↓
 

The New Neo

A blog about political change, among other things

  • Home
  • Bio
  • Email
Home » Page 1383 << 1 2 … 1,381 1,382 1,383 1,384 1,385 … 1,881 1,882 >>

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Body wash or soap?

The New Neo Posted on August 27, 2012 by neoAugust 27, 2012

That’s the burning question of the day

And here I hadn’t even known there was a choice. The only place I’d ever encountered body wash was in the locker room of a gym I used to attend years ago. The showers at that place were thoughtfully provided with dispensers of the stuff, which I assumed were there for people who’d simply forgotten to bring their own soap with them.

Dummy me. Little did I know that I was standing on the threshold of a cutting-edge technology that would revolutionize the showering industry.

Good old soap has always been good enough for me. I deal with the potential mushiness factor by keeping my soap elevated on a neat little gizmo like this, a wonderful product you can buy for about 99 cents or less, one of the most fabulous bargains modern life offers:

Soap is effective. Soap is much cheaper than body wash. Soap has always been a product that didn’t seem to need perfecting. Who knew that a host of people would some day find it icky and unsanitary, as some of the commenters on the soap vs. body wash article seem to? It reminds me of that claptrap about needing to sterilize one’s toothbrush to prevent getting sick from it. Not true.

[NOTE: I don’t share my soap with those near and dear. But it turns out that even doing that isn’t really going to harm anyone]

Posted in Health, Me, myself, and I | 18 Replies

Remember South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford?

The New Neo Posted on August 27, 2012 by neoAugust 27, 2012

I guess his affair had some staying power after all, because Sanford and his Argentine girlfriend are now engaged to be married.

I don’t think most people would have bet on that outcome back in the summer of 2009 when Sanford’s bizarre disappearance, strangely inadequate excuses, and rambling press conference revealed his affair, broke up his marriage, and ended his promising political career. A trifecta.

If things had gone differently, Sanford might even have been a candidate for president in 2012. As it is, he’s just a historical footnote, albeit perhaps a happy one at this point—although I wonder whether his ex-wife and four children are equally overjoyed.

Posted in Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex | 7 Replies

Obama the con artist

The New Neo Posted on August 25, 2012 by neoAugust 25, 2012

After I asked that question the other day about why so many people still consider Obama likeable, I remembered this article I wrote for PJ back in November of 2009. I thought it might be time to recycle it. Sort version of the answer: he’s a con artist.

Posted in Obama | 34 Replies

Anderson Cooper actually seems annoyed by Wasserman Schultz’s lies

The New Neo Posted on August 25, 2012 by neoAugust 25, 2012

Anderson Cooper jumps on the media truth squad, at least for this one exchange. Note that, although something seems to really get his goat about Wasserman Schultz’s misquoting of the LA Times, as well as her refusal to admit she’s misquoting it even when that fact is rubbed in her face—he remains careful not to call her a liar.

He’s treating her with remarkable deference while at the same time haranguing her. It’s an odd combination:

Note also that Wasserman Schultz hardly seems at all perturbed. She could do this sort of thing in her sleep (and probably does). Two and two equals five, after all, if it’s in the service of the Party.

The funniest thing is her line towards the end of the clip, when she says without the slightest awareness of the irony involved, “The main thrust of the information we’re trying to convey is that Mitt Romney is disingenuous…”

The saddest thing is that tons of voters will be taken in by her lies—and that she may even help gain Obama the election. And that Anderson Cooper and most of his MSM colleagues will probably waste no time in getting back to carrying Obama’s water, and nodding when Wasserman Schultz offers whatever outrageous assertion is next on her agenda.

Or maybe the saddest thing is when Wasserman Schultz says, “It doesn’t matter.”

[NOTE: And by the way, Cooper fails to call Wasserman Schultz on her distortion of the Republican platform on abortion in cases of rape (it never even mentions it). Full text of the platform wording on the subject is here.]

