at the state level.

Posted in Politics | 11 Replies

It’s Election Day!

The New Neo Posted on November 2, 2010 by neoNovember 2, 2010

Well, it all comes down to today.

I’m going to be especially busy during the day and early this evening, although I plan to be back at my trusty computer by the time things really get going later tonight. But just in case I’m late to the party, here’s a thread for you to talk about it all.

vote.jpg

Yes, vote. Please. Not that any of you would fail to do so.

Posted in Politics | 89 Replies

What I used to think of Republicans

The New Neo Posted on November 2, 2010 by neoNovember 2, 2010

Here’s Bookworm, writing a month ago in response to a question about what she used to believe about Republicans:

He was curious as to what I believed.

My answer was a simple one: “When I was a college Democrat, I believed that Republicans are evil people who hate blacks, children and poor people, who want to force everyone to convert to Christianity, and who want to weaponize America to take over the world.” In other words, my understanding of my ideology was simply that I, as a Democrat, existed to thwart evil Republicans. By voting straight down the “D” column on my ballot, I was protecting blacks, children and poor people, and keeping the proselytizers from my state house.

I believed all of this absolutely. I was unconcerned about more sophisticated issues of limited government; the moral rot of welfare; the economic damage wrought by government’s heavy hand in the marketplace; the genuine threat totalitarianism posed to world stability and American security; the danger of allowing government to pick winners and losers amongst its own citizens through taxation, spending, legislation and police action; etc.

All I knew was that Republicans were evil, and I was not evil. They hated people, and I wanted people to do well. Whatever they were for, I was against it.

Bookworm, of course, has since changed her point of view. But the question interested me: what did I used to think about Republicans? I’m older than Bookworm, and so not only do I have to think back further to come up with my childhood and young-adulthood memories, but the memories are of a different era, before liberalism had quite taken over so forcefully in the school system.

I never could have believed that Republicans hated blacks, for example, because I had personal memories of the 50s and very early 60s in the South, and I knew that it was Democrats who had stood in the way of civil rights there. Who could forget Orville Faubus or George Wallace? And who didn’t know they were Democrats? It was almost unavoidable to be aware of that, if you followed politics at all. So revisionist history about noble Democrats and racist Republicans could not touch me.

Likewise, I had been a child during the lengthy (seemingly interminable, at the time) presidency of Dwight Eisenhower, a Republican. His election campaign slogan was “I Like Ike,” and everybody did. It was nearly impossible to dislike him, or think of him as evil, even if you were a liberal Democrat, as were my “All the Way With Adlai” parents. He was a war hero, for starters. And he seemed a genial, non-extreme sort of president.

What’s more, I grew up in a part of New York that had a fair number of Republicans (for New York, anyway), and I knew some of them. They were just—well, they were just people. So there was really never any chance of demonizing Republicans in general. Maybe the John Birchers, whoever they were.

I also watched the decidedly odd Bill Buckley on TV and had to admit he was an intelligent sort, and humorous, too. It’s true that when Barry Goldwater conservatives started to take charge of the Republican Party it was a new breed of cat, and one with whom I disagreed at the time (I was still pretty young). But I never thought he wasn’t motivated by a sincere belief in what he was advocating, nor did I think he hated anybody.

At worst, I thought he—and other conservatives—just didn’t care all that much about poor people. I thought the worst they were was selfish and perhaps mean, rather than evil. But that was “mean” in the way of tough, hard parents who wanted their children to struggle and learn things on their own. As a child, I had no sympathy with that—I wanted things done for me! I wanted to be coddled! But at least I understood that it could be motivated by what we would now call tough love, rather than hatred.

Maybe I’m whitewashing the past. Maybe I was more intolerant and narrow-minded than I care to remember. But I don’t think so. Half the time I hadn’t a clue what party my friends belonged to, and didn’t care; we simply didn’t talk politics as a rule. In fact, I distinctly recall that when Clinton was running, I was very surprised to be part of a group conversation among about ten of my friends and to learn that all of them were Clinton supporters and Democrats. Until then, I’d had no idea.

Never such innocence again.

Posted in Liberals and conservatives; left and right | 22 Replies

Spambot of the day

The New Neo Posted on November 1, 2010 by neoNovember 1, 2010

Hyperbolic spambot:

This post is so amazing, I almost spontaneously conceived a child just from reading it. Just incredible.

Posted in Blogging and bloggers | 10 Replies

Pre-election excitement?

The New Neo Posted on November 1, 2010 by neoNovember 1, 2010

So, it’s come down to this: one more day till the election.

Are you excited, nervous, cocky, or blase? Or perhaps some combination? Here’s a thread to discuss it all.

I briefly listened to some of the cable stations this morning and it seems it’s nothing but election, election, election and polls, polls, polls. As a politics wonk, I must say I find it fascinating, although a decade ago it would have been something of a yawn to me. Mid-term elections? Whoever paid attention to those? Not this baby.

Here’s just a small roundup of pieces I find of special interest:

All of a sudden, this poll shows Miller of Alaska ahead. I have no idea whether this means anything or not.

Nate Silver has a lot to say. And for those who are detail-oriented, he crunches the numbers here.

