↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 1570 << 1 2 … 1,568 1,569 1,570 1,571 1,572 … 1,880 1,881 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Obama and the individual mandate: tax, or no tax?

The New Neo Posted on June 18, 2010 by neoJune 18, 2010

it’s a little challenging to follow all the twisting and turnings, but let’s give it a go.

One of Obama’s most oft-repeated campaign pledges was that he would not raise taxes on anyone but the rich (defined variously, but usually as income over $250 K).

He also excoriated Hillary during the campaign for including an individual mandate in her HCR proposals.

Then, when the Congressional HCR bill included an individual mandate to buy health insurance because otherwise it would be grossly underfunded, he argued that it didn’t involve a tax at all, merely a penalty.

Now, because some states have begun lawsuits against the federal government’s HCR law, the Obama administration is arguing that such suits are unconstitutional because—why, because they violate “the Anti-Injunction Act, which restricts courts from interfering with the government’s ability to collect taxes.” The administration is arguing that it’s actually just like a tax, don’t you see, because it is “assessed and collected in the same manner” as taxes, by the IRS.

Kinda makes your head spin, doesn’t it?

Posted in Health care reform, Law, Obama | 18 Replies

Jindal, the Coast Guard, and the barges: government efficiency at its finest

The New Neo Posted on June 18, 2010 by neoJune 18, 2010

President Obama famously said he can’t personally fix the oil spill by sucking it up with a straw.

But when the oil-sucking barges that Bobby Jindal had ordered to do just that (minus the straws) arrived and got to work, they were stopped by the feds and now sit idle, waiting, on this—the 60th day since the oil spill occurred:

Sixteen barges sat stationary today, although they were sucking up thousands of gallons of BP’s oil as recently as Tuesday. Workers in hazmat suits and gas masks pumped the oil out of the Louisiana waters and into steel tanks. It was a homegrown idea that seemed to be effective at collecting the thick gunk.

“These barges work. You’ve seen them work. You’ve seen them suck oil out of the water,” said Jindal.

So why stop now?…

But the Coast Guard ordered the stoppage because of reasons that Jindal found frustrating. The Coast Guard needed to confirm that there were fire extinguishers and life vests on board, and then it had trouble contacting the people who built the barges.

I’m all for safety, and if life vests are required, fine. But have these people never heard of emergencies? Or the concept of expediting matters? Color me confused, but it seems it should be possible for the Coast Guard to board a ship and inspect it to see whether these things are there or not. And it doesn’t seem as though it would take all that long to do so.

It would almost be comical if it weren’t so serious. And anyone who knows anything about government and the way it operates knows that this sort of “efficiency” is what we will get in all areas into which the government manages to insert its graspy, tangled tendrils.

President Obama’s comment about not being able to suck it up with a straw has gotten a lot of coverage. But how many people are aware of what he said immediately afterwards?:

All I can do is make sure that I put honest, hard-working smart people in place … to implement this thing.

Honest, hard-working, and smart—sounds good. How about adding “efficient and full of common sense?” While we’re at it, let’s throw in “creative in their ability to come up innovative solutions?” And “willing and able to cut through needless red tape?”

Or am I asking too much?

Posted in Politics | 41 Replies

The wheels of justice grind slow…

The New Neo Posted on June 18, 2010 by neoJune 18, 2010

…but they grind exceedingly fine.

[NOTE: See this for a previous post of mine on the subject.]

Posted in Law, Violence | 7 Replies

Olbermann leaves Kos

The New Neo Posted on June 17, 2010 by neoJune 17, 2010

Keith Olbermann, criticized at Kos for his rare putdown of Obama the other night, takes his ball and goes home.

What’s the big surprise—did he fail to study his French Revolutionary history?

Posted in Leaving the circle: political apostasy, Press | 17 Replies

Sarah Jessica Parker’s shoes: the sequel

The New Neo Posted on June 17, 2010 by neoJune 17, 2010

The Manolo, he has spoken.

And he has a lot more to say on the subject than I did:

The second, and more perplexing matter, is the Charlotte Olypmia platform pumps, of which the Manolo’s friends have inquired “How? Why?”

The problem is that unless you are the Japanese Lolita Princess Fairy, you cannot credibly mix these outrageous shoes with anything that is itself outrageous. If these shoes are to be worn you must first be absolutely certain you can walk in them (which if anyone can walk in these it is the Sarah Jessica Parker) and secondly, they can only be paired with something that allows them to be the focus of the total outfit.