Posted in Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex, Press, Romney | 16 Replies

I’m not sure why, but…

The New Neo Posted on August 25, 2012 by neoAugust 25, 2012

…this passage about Marie Antoinette strikes me as poignant:

She sported towering bouffant hairdos, including the “inoculation pouf,” a forbidding confection that featured a club striking a snake in an olive tree (representing the triumph of science over evil) to celebrate her success in persuading the king to be vaccinated against smallpox.

And that wasn’t all:

Later, while in mourning for her father-in-law, Louis XV, the new queen wore a pouf garnished with a tiny cypress tree rooted by a black tangle of ribbons, as well as a sheaf of wheat and a fruit-filled cornucopia, promising a bountiful new reign. Topping all previous efforts, in 1778 she wore an exact replica of La Belle Poule, a French battleship that had just sunk an English frigate, riding the swelling sea of her hair. “Behold the coiffure of our Queen, whose perfect taste is therein seen,” began one poem of the day.

The whole bit reminds me of something Lady Gaga might do. I searched and, sure enough, Gaga has taken a leaf out of Marie A.’s stylebook, although I don’t think she can compare:

Posted in Fashion and beauty, Historical figures | 6 Replies

Apparently…

The New Neo Posted on August 25, 2012 by neoAugust 25, 2012

…the liberal media can’t take a joke. Some things (birth certificates?) are just too sacred for levity.

At least by Romney. If Obama makes the funny it’s perfectly fine.

And here’s a pretty good explanation of the mentality of the MSM pecking order: it’s high school, plus The Collective Narrative [hat tip: commenter “T.”]

Posted in Press, Romney | 16 Replies

Anders Breivik: sane and sentenced

The New Neo Posted on August 24, 2012 by neoAugust 24, 2012

The Norwegian court has found mass murderer and political terrorist Anders Breivik both guilty and sane, and sentenced him to the maximum.

Unfortunately, that’s only 21 years. The good news is that the sentence can be extended if he is found to still be a danger to society after that time.

Seems like a cockamamie system to me. In its race to distance itself from what it sees as vengeful, violent societies such as the US, and because its murder rate is already low, Norway feels it can afford to be kinder and gentler—and to have 21 years as the maximum penalty for the cold-blooded slaughter of 77 people.

These quotes in response to the verdict leapt out at me:

“He [Breivik] is getting what he deserves,” said Alexandra Peltre, 18, whom Breivik shot in the thigh on Utoeya. “This is karma striking back at him. I do not care if he is insane or not, as long as he gets the punishment that he deserves.”…”This is what we hoped for,” said Mette Yvonne Larsen, who represented some of those affected in court.

“This is justice served and they are happy it’s over and will never have to see him again.”

“What he deserves” and “justice served.” I wouldn’t think the paltry punishment fits the crime at all. But the Norwegians generally seem satisfied and they are the ones most affected.

I have already written at some length about the Norwegian system of law and order. Here’s an excerpt:

To us in this country it seems nearly preposterous that a nation could function with a police force and a penal system with so few teeth. But until now, it did not seem so strange to most Norwegians. Their kinder, gentler system of law and order was a pleasant philosophical choice that [has] cost them very little, and of which they [are] quite proud. In a largely homogeneous country, and with a long tradition of an orderly and law-abiding citizenry, things had mostly gone well since the death penalty had been abolished in 1902 for peacetime use and for wartime use in 1979.

This 2010 article about Norwegian prisons is enough to make one weep with envy of the prisoners. Wide-screen TVs in each IKEA-esque room, scenic bucolic settings, guards without guns. As Charles Lane, who calls the system “gentle justice,” writes, “The Norwegian Correctional Service’s Website makes no mention of punishment, but does refer to ”˜services’ to which inmates are ”˜entitled.’”

But note the tiny number of convicts, just 3,300 in a country of about 5 million inhabitants. Lane quotes a prison warden in Norway as saying, “If you treat people badly, they will behave badly. Anyone can be a citizen if we treat them well, respect them, and give them challenges and demands.”

