↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 1433 << 1 2 … 1,431 1,432 1,433 1,434 1,435 … 1,880 1,881 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

The Cat (Stevens) came back

The New Neo Posted on February 1, 2012 by neoMarch 4, 2021

The singer formerly known as Cat Stevens is nothing if not controversial. It’s hard to write about him even now without generating a firestorm of hatred. But I’m going to try.

Stevens (now Yusuf Islam) is hated by a lot of people mainly for two reasons. One, he became a Muslim, and in the early days of his conversion he seemed to support the fatwah against Rushdie (he later said the remarks were a joke, but not many buy that). Two, he left performing after he converted, dismaying his devoted fans—although it was Steven’s intensity and spirituality they’d always liked in the first place (as well as his music, of course), which made the extremes of his commitment to his chosen faith a bit less surprising but no less disturbing.

A few years ago Stevens returned to performing. In more recent clips of his concerts, it appears that he has lost some of his intensity, which is not all that surprising. What originally drove it? Youth was probably a good part of it, and there would be a natural diminution of energy as he aged. But I think some of that early energy was fueled by his spiritual quest which, according to his Wiki entry, was a search Stevens had been on for quite some time.

When a person finds what he’s looking for he can lose some of that edge. Stevens’ edge was never all that edgy to begin with, though; he was sincere and touchy-feely, but not saccharine. That’s part of what made him great—that slight hint of bite combined with the sweetness in his lovely and immediately distinctive voice.

Even before Cat’s conversion he showed an almost trance-like quality in many of his performances. projecting a seemingly unselfconscious sincerity in surrendering to this religiously-inspired feeling that is unlike that of any performer I’ve seen. If you look at the comments at YouTube on many of his old videos, many people write “I love him!” and I think it’s because Stevens used to seem emotionally naked when he performed, even though he had all his clothes on. And his nakedness did not have as its source—as with some performers, such as for example Janis Joplin—the emotion of anguish. It seemed, instead, to spring from ecstasy.

Like most great singers, Stevens has an instantly recognizable and unique voice, now somewhat deepened with time. Here he is in his heyday, performing his signature piece (which he did not write, by the way; it’s a Christian hymn written in the 1930s and set to a traditional tune):

And here he sings the same song much more recently. You can see (and hear) the difference:

Here’s another before-and-after. In this case one of the oddities of the song “Oh Very Young” is that, although Stevens wrote it when he was very young, the words are more suited to an older person. I love this early version, despite the gratuitous and random still photos that the compiler of this video has chosen to add:

Here’s the same song from the perspective of age (I left in the intro because I wanted to show that the old guy still looks awfully good):

I defy you to find a cover of “Morning Has Broken” that can compare to Stevens’ original version. And I defy you to find an even halfway decent cover of “Oh Very Young” at all. Most YouTube cover versions of the latter song—as well as the cover versions available through iTunes, which number quite a few—are too sweet, icky sweet and slow, unlike Stevens’ original, with its rhythmic drive and verve. “Oh Very Young” is a song about the transience of life, but Stevens makes it energetic and upbeat whereas other performers seem to just make it syrupy. Yuck. When Stevens sings the song it may sound simple, but it most assuredly is not, and his rhythms always surprise.

Posted in Music, Religion | 42 Replies

After Florida

The New Neo Posted on February 1, 2012 by neoFebruary 1, 2012

There’s plenty of post-Florida-primary musing around the MSM and the blogosphere today. This piece by Byron York has a lot to recommend it, especially this observation:

Gingrich did not learn the lesson of Romney’s first wave of attacks against him. At that time, Gingrich reacted angrily and publicly, complaining constantly and accusing Romney of lying. Voters in New Hampshire who were once open to Gingrich’s candidacy turned away from him, saying his hot-tempered response to the ads — rather than the ads themselves — just turned them off…In Florida, Romney’s answer was a second, even bigger, wave of attacks. And Gingrich reacted in the same complaining, self-defeating way he did the first time, only more so…

Every time Gingrich, provoked by a Romney ad, made an angry speech, as he did in Mount Dora, the answer he gave showed voters exactly where Angry Newt was. Romney, in the persona he presents to voters, doesn’t have that subtext of anger.