The Manolo would have advised the SJP against the dress, as lovely as it is. However, if she were intent on wearing the dress, the Manolo would have softened the makeup, put the hair down, removed the belt, ditched the necklace, and changed the shoes for something elegant and minimalistic, something that would be the next thing to barefeetedness, for this dress is adornment enough.

Of the course, the problem is that we are no longer in the era of elegant and minimalistic shoes. In the stead, now we are in the era of fantastical and expressive shoes-as-art-and-armor, heavy shoes with greaves and metal plates. While this is perhaps somewhat satisfying for the Manolo, such shoes preclude certain ornate dresses from being worn in seriousness.

More simply put, you cannot mix statement shoes with statement dresses.

I may have taken some wrong turnings in my life, but I am proud and relieved to say that I have never committed the faux pas of mixing statement shoes with statement dresses. In fact, I’ve probably never even worn either, although I’m not completely clear on the parameters of the genres.

Posted in Uncategorized | 18 Replies

BP’s “small people”

The New Neo Posted on June 17, 2010 by neoJune 17, 2010

As if the public’s anger at BP wasn’t already strong enough, the company’s chairman, Carl-Henric Svanberg, put his foot into another pile of steaming doo-doo when he said:

[Obama’s] frustrated because he cares about the small people, and we care about the small people. I hear comments that sometimes large oil companies are greedy companies that don’t care. But that is not the case with BP. We care about the small people.

But ordinary Americans don’t like being called “small people”—as opposed to what, giants like Obama and Svanberg and Hayward?

Of course, Svanberg can’t be expected to know that. He’s a European (Swedish), and Europeans (and, I suspect, Obama, who has a European sensibility) really do think in those noblesse oblige terms. Svanberg may speak English, but he doesn’t speak American, and he let slip a Europeanism. That part of the world has traditionally been, and still is, far more hierarchical and class-ridden than we in this country.

When I heard the phrase, I recalled that the book They Thought They Were Free, by Milton Mayer (I’ve written at length about the work before, here and here) featured a discussion of a similar expression (“little men”) common in post-WWII Germany. I think it’s of some interest:

These ten men [whom Mayer interviewed in Germany after WWII] were “little men”…And when I say “little men,” I mean not only the men for whom the mass media and the campaign speeches are everywhere designed but, specifically in sharply stratified societies like Germany, the men who think of themselves in that way. Every one of my ten Nazi friends…spoke again and again during our discussions of “wir kleine Leute, we little people.”

This self-consciousness is nonexistent—or repressed—in America. European students of our culture have all cited our egalitarianism as an affectation and an expensive one, producing a national leadership indistinguishable from its constituency. If everybody is little, nobody is little. But the rise of National Socialism involved both the elitist and servile impulses. When “big men,” Hindenburgs, Neuraths, Schachts, and even Hohenzollerns, accepted Nazism, little men had good and sufficient reason to accept it…

Foreigners speaking of the “National Socialist Party” miss the point, said the younger Schwenke [one of Mayer’s German interviewees]; it was the National Socialist German Workers Party, “the party of the little men like me. The only other was the Communist.” Emperor and Fuhrer both
required the consciousness of littleness in the Germans, but Fuhrer, bringing bigness down, lifted littleness up.

No man—or woman—is little in America, although we may feel that way sometimes.

.

Posted in Historical figures, Liberty | 25 Replies

Chris Christie, the un-Obama

The New Neo Posted on June 17, 2010 by neoJune 17, 2010

It’s so refreshing to hear this guy speak:

Christie has a quality rare in politicians, that of a smart guy telling the truth and speaking from the heart. It’s a quality many thought they saw in Barack Obama, but from the first I was puzzled by that reaction to him.

Christie is a guy who seemingly came out of nowhere to score his stunning upset as New Jersey’s first Republican to hold any statewide office in the last twelve years. With Christie, what you see is (apparently) what you get, a half-Italian half-Irish lawyer who is New Jersey born and bred, speaking in the familiar cadences of his home state, and telling it as he sees it.

Without a teleprompter.