Most Norwegians thus far have had no compelling reason to believe that this was false. Their society has continued to be remarkably peaceful, with an extremely low rate of murder, and despite increasing theft and rape rates during the last few years, both attributed largely to immigrants.

It is as though the modern Norwegian system had evolved in the absence of natural predators, and never really developed defenses against them. No doubt Breivik was familiar with the vulnerabilities of Norway’s police and population, and knew they would be unarmed.

Breivik was also certain that he would not be executed or even given a life sentence, and that he’d be allowed a bully pulpit for his views during the trial. And with this verdict of “sane,” he gets to celebrate that another wish of his has been granted, because “his biggest concern was being declared insane, a fate he said would be ‘worse than death.'”

I happen to think that Breivik was in fact legally sane. But the length of the sentence seems a travesty and an insult to those who died. Although I cannot think of a punishment a civilized society would accept that would fit Breivik’s crime, this one most assuredly does not.

Posted in Law, Violence | 28 Replies

After the fall

The New Neo Posted on August 24, 2012 by neoAugust 24, 2012

Remember when I took that awful fall? Now that it’s been nearly a month since then, I thought I’d report of my progress.

Most of the abrasions on my face are healed, with just a couple of red marks that have been getting fainter. There’s a pea-sized bump on my forehead that represents Ground Zero, as it were, of the impact. It’s been getting smaller and smaller, but slowly

My nose seems pretty straight, but it’s still a teeny bit swollen and a little bit numb. They say I cut a cutaneous nerve there, and they predict the feeling should come back within a few months.

My scraped knee is still healing, but that’s been the least of my worries.

I have to wear either a sunhat or sunblock on my face for another month or two. Since I’m somewhat allergic to the cream, I’ve used the directive as an excuse to go out a get a couple of snazzy hats with wide brims. I ordinarily never wear hats, but I’ve gotten a surprising number of compliments on these, although wearing them makes me feel too close for comfort to being one of the Ladies Who Lunch.

So all in all, the prognosis is good, although I’m left with the psychological residue from it all—fear. But I’ve been continuing to do my fast walking outside. But never never NEVER again will it be in the dark. Whatever was I thinking of?

Posted in Health, Me, myself, and I | 24 Replies

Who loves politics? Not George Bush

The New Neo Posted on August 24, 2012 by neoAugust 24, 2012

It comes as absolutely no surprise to learn that former president George W. Bush does not miss politics. In a recent interview he said:

I crawled out of the swamp, and I’m not crawling back in.

In general there are two types of politicans: those who thrive on politics, and those who consider it a necessary evil that doesn’t come especially naturally to them. Bush always struck me as of the latter variety (Romney, likewise, by the way). The first type would include FDR, LBJ, and Bill Clinton as its most prominent exemplars in modern times.

But when Bush characterizes politics as a swamp, he’s not talking about shaking people’s hands. I assume he’s talking about the nastiness and the deception, the wheeling and dealing and the press bias. Politics is a game, and a dirty one at that. Just as some presidents are more comfortable than others when pressing the flesh, some are better at playing the political game, and have no reluctance to do so. Again, Clinton comes to mind—a man who was at ease with both aspects of politics. A good example of a president who was more gifted at the game aspects than the people aspects was Richard Nixon.

And what of Obama? I think he needs politics because it gives him the power he craves. He believes himself to be very good at it, and he’s developed a style and a method of approaching it that so far has worked very well for him. But I never see him loving the contact; he always seems uncomfortable to me. Simply put, Obama is not an gregarious people-person. He puts up with the close interaction involved in politics and campaigning because he knows its necessary, but he’d rather stand on a podium and address a crowd from on high.

As for the lying and the dirty tricks, I think that’s his forte. Another strength (in the political sense) is his remarkable ability to do those things while hiding, disguising, or distracting from them, and simultaneously continuing to seem likable to an awful lot of people.