I’m an issues person, and I spend a lot of time here talking about just that: issues. But I can’t help but notice that in all campaigns, spectators aren’t exactly the Jack Webbs of the voting process: just the issues, Mister, just the issues. There’s a lot of emotional reaction involved too, including the evaluation of the affective qualities of the candidates themselves. That may sound irrational (and some of it is) but it’s really not. Temperament matters, especially in a president.

I think a big part of Gingrich’s problem is temperament, and the problem is real. As far as Newt’s supporters are concerned, his anger is one of his strengths and not a problem at all. When it’s directed at the media it seems to work for him, although that may be getting a bit old. When it’s directed at Mitt Romney it has been working less effectively, especially when it features attacks that are from the left and/or hyperbole.

Gingrich is already a “hot” candidate rather than a cool one, and he runs the risk of seeming intemperate and out-of-control when he goes off like that. I submit that his decision to go angry in Florida was not just a tactical one; it was dictated by his personality itself. Voters in Florida decided that was not the sort of man they wanted facing Obama, or in the Oval Office.

Remember back in the fall of 2008, when the financial crisis happened and Obama seemed so cool and collected while John McCain seemed like an impulsive hothead running around in circles? Remember that McCain had been ahead up to the time of the meltdown (the financial one, and his own) and then he fell behind? There were many reasons it happened—one was that McCain was not perceived as being knowledgeable about the economy, as he himself had previously admitted. But the other (and I submit that it was a major factor) was that people felt uneasy about his temperament and soothed by Obama’s.

Romney is much more like Obama in that regard: he has a calm demeanor. Some say too calm; he needs more pizazz. His problem (at least, one of them) is that he’s considered fake and inauthentic. So a little righteous anger does nothing to hurt him; it actually reassures people that he’s human.

[ADDENDUM: Rusty Shackleford says much the same thing, just in a different way. We disagree on one thing, though: he thinks it’s stupid to judge candidates on things like personality rather than issues. As I wrote above, I don’t think it’s all that stupid at all.]

Posted in Election 2012 | 41 Replies

Florida primary today

The New Neo Posted on January 31, 2012 by neoFebruary 1, 2012

Here’s a thread to discuss it.

If you dare.

[ROLLING UPDATES: Romney is projected the winner. As things look now, he may even get a total percentage similar to the combined totals of Gingrich and Santorum.

In Romney’s acceptance speech (going on right now), I noticed one smart thing at the outset: he warned Democrats that a tough fight like this won’t help the winner: it will prepare him. Then he’s gone on to talk only about Obama, and to repeat the magic pledge to repeal Obamacare.

More reflections: Florida is a primary in which Independents can’t vote, so the results there represent Republicans only.

Apparently, the polls were correct.

Quite a few of Gingrich’s recent attacks on Romney have been attacks from the left: he’s a Bain vulture, he invested in funds that included Fannie/Freddie, and he’s a cost-cutting meanie who nixed kosher meals. I’m trying to think of any time that Romney attacked Gingrich from the left, but I can’t come up with anything. I think that’s telling. It undercuts Gingrich’s claim to be the real conservative.

Listening to Santorum’s speech, it occurs to me (and not for the first time, either) that he may be positioning himself for the VP spot.

Oops, in Gingrich’s speech, he isn’t being kind to Santorum. He says the race is a 2-person one between him, the “conservative leader,” and the moderate Romney. Gingrich goes on to cast himself a populist (it’ll be a “people’s campaign”) and predicts he’ll be the new comeback kid (no, he doesn’t actually call himself that, but that’s the idea).]

