You may be surprised to know that there is a plan; Secretary of State Rubio describes it here. I’ve cued up two short segments:
And here is some truly fascinating background from a Venezuelan with an improbable name:
You may be surprised to know that there is a plan; Secretary of State Rubio describes it here. I’ve cued up two short segments:
And here is some truly fascinating background from a Venezuelan with an improbable name:
Sometimes Trump is very clear about what he’s doing and why. But sometimes he’s using misdirection to provide cover for some other plan. He can be unpredictable and somewhat unreadable, or he can say what he means and mean what he says.
In the case of the present Iran crisis, it seems to me that not following though on threats would be a bad thing. Trump threatened something big if the mullahs killed a lot of demonstrators. They did, but he doesn’t seem to have done much in response.
However, being flexible and reactive to circumstances is good. What are the circumstances right now? Is something in the works? Does that something involve Israel?:
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu personally asked US President Donald Trump to hold off on a US military attack on Iran, The New York Times reported on Thursday, citing an anonymous senior US official.
The two leaders reportedly held a call on Wednesday. The White House confirmed that a call took place after The Jerusalem Post asked for comment. …
Notably, that same day, Trump claimed that he had received information from “very important sources on the other side,” that Iran had stopped killing dissidents.
Is some action forthcoming from Israel? That country almost certainly has formidable intelligence sources in Iran. Are they using misdirection, or are they saying conditions just aren’t right for intervention at present? We simply don’t know.
These statements from Trump on Reza Pahlavi seem very careful:
“He seems very nice, but I don’t know how he’d play within his own country,” Trump said. “And we really aren’t up to that point yet.
“I don’t know whether or not his country would accept his leadership, and certainly if they would, that would be fine with me.”
Meanwhile, the news from Iran is terrible; please see this. The Times of Israel has a lot of coverage of Iran, all of which I find depressing. For example, there’s this (from someone who admittedly thinks very little of Trump):
The theocratic regime, which has ruled the country since the 1979 revolution, has been shaken to its core, but – like on several occasions in the past 25 years – appears to have survived yet another nationwide wave of protest and dissent from a population that overwhelmingly rejects its oppressive governance. …
While Israel, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and the other Gulf States benefit from a weakened Iranian regime, they do not want one which collapses without an obvious successor.
Paradoxically, they also know that US military intervention could strengthen the Iranian leadership. Since 1999, the regime has relied on the portrayal of its opponents as American and Israeli agents. An American attack strengthens that narrative. …
For all the scale and potential of the protests, the opposition does not have the organization for its political, social and economic ambitions. The regime has seen to that with its decapitation strategy, imprisoning prominent activists from all spheres of Iranian society. How can protesters and the opposition be supported in developing that organization?
But what revolt ever has a certain outcome? If certainty were the requirement, no such movement could ever be supported.
I guess it’s the old “time will tell.”
With all the more violent news going on, you may have missed the fact that the administration has unveiled a proposal to replace Obamacare.
Some key elements:
The Great Healthcare Plan calls for codifying the Trump Administration’s Most-Favored-Nation deals to get Americans the same low prices for prescription drugs that people in other countries pay. …
The Great Healthcare Plan makes more verified safe pharmaceutical drugs available for over-the-counter purchase. …
The Great Healthcare Plan stops sending big insurance companies billions in extra taxpayer-funded subsidy payments and instead send that money directly to eligible Americans to allow them to buy the health insurance of their choice.
The Great Healthcare Plan funds a cost-sharing reduction program for healthcare plans which would save taxpayers at least $36 billion and reduce the most common Obamacare plan premiums by over 10% according to the Congressional Budget Office.
The Great Healthcare Plan will end the kickbacks paid by pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) to the large brokerage middlemen that deceptively raise the cost of health insurance.
Would Congress pass this? And would it actually help the situation? I’ve long been pessimistic about solutions to the problem of high health care costs (plus rampant fraud, apparently). But that doesn’t mean a switch from Obamacare couldn’t make things at least somewhat better. I don’t have the economics chops to figure out whether this would help, and at the moment I can’t find an analysis I trust. If you have one, please put a link in the comments.