Posted in Historical figures, Obama | 15 Replies

Spambots of the day

The New Neo Posted on August 23, 2012 by neoAugust 23, 2012

Two unrelated bots who have a way with words:

A floral handbag can make you glimpse girly.

Will not be frightened to allow your creativeness test wild.

And here I offer a glimpse girly of a floral handbag whose maker was not frightened to allow his/her creativeness to test wild:

Posted in Blogging and bloggers | 6 Replies

Early Castro: “it’s never going to taste the same”

The New Neo Posted on August 23, 2012 by neoAugust 23, 2012

I’ve just finished my latest book group assignment, Waiting For Snow in Havana, a memoir by Carlos Eire about his childhood in pre-Castro Cuba, the Castro takeover, and the circumstances under which he was able to leave Cuba for the US at the age of eleven.

It’s a pretty good read, although a bit long. A great deal of it is free-form and poetic, and deals with Eire’s extremely odd family and the pranks he and his friends got into (some of them might be considered more serious than pranks, actually; that Eire and his buddies didn’t kill either themselves or each other seems a small miracle).

So the book’s political emphasis is hardly unrelenting. But the shadow of Castro hangs over the entire story, and lends a somber seriousness. Eire’s childhood in Cuba doesn’t really represent an idyllic Paradise Lost; it was too complex and too troubled for that. But there is no question that Castro is the snake in whatever Eden did previously exist there.

I don’t know Eire’s present political persuasion, but like many refugees from Communist countries he is adamant about the soul- and mind- and economy-stifling effects of the rule of a leftist dictator (and his henchmen; Che figures in the book as well) bent on reorganizing a society with an iron hand for its citizens’ “own good.” Eire has many chilling passages about Castro’s Reign of Terror that leave a reader with no doubt as to how bad it was. Castro may not have been Stalin, but only because he had a smaller canvas to work on.

Here’s a passage that gives you an idea of the book’s flavor. It’s not about the torture or the killings, but about something seemingly more trivial. As seen from a child’s eyes, the revolution took away everything good and replaced it with ugliness and dullness [in the following passage, “Cawy” refers to a Cuban soft drink, made by the family of a schoolmate of Eire’s, and Eire’s “Cuban people” remark is sarcastic]:

…Cawy and all the other soft drinks went down the tubes soon enough. The Cawy boy and his family lost everything. Confiscated. Nationalized. Everything from Coca-Cola to Cawy and Materva and Ironbeer, everything taken over by the state. Excuse me. Taken over by the Cuban people.

And the soft drinks went to hell.

…Once, when [Che Guevara was] asked on television about soft drink production in the newly nationalized bottling plants, he admitted that they had no clue as to what they were doing, that they didn’t know how to get them to taste good. The owners had been forced to turn over their bottling plants but not their recipes.

“Forget about coca-Cola and Pepsi-Cole,” said Che. “Forget about them. We’ll keep bottling something that looks like them, but we don’t have the formulae. The Yankee Capitalists took them. You can keep drinking the stuff, if you want, but it’s never going to taste the same.”

The decline in the taste of soft drinks may seem a relatively trivial change, but it’s part of a generalized quality of life issue that is one of the many, many failures of Communism. Life loses much of its savor, its taste—and that’s not trivial, although it pales in comparison to the brainwashing and the mind-control about which Eire also writes.

Eire also makes it crystal clear that it wasn’t just the money and savings of the rich that were confiscated. It happened to everyone. For him it has had lifelong repercussions:

One fine morning…Che came up with the great idea of doing away with money altogether…So all banks have been closed, and all accounts have been seized. This is the first step. Everyone who had a bank account can keep some arbitrary low sum—a few hundred pesos, I think. All else is gone, obliterated…

The second step is to change all the currency so that the bills and coins that people have will be worthless and all Cubans can start with a completely level playing field…