Posted in Election 2012 | 38 Replies

Gingrich won’t debate Obama if the media sets the terms

The New Neo Posted on January 31, 2012 by neoJanuary 31, 2012

I think this is another bad tactical move of Gingrich’s:

…Newt Gingrich returned Monday to his tried-and-true offensive against the media, declaring that if he’s the Republican nominee, he will not debate President Obama if a reporter serves as moderator.

“…[A]s your nominee, I will not accept debates in the fall in which the reporters are the moderators because you don’t need to have a second Obama person on the debate.”

…The former House speaker has said that as nominee he would challenge the president to seven, three-hour Lincoln-Douglas style debates, despite the fact that the debate schedule has already been set by the Commission on Presidential Debates.

He may think it makes him look as thought he’s a tough alpha-guy taking on everybody’s favorite nemesis, the media. But I think it makes him look whiny, inflexible, and afraid of facing Obama in a debate unless it’s on Gingrich’s terms. Since that isn’t going to happen—does anyone really think Obama or the media would take him up on his “offer”?—it makes him look as though he’s refusing to debate Obama at all.

And, since one of his strengths as perceived by his supporters is that Gingrich could best Obama in a debate, this weakens his cause still further.

I just don’t get it.

[NOTE: I wonder what Gingrich-supporters think of this approach of Newt’s. Is it just political business as usual?

As for me, I agree with this comment at Ace’s:

The worst and most revoltingly hypocritical aspect of the “ZOMG ROMNEY HATES THE JEWS!” argument coming from Gingrich now, in his final despair, is that he is criticizing Romney for attempting to cut wasteful government spending. That’s right: Newt Gingrich, True Conservative Tea Party Hero, is attacking supposed Big Government Spending RINO Mitt Romney for trying to slash government subsidies and spending”¦and attacking him as a crypto-anti-Semitic religious bigot, no less.
Newt just can’t help attacking from the Left.]

[ADDENDUM: And this comment from that same thread at Ace’s is priceless:

Newt just gave a speech to a retirement community in Pembroke Pines, FL and he converted to Judaism in the middle of the speech.]

[ADDENDUM II: Here’s an interesting video in which Romney employs the fist-in-the-velvet-glove approach on Gingrich:

It really has been very sad and painfully revealing about the speaker to see him railing on like this. I think in some respects this helps us understand why it is that out of the hundreds who he worked with as speaker, only a handful are willing to support him.

]

Posted in Election 2012, Press | 31 Replies

Blog comments are good for your mental health

The New Neo Posted on January 31, 2012 by neoJanuary 31, 2012

So says this study.

At least for teenagers. Who write blogs about their personal problems. And whose blogs are not especially popular:

In all the groups, the greatest improvement in mood occurred among those bloggers who wrote about their problems and allowed commenters to respond.

Interestingly, the commenters on the blogs were overwhelmingly supportive. “The only kind of surprise we had was that almost all comments made by readers were very positive and constructive in trying to offer support for distressed bloggers,” Dr. [Azy] Barak wrote in an e-mail…

The trolls, the bullies, they go where they can be seen. Some of the most well-trafficked sites on the Internet have the worst commenters. In general, smaller blogs with dedicated readers — whether personal journals or niche-interest publications — have lively, thoughtful, and smart conversations in their comments sections.

The site has had its share of trolls and bullies, although I have ways of blocking them and keeping it to a minimum so far. But I love the comments section here, and probably wouldn’t continue to write this blog if I didn’t have a fairly lively one. The article didn’t define a “smaller” blog—mine would probably be called medium-sized—and this ain’t no support group.

But still, there are elements in the comments section here that give it something in common with the helpful ones in the study. Mainly, it acts as a community—one that sometimes challenges and even enrages, but always engages and sometimes supports—but a community nonetheless.

Posted in Blogging and bloggers | 12 Replies

Don’t blame me, I voted for Kodos

The New Neo Posted on January 31, 2012 by neoJanuary 31, 2012

This comment by “rickl” made me think of the following Simpsons episode. You may especially enjoy it if you’ve got a yen (and really, who doesn’t?) to revisit the 1996 presidential campaign:


kang and kodos
Posted in Politics, Theater and TV | 4 Replies

Meanwhile, in the wider the world…

The New Neo Posted on January 30, 2012 by neoJanuary 30, 2012

…Syria is in an uproar. Sound familiar?