Posted in People of interest | 19 Replies

Hanson: Gulf War III

The New Neo Posted on June 17, 2010 by neoJune 17, 2010

If you read just one article on Obama and the oil spill and the current state of his presidency, let it be this one by Victor Davis Hanson.

Posted in Obama | 9 Replies

How hard can it be to be a competent president?

The New Neo Posted on June 16, 2010 by neoJune 16, 2010

I think the left is finally realizing that the answer is: very.

Their hatred and contempt for George Bush made them actually believe that he was every bit as stupid as they said he was. A village in Texas was missing its idiot, to be sure.

So it couldn’t be hard to improve handily on what he’d done as president. And what better person to do so than the smart, articulate, liberal candidate Obama? No experience necessary.

Well, as things have turned out, they are starting to learn that it’s not that simple. Obama’s handling of the oil spill is making Bush’s Katrina response look good, much to their anger and chagrin.

And it doesn’t even matter if his true goal is a Cloward-Piven magnification of the crisis so that he can sweep in with a leftist solution. That’s what he may have been outlining in his address last night. But it seems that, at least so far, he’s been incompetent at that, too—letting the crisis going on for too long, tipping his hand, and alarming the American people, including those useful idiots on the left who aren’t in on the hidden agenda.

Posted in Liberals and conservatives; left and right, Obama | 67 Replies

Another change story: sports, politics, and life

The New Neo Posted on June 16, 2010 by neoJune 17, 2010

Here’s the story of a man whose political change was sparked by a kids’ basketball game, of all things.

Roland Toy ran up against a group of liberal parents who wanted to protect their fourth-graders from the pain and struggle of a championship game—the thrill (and bragging rights) of victory, as well as the agony of defeat:

Surely we could all agree that the real reason for the competition was to teach the boys cooperation and sportsmanship. Playing the game would mean one of the teams would lose, which would lead the winning team to “bragging rights in the schoolyard.” And that would not be healthy. It would undermine the real lessons to be learned about self-esteem and mutual respect.

This was a turning point for the author of the piece, who realized that the divisions were ultimately political, and that he—a lifelong Democrat—was on the conservative side of this one.

I had a somewhat related although very different experience when my son was young and playing Little League. The community in which I lived back then was unlike Toy’s. Oh, lip service was paid to the Little League idea of fostering self-esteem: coaches were required to let every player into the game for at least two innings and one at-bat, however lousy his skills. In practical terms, however, that meant that a great many players sat on the bench most of the time, in the hot sun or the frigid cold (game weather always seemed to alternate between these two extremes), during the many long hours that constituted the seemingly-interminable Little League games.

In my town (unlike Toy’s), kids’ sports were hugely competitive and the PC contingent was small or nonexistent. It was the sort of place where parents sometimes ended up arguing in the stands about a bad call, or yelling at their kids—or even on occasion slugging it out with each other or the ump, although fortunately I never actually witnessed the latter.

My son was a decent enough player—fair to middling, neither a star nor a goat. Most coaches allowed him to play somewhat more than the two requisite innings. But he was not one of those players who always got to play entire games, although on a good day it could happen.

Things went along just fine until one year he came across a coach I’ll call Mr. Martin (the coaches in our town were always “Mister,” never addressed by first names). Mr. Martin was a volunteer, like all the coaches, and like the rest he had his strong habits and opinions and was not to be crossed.

His son was on the team. His son’s friends were well-represented there, too, and Mr. Martin favored them mightily. No matter what their skills—and some of them were very poor players indeed—Mr. Martin let his son and his son’s friends play for the entire game, every game.

Those who were not of the inner circle—and my son was not—got short shrift from Mr. Martin. He only allowed them to play the minimal two innings, game after game after game (and believe me, there are a lot of games in Little League), no matter how well they might be performing during those two innings.

It was hard on my son. But baseball rules were baseball rules, and we knew from experience that a coach’s decisions were law with no appeal, as long as he followed the Little League rules (our son recoiled in horror at even the idea of our talking to the coach about it, anyway). Sometimes our son said he wanted to quit, and my husband and I were placed in the position of counseling him.

Although our strongest instincts were to protect him (our baby! out in the cold cruel world!) we decided it was far better that he stay in the league and finish the year if he could possibly stand it. We gave him pep talks about Life and Hard Knocks and Learning From Adversity and all those cliches that actually have meaning, and then we gritted our teeth and sat in the stands and watched all the games. Each time he was pulled out after two innings, he’d grit his teeth and look away from where he knew we were sitting, and we’d try to keep our heartrates down below the rapid pace to which they’d suddenly shot up in anger and frustration.