The lines are very long, but they move fast because you are allowed to change so very little. I’m standing in line, and so is my brother Tony, and everyone else I know. No one is sure about the rules, but the money changers don’t ask very many questions. When you finally make it to the changing table with bills and coins in your hand, they take them from you and give you new colorful bills with pictures of Fidel and Che and Raul and Camilo and all the other heroes of the Revolution. The new coins are so flimsy that we take turns trying to blow them off one anothers’ hands…

Four decades later, I am staring at my troubled bank account, meditating on the numbers I see before me. Suddenly I see them all turn to zero. I am back in line that Sunday morning and I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. I still expect all the money in America to disappear some day, the same way. It’s all an illusion, mere figures on paper. Retirement account? Stocks? Bonds? Savings accounts? Forget it. I don’t put away one cent. I don’t have any money in the bank, save for the little I have in my checking account, which is always fully depleted at the end of every month. I spend every cent I earn and then some. I’m always in debt, always ready for the day when everyone else will lose their money. On that day, thanks to my advance planning, I won’t have any to lose. I’ll only have debts to wipe out, like my uncle’s customers, come the Revolution.

Ha.

Not everyone would react in that particular fashion. But every refugee bears the scars. It’s no accident that emigrants from Communist countries are among the most virulent anti-Communists imaginable. Their cynicism about its false promises and its brutal leaders is profound, because they’ve lived it.

It’s funny, too (and not “funny ha-ha”), how similar all these stories are, even though the countries might be different. The pattern could not be more clear, and yet so many people think that somehow the pitfalls can be avoided and true “fairness” can be achieved—next time. There is something in human nature that falls prey to this dream, and it is a something can be taken advantage of over and over by cynical and power-hungry dictators.

And then it’s too late—and it’s never going to taste the same.

Posted in Historical figures, History, Latin America, Literature and writing | 17 Replies

I know we’ve discussed this before, but…

The New Neo Posted on August 23, 2012 by neoAugust 23, 2012

…every now and then it hits me again: how is it that so many people still see Obama as likable? Or even saw him that way in the first place?

To me, it became clear early on in the 2008 campaign that Obama had a petty nastiness that was extremely unlikable, as well as being a ruthless narcissist. That’s different from just being a tough campaigner.

And it wasn’t about disagreeing with his politics, either. Back in the 80s I disagreed with Reagan’s politics for the most part, and I thought him somewhat of a phony as well. But he never seemed to me to be anything other than a basically nice guy. In contrast, Bill Clinton always roused a certain generalized distrust in me, although I agreed with him politically and voted for him twice. In other words, I didn’t much like him, ever, and this was long before Monica Lewinsky came into his life. So likability and political synchronization did not always go hand in hand for me.

I know that many people think the polls on Obama’s likability reflect polite lying by the respondents, who dislike Obama more (or perhaps like him less) than they let on. It’s a common notion that people are saying they like him more than they do because they don’t want to be perceived as racists. But my impression (based mostly on a small sample: my friends) is that the liking is very genuine, and it has not budged despite some disappointments with his achievements.

And these people are not generally gullible pushovers, nor do they ordinarily have poor judgment about people in regular life. Nor do I expect them to vote against Obama and for Romney; after all, they’re liberal Democrats. But this “he’s such a great guy” thing is a mystery to me.

Posted in Obama | 56 Replies

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Your support is appreciated through a one-time or monthly Paypal donation

Please click the link recommended books and search bar for Amazon purchases through neo. I receive a commission from all such purchases.

Archives

Recent Comments

  • M J R on Young versus old: the politics of generational envy
  • Gringo on Gavin Newsom gave taxpayer money to CAIR
  • Oldflyer on Young versus old: the politics of generational envy
  • Gothamite on Young versus old: the politics of generational envy
  • Mark on Indiana RINOs go down in primaries

Recent Posts

  • Young versus old: the politics of generational envy
  • Gavin Newsom gave taxpayer money to CAIR
  • California dreaming: have the voters had enough of the left for now?
  • Open thread 5/7/2026
  • Indiana RINOs go down in primaries