As with similar situations before, the rebels can easily be overpowered by the government, if their numbers don’t reach a critical mass, and if the army and police stay loyal to ruler Assad. Otherwise, all bets are off; there’s probably a limit to how far Russia will go to protect the rulers there.

Unlike Egypt, Syria is not an ally of ours; that may even be an understatement. So it’s easier to say that in the event of an overthrow in Syria, the replacement government probably won’t be much worse.

Posted in Middle East | 8 Replies

Boy, I can’t wait…

The New Neo Posted on January 30, 2012 by neoJanuary 30, 2012

…till tomorrow’s over and Florida is done. In fact, I can’t wait till the nominee is in the bag. And then the election can’t come soon enough.

Maybe I’ve just gotten wimpier as I’ve gotten older, but this really did seem like one of the more depressing campaigns right from the start, when the field was first set and the most promising candidates (IMHO) weren’t in it. Now it’s gone from merely depressing to viciously depressing. Even on this blog, the comments section has never seemed so full of anguish and rage, and a more-than-usual dose of misinformation and misunderstanding. I think it’s just a symptom of the difficult situation the nation is in.

And yet, compared to so many earlier troubled times, this is a piece of cake. The ones that come to mind right off the bat are—oh, little things like the Civil War, the Great Depression, and WWII—especially its early days. Even in my own lifetime the 60s were pretty bad: riots, assassinations, generational conflict of a fairly intense kind.

Come to think of it, maybe I really have turned into a wimp. Because we’ve weathered much worse storms, haven’t we?

Posted in Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe, Me, myself, and I, Politics | 38 Replies

The character issue and the fighters

The New Neo Posted on January 29, 2012 by neoJune 7, 2012

I don’t know about you, but to me, this doesn’t seem like the best approach for Newt.

And Ed Morrissey agrees:

…[I]t seems unwise for Gingrich to play the character card. Throughout his campaign, the subtext of Gingrich’s pitch is that his personal baggage ”” all of which redounds to character ”” is irrelevant in a campaign where ideology and fighting temperament matter most. As the Rasmussen polls showed the last couple of weeks, Gingrich scores very low on the character questions even among the Republican base. Even in a poll where Gingrich led nationally, he came in dead last in the current roster of four contenders for the Republican nomination on character ”” even below “Not Sure.”

Why would Gingrich pick a fight on the issue of character? Granted, he’s not talking about things like faithfulness to a wife vs. philandering, but even on the issue of campaign “lies” his own are pretty glaring.

Gingrich should play to his own strengths, not his weaknesses. He seemed to understand that at the beginning, but now he’s lost all focus in his rage.

The general perception has been that Gingrich’s major strength is as a fighter. And to give him his props, there’s no question that he has been, both in the sense of general pugnaciousness and of specific battles he fought when Speaker. He stood up not only to Democrats in the House and to President Clinton, but sometimes to those in his own party—although in the end they prevailed and successfully pressured him to resign.

And yet it’s a paradox that, as a campaigner, Gingrich actually didn’t have to use those combat skills very often. He ran in a conservative district in which the only real question at the outset (1974) was whether the public would choose a conservative Democrat (20-year incumbent Jack Flynt) or a conservative Republican (Gingrich). They chose the Democrat, and then they chose him again in 1976 by an even greater margin, although compared to his scarce Republican predecessors (Flynt had often run unopposed) Gingrich did pretty well.

But in 1978 Gingrich got lucky; Flynt finally retired and Newt won. After that, Gingrich was an incumbent member of the House from a South that was increasingly Republican, and from a district that was Republican as well. He seems to have never faced an election challenge worth mentioning after that except in 1990, when he almost lost again (although I can’t find any background on why that one was more difficult). So, although Gingrich was elected eleven straight times after those first two losses, he may be quite untested in the sense of being unused to tough campaigns. One thing for sure: were he to be nominated, he would be very unused to fighting for a win in a campaign against a liberal incumbent such as Obama, in a national election in which he would have to appeal to someone other than conservatives.