At Politico, Alexander Burns wonders what the final score will be. As does just about everyone, although Democratic pollster Dave Beattie has tried to be philosophical: “”˜It sucks…I’m resigned to the fact that it sucks.”

It bears repeating, though: don’t assume anything. Get out there and vote!!

Posted in Politics | 84 Replies

When Reagan was a neocon

The New Neo Posted on November 1, 2010 by neoNovember 1, 2010

What would Reagan say about the dilemmas facing us today? Actually, we kinda know what Reagan would say, because he kinda said it already.

I was listening for the first time to a well-known speech Reagan gave back in Goldwater times (to a particularly bookish group, or was this before contact lenses became popular? Note how many people in the audience are wearing glasses as compared to today. And of course, they’re all white! Racist Tea Partiers!!!)

The following quotes from Reagan’s speech have only become more relevant with the passage of over fifty years:

“The more the plans fail the more the planners plan.”

“The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they’re ignorant, it’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.”

And note also, starting around 13:35, his remarks on opposition claims about Social Security—very familiar to those who’ve followed the shifting “It’s a tax! No, it’s a fine!” argument about the individual HCR mandate.

Ah, what a dunce.

[HAT TIP: commenter “texexec”]

Posted in Historical figures, Liberals and conservatives; left and right | 23 Replies

Juan Williams, the process of political change, and breaking the liberal trance

The New Neo Posted on October 30, 2010 by neoOctober 30, 2010

Thomas Lifson at American Thinker reflects on Juan Williams and the ideological journey he might be beginning as a result of his NPR firing.

A great deal of this is familiar to me; political change, especially from left to right, is one of the themes of this blog, and the reason I started writing it in the first place. As a changer himself (boy, there are a lot of us), Lifson has some cogent thoughts to add. He also coins a phrase I hadn’t heard before, but which I think is especially apt: the liberal trance.

Juan Williams has been delivered the sort of shock which can cause him to reevaluate the lifelong assumptions of a comfortable liberal. Last night, guest-hosting “The O’Reilly Factor,” he admitted that his assumption that the left was the home of open-mindedness had been wrong.

Having made the journey from liberalism to full-throated conservatism myself, I recognize the importance of this particular revelation. It is the key to opening a mind to rethinking other assumptions about politics. It breaks the trance, so to speak, which keeps many otherwise thoughtful, intelligent, caring people enmeshed in the delusions of modern American liberalism. To these liberals, membership in the cadre of caring, enlightened, public-spirited Americans defines what it means to be a good and responsible member of the civic community.

The overwhelming focus on caricaturing and demonizing conservatives as racist ignoramuses is based on a pragmatic understanding of the importance of maintaining this trance. Because liberal ideas manifestly fail when implemented, the liberal trance is the only way to maintain the allegiance of intelligent liberals to the cause. This is why academia, media, and other liberal hotbeds are so intolerant of conservatives. They fear that real and prolonged exposure to the vibrancy and humanity of modern American conservatism will bleed away the most thoughtful liberals from the cause.

Fascinating stuff. But I disagree with Lifson on that last point; I don’t think they fear it at all. They can barely even conceive of it, and their contempt for those apostates who manage to stop dancing in the liberal circle is very real and not feigned. They don’t consider them the most thoughtful ones; they consider them the most evil ones.

Also, I had a very different experience than Williams in terms of this type of disillusionment. I had gone through most of my transition over a period of about two years, in privacy—through reading and thinking and not discussing it with much of anyone. It was only later that I thought to voice any of my ideas to friends, and the angry and intolerant reaction of many profoundly shocked me. But that wasn’t the beginning for me; it was near the end of the transition—the poisoned icing on the cake, as it were.

[HAT TIP: commenter “kcom.”]

Posted in Leaving the circle: political apostasy, Political changers, Press | 117 Replies

It’s Candy Corn Day: how will you celebrate?

The New Neo Posted on October 30, 2010 by neoOctober 30, 2010

[NOTE: This is a slightly-edited repost of a previous article.]

No doubt you readers, being unusually well-informed people, were already aware that today is National Candy Corn Day.

But did you know it is estimated that in this country twenty million pounds of the classic treat (invented in the 1880s) are sold every year? I personally might be responsible for approximately a ton of that if I gave in to my worst impulses. However, I try to keep my addiction in tightly-controlled check.

It is part of my penance to confess here that I really like the stuff and always have. Once I even went to a Halloween party dressed as a piece of candy corn, and I was already a grownup.

Apparently I am not the only adult who has done so. And no, I didn’t look like this—more’s the pity (although to be technical, isn’t she dressed as two pieces of candy corn, the body and the hat?):

candycorncostume.gif

I am not alone in my shameful liking for the tricolored tooth-destroyer. I heard on Fox News (can’t give a link here because I was unable to find the information online) that candy corn is the Halloween treat most often stolen by parents from their kids’ Halloween stash. The craving is a guilty, shameful secret for most, but I am glad this affliction is finally seeing the light of day.