Categories

  • A mind is a difficult thing to change: my change story (17)
  • Academia (319)
  • Afghanistan (97)
  • Amazon orders (6)
  • Arts (8)
  • Baseball and sports (162)
  • Best of neo-neocon (90)
  • Biden (536)
  • Blogging and bloggers (583)
  • Dance (287)
  • Disaster (239)
  • Education (320)
  • Election 2012 (360)
  • Election 2016 (565)
  • Election 2018 (32)
  • Election 2020 (511)
  • Election 2022 (114)
  • Election 2024 (403)
  • Election 2026 (26)
  • Election 2028 (5)
  • Evil (127)
  • Fashion and beauty (323)
  • Finance and economics (1,018)
  • Food (316)
  • Friendship (47)
  • Gardening (18)
  • General information about neo (4)
  • Getting philosophical: life, love, the universe (729)
  • Health (1,138)
  • Health care reform (545)
  • Hillary Clinton (184)
  • Historical figures (331)
  • History (700)
  • Immigration (432)
  • Iran (439)
  • Iraq (224)
  • IRS scandal (71)
  • Israel/Palestine (799)
  • Jews (423)
  • Language and grammar (361)
  • Latin America (203)
  • Law (2,914)
  • Leaving the circle: political apostasy (124)
  • Liberals and conservatives; left and right (1,283)
  • Liberty (1,102)
  • Literary leftists (14)
  • Literature and writing (388)
  • Me, myself, and I (1,476)
  • Men and women; marriage and divorce and sex (910)
  • Middle East (381)
  • Military (318)
  • Movies (347)
  • Music (526)
  • Nature (255)
  • Neocons (32)
  • New England (177)
  • Obama (1,736)
  • Pacifism (16)
  • Painting, sculpture, photography (128)
  • Palin (93)
  • Paris and France2 trial (25)
  • People of interest (1,024)
  • Poetry (255)
  • Political changers (176)
  • Politics (2,775)
  • Pop culture (393)
  • Press (1,618)
  • Race and racism (861)
  • Religion (419)
  • Romney (164)
  • Ryan (16)
  • Science (625)
  • Terrorism and terrorists (967)
  • Theater and TV (264)
  • Therapy (69)
  • Trump (1,601)
  • Uncategorized (4,394)
  • Vietnam (109)
  • Violence (1,412)
  • War and Peace (993)

Blogroll

Ace (bold)
AmericanDigest (writer’s digest)
AmericanThinker (thought full)
Anchoress (first things first)
AnnAlthouse (more than law)
AugeanStables (historian’s task)
BelmontClub (deep thoughts)
Betsy’sPage (teach)
Bookworm (writingReader)
ChicagoBoyz (boyz will be)
DanielInVenezuela (liberty)
Dr.Helen (rights of man)
Dr.Sanity (shrink archives)
DreamsToLightening (Asher)
EdDriscoll (market liberal)
Fausta’sBlog (opinionated)
GayPatriot (self-explanatory)
HadEnoughTherapy? (yep)
HotAir (a roomful)
InstaPundit (the hub)
JawaReport (the doctor’s Rusty)
LegalInsurrection (law prof)
Maggie’sFarm (togetherness)
MelaniePhillips (formidable)
MerylYourish (centrist)
MichaelTotten (globetrotter)
MichaelYon (War Zones)
Michelle Malkin (clarion pen)
MichelleObama’sMirror (reflect)
NoPasaran! (bluntFrench)
NormanGeras (archives)
OneCosmos (Gagdad Bob)
Pamela Geller (Atlas Shrugs)
PJMedia (comprehensive)
PointOfNoReturn (exodus)
Powerline (foursight)
QandO (neolibertarian)
RedState (conservative)
RogerL.Simon (PJ guy)
SisterToldjah (she said)
Sisu (commentary plus cats)
Spengler (Goldman)
VictorDavisHanson (prof)
Vodkapundit (drinker-thinker)
Volokh (lawblog)
Zombie (alive)

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2026 - The New Neo - Weaver Xtreme Theme Email
Web Analytics
↑