I remember the worst game of all. My son’s team was behind, and even the most solid members didn’t seem to be able to do much of anything with their at-bats. My son, however, had managed to get a very solid hit—an earned double—in his very first at-bat, and then to successfully steal third in a gutsy move, although he remained stranded there at the end of the inning. He had some nice fielding moments, too, and I thought that this time the coach would have to leave him in. After all, he was the only thing going on offensively and defensively for the team that day.

It seemed I was correct, because when it came near the time for his second at-bat (and third inning!), he strode to the on-deck circle and took a few practice swings. Then, when the player ahead of him struck out, he approached the plate.

Mr. Martin, who’d been engaged till then in studying the clipboard on his lap, suddenly looked up and saw my son. The coach quickly stood and waved at him with a frantic come–over-here hand motion, as he yelled my son’s name and yelled “You, out!”

Another kid trotted in to replace him. I could feel my son’s fury as he walked, silent and contained, to the dugout (not really a dugout, of course, but a bench behind a protective wire fence). As for me, I simply could not sit still; I jumped up, climbed down from the stands, and began to pace in back of them, nearly hyperventilating in my own rage and frustration. I found that I could not look, and for the very first (and only) time, I left the game and drove home without staying till the bitter end.

My son, on the other hand, sat there for the whole thing; he had to. I’m not sure what sustained him—perhaps the knowledge that if he left he’d be known as a quitter. When the three of us assembled at home (my brave husband had managed to stay, as well), we all agreed that our son would stick out the season. Which he did.

I bowed to no one in my desire to protect my child. But he was growing up, and I knew I had to try to prepare him for the world as it is, with all of its disappointments, not the world as I might wish it to be. Unfair Little League coaches were a piece of cake compared to some of the things that could happen out there, and there was no way to protect him. All I could do was love him, support him, and try to make him strong—stronger and better than I was. Isn’t that what every parent wants?

Posted in Baseball and sports, Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe, Me, myself, and I, Political changers | 37 Replies

Watch the rats leave the sinking ship: Olbermann, et al, on the President’s oil spill speech

The New Neo Posted on June 16, 2010 by neoJune 16, 2010

Please watch this video response to the president’s oil spill speech. I believe that commenter “chemman” at Hot Air has summed it up best:

I think a rogue worm-hole momentarily transported us to an alternate reality.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

.
The only thing that surprises me about the reaction of these formerly Obama-enthralled pundits to Obama’s speech is their vehemence, the naked frustration with which they spit out their rapidfire words of frustration. As I wrote a while back in my PJ piece on the subject, Obama’s handling of the oil spill may represent a watershed for his formerly adoring press:

…[D]isappointment and bitterness and even embarrassment are starting to set in [with the MSM], much of it coalescing around Obama’s performance regarding the oil spill. This particular event has presented the left with a highly visible crisis concerning an issue that means a great deal to them ”” energy and the environment ”” and on which Obama was supposed to lead in a manner completely different from his predecessor Bush.

Did I say “lead”? That’s exactly what Obama has not done, and the left and the press are shocked and stunned…[E]ven the left and Obama’s supporters in the press seem to realize that Obama has come to own the oil spill, and that there has been something really, really wrong with his reaction to it.

That “something” is hard to describe. But it is more character than policy-driven, and more of an absence than a presence. Obama’s supporters were always attracted more to personality traits they saw (or imagined) in Obama than in his actions or his thin resume. And now it is once again personality traits that are the main focus, although this time as a problem: Obama is seen as strangely passive and passionless, tongue-tied and stalled.

How bad an executive and leader Obama has shown himself to be has genuinely surprised the left and the MSM, although neither failing should have been a surprise at all. But as a result the press is now caught in a trap of its own making…

If Olbermann and Matthews and the rest are taking pot shots at Obama now, it is not only because they are angry with him for not being what they thought he was, but because they are desperately attempting to save their own reputations—or whatever tattered shreds may remain of them.