Now you might say Romney is quite untested, too, although to win as a Republican in Massachusetts is always somewhat of a test. But “tough and combative candidate” is not the way Romney has been billed in the first place. The fact that Gingrich is now reduced to sputtering rage at how tough and mean Romney is being to him is just as likely to help Romney as Gingrich right now—perhaps more so. It makes Romney seem to be more of an alpha-male and Gingrich less of one.

Those who criticize Romney often like to say that Romney could never be tough enough to fight Obama. But Romney seems to be standing up to Gingrich rather well and keeping his cool. Gingrich to Romney, not so much. And if Gingrich can’t stand up to Romney, how in the world will he ever stand up to Obama?

[NOTE: More here.]

Posted in Election 2012, Romney | 9 Replies

Trisomy 18

The New Neo Posted on January 29, 2012 by neoJanuary 29, 2012

Very sad about Rick Santorum’s daughter.

Both he and Palin not only have talked the pro-life talk but walked the walk. And it’s no walk in the park, that’s for sure.

Posted in Election 2012, Health | 19 Replies

Bumper sticker for 2012

The New Neo Posted on January 28, 2012 by neoJanuary 28, 2012

Tired of Obama, Gingrich, and Romney? I certainly am.

Here’s bumper sticker that offers an interesting alternative candidate for this election year. At least you can’t accuse him of lying:

[NOTE: If you don’t know who “Cthulhu” is, see this.]

[UPDATE: Bumped up.]

Posted in Election 2012 | 52 Replies

Let’s all chill out…

The New Neo Posted on January 28, 2012 by neoJanuary 28, 2012

…and dance. And it’s not even that cold in New England today, so let’s have a summer song:

Posted in Music | 4 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • Turtler on Is there still a ceasefire with Iran?
  • Art Deco on Lenient plea deal for man responsible for the death of Paul Kessler during an anti-Israel demonstration
  • Ed on Today’s worthless news on Iran
  • YoungHegelian on Open thread 5/6/2026
  • Kate on Lenient plea deal for man responsible for the death of Paul Kessler during an anti-Israel demonstration

Recent Posts

  • Indiana RINOs go down in primaries
  • Today’s worthless news on Iran
  • Lenient plea deal for man responsible for the death of Paul Kessler during an anti-Israel demonstration
  • Open thread 5/6/2026
  • News roundup

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (319)
  • Afghanistan (97)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (162)
  • Best of neo-neocon (90)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (583)
  • Dance (287)
  • Disaster (239)
  • Education (320)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (565)
  • Election 2018 (32)
  • Election 2020 (511)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (25)
  • Election 2028 (5)
  • Evil (127)
  • Fashion and beauty (323)
  • Finance and economics (1,016)
  • Food (316)
  • Friendship (47)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (728)
  • Health (1,138)
  • Health care reform (545)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (331)
  • History (700)
  • Immigration (432)
  • Iran (439)
  • Iraq (224)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (798)
  • Jews (423)
  • Language and grammar (361)
  • Latin America (203)
  • Law (2,914)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (124)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,283)
  • Liberty (1,102)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (388)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,476)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (910)
  • Middle East (381)
  • Military (318)
  • Movies (346)
  • Music (526)
  • Nature (255)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (177)
  • Obama (1,736)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (128)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,024)
  • Poetry (255)
  • Political changers (176)
  • Politics (2,775)
  • Pop culture (393)
  • Press (1,618)
  • Race and racism (861)
  • Religion (418)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (625)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (967)
  • Theater and TV (264)
  • Therapy (69)
  • Trump (1,601)
  • Uncategorized (4,393)
  • Vietnam (109)
  • Violence (1,412)
  • War and Peace (993)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