Even some fanatically health-consciously vegans seem to crave candy corn although alas, the treat is off-limits to them because of its animal-related ingredients. Animal ingredients? If you doubt my words, just take a look:

Sugar, Corn Syrup, Salt, Honey, Soy Protein, Gelatin, Confectioner’s Glaze, Dextrose, Artificial Flavor, Titanium Dioxide Color, Artificial Colors (Yellow 6, Yellow 5, Red 3, Blue 1)

Gelatin and honey must be the big no-nos. But happily, a thoughtful vegan (are there any other kind?) mother has come to the rescue with a recipe for candy corn so complex and labor-intensive that it undoubtedly reflects a devotion to the stuff even more intense than mine. Try it if you dare—and if you are insane.

There are various gourmet variations on candy corn, and I’ve sampled quite a few in my day. To my mind they can’t compare to good old Brach’s. But after watching the following highly informative video, I may just try some Goelitz:

And here’s a burning question I was reminded of on watching the video: do you eat your candy corn in sections? And, if so, do you consider the top to be the yellow part or the white part? I’ve always seen the little white triangle as the “foot” of the candy corn, but I learned when I designed my costume years ago that most people see it the other way. For those who might be inclined to disagree with me and join my critics, I offer the following exhibit from the realm of science:

corn-components.jpg

Happy eating. And oh—I’m done with candy corn this year. I think.

Posted in Uncategorized | 16 Replies

Obama the radical-in-chief

The New Neo Posted on October 29, 2010 by neoOctober 29, 2010

To those who haven’t done their homework, it sounds like just another crackpot conspiracy theory. But Stanley Kurtz has done his, and his new book Radical-in-Chief: Barack Obama and the Untold Story of American Socialism is the result.

Kurst is interviewed by National Review’s Kathryn Jean Lopez on the subject. Here’s an excerpt [emphasis mine]:

LOPEZ: You wrote, “When I began my post-campaign research for this book, my inclination was to downplay or dismiss evidence of explicit socialism in Obama’s background. I thought the socialism issue was an unprovable and unnecessary distraction from the broader question of Obama’s ultra-liberal inclinations. I was wrong. Evidence that suggests Obama is a socialist, I am now convinced, is real, important, and profoundly relevant to the present.” Explain.

KURTZ: It takes a whole book to explicate that statement. But to be brief, when I first found programs from the Socialist Scholars Conferences Obama attended in New York in the 1980s, I saw a number of people who were later part of his political circle. I was particularly struck by the name James Cone, who was Jeremiah Wright’s theological mentor and the founder of black liberation theology. There were other talks on black liberation theology at those conferences as well. That meant Obama would very likely have known about Wright’s theology even before he met Wright, and would have recognized its socialist content. Following this trail, I discovered that many of Obama’s organizing mentors and colleagues in Chicago were prominent socialists, with ties to the group that had sponsored those early socialist conferences. The policy preferences, tactics, and strategies of these socialist organizers are recognizable in the administration’s conduct today. In fact, the Obama administration continues to coordinate its grassroots support through many of the same socialist organizers he worked with in previous years.

One of the points that comes out quite strongly in the article is that Obama, in concealing his socialist past and present, has purposely deceived the American people.

Is Kurtz correct? I haven’t read the book. But from the evidence I have pieced together myself, I believe it is very likely to be true—and I’ve never been much of a conspiracist.

Posted in Obama | 61 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Cicero on The AfD does very well in the recent German elections in Saxony-Anhalt
  • Art Deco on The AfD does very well in the recent German elections in Saxony-Anhalt
  • AesopFan on A restrained AI spam comment
  • SHIREHOME on The AfD does very well in the recent German elections in Saxony-Anhalt
  • huxley on A restrained AI spam comment

Recent Posts

  • The AfD does very well in the recent German elections in Saxony-Anhalt
  • Happy Labor Day
  • Open thread 9/7/2026
  • A restrained AI spam comment
  • A lost skill

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (328)
  • Afghanistan (98)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (164)
  • Best of neo-neocon (91)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (595)
  • Dance (292)
  • Disaster (244)
  • Education (323)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (566)
  • Election 2018 (33)
  • Election 2020 (513)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (93)
  • Election 2028 (13)
  • Evil (129)
  • Fashion and beauty (324)
  • Finance and economics (1,042)
  • Food (317)
  • Friendship (48)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (734)
  • Health (1,161)
  • Health care reform (545)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (337)
  • History (716)
  • Immigration (448)
  • Iran (464)
  • Iraq (227)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (821)
  • Jews (437)
  • Language and grammar (365)
  • Latin America (212)
  • Law (2,975)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (124)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,321)
  • Liberty (1,117)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (394)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,498)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (929)
  • Middle East (384)
  • Military (324)
  • Movies (353)
  • Music (533)
  • Nature (261)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (183)
  • Obama (1,738)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (131)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,043)
  • Poetry (258)
  • Political changers (178)
  • Politics (2,793)
  • Pop culture (397)
  • Press (1,635)
  • Race and racism (882)
  • Religion (428)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (641)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (971)
  • Theater and TV (266)
  • Therapy (71)
  • Trump (1,630)
  • Uncategorized (4,555)
  • Vietnam (109)
  • Violence (1,445)
  • War and Peace (1,027)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