The dawn of a new age for nuclear power?

The New Neo Posted on by

I’ve long been in favor of nuclear power. Maybe more of the world is now going in that direction, having discovered that the green alternatives don’t work very well.

For example:

Over the past few days, the politics and policies around nuclear energy have shifted faster than at any other period in the post-Chernobyl era. Here are a few examples:

Germany, the world’s long-time anti-nuclear poster child, just did a screeching U-turn. Under its new chancellor, Friedrich Merz, Germany will cooperate with France and treat nuclear as a “green” power source under EU regulations. The move comes just 25 months after Germany took its last three nuclear plants offline. As one German official said, the move is a “sea-change policy shift.”

The announcement from Berlin came just days after Belgium’s federal parliament voted by a large majority to repeal a 2003 law mandating the phase out of nuclear energy and banning the construction of new reactors.

The article lists more in that vein.

Plus of course we have Trump, who yesterday issued a new EO on the subject:

Instead of efficiently promoting safe, abundant nuclear energy, the NRC has instead tried to insulate Americans from the most remote risks without appropriate regard for the severe domestic and geopolitical costs of such risk aversion. The NRC utilizes safety models that posit there is no safe threshold of radiation exposure and that harm is directly proportional to the amount of exposure. …

Recent events in Europe, such as the nationwide blackouts in Spain and Portugal, underscore the importance of my Administration’s focus on dispatchable power generation –including nuclear power — over intermittent power. Beginning today, my Administration will reform the NRC, including its structure, personnel, regulations, and basic operations. In so doing, we will produce lasting American dominance in the global nuclear energy market, create tens of thousands of high-paying jobs, and generate American-led prosperity and resilience.

Sec. 2. Policy. It is the policy of the United States to:
(a) Reestablish the United States as the global leader in nuclear energy;
(b) Facilitate increased deployment of new nuclear reactor technologies, such as Generation III+ and IV reactors, modular reactors, and microreactors, including by lowering regulatory and cost barriers to entry;
(c) Facilitate the expansion of American nuclear energy capacity from approximately 100 GW in 2024 to 400 GW by 2050;
(d) Employ emerging technologies to safely accelerate the modeling, simulation, testing, and approval of new reactor designs;
(e) Support the continued operation of, and facilitate appropriate operational extensions for, the current nuclear fleet, as well as the reactivation of prematurely shuttered or partially completed nuclear facilities; and
(f) Maintain the United States’ leading reputation for nuclear safety.

Much more at the link.

When I’ve discussed these issues for the past few decades with Democrat friends and family members, two patterns have emerged. One is of the non-scientifically-inclined person who is afraid of nuclear power and has exaggerated the bad effects of nuclear accidents in the past, and does not credit safety advances since – for example – Chernobyl. The other is of the scientifically-inclined person who is in favor of nuclear power, considering it a relatively “green” form of energy that could solve some of the problems of fossil fuels.

Trump against Harvard; judges against Trump

The New Neo Posted on by

Here we go again.

Trump issued an order “revoking Harvard’s participation in F-1 and J-1 visa programs, under which foreign students attend Harvard.” The administration had asked Harvard to provide information on its foreign students’ participation in “illegal and violent activities,” and Harvard’s reply was not considered adequate. Harvard sued, and an injunction was issued against the administration.

John Hinderaker, who wrote the post I just linked, believes that the administration will lose this particular case, and even that they probably expect to lose it because they have arbitrarily dispensed with certain statutory requirements. He considers this particular action against Harvard to be more political than legal.

On the other hand – as pointed out at Legal Insurrection:

The judge made the ruling without a Trump lawyer present. As I stated in my blog yesterday and today, DHS gave Harvard 72 hours to respond to requests.

As Margot Cleveland pointed out, there is “no reason the court couldn’t have set [an] afternoon hearing.”

I suppose this one may end up going to SCOTUS as well.

One particularly interesting aspect of this case is how it highlights the extreme dependence a university such as Harvard has on foreign students. They pay full tuition for the most part, unlike many of Harvard’s regular students. The percentage of foreign students is twenty-seven percent of Harvard’s enrollment.

Lies beget murder: “blood on their hands”

The New Neo Posted on by

In the aftermath of the DC killing by Elias Rodriguez, there are many articles (for example, this) featuring the phrase “blood on their hands” and blaming various entities for stirring up such murderous hatred: the universities, the online influencers, leftist organizations, the UN, international courts, and the press – all of which have been busy churning out anti-Jewish anti-Israel venom, a regular “Protocols of Zion” and/or blood libel a day.