This Reuters article (a news outlet hardly sympatico with Trump) mentions the following criticism:
Critics say replacing subsidies with direct payments could force lower-income Americans to shift toward less comprehensive plans sold outside of former President Barack Obama’s signature Affordable Care Act. That law sought to put all Americans – both healthy and sick – in one marketplace to keep premiums down.
Yes, that was the stated idea. But premiums haven’t been kept down.
(1) VDH is recovering from his surgery and explains quite a bit here, including the fact that his lung cancer was of a rare type that’s difficult to diagnose and often mimics infection/inflammation on scans. That explains a lot.
The cancer doesn’t seem to have metastasized, which is excellent news.
(2) How Communists think, with director of Mamdani’s “Office to Protect Tenants” Cea Weaver as an example. The quotes are from 2021, when she was already a prominent tenants’ rights activist, and indicate very little understanding of the interface between renting and home-owning, as well as the distinction between home-owning and being a landlord owning multiple units. It’s slogans all the way down.
(3) It seems like it’s a good idea to know what a woman is, if you’re going to be a SCOTUS justice. Here’s why:
Oral argument took place on January 13, 2026, in two cases involving state law attempts to protect girls sports – in Idaho and West Virginia.
… Alito, who’s tied with Thomas for the best Justice on the court asked a question, and we don’t have video, but you know he had an ear-to-ear grin. He asked the attorney for the girls to give him the definition of what it means to be a girl or a boy. And she said, well, we don’t have that definition, which harkened back to Katanji Brown Jackson’s confirmation hearing, where she was asked, give me the definition of a woman. And she said, well, I can’t, ’cause I’m not a biologist. …
… Most of the argument today surrounded levels of review. A lot of words like heightened scrutiny and strict scrutiny. So a lot of it was kind of court sort of jargon as to what can we do to review this.
But when you get down to it, we are literally in the Supreme Court arguing whether a school district can protect girls’ sports or not.
Girls’ sports exist for a reason, and the reason is rooted in biology.
(4) Ann Althouse wonders what to call Reza Pahlavi:
I know he’s not the Shah. Not yet. Just testing the concept on you after Meade called him the Shah. I said he’s not the Shah, and Meade said it was like addressing a nun as “Sister” when you’re not Catholic. I said: “You mean like using someone’s preferred pronouns?” It doesn’t matter what you think the person really is, you’re showing respect.
Is it wrong to call Reza Pahlavi the “Shah”? Does it help him garner support or not? He’s not in power, not yet anyway, but is there good reason to refer to him as the Shah?
I suppose if I were to address him personally I might call him Shah. But I think I can safely say that it’s highly unlikely that I ever will be addressing him personally. In the meantime, there are lots of other perfectly good terms to use to refer to him: “heir apparent,” “would-be Shah,” or “Crown Prince.”
From his Wiki entry:
Born in Tehran, Iran, Reza Pahlavi was officially named crown prince of Iran at the time of his father’s coronation in 1967.
…… In 1980, following the death of his father in exile in Cairo, Egypt, Reza Pahlavi declared himself shah of Iran, styling himself “Reza Shah II”, and actively participated in political activities opposing the Islamic Republic from abroad.
So for approximately 45 years he’s been referring to himself as the Shah.
(5) DeSantis is not Walz:
Jennifer Cruz was arrested outside Mi Pueblo, a Mexican grocery store and meat market in Jacksonville, Tuesday morning after she allegedly jumped out of her car and punched a state trooper in the face while officers were working with Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents …
Another shocking video shared on X appeared to show Cruz kicking and screaming as officers struggled to get her into a squad car, laughing and taunting police and calling one officer a “weak-ass motherf–ker.”
Footage shows her lying in the back seat before suddenly popping up and kicking the officer who was trying to restrain her.
“Don’t you dare start kicking me!” one officer is heard warning her.
Cruz was then tased …
“This is not Minneapolis. This is not going to end well for you in Florida,” DeSantis vowed.
“You have a right to go out there and criticize government policy. You can go out there and protest within respected zones, but the idea that you’re going to assault one of our troopers is unacceptable, and you are going to face consequences as a result of that.”
One would think that would be very basic. These days, not so much.
I’m getting used to writing “2026.”
… the transport of money to Somalia.