But I’m with commenter “RalphyBoy,” who writes:

They are admitting [Obama’s] a world class boob”¦ Where the hell is our apology? I want some serious, dead serious, friggin ole time begging and gnashing of teeth groveling from these turds. Otherwise, Obama is only one really well written, and teleprompt-orated speech away from being the man of their dreams”¦ again.
–
Nothing less than total admission of their own idiocy and culpability in the fraud that has been perpetrated on our great country will do. They are still preaching from a perch that puts them in a special place of separation from and above their part in this calamity.

[ADDENDUM: Rachel Maddow and Ezra Klein are not happy campers, either.]

Posted in Obama, Press | 57 Replies

Al’s affair?

The New Neo Posted on June 15, 2010 by neoJuly 30, 2010

Now that Al and Tipper have split, the inevitable rumor of an affair is going round.

But the most interesting thing to me is not the possibility of Al’s cheating. I’ve learned that a person who ends a long-term marriage usually crowbars out of it with an affair, or their spouse does. Very few decide to just up and leave in a vacuum; the force of habit and connection is usually too strong.

It’s a little more interesting to me that, if an Al Gore affair has occurred, it appears to have been with Laurie David, Larry David’s supposedly-already-cheating (with the caretaker of their estate) ex-wife. She’s as dedicated an environmentalist as Gore, and that’s saying something—although, like Gore, she also has a huge carbon footprint. In addition, she’s a sometime blogger at Huffington Post (I’d love to see headlines that read “Gore rumored to have affair with blogger,” but alas, I doubt we will).

The most interesting thing to me about the reports in Star, however, is the following statement about the entire episode, allegedly made by an “unnamed insider”:

Al and Laurie went from friends to lovers…It couldn’t be avoided.”

Really? Was no free will involved? I know that Al Gore has a certain density, but surely his gravitational pull is not that powerful.

[ADDENDUM: Laurie David denies any such thing:

“It’s a total fabrication. I adore both Al and Tipper. I look at them both as family. And I have happily been in a serious relationship since my divorce.”

A serious relationship—is there any other kind?

But whatever may or may not be going on between Ms. David and Al Gore, isn’t she bending the truth a mite already when she uses the phrase “since my divorce?” Her affair is supposed to have broken up the Davids’s marriage.

And this is pretty funny, in a sad way.

(Hat tip: Ann Althouse).]

Posted in Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex, People of interest, Theater and TV | 16 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • sdferr on New facts about the Correspondents’ Dinner shooter, but gaps remain
  • om on New facts about the Correspondents’ Dinner shooter, but gaps remain
  • Mike Plaiss on On portraying Mrs. Danvers
  • Niketas Choniates on New facts about the Correspondents’ Dinner shooter, but gaps remain
  • Betsybounds on On portraying Mrs. Danvers

Recent Posts

  • On portraying Mrs. Danvers
  • The Kentucky Derby …
  • Tucker Carlson’s apology for having supported Trump
  • Did the press get a wake-up call at the Correspondents’ Dinner?
  • Why doesn’t the left care about the Iranian protesters who were slaughtered by the mullahs?

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (319)
  • Afghanistan (97)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (162)
  • Best of neo-neocon (90)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (583)
  • Dance (287)
  • Disaster (239)
  • Education (319)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (565)
  • Election 2018 (32)
  • Election 2020 (511)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (24)
  • Election 2028 (5)
  • Evil (127)
  • Fashion and beauty (323)
  • Finance and economics (1,014)
  • Food (316)
  • Friendship (47)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (728)
  • Health (1,137)
  • Health care reform (545)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (331)
  • History (700)
  • Immigration (432)
  • Iran (437)
  • Iraq (224)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (796)
  • Jews (422)
  • Language and grammar (360)
  • Latin America (203)
  • Law (2,913)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (124)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,283)
  • Liberty (1,102)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (388)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,475)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (910)
  • Middle East (381)
  • Military (318)
  • Movies (346)
  • Music (526)
  • Nature (255)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (177)
  • Obama (1,736)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (128)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,023)
  • Poetry (255)
  • Political changers (176)
  • Politics (2,775)
  • Pop culture (393)
  • Press (1,618)
  • Race and racism (861)
  • Religion (418)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (625)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (967)
  • Theater and TV (264)
  • Therapy (69)
  • Trump (1,601)
  • Uncategorized (4,389)
  • Vietnam (109)
  • Violence (1,411)
  • War and Peace (991)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