Much of this anti-Jewish propaganda takes the form of an ancient Jew-hating lie: the blood libel, which accuses Jews of being baby-killers. Now, it’s certainly true (and tragic) that in modern wars, babies are killed at times. But the IDF goes out of its way to avoid that, whereas Hamas puts its children in harm’s way in order to encourage it and use it to demonize Israel and Jews. Hamas also lies constantly about the number of casualties, especially of young people, and the press dutifully spreads the lies without question. Accusations of “genocide” are hurled at Israel and accentuated by the farce of international courts.

In my early blogging days, I wrote at length about one of these blood libels, the Mohammed al Durah case. Palestinians faked a child’s death at Israeli hands, filmed it in an early example of what became known as Pallywood, and spread the lie around the world. It was used as justification for the Second Intifada, a series of bloody terrorist attacks on Israel.

Now the cry around the world is “Globalize the Intifada!” and we have the very predictable murder at the hands of the non-Arab activist leftist American-born Rodriguez.

Melanie Phillips describes the process in a piece entitled “Blood on their hands,” with the subtitle “Horrifyingly, antisemitism has become a moral obligation for liberals.” An excerpt:

The murderer pulled the trigger. But many others have the blood of these two innocents, who were reported to have soon become engaged, on their hands.

The university principals who have allowed hate mobs on campus to incite the murder of Jews and destruction of Israel, week in, week out; the politicians who have allowed the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and Iranian extremists to spread their influence throughout western civil society; the media and all those who relentlessly demonize Israel with blood libels and murderous lies, including the British, French and Canadian governments that this week threatened to punish Israel for defending itself—these all bear responsibility for what happened in Washington.

This week, another falsehood about Israel’s war in Gaza was added to the relentless incitement against the Jewish state. This one came from the U.N.’s emergency coordinator, Tom Fletcher, who told the BBC that “14,000 babies will die in 48 hours” from malnutrition.

A moment’s thought would suggest that such a synchronized mass mortality event was simply incredible.

The media, however, parroted it as valid. It duly spread like wildfire. Countless Israel-haters leapt upon it to validate their loathing. In a poisonous debate about Gaza in Britain’s House of Commons, members of parliament referred to it no fewer than 13 times.

It soon turned out, however, that it was indeed nonsense. As the BBC later clarified, Fletcher had misrepresented a claim made on May 12 by the U.N.’s IPC food classification system—a claim that was itself highly questionable—that an estimated 14,100 severe cases of acute malnutrition were expected to occur among Gazan children aged between 6 and 59 months from April 2025 to March 2026.

So two days actually turned out to be one year, and 14,000 certain deaths turned out to be 14,000 possible cases of malnutrition.

We don’t know whether Fletcher can’t read, was feeling the worse for wear that day or maliciously misrepresented what the IPC had said. What we do know is that the United Nations and the entire global humanitarian establishment constitute a bubbling sewer of anti-Israel and anti-Jewish hatred.

False claims of imminent famine and starvation in Gaza have been made on a regular basis since the very start of the war. It’s an emotive blood libel that has incited a murderous hysteria of the kind that led to the gunning down of the young couple on Wednesday night.

The famine and starvation never materialized.

Those aren’t the only lies about Israel and the Gazans, of course. But accusations of baby killing and baby starvation are especially potent and emotional ones with an ancient lineage. They’ve been sparking the murder of Jews for centuries.

Rodriguez is a leftist clearly motivated by the left and its propaganda. But don’t think there aren’t people on the right – or supposedly on the right – who spread the same and/or different lies, although there are far fewer of them then on the left. I’m thinking of Candace Owens, to take one prominent example (the following are from her “X” account):

Live with Ian Carroll today discussing Zionists wasting no time using a tragedy to try to score points.

Or:

There is nothing more fake, gay, and obvious than the“you have blood on your hands” aimed at people who have nothing to do with a crime that has taken place, because they hold a reasonable opinion about something else.

What is happening in Gaza is still wrong, psychos.

Her use of the phrase “what is happening in Gaza” does not refer to anything the Palestinians are doing; it refers to Israel.