Okay
@DataRepublican, and I did some general numbers on the SomaliFraud cash going through Minneapolis airport.According to reports, over 2 years, they moved roughly $700MM through the airport. …
That would essentially mean that the Somalis were taking a $1 million dollar duffle bag through the airport — EVERY SINGLE DAY — for two years.
Further, we can assume that this is only the money that was flagged.
And there are only something like 107,000 Somalis in Minnesota. All the money going to Somalia through the airport is not just from Minnesota, however.
But apparently a great many of the Somalis of Minnesota work at the airport:
Well, after some quick discussing with regular travelers of the MN airports.
The Somalis run the airport.
They’re the ground crews.
They’re the airport staff.
They’re friggin TSA.
I have noticed something of the sort, although not as extreme, in airports such as Logan in Boston. There seems to be a large Somali or at least Muslim (head scarves, etc.) presence in the TSA ranks there.
Here’s the original John Solomon report:
“It was like a cash ATM draining American dollars and moving them overseas, and nobody in the Biden administration seemed to think anything of it,” one official with direct knowledge told Just the News, speaking on condition of anonymity. “These couriers were openly flaunting what they’ve doing by legally declaring the cash they were taking out.”
Minneapolis travelers alone had $342.37 million in their luggage in 2024 and $349.4 million in 2025, and the totals nationwide are likely to be much higher, the officials told Just the News.
The flow of the Somali couriers’ cash out of Minneapolis was 99 percent larger than the foreign cash detected or declared in 2025 moving in luggage from the airports in Dallas-Fort Worth, Atlanta or John F. Kennedy International in New York City, the officials said. And it was 90% larger than the amounts that left Seattle, a major hub for Asian travelers. …
Rep. Jeff Crank, R-Colo., told the Just the News, No Noise television show on Tuesday night that he believes the current Minnesota fraud scandal will embolden Congress to make changes to the law to give federal authorities more power to investigate the exodus of U.S. money to foreign countries, especially from illegal aliens.
I wonder whether such a bill would get bipartisan support from anyone but John Fetterman – maybe not even from him.
What a nasty piece of work Walz is. Now that he’s not running again for office, the mask is totally off:
Refers to the federal government as an “occupation.” Walz channeling 1860’s Democratic energy here. Unbelievable. https://t.co/i4zGTHujji
— Scott Jennings (@ScottJenningsKY) January 15, 2026
The people obsessed with the Confederacy for the past decade have essentially adopted the stance of the fire-eaters. That’s one of the weirder parts of this entire ordeal. https://t.co/cyX3EjLPTw
— Carl Paulus (@CarlPaulus) January 15, 2026
I think Walz loves being in the spotlight again and fancies himself a leftist hero. Just a week or two ago he was in the spotlight for winking at and enabling – and perhaps benefiting from – rampant fraud in his state. Now he gets to change the channel and defy the evil ICE agents.
I can attest to the fact that many people I know buy the story that he’s selling. Some are people who lead with their emotions, but some are very rational. From what they see and hear, ICE is a bunch of violent thugs harming innocent people.
Once a strong supporter of Israel, Megyn Kelly seems to have now cast her lot with the Carlson/Owens/Fuentes crowd on the topic, at least potentially. She apparently has done little looking into the issue previously, if you can believe what she says in this clip. I’m just a lowly blogger, but I can assure you I’m quite familiar with both sides of the story; why isn’t she?:
What have I thought of Kelly over they years? When she first started with Fox, she seemed like one of the smarter newspeople and was unafraid to ask pointed questions of her guests. When Trump started his first campaign, she seemed very anti-Trump in the debates, and although I wasn’t keen at all on Trump at the time I didn’t think much of her question (see this). Then lately she’s seemed to veer more to the right.
After she left Fox, I noticed (the few times I watched her show) that she started covering more tabloid-type issues, and suddenly there was a lot of cursing from her, a kind of “tough-girl” persona.
And now this.
… deal with a medical issue. Nothing life-threatening, but I’ll be doing that for the next few hours.
I plan to resume posting after that.
Do you recall that the press seemed okay with ICE before Trump came along? Here’s a video that might remind you; unfortunately, it can’t be embedded but you can view it here.