By highlighting Owens, I most definitely do not mean to suggest that the left isn’t much much worse in this regard. I’ve written about that many times before. I merely want to illustrate that Jew-hatred is growing on the right as well, mostly online and due to Owens and a few others who have gained many many followers.

NOTE: Here are some posts you get when you do a search on this blog for “blood libel.”

AI: is it real or is it Memorex?

The New Neo Posted on by

We can still tell the difference – kind of. But soon, it may be impossible:

The possible ramifications are huge, and not just (as is obvious) for the movie business. For video proof of truth itself. Some of this change has already happened, but there’s much more to come.

From the replies to that tweet:

So basically we can’t trust anything from a screen or a speaker ever again.

Also:

I don’t know man it looks like it doesn’t have a soul.

Every now and then I play a game on my phone. Those things are rife with AI ads featuring “people” who look 99.99% like real people but somehow don’t quite make it. There’s a very slight disconnect among gestures, expressions, and speech, as well as a slight offness (very slight) to the faces. But how long will that last before they perfect it?

Will there always be a sort of Turing test for AI-generated content? Or will they finally get the “soul” thing right?

Here I am – a bit late to the party today

The New Neo Posted on by

I’ve mentioned before that I have quite a few close friends with serious health problems. Every now and then I get called on to help with a doctor visit or procedure, and today was one of those days.

The whole episode lasted longer than I thought and kept me away from the computer longer than expected. But here I am.

I guess this is one of the perks of getting older.

More information on the DC murder

The New Neo Posted on by

Horrifying details are coming out now, having been captured on video:

In summary, the video shows a slim build person, wearing a blue jacket with a hood, a large dark-colored backpack, blue pants, and light-colored shoes, consistent with the clothing worn by RODRIGUEZ, walking across F Street, Northwest, in the direction of the Museum, and where the decedents were standing, preparing to enter the crosswalk. Once RODRIGUEZ walked past the decedents and two witnesses, he turned to face their backs and brandished a firearm from the area of his waistband. RODRIGUEZ is captured on the video extending both his arms in the direction of the decedents and firing several times, as indicated by the muzzle flashes. Once the decedents fell to the ground, RODRIGUEZ is captured on the video advancing closer to the decedents, leaning over with them with his arm extended, and firing several more times. As Decedent-1 attempted to crawl away from RODRIGUEZ, he followed behind her and fired again. After a brief moment, RODRIGUEZ appeared to reload his firearm. At the same time, Decedent-1 sat up. Once he reloaded, RODRIGUEZ fired several times at Decedent-1. RODRIGUEZ is then captured jogging back in the direction of 3rd Street, NW, and southbound in the direction of where the entrance to the Museum is located.

A disgusting and repulsive crime. Too bad none of the witnesses were armed.

It also sounds as though – as with leftist hero Luigi Mangione – he initially shot his victims in the back.

I had wondered how Rodriguez was caught, and I had assumed it was outside the building. But that turns out to have been incorrect. Apparently he purposely entered the building after having thrown his gun away. The people there tried to help him, thinking he was someone who’d witnessed the shooting and was seeking shelter:

“The suspect came over to where I was and we offered him water and he reaches into his backpack and pulls out a kufiya and says, ‘I did it. I did this for Gaza,’ “ eyewitness Kalisher shared on Good Morning America.

Speaking with the BBC, Kalisher also explained that at first she heard gunshots outside the building and thought the man was seeking refuge from the violence outside.

“We thought he needed shelter so he comes in,” she shared.

Fellow eyewitness Yoni Kalin added, “People were calming him down, giving him water, little did we know that he was someone who executed people in cold blood. He was the shooter. Once the police originally showed up, he was like, ‘I did this. I’m unarmed,’ pulls out a red kufiya and was like, ‘I did this for Gaza. Free Palestine.’ “

A death and murder cult inspires murder.

Rodriguez supposedly left a manifesto, which can be found here and is apparently filled with the usual bogus “facts” promulgated by Hamas with the cooperation of much of the MSM.

In my earlier post today on the murders, I speculated about the news that Yaron Lischinsky, one of the two victims, was an evangelical Christian. Because of his name, it seemed to me he may have been born a Jew and embraced what is known as Messianic Judaism. That turns out to be the case:

Lischinsky, born in Germany to a Jewish father and Christian mother, moved to Israel at 16 and found a spiritual home in Melech Ha’Mlachim — “King of Kings” in English — a Messianic congregation near Jerusalem’s bustling Mahane Yehuda market. There, he translated sermons for English-speaking visitors and regularly stayed after services to talk about his future with Boskey, who led the youth group. …

Messianic Judaism is a religious movement made up of people who identify ethnically and culturally as Jewish and believe that Jesus — whom they call Yeshua — is the promised Messiah.