There’s also this:
2016. Obama’s Press Secretary is asked about reports that during immigration raids, ICE agents were storming into homes, going room to room looking for illegals, and making children tremble with fear.
I thought only fascist Presidents do that sort of thing.
Why was the press so civil? Why weren’t they crying or at least calling Obama a nazi?
How come nobody was shaving their head in protest? Surely there were a bunch of angry white liberal wine moms outside the building screaming at the top of their lungs, right?
Always keep in mind how fake and performative the outrage is.
I don’t think the present rage is fake. I’m basing this on the rage against ICE of some people I know. It’s real, and it’s created, fostered, and nurtured by Democrats and the press coverage as well as social media. It’s no accident at all, it’s deliberately drummed up, but the rank-and-file are for the most part sincere.
Some of the most active protesters seem to not understand that this is serious, and that their actions could be deadly serious – to themselves. For example, there was this:
Ask yourself what [Renee] Good’s partner’s conceptual world has to be like for her to scream [after Good was killed] “Why did you have real bullets?”
This is the outrage of someone who is discovering the hard limits of social construction.
Indeed. It’s also the result of too much reliance on imagology and not enough awareness of reality. Perhaps that’s saying more or less the same thing. But it doesn’t pay to live in a fantasy world where federal agents arresting criminals don’t have real bullets in their weapons, and impeding them – or even trying to run them down in your car – won’t have potentially very dire consequences resulting from the use of very real bullets.
It’s also a reflection of the fact that in this country, protesters are not shot unless they do something very dangerous. Despite the left’s rhetoric about ICE, the officers are not going around murdering people and demonstrations against them would be fine if those demonstrations were non-violent. So based on that knowledge, perhaps demonstrators get into a mindset of “anything goes” because they believe there will never be serious retaliation on the part of ICE. It’s paradoxical, but it makes a certain amount of sense – they hate ICE but rely on ICE’s general tolerance of dissent.
Who’s funding the training of these people? Here’s a piece that attempts to find out.
The left wants martyrs and is happy to have them and to exploit their deaths to fire up even more rage against ICE and Trump. It’s pretty much the Black Lives Matter playbook, only it’s not about race this time.
[NOTE: More from that tweet:
I’m reminded of a news story I read a couple of weeks ago. White couple out on the town, approached by a random black street psycho, random psycho insults the girl and spits at the guy, guy squares up to fight him.
The girl grabs her man’s arm and says “Don’t fight”. While she’s restraining him and his attention is distracted, black psycho stabs him to death.
That girl lived in a universe where everything was head pats and cookies and good intentions. So does Becca [Renee Good’s spouse]. And so, I’m pretty sure, did Renee Good.
I wonder about that analysis of the street fight. If an unarmed person is confronted at close quarters by someone with a knife, it’s very dangerous. I don’t think a fist fight necessarily stops the potential knifing at all – it might be best to try to get away as fast as possible. Knife attacks can be very quick, and even if the victim has a gun the knife often is faster at close quarters or even semi-close quarters.
Looking it up just now, I tried to identify the murder. If it was this one, the facts are significantly different from the description in that tweet:
Carson and his girlfriend were coming home from a wedding when the apparently unprovoked attack occurred, ABC New York station WABC reported.
The suspect walked past the couple while they were seated on a bench at a bus stop, police said. They then begin to walk toward the suspect, who started to damage scooters, police said. The suspect said to Carson, “What are you looking at?” according to NYPD Chief of Detectives Joseph Kenny.
“Mr. Carson immediately places himself between the male and his female companion to protect her,” Kenny said during a press briefing on Wednesday.
As Carson tried to de-escalate the situation, the suspect swung a knife at him, Kenny said. Carson backed up and tripped, falling to the ground. The suspect then stabbed him three times, with the knife piercing his heart, Kenny said.
“As Mr. Carson laid dying on the sidewalk, the male with the knife kicks him in the chest, threatens to stab the woman companion and spits in her face,” Kenny said.
Awful, horrible, but the woman was not restraining Carson and he was trying to get away, having seen the knife. He was murdered because he tripped and fell, affording the murderer the opportunity to stab him. The perp spitting on the woman occurred afterwards.]