Most adherents consider themselves Jewish, a position rejected by the mainstream Jewish community but embraced by congregations like Melech Ha’Mlachim. Unlike Jews for Jesus — an evangelical missionary organization — most Messianic congregations in Israel are locally run and culturally Jewish, with Torah readings, Hebrew prayer and Jewish holiday observance.

The murderer, of course, was not doing research on the religious beliefs of his victims. They were Jews and Israelis as far as he was concerned.

ADDENDUM:

I had also wondered why the murderer stopped at two victims. Apparently it was because his gun jammed or ran out of ammunition.

The autopen-wielders may face interrogation

The New Neo Posted on by

Comer would like to have a word with them:

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer on Thursday wrote to key aides to President Joe Biden demanding that they sit for transcribed interviews as part of his investigation into the former president’s mental decline and the potentially unauthorized use of an autopen for executive actions. …

“The cover-up of President Biden’s obvious mental decline is a historic scandal. The American people deserve to know when this decline began, how far it progressed, and who was making critical decisions on his behalf,” Comer said in a press release. “Key executive actions signed by autopen, such as sweeping pardons for the Biden Crime Family, must be examined considering President Biden’s diminished capacity.”

“Today, we are calling on President Biden’s physician and former White House advisors to participate in transcribed interviews so we can begin to uncover the truth,” he added. “In the last Congress, the Biden White House blocked these individuals from providing testimony to the Oversight Committee as part of the effort to cover-up Biden’s declining health.

There’s not a whole lot that usually comes from these hearings, but one can hope. I like to think that even some Democrats are angry about the fact that the man they voted for, Biden, was having many of his presidential actions taken over by a bunch of relatively unknown and unelected figures.

Then again, if they approve of what those people did, they probably won’t care at all. One leftist is just as good as another.

Another day, another roundup

The New Neo Posted on by

(1) Trump’s budget bill finally clears the House by a one-vote margin. Johnson and/or Trump must have twisted some arms; the holdouts were on the fiscal right, by the way. Now the question is what will happen in the Senate. Because it’s a budget bill, it can pass by a simple majority through reconciliation.

(2) The question of what Kamala knew about Biden’s cognitive health, and when she knew it, may dog her footsteps if she decides to run for the governorship of California. I’m not at all sure she wants to run; she may opt for some non-elective office or the lecture circuit.

(3) Some illegl aliens have been voting. Fancy that.

(4) Those babies in Gaza about to die of malnutrition: another myth perpetrated by the leftist press. It’s actually a variation on the ancient theme of the blood libel committed by Jews.

(5) Judge Ho excoriates SCOTUS for its recent decision to send AARP v. Trump back to the lower court. An excerpt:

But starting the clock at 12:34 a.m. not only ignores the court’s express instructions respecting the Government’s right to respond. It also ignores the fact that the Court is starting the clock at—12:34 a.m. We seem to have forgotten that this is a district court—not a Denny’s. This is the first time I’ve ever heard anyone suggest that district judges have a duty to check their dockets at all hours of the night, just in case a party decides to file a motion. If this is going to become the norm, then we should say so: District judges are hereby expected to be available 24 hours a day—and the Judicial Conference of the United States and the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts should secure from Congress the resources and staffing necessary to ensure 24-hour operations in every district court across the country. If this is not to become the norm, then we should admit that this is special treatment being afforded to certain favored litigants like members of Tren de Aragua—and we should stop pretending that Lady Justice is blindfolded.

If any SCOTUS justice retires during Trump’s term, Judge Ho might be a good replacement.

See also this on the subject by Professor Jacobson at Legal Insurrection.

The leftist Jew-killer

The New Neo Posted on by

30-year-old Elias Rodriguez was – until yesterday – a fairly typical-seeming leftist activist:

Elias Rodriguez [is] the social justice “activist” whose many, many, many “causes” include promoting antisemitic Palestinian terrorism, Black Lives Matter, and, inevitably, Socialism.

His resume includes being “an active member of the Party for Socialism & Liberation who marched with BLM, the People’s Congress of Resistance & ANSWER Chicago.”

More here:

There seems to have been no leftist cause he didn’t embrace.

But the one that inspired him to murder was Jew-hatred. Not simple Jew-hatred, but Jew-hatred stirred up by the left, the MSM, and the virtue-signaling useful idiots who champion the Hamas killers. What better way to express solidarity with them than to kill some Jews representing Israel?

His victims were Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Lynn Milgrim:

Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Lynn Milgram, two employees of the Israeli embassy in Washington, were murdered on Wednesday night at an American Jewish Congress conference in Washington, DC.

They were a couple who were about to get engaged, Israeli Ambassador to the US Yechiel Leiter said.

“He bought a ring and planned to propose to her in Jerusalem – a beautiful couple who came to spend an evening at Washington’s cultural center,” he said.

Lischinsky was born in Jerusalem, and grew up in Germany with his family. He moved to Israel at the age of 16. He served as a research assistant in the embassy’s policy department and was responsible for monitoring trends and events in the Middle East and North Africa.

He had a bachelor’s degree in international relations and Asian affairs from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and a master’s degree in diplomacy and conflict studies from Reichman University in Herzliya. …

Atar Porat, a friend from Model UN (MUN) at Hebrew University, told the Post he didn’t think there was one person who didn’t love Lischinsky.

“He was friendly, polite, erudite, always willing to learn, very humble, just the good guy,” he said. …

Prior to working in the embassy’s public diplomacy department, Jewish-American Sarah Lynn Milgram worked for Tech2Peace, where she researched processes of peace with an emphasis on the roots of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

She had a bachelor’s degree in environmental studies from the University of Kansas, a master’s degree in international affairs from American University, and a master’s degree in natural resources and sustainable development from the University for Peace. …

On her LinkedIn account, she said her passion was at the intersection of peacebuilding, religious engagement, and environmental work, and that she was “eager to contribute to organizations dedicated to bridging divides, promoting religious harmony, and advancing sustainable practices.”

Much like the Israeli kibbutz-dwelling victims of 10/7, it seems that Milgram was dedicated to the idea that peace in the region was possible. That didn’t save her any more than it saved them.

The murders took place outside the venue; I’m pretty sure there were metal detectors at the entrance, and that’s why Rodriguez decided to do his filthy work outside. He apparently was arrested quickly – probably because of a police presence – and the killer yelled “Free Palestine” as he was carted away.

Of course, his actions aren’t going to free Palestine – whatever that means. But they were designed to call attention to his “cause.” And to murder Jews, of course. His biggest inspiration may have been Luigi Mangione, strangely enough, because the latter has gotten so much positive attention from a certain crowd that considers him practically a matinee idol. Is this what Rodriguez wants? Who knows; it may be what he gets, although he’s not quite as telegenic as Mangione.

You may recall that Black Lives Matter initially had a pro-Hamas reaction to 10/7. The left loves the “Palestinian” cause; I wrote a post on that subject here (actually, it was only Part I of a planned 2-part series and I haven’t gotten around yet to the second half). So the fact that a leftist activist committed this murder is not the least bit surprising.

RIP, Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Lynn Milgrim, whose lives were cruelly cut short.

NOTE: See also this article on the connection between leftism and terrorism.

ADDENDUM: News has come out the Lischinsky was Christian. I hadn’t read that previously. Whether he was a Christian convert or not I don’t know.

However, there’s little question in my mind that the killer thought he was killing a Jew. Here’s some information on the gathering:

The two young people gunned down outside a Jewish museum in D.C. Wednesday night were young Israeli Embassy staffers who were soon to be engaged.

Israel identified the victims as Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim, without giving their ages. They were leaving a young diplomats’ event at the Capital Jewish Museum that was meant to “foster unity and celebrate Jewish heritage” when they were killed. …

Ron Prosor, a veteran Israeli diplomat, said Lischinsky was a student of his at an Israeli university. He said Lischinsky was Christian, “a true lover of Israel” who had served in the military “and chose to dedicate his life to the state of Israel.”

It’s a bit confusing because I also read that Lischinsky was born in Israel and moved with his family to Germany, where he was raised. As a German, why was he born in Israel? Other sources say he was born in Germany. Which is true? He also has a last name that indicates Polish origins (either Christian or Jewish; both can have the “ski” or “sky” endings) and a first name that is Hebrew. He apparently identified as an evangelical Christian